Recommended Posts

Hmmm... just have to decide whether to get it for PC or PS3.

I played BF2 on PC, but I've since moved to PS3 and played BFBC2 on console.

For the time being , I recommend on PC cuz there will be hell in this game with 64 players, while consoles are limited to 32 only. :laugh:

[...]

What are your plans with DLC Content? Another VIP-Pass?

The only DLC we have announced now is the ?Back to Karkand? pack that includes re-made maps, Weapons and Vehicles from Battlefield 2. If you pre-order the game you will get that for free.

Why is there 24 player limits on consoles? Is it engine performance or networking issues?

We always have to find the sweet spot between player count, visual quality, destruction, vehicles, network traffic and general game quality in all games we are building. In this case we are focusing on all of the above and have come to the conclusion that 24 players on the console gives us the right balance. We had this number in Battlefield Bad Company 2 and that worked pretty good we think. We still have more players than most other FPS games on console with the added value of vehicles and destruction that we are almost alone in having. We have seen some games trying to do more and not always succeeding since it is really hard to keep the quality of the experience when just adding more players. We are not worried that the intensity of the multiplayer experience will not be enough on the consoles even if we are pushing the numbers further up on the PC.

[...]

[source:MSXbox-World]

I didn't know the "Back to Karkand" map pack would contain weapons and vehicles from BF2.

[source:MSXbox-World]

I didn't know the "Back to Karkand" map pack would contain weapons and vehicles from BF2.

Yup, the only problem is that the same guys who made BC2:Vietnam are making the BF2 maps. I know how Vietname played differently from BC2 so I just hope they make it the same as BF3.

Yup, the only problem is that the same guys who made BC2:Vietnam are making the BF2 maps. I know how Vietname played differently from BC2 so I just hope they make it the same as BF3.

That's an extremely strange way to think of it... :blink:

Vietnam was an expansion that supposed to be different; it wasn't just the result from this team working on it. So obviously the DLC will be built so that it works or is balanced with in BF3. All these things are discussed and planned.

That's an extremely strange way to think of it... :blink:

Vietnam was an expansion that supposed to be different; it wasn't just the result from this team working on it. So obviously the DLC will be built so that it works or is balanced with in BF3. All these things are discussed and planned.

BC2: Vietnam has no weapon recoil and a higher hit damage. It played like a different game but launched from within BC2. It felt like a completely different game developer made it.

BC2: Vietnam has no weapon recoil and a higher hit damage. It played like a different game but launched from within BC2. It felt like a completely different game developer made it.

It wasn't THAT different. But you miss my point anyway. Vietnam was supposed to be different, it's not like the team tried to make it like the original and it came out different; it was planned.

I'm pretty positive that it will be available on Steam eventually. I would be completely shocked if it wasn't. They'll probably get their pre-orders going a little closer to the release date.

Just read through the Q&A that Anaron and Singh400 posted. That reminded me of the whole base camping issue, and I really hope that they do something about it this time around. It didn't happen very often from my experience, but when it did happen, it was one of the least fun gaming experiences I had all year. I remember at one point we were getting base camped so bad that I started reading a book at my computer desk, waiting for the match to finish, lol.

Found a good pre-order deal for BF3: ?18.89 at CDKeysHere, or ?27.99 for the limited edition. :) The only downside is you can't redeem it on Steam, so it's EADM only.

By the way dude (too late for me to edit the post below yours); have you ever purchased from that site? A search on Bing gives too many bad results, where people say they were banned from using the game (mostly Modern Warfare), when activated using a key purchased from that site.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!