Recommended Posts

Do you get any extra weapons unlocked for MP by beating the SP, like with co-op?

Don't really want to bother with SP, even if it's 5 hours long.

Not that I'm aware of. And the only way I can see the single player being 5 hours long is if you play it on easy. I'm playing it on hard and I wouldn't exactly call it hard. You just die... a lot. I guess if hard is dieing repeatedly just to learn where the baddies will spawn and shoot there then yeah, it's hard. Anyways, I've got a lot more than 5 hours into it.

Am I right in thinking there's different weapons per class if your on different sides, I.e American and Russian.

Also on a side note im playing with a gtx285 and having it overheat when things get crazy on screen! New card time I think

The starting weapon for each class is different for russian and american. Later you do unlock the russian starting weapon for use on the american side and vise-versa though.

The starting weapon for each class is different for russian and american. Later you do unlock the russian starting weapon for use on the american side and vise-versa though.

But if I unlock an American gun is it available on Russian?

Also I've only unlocked 1 gun so far on the American assault, a m16sa or something like that

Am I right in thinking there's different weapons per class if your on different sides, I.e American and Russian.

Also on a side note im playing with a gtx285 and having it overheat when things get crazy on screen! New card time I think

Yes I am using a GTX460 and I can only use the medium level.

bf3.png

I will stick at this level as I am not going upgrade my card for one game. The 590 would be nice but it is about $500.00 USD.

But if I unlock an American gun is it available on Russian?

Also I've only unlocked 1 gun so far on the American assault, a m16sa or something like that

Yes. Only the initial guns for each class are locked to faction specific but you can even unlock those to use on either side.

When your in the spawn selection screen, click on the gun and list of your unlocked weapons will pop up.

GTX 285 is still a beast

It should run fine on your settings and resolution.

Problem might lie somewhere else

Ive got some oc software to record some temperatures next time I play and to crank the fan up to 100% at a lower temp.

The game crashed and exited then windows 7 jumped between the high res and low colour schemes before telling me my video card drivers had crashed and recovered

Ive got some oc software to record some temperatures next time I play and to crank the fan up to 100% at a lower temp.

The game crashed and exited then windows 7 jumped between the high res and low colour schemes before telling me my video card drivers had crashed and recovered

Reinstall the driver. Make sure its the latest and if possible pull it out and use an air-blower to remove dust from the fan and inside of the card.

Job for tonight then

Worth getting another card to sli do you think or spend a bit more on a 570 or 6950?

Yes install driver 285.62. It only took me about 6 minutes to upgrade it. Unless you are a real hard core BF3 gamer, I would not spend any more money. As Muhammad said, your card is still a beast. Look at that chart I posted.

I am running 2 460's in SLi, and the game's Auto settings default to all High for me. In the SP that is fine, get a constant 60 FPS. I prefer as many FPS as possible in MP, so I personally put the settings down to Medium when playing MP, and I am always getting at least 60 FPS, and I get as high as 80-85. I am willing to sacrifice nice visuals for better performance, and honestly medium still looks good to me, so worth trying for those who want better performance. With that said, if I leave it at High in MP, I get anywhere from 40-65 FPS, which is still playable, just as I said, I prefer the constant 60+ FPS.

I am running 2 460's in SLi, and the game's Auto settings default to all High for me. In the SP that is fine, get a constant 60 FPS. I prefer as many FPS as possible in MP, so I personally put the settings down to Medium when playing MP, and I am always getting at least 60 FPS, and I get as high as 80-85. I am willing to sacrifice nice visuals for better performance, and honestly medium still looks good to me, so worth trying for those who want better performance. With that said, if I leave it at High in MP, I get anywhere from 40-65 FPS, which is still playable, just as I said, I prefer the constant 60+ FPS.

They defaulted to high for me as well but I will play it in medium as one 460 can't handle it, at least I don't think so.

Yes install driver 285.62. It only took me about 6 minutes to upgrade it. Unless you are a real hard core BF3 gamer, I would not spend any more money. As Muhammad said, your card is still a beast. Look at that chart I posted.

I updated driver after installing bf3, not a true hard core gamer but have been looking for an excuse to upgrade ;)

Ill ask again, please help. My EA account still is not being recognized by Origin and my xbox live name wont connect to my EA account either yet im playing now. Also, is there a code or something for the Mass Effect 3 dog tags?

I think you are in the wrong thread. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Python programmers in a nutshell. Now, guess what lang most AI programmers use... :-)
    • There was nothing whatsoever wrong with Vista as an OS after the SP1 update. People who claim it wasn't were using ancient machines for some silly reason. Not kidding, no hyperbole/exaggeration. Vista was good.
    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!