Recommended Posts

Metro is a great map on conquest when both teams are equal or your on the winning team. If you have a bad team there is basically no way for eg me and three friends to capture another point especially from Charlie. On Metro it's very narrow and there isn't any good flanks that go past B there is one on the right hand side from Charlie but it's quite exposed and is usually heavily defended.

However Grand Bazaar is almost like metro but you can easily flank the enemy, it can set up some really nice battles and usually even if you have a bad team you can flank them and take one of the end flags, push on B from behind or simply divert attention from B so the rest of your team can push onto it.

I think Metro would be improved if it had a way to flank on the left hand side from Charlie, perhaps a set of stairs that leads to a door that goes behind B because the back stairs that comes up just behind B is almost impossible to come up if someone is watching it.

the MP on the 360 is great, i hear from a lot of people even better on PC, which is as all should be. this is by far the best gaming season since 2007, we're so spoiled for choice right now it's not even funny anymore.

the MP on the 360 is great, i hear from a lot of people even better on PC, which is as all should be. this is by far the best gaming season since 2007, we're so spoiled for choice right now it's not even funny anymore.

Tell me about it. I've been on BF3 ... just got MW3... Arkham City ... still need to finish Deus Ex ...

Ok, the engineer glitch is getting annoying. Was on several servers yesterday and seems half the team is tucked away in the base repairing the EOD Bot. They need to fix this quick. I also hope they look at everyones stats and reset the ones doing it :) Its obvious those doing it, no kills, no deaths, captures ect..... a million repairs. Plus, I just do not get it, having a high score then getting destroyed by someone half your rank is an embarrassment.

Ok, the engineer glitch is getting annoying. Was on several servers yesterday and seems half the team is tucked away in the base repairing the EOD Bot. They need to fix this quick. I also hope they look at everyones stats and reset the ones doing it :) Its obvious those doing it, no kills, no deaths, captures ect..... a million repairs. Plus, I just do not get it, having a high score then getting destroyed by someone half your rank is an embarrassment.

Yeah, I refuse to play on any HC servers until this is fixed.

Yeah, I refuse to play on any HC servers until this is fixed.

I didn't know it can only be done on HC servers, well that's an easy fix, no HC for me. Maybe the admins of the HC servers will see their population drop and self police them and start booting and banning people.

I didn't know it can only be done on HC servers, well that's an easy fix, no HC for me. Maybe the admins of the HC servers will see their population drop and self police them and start booting and banning people.

Any server with friendly fire on works for that EOD bot exploit

I'm not kidding at all. There is no worse experience in Battlefield 3 than playing conquest on Operation Metro.

If you were to poll it with all other options listed, it would get 80%+ votes.

Dunno about that. Conquest on Damavand Peak is pretty bad too.

I've been encountering many stupid "bad luck" or false "suicides" in the last 2 days. Once I was was sprinting, jumped over a concrete slab, and I randomly died from suicide... Another time I was lying prone in high rocks and turned around quickly and died from bad luck, no falling involved...

Anyone else getting these extremely annoying false deaths?

I don't care for conquest Metro regardless of the player size.

Yeah, it happens to me quite often. I'm probably exaggerating but I think Bad Luck accounts for about 1/4 of my deaths. Actual bad luck.. spawning right in front of an enemy makes up about another 1/4. :wacko:

It seems that the servers with HC get more points on repair since team damage is on, if you do the EOD bot exploit on just a normal server the ppm is way lower and therefore inefficient.

Almost every HC match on XB360 someone is doing the exploit.

And I have come across this quite a few times on normal matches.

Basically the Cheech guy would kill a guy on our team, the Chong guy on our team would revive him, and there was another fella who left, who would revive Chong after Cheech killed him. Thus boosting his way to 76-8. The guy ended up with 30,000 points at the end, plus award score.

It isn't as common as the EOD bot exploit, but it has happened 3 times so far.

post-46379-0-41468300-1320862942_thumb.j

Almost every HC match on XB360 someone is doing the exploit.

And I have come across this quite a few times on normal matches.

Basically the Cheech guy would kill a guy on our team, the Chong guy on our team would revive him, and there was another fella who left, who would revive Chong after Cheech killed him. Thus boosting his way to 76-8. The guy ended up with 30,000 points at the end, plus award score.

It isn't as common as the EOD bot exploit, but it has happened 3 times so far.

post-46379-0-41468300-1320862942_thumb.j

Holy...

That is freakin'...

Holy...

That is freakin'...

Lol. I know, right?

I noticed it when I looked at the scoreboard and he was 46-0. I looked on our team and, of course no one had 46 deaths, nor did anything add up to that. It was on Noshahr Canals. I ran around and found them hiding way off near the pipes behind B, the three of them boosting and saw how they were doing it. And spent the rest of the match finding them and trying to kill him to stop it. Oh well. =/

What EOD bot exploit are you guys talking about? Yet t witness anything to it on the PC (pulled almost 43 hours already).

Teammate 1 pulls out EOD Bot on Hardcore mode (Friendly Fire on).

Teammate 2 (engineer with repair tool) shoots EOD bot to near death, then repairs it back to full.

Rinse and repeat part two for mass mechanical efficiency ribbons and points.

Lol. I know, right?

I noticed it when I looked at the scoreboard and he was 46-0. I looked on our team and, of course no one had 46 deaths, nor did anything add up to that. It was on Noshahr Canals. I ran around and found them hiding way off near the pipes behind B, the three of them boosting and saw how they were doing it. And spent the rest of the match finding them and trying to kill him to stop it. Oh well. =/

That is as stupid as it gets

You should've thrown a gernade or launched a shot of RPG-7 (Y) :D

Lol. I know, right?

I noticed it when I looked at the scoreboard and he was 46-0. I looked on our team and, of course no one had 46 deaths, nor did anything add up to that. It was on Noshahr Canals. I ran around and found them hiding way off near the pipes behind B, the three of them boosting and saw how they were doing it. And spent the rest of the match finding them and trying to kill him to stop it. Oh well. =/

Report him. Send the screenshot with the report.

@Muhammad Farrukh/Got3n?: Fellas, I'm loving your simplistic signatures. Tips on making them? Looks like a lot of code to me!

Sing, just use the following URL...

http://g.bf3stats.com/pc/KEn6ktnc/ENTERNAMEHERE.png

All you have to do is change the username at the end to yours.

Also, make sure to register/update your stats on bf3stats.com so it reflects your recent stats,

Here is the detail page for it...

http://bf3stats.com/...tnc#ps3/IDROJ-4

For documentation and values just try creating one yourself on the site and it provides you with some helpful links for reference.

I may just put one together when I have some time.

  • Like 2

Sing, just use the following URL...

http://g.bf3stats.com/pc/KEn6ktnc/ENTERNAMEHERE.png

All you have to do is change the username at the end to yours.

Also, make sure to register/update your stats on bf3stats.com so it reflects your recent stats,

Here is the detail page for it...

http://bf3stats.com/...tnc#ps3/IDROJ-4

For documentation and values just try creating one yourself on the site and it provides you with some helpful links for reference.

I may just put one together when I have some time.

Ahhh I see. I thought they were using http://bf3s.com/stats-signature hence the code bit ;)

Found a really nice little tool for this game, that adds borderless windowed mode support! I've been bitching that this game needed that since the alpha.

http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/showthread.php?t=154809

makes switching between the game and battlelog much smoother. Really helps on my setup, because I have an annoying bug where about 50% of the time going fullscreen will black out my second monitor (this doesn't only happen with bf3, happens with other games as well)

Found a really nice little tool for this game, that adds borderless windowed mode support! I've been bitching that this game needed that since the alpha.

http://www.techpower...ad.php?t=154809

makes switching between the game and battlelog much smoother. Really helps on my setup, because I have an annoying bug where about 50% of the time going fullscreen will black out my second monitor (this doesn't only happen with bf3, happens with other games as well)

Will that have any problem with Orgin? I know they are very bitchy about TOS and such, just don't want to use this and some wired way they see it has a "cheating" attempt.

I know it sounds daft but woudn't put it past them

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!