Recommended Posts

^That is what they mean with "Exclusive extras" though. How else would that be exclusive?

I took that to mean that it's exclusive only because you had to pay for it as an extra. Not that it will be exclusive to the premium thing. Because every other "exclusive" thing they've had in the game from pre orders and such you can now buy as an extra.

To be honest, I believe that this time they mean that those items are exclusive to the people who paid for "Battlefield Premium" and won't be available as an extra. That's the way I read it anyway. "Premium" usually means that there's an extra for such users and I believe that in this case it's those extra items.

Though I'd rather know this for sure before buying "Battlefield Premium". If there's an decent price and the items are "Premium" only, I'd buy it. Though if the items aren't "Premium" only I wouldn't buy it and just buy them individually like you.

Who knows. Before BF3 was released they said the only way to get the specact skins and the dog tags was to pre order from that certain retailer, they were exclusive...now you can buy them through Origin.

I'm willing to bet, since it contains all their future dlcs that it will be $50-$60. Individually they will probably be $15. That's just a guess though, and I hope I'm wrong and they are cheaper but I doubt it.

You've got to be kidding me. BC2 is utter garbage when it comes to joining friends, adding friends, browsing servers and joining them. Complete and utter garbage compared to Battlelog. I've moved from BF3 to BC2 lately and I miss Battlelog so much. That and character movement (except vaulting of course).

Well in my experience Battlelog is utter garbage when joining friends and browsing servers and joining them. Me and my mates struggle to connect to EA online and it takes ages to join servers because of the ridiculously long loading times. I don't see what's so bad about BC2- you find your friends username, you can add them easily, joining friends is simple and the maps load so quickly and browsing servers is just as easy, if not moreso, in BC2 than Battlelog.

I find BF3 is all about personal experience- it crashes on me quite a lot and has random freezes which isn't a driver issue as there have been numerous updates since the game released and I've reinstalled a number of times and none of these has helped my issues. That, and when I quit the game it takes at least 10 minutes for my PC to be actually usable again after it's finished doing whatever it's doing.

And don't even mention Origin- it's the buggiest program I've ever been forced to use, with it rejecting the game totally at times throwing random errors and refusing to open at times. Again, this is just my experience with it and it has been other people's too, not just me.

Well in my experience Battlelog is utter garbage when joining friends and browsing servers and joining them. Me and my mates struggle to connect to EA online and it takes ages to join servers because of the ridiculously long loading times. I don't see what's so bad about BC2- you find your friends username, you can add them easily, joining friends is simple and the maps load so quickly and browsing servers is just as easy, if not moreso, in BC2 than Battlelog.

I find BF3 is all about personal experience- it crashes on me quite a lot and has random freezes which isn't a driver issue as there have been numerous updates since the game released and I've reinstalled a number of times and none of these has helped my issues. That, and when I quit the game it takes at least 10 minutes for my PC to be actually usable again after it's finished doing whatever it's doing.

And don't even mention Origin- it's the buggiest program I've ever been forced to use, with it rejecting the game totally at times throwing random errors and refusing to open at times. Again, this is just my experience with it and it has been other people's too, not just me.

Well, if you have that many issues then I can see why you'd dislike it. Personally I pretty much don't have anything you just described (save for the occasional Disconnected from EA bug, but that's less common than used to be and I had long load times before I installed an SSD) so I find Battlelog to be excellent. And no issues with Origin either.

Sigh. Battlefield 3 is not only ditching the massive maps and vehicles that define the franchise in the upcoming Close Quarters map pack, er, sorry, Close Quarters "expansion," it appears Electronic Arts is once again following in Activision's footsteps with a premium, paid, Call of Duty Elite-like Battlefield 3 service.
I can't help but remember the comments DICE Senior Producer Patrick Bach made about charging for Battlefield maps back in 2010 when the $15 CoD map pack became the norm: "We don't ever want to charge for our maps and insisted to EA that this attitude was crucial when it came to keeping our community happy and playing together. We're owned by EA but we're still very much DICE."

Guess this means DICE isn't DICE anymore.

http://uk.pc.gamespy.../1224747p1.html

Straight from the horses mouth. Being GameSpy who use to deals with BF2 accounts.

Use to hate GameSpy, now I love 'em :rofl:

Yep, for example BC2 Vietnam had significantly more content than a COD map pack.

I never played the Vietnam DLC, but couldn't you shoot a Huey down with an AK-47 as well? The gameplay looked so far removed from the core game in that sense that it would be a mini-game on its own, like Battlefield 1943 was.

I never played the Vietnam DLC, but couldn't you shoot a Huey down with an AK-47 as well? The gameplay looked so far removed from the core game in that sense that it would be a mini-game on its own, like Battlefield 1943 was.

No, but the map designs made it really easy to shoot down helicopters with tanks though. The helicopters in Vietnam were op as hell though so it was kind of fair.

I don't remember that happening at all. But it has been a while since I played.

Yeah, They didn't do huge ammounts of damage, but I've taken a heli down with an assault rifle after popping a few RPG's into it and then running out of them.

So apparently Battlefield Premium gives you server queue priority...

0EysX.png

Proof: http://i.imgur.com/0EysX.png

I was going to buy it but now I'm not on principal, no one should get priority queue access just because theyve bought some DLC, EA are getting worse than Activision.

Just to state, I think I remember seeing a Battlefield tweet saying that Close quarters would cost $14.99. Assuming the other will cost the same, $14.99 x 4 = $59.96. So this would be a better deal if you plan to buy the expansions when they come out.

Just to state, I think I remember seeing a Battlefield tweet saying that Close quarters would cost $14.99. Assuming the other will cost the same, $14.99 x 4 = $59.96. So this would be a better deal if you plan to buy the expansions when they come out.

But its no deal if you don't plan on getting all of them. I know I won't get Close Quarters, so that means the other three turn out to ~45.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • BrowserOS 0.46.0 by Razvan Serea BrowserOS is a free, open-source Chromium-based browser that runs AI agents natively, offering a smarter, more productive browsing experience. It supports Chrome extensions and integrates AI agents to automate tasks, fill forms, and streamline workflows. Your data stays on your computer: you can use your own API keys or run local models via Ollama, making it a privacy-first alternative to tools like Perplexity, Comet, or Dia. With built-in productivity tools and app integrations, BrowserOS boosts efficiency while keeping control firmly in your hands. Being Chromium-based, BrowserOS lets you effortlessly import your bookmarks, passwords, and Chrome extensions in just a few clicks. BrowserOS works with OpenAI GPT models, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and local AI models via Ollama or LMStudio. You can use your own API keys and effortlessly switch between providers. BrowserOS Agent Your AI productivity assistant that organizes and manages your browsing effortlessly Quickly list, group, or close tabs Save and resume browsing sessions Search your history and organize bookmarks Switch instantly to the tab you need BrowserOS Navigator – Automate web tasks with ease Navigate websites and search automatically Interact with pages without manual effort Handle repetitive tasks in seconds What makes BrowserOS special Feels like home - same familiar interface as Google Chrome, works with all your extensions AI agents that run on YOUR browser, not in the cloud Privacy first - bring your own keys or use local models with Ollama. Your browsing history stays on your computer Open source and community driven - see exactly what's happening under the hood MCP store to one-click install popular MCPs and use them directly in the browser bar (coming soon) Built-in AI ad blocker that works across more scenarios! BrowserOS 0.46.0 changelog: Run Claude Code & Codex right in your browser — We've extended the agent harness to bring full coding agents into BrowserOS. Claude Code and Codex now come bundled and plug straight into the assistant, so you can drive your browser with the agent — and the subscription — you already use. A brand new experience — A redesigned new tab, a calmer composer, and a rebuilt command center for switching between agents. The whole assistant is cleaner, faster to reach, and easier to live in. New MCP tools — We rebuilt the browser tool surface from the ground up — a tighter, more reliable set of tools for agents to drive the browser. Plus one-click install of BrowserOS as an MCP server into the agents you already run, with automatic URL sync. Chromium 148 — Updated to the latest Chromium base with all recent upstream fixes and security patches. Streamlined — We've pulled back a few features that weren't getting much use — Skills, Soul, and Memory — so we can focus and ship better versions of them soon. Download: BrowserOS 0.46.0 | 181.0 MB (Open Source) Download: BrowserOS for macOS | 485.0 MB Links: BrowserOS Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!