is XP SP3 still a good OS for today's computing?


Recommended Posts

Also, keep in mind WINDOWS MESSENGER 4.7 even after SP3 is still present which has a security flaw

just like how IE6 still present

they simply can't remove features with servicepacks :/ (although i wish they do ,in like those two cases )

a Friend of mine up in washington got his mom a used AMd 1.5ghz single core laptop with 1gb of ram and an ATI DX9 GPU with windows XP on it on batt save setting it got slightly under 2hrs of life with windows 7 on it clean install it gets 5HR 32min

a Friend of mine up in washington got his mom a used AMd 1.5ghz single core laptop with 1gb of ram and an ATI DX9 GPU with windows XP on it on batt save setting it got slightly under 2hrs of life with windows 7 on it clean install it gets 5HR 32min

Well I had a machine with a 1.8 GHz intel Pentium and 768MB of RAM, and when I installed Windows XP on it, my penis grew 5 inches and I gained the power to fly by fart-propulsion, so there.

So very true! Since moving on to Windows 7, reboots are only necessary when updates or software installations require it. It is so much more stable than XP ever was. I recently kept my office machine (Win7 Pro x64) running for over 3 weeks without a reboot with absolutely no degradation in performance.

Reboots are only necessary when updates or software installations require them on XP as well. Additionally, most of software doesn't need a restart which requests it.

XP can also run for long periods of time without any issues, if it doesn't I suggest replacing user.

Two bugs noticeable so far, one has bee fixed by the SP1. The second, sometimes while choosing a wifi to connect to, I single click on the network, but the OS registers it as a double click.

Sadly no bugs that I know of have been fixed with SP1, such as desktop icons becoming transparent.

There has been no work on increasing performance of WMP scrolling or Windows Explorer scrolling which noticeably laggs on any low-end hardware.

Sadly no bugs that I know of have been fixed with SP1, such as desktop icons becoming transparent.

There has been no work on increasing performance of WMP scrolling or Windows Explorer scrolling which noticeably laggs on any low-end hardware.

Again with the Explorer complaints....

this is my windows 7 system my only system doing the same winrar extaction of window s77 iso and all that or well to iso or so like the guy above as you can see with 1 sec left on the extraction it only took my system ( AMD 9550 2.2ghz quad core with multi-threading enabled in winrar on windows 7 ultimate 64bit my system to extract the 32bit version of windows 7 ) 1min 42 sec

post-74594-0-85491800-1301638785.jpg

this is my windows 7 system my only system doing the same winrar extaction of window s77 iso and all that or well to iso or so like the guy above as you can see with 1 sec left on the extraction it only took my system ( AMD 9550 2.2ghz quad core with multi-threading enabled in winrar on windows 7 ultimate 64bit my system to extract the 32bit version of windows 7 ) 1min 42 sec

post-74594-0-85491800-1301638785.jpg

You are extracting a RAR file. The other person is extracting the contents of an ISO file.

The ISO extraction is probably going to take longer because there are hundreds of files to extract.

You are extracting a RAR file. The other person is extracting the contents of an ISO file.

The ISO extraction is probably going to take longer because there are hundreds of files to extract.

true but i dont have the time but i did exact same then did the rar extraction but doing the iso extraction took lless time then his system less then the XP system and also i had multi-threading enabled not sure if he did

true but i dont have the time but i did exact same then did the rar extraction but doing the iso extraction took lless time then his system less then the XP system and also i had multi-threading enabled not sure if he did

Also, look at the progress bar. It appears that the person is using a very old version of WinRAR, probably not optimized for the new OS.

also was multi-threading enabled on winrar for both versions

There's a few other improtant questions

if thsi was one the same computer. where both OS' on the same physical HDD ? if not was one of the OS' on the same HDD as the RAR file or the HDD where the rar fiel was being extracted to ? was the file extracted to and form the same place on both examples ? Fragmentation, since they can't be done at the same time, one of them will be unpacked to a different part of the HDD. unless you defragged the drive before both experiments, one of them could have been extarcted to a heavily fragmented part of the disk. If they where extracted to different disks, Disk speed on the target disks ?

there so many things that will affect this example, the only thing that really won't affect the extraction time here is the OS. unless one is 64bit and you use 64bit Winrar.

true but i dont have the time but i did exact same then did the rar extraction but doing the iso extraction took lless time then his system less then the XP system and also i had multi-threading enabled not sure if he did

oh so they're entirely different systems making the whole thing useless. since pretty much ALL of my possible reasons for slowdown and a few more are probably there then.

I think the overall point is that every system is different, and that goes both way people. Some things will be faster on certain machines with XP, others will be faster on 7, it's all dependent on the hardware, the software, a million different things.

Coming up with stories about how 7 turned your dinosaur into a magical unicorn is pointless and stupid, since a) it isn't representative of computers in general, and doesn't prove anything, and b) is most likely an exception, rather then a rule, since 7 is made to run on higher resource requirements. This isn't opinion, it's fact. Try to install it on a 1.5GHz with 768MB of RAM and see what happens.

I love 7, but trying to argue that it's the perfect OS for every system and every situation is just dumb.

this is my windows 7 system my only system doing the same winrar extaction of window s77 iso and all that or well to iso or so like the guy above as you can see with 1 sec left on the extraction it only took my system ( AMD 9550 2.2ghz quad core with multi-threading enabled in winrar on windows 7 ultimate 64bit my system to extract the 32bit version of windows 7 ) 1min 42 sec

post-74594-0-85491800-1301638785.jpg

windows ultimate retial.rar? That looks legitimate :rolleyes:

Maybe his system runs better with 7 because it's one of those special "gamer" editions that you can find online ;)

Edit: Just realized that this is the same guy who I was arguing with about monetary reasons, too! He said that Win7 is definitely worth the $200.

edit2: Did he assign "B" to one of his HDDs?

Maybe his system runs better with 7 because it's one of those special "gamer" editions that you can find online ;)

Edit: Just realized that this is the same guy who I was arguing with about monetary reasons, too! He said that Win7 is definitely worth the $200.

edit2: Did he assign "B" to one of his HDDs?

ok so you would tell anyone not to upgrade to windows 7 because of price vs security Example store gets robbed

Windows XP Cameras are there for Show to give you the illusion of security but the upside it saves ya money

Windows 7 has working Camera system that record and stores the video and in case your security is breached the cops will have evidence of the man on video because you invested in a far better security system

Examples include any RAM-heavy XP-7 compatible application actually.

There is a ~400 MB difference between RAM usage in XP and 7 (memory that cannot be freed), that is ~400MB of RAM that will be used for the application.

That is ambiguous. You may have to rephrase your post.

What "application" are you talking about?

xpvs7reboot.png

Anyone who isn't an idiot is using the hybrid sleep since Vista (which is 4years old now). Then your system boots in less than 5s.

Also, when you say "same system", did you use the same HDD? Did you installed XP on the first partition on the disk and 7 at the end of the disk (so it's much slower than it would be when it comes to hdd i/o like your test is), lolz?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!