is XP SP3 still a good OS for today's computing?

By Nguyen07
in Microsoft (Windows)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Subject Delta

Posted
Posted

Examples include any RAM-heavy XP-7 compatible application actually.

There is a ~400 MB difference between RAM usage in XP and 7 (memory that cannot be freed), that is ~400MB of RAM that will be used for the application.

Curious, I run a lot of memory heavy applications, particularly games and I have never noticed any difference. Do you have any evidence to back this claim up?

Mentor

Jen Smith

Posted
Posted
Curious, I run a lot of memory heavy applications, particularly games and I have never noticed any difference. Do you have any evidence to back this claim up?

More or less the same for me; 7 initially starts up a little heavier, but once it "settles down" after a couple minutes, it's more or less on par with XP. After using it a while, stuff moving in and out of swap, etc etc, I'll typically wind up with more free memory available than XP, especially after using heavy applications like Visual Studio 2010 and the like, which is anything but lightweight. Even on an old system that's very resource limited, I've had overall better results with 7 than XP. (Including an old celeron tablet with 512MB, going to be swap-heavy either way but just felt more responsive in 7.) I've seen a couple reasons for mayyyybe keeping XP around, but memory isn't one of them.

As far as the reboot speeds go, again noticing a complete opposite here. From a cold boot, at least on my systems, XP and 7 get to the desktop more or less at the same time, but 7's typically idle and ready to go where XP's still chugging along loading stuff in the background for a while longer. But that's a cold boot; I much prefer just putting the sucker to sleep, and being ready in a second flat. Only time I usually power them down fully is during a storm.

Grand Master

Subject Delta

Posted
Posted

More or less the same for me; 7 initially starts up a little heavier, but once it "settles down" after a couple minutes, it's more or less on par with XP. After using it a while, stuff moving in and out of swap, etc etc, I'll typically wind up with more free memory available than XP, especially after using heavy applications like Visual Studio 2010 and the like, which is anything but lightweight. Even on an old system that's very resource limited, I've had overall better results with 7 than XP. (Including an old celeron tablet with 512MB, going to be swap-heavy either way but just felt more responsive in 7.) I've seen a couple reasons for mayyyybe keeping XP around, but memory isn't one of them.

As far as the reboot speeds go, again noticing a complete opposite here. From a cold boot, at least on my systems, XP and 7 get to the desktop more or less at the same time, but 7's typically idle and ready to go where XP's still chugging along loading stuff in the background for a while longer. But that's a cold boot; I much prefer just putting the sucker to sleep, and being ready in a second flat. Only time I usually power them down fully is during a storm.

Precisely. 7 is a more complex OS than XP, it's natural that it will have a slightly higher memory footprint, but it does not cause applications to use more memory, and I don't know why people claim it does!

Veteran

Frylock86

Posted
Posted

Precisely. 7 is a more complex OS than XP, it's natural that it will have a slightly higher memory footprint, but it does not cause applications to use more memory, and I don't know why people claim it does!

Keep in mind XP and 7 deal with memory differently. Application that use XX amount of RAM on XP could end up using XY amount of RAM on 7, but it won't be too much of a difference.

Look at FF4 for example, same application, two different operating systems. Firefox 4 has features that work on 7, but don't on XP.

Mentor

Jen Smith

Posted
Posted
Hey, is there a way to uninstall Windows XP Sp3? I wanna go back to RTM, I've found that RTM will use less RAM than SP3. I hate seeing almost a GB of my 4 used up. :(

Be careful going that route, the only flavor of XP that's still officially supported is SP3. Anything older is officially dead and buried as far as Microsoft is concerned, you're probably going to miss out on some critical security updates and the like that are still being pushed for SP3. (Besides, RTM sucked, personally had better results with Server 2K3 until XP3 SP3 came along, but that's just me.)

Edit for next post below : Yea I hope so too :D

Grand Master

Rigby

Posted
Posted

Be careful going that route, the only flavor of XP that's still officially supported is SP3. Anything older is officially dead and buried as far as Microsoft is concerned, you're probably going to miss out on some critical security updates and the like that are still being pushed for SP3. (Besides, RTM sucked, personally had better results with Server 2K3 until XP3 SP3 came along, but that's just me.)

I think he was being sarcastic, I hope. ;)

Mentor

nekkidtruth

Posted
Posted

I was going to go into this whole drawn out post about all of the silliness being spewed about XP being superior to 7, but decided this was much more fitting.

Let's call a spade a spade guys.

If you think XP is far superior to 7, you're doing it wrong. Very very wrong.

Mentor

nekkidtruth

Posted
Posted

XP if your hardware can't handle 7. Thread over.

Which doesn't even happen that often since 7 runs disgustingly well on a LOT of older hardware. I've got it running on several older P4 machines and it runs like a beast. Sure I have to use the classic look, but it runs circles 'round XP on that older hardware.

  • Frylock86, soonerproud and Skyfrog
  • Like 3
Rising Star

DootDootMan

Posted
Posted

Which doesn't even happen that often since 7 runs disgustingly well on a LOT of older hardware. I've got it running on several older P4 machines and it runs like a beast. Sure I have to use the classic look, but it runs circles 'round XP on that older hardware.

That's what I meant. If you can't get 7 to run on your current hardware use XP, Linux, etc.

Grand Master

Udedenkz

Posted
Posted

Curious, I run a lot of memory heavy applications, particularly games and I have never noticed any difference. Do you have any evidence to back this claim up?

Think about it... 400MB of RAM vs. 400 MB extra Swap... RAM vs HD.

Do I have to prove to you that disk trashing is worse than having more free RAM?

Grand Master

Subject Delta

Posted
Posted

Think about it... 400MB of RAM vs. 400 MB extra Swap... RAM vs HD.

Do I have to prove to you that disk trashing is worse than having more free RAM?

And I repeat, evidence? I have neither problems with excessive memory usage, or disk thrashing

Grand Master

Rigby

Posted
Posted

Think about it... 400MB of RAM vs. 400 MB extra Swap... RAM vs HD.

Do I have to prove to you that disk trashing is worse than having more free RAM?

Do I have to point out that RAM is dirt cheap and with systems having 4-8GB these days your argument is completely absurd.

I have Windows 7 and only 2 GB of RAM and I have no thrashing in any programs or games. You either have a very crappy system or you're just making stuff up. Go back to Windows 98 and have fun, it only requires something like 16 MB.

  • Frylock86, Skyfrog and soonerproud
  • Like 3
Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted

Yeah, I might do that. If I don't get an extra 2gb of ram, it's still wise to go with the 64 bit? I won't be screwed in terms of driver support?

I have only 3 GB now, and had only 2 GB when I crossgraded, so RAM isn't now (and wasn't then) the issue.

While large amounts of RAM are *a* reason for making the move, it's not the only one, and in some cases (like mine) it wasn't evne close to being a major reason.

Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted

Which doesn't even happen that often since 7 runs disgustingly well on a LOT of older hardware. I've got it running on several older P4 machines and it runs like a beast. Sure I have to use the classic look, but it runs circles 'round XP on that older hardware.

And if you have GPUs that are newer than R300 (Radeon 9600/9700/9800), why would you need Classic? Aero requires, at most, DX9c (which even GPUs that old support); further, all their successors support at least DX9c as well (AMD 85xx, nV 6xxx, and Intel 8xx are the respective Aero floors).

There are some decent GPUs *today* that can be had for the AGP, and even the (don't laugh) *PCI* (not PCIe) bus - they aren't spendy, either; some can be had, depending on where you look, for less than $30 new.

Which doesn't even happen that often since 7 runs disgustingly well on a LOT of older hardware. I've got it running on several older P4 machines and it runs like a beast. Sure I have to use the classic look, but it runs circles 'round XP on that older hardware.

True. Mom had inherited my old P4 workhorse desktop when I crossgraded (I had been running Vista x32 on it) she followed me to Windows 7 when it launched (I went with 7 x64, while her P4 then went to 7 x32).

She has since moved to a newer P4 which is x64-ready (Prescott in LGA775 - specifically the P4 3.0-E) and, like me, runs 7 Ultimate x64 today.

Rising Star

XP1

Posted
Posted

Hey, is there a way to uninstall Windows XP Sp3? I wanna go back to RTM, I've found that RTM will use less RAM than SP3. I hate seeing almost a GB of my 4 used up. :(

Be careful going that route, the only flavor of XP that's still officially supported is SP3. Anything older is officially dead and buried as far as Microsoft is concerned, you're probably going to miss out on some critical security updates and the like that are still being pushed for SP3. (Besides, RTM sucked, personally had better results with Server 2K3 until XP3 SP3 came along, but that's just me.)

Edit for next post below : Yea I hope so too :D

Sarcasm alarm bells:

  • Going back to RTM.
  • Trying to use the full 4 GB RAM on 32-bit XP.

Two unrelated issues.

Rising Star

muratoner

Posted
Posted

Oh no, what am I going to do now every time I want to open services and drag the window border back and forth really fast?

I guess I'll have to go back to XP. :rolleyes:

it's not just the services box.It's for everything that needs 2D.I've noticed this and hated the responsiveness of W7.It's even worse if you have a folder with 200+ video files and click the folder and wait for about a minute (every freakin time) to process.It's the most annoying thing ever.I don't want any preview handlers checking folders.I just want to see my files.Is it too much to ask for

Rising Star

muratoner

Posted
Posted

Why don't you just turn the previews off then, it's a very simple setting.

i did.But it still processes the folders anyway.It takes like 10sec on a 300gb folder with avi files where in xp it just shows your files in a sec

Grand Master

LiquidSolstice

Posted
Posted

i did.But it still processes the folders anyway.It takes like 10sec on a 300gb folder with avi files where in xp it just shows your files in a sec

I think you're talking about the thumbnail cache being deleted and rebuilt. If so, that's pretty easy to fix.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • TerraMaster F2-425 Pro review: a low-powered Intel NAS that ships with AI (OpenClaw)

      By ad47uk · Posted

      I have a older F4-210 NAS, it is pretty basic, the CPU is not the fastest by a long way and only 1GB of ram, but it works fine. I don't understand the need for A.I in a NAS. It seems like A.i is being shoved into everything, if we like it or not. i will stick to my old Terramsater NAS, thankfully the OS is not being updated. Also, got myself a small NAs built using a Raspberry Pi 5. iy usesd less energy, so stays on all the time. As for the unit above, if it is as reliable as my old Terramaster Nas, then it will be a good unit.
    • Gemini in Google Sheets can now help you debug and fix formula errors

      By David Uzondu · Posted

      Gemini in Google Sheets can now help you debug and fix formula errors by David Uzondu Google has started rolling out an update to Gemini in Google Sheets that allows the AI to diagnose and fix formula errors in one click, as long as your Workspace admin has Gemini for Workspace in Sheets turned on. According to Google, the new feature can handle pretty much everything from basic arithmetic to very complex calculations. This ability to debug formula errors comes about two years after Google introduced basic formula generation with Gemini in Sheets. To create a formula with Gemini in Sheets, you open a spreadsheet on your computer and click Ask Gemini in the top right corner. You can also enter an equals sign in any cell and use a shortcut like Ctrl + Alt + G on Windows and Chrome OS, or Command + Ctrl + G on macOS. Once you open the side panel, you write a natural language prompt using your sheet references. For example, you can ask Gemini to divide goals by games, or to find cell C1 in range D:G. If for some reason, the formula Gemini generated doesn't work, or maybe you wrote the formula yourself, you can troubleshoot the issue directly inside the grid. When a cell shows an error message, you hover over it and click "Fix". This action opens the side panel where Gemini analyzes the data structure and automatically applies the fixes when they are ready. You can cancel the process at any time by clicking stop in the side panel. Image via Google Google has been pushing its Gemini integration in Google Sheets for a while now, steadily moving AI features from side panels directly into user spreadsheets. Last year, the Mountain View giant shipped an =AI() Function in Sheets that allowed users to run translation and text generation directly inside cells instead of using the side panel interface. Earlier this year, the company announced that Gemini in Sheets had reached near-human expert performance, achieving a 70.48% success rate on the SpreadsheetBench dataset.
    • It's about to become harder to turn off your Samsung TV, thanks to Instagram

      By ad47uk · Posted

      I get what you are saying, If i go onto the Instagram site, it says log in with Facebook, but they are not allowed to link my account with Instagram until I do that. Maybe in the U.S, they can link them, but Privacy is not a thing in the U.S. the way things are going,l won;t be any better in the U.K.
    • One of Logitech's best productivity mice is now available for just $79.99

      By TarasBuria · Posted

      One of Logitech's best productivity mice is now available for just $79.99 by Taras Buria The MX Master 3S, formerly Logitech's flagship productivity mouse, is now available at an all-time low price during Prime Day sale. Thanks to the latest discount, you can have this mouse for as little as $79.99. This large-sized mouse has many things to like. From its ergonomic shape to the iconic MagScroll wheel, the MX Master 3S is a great productivity-focused accessory. It has an 8K DPI sensor that tracks on various surfaces, including glass. Its main MagScroll has two modes: ratched and infinite, with the latter capable of scrolling up to 1,000 lines in just a second. Additionally, there is a secondary wheel for horizontal scrolling. The MX Master 3S has plenty of buttons, which can be remapped to gestures, keyboard shortcuts, or other actions in the Options+ app on Windows and macOS. You can connect the mouse to up to three devices (via Bluetooth or the Bolt connector) and switch between them with a dedicated button. You also get a USB Type-A to Type-C cable to recharge the built-in battery, which lasts up to 70 days on a full charge, and a quick one-minute charge gets you three hours of use. Logitech MX Master 3S - $79.99 | 20% off for Prime Members Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it

      By leonsk29 · Posted

      Exactly, this is just the beginning. I hope that by that time, our inept politicians devise something like a Universal Basic Income, because unemployment and poverty rates will skyrocket otherwise. And believe me, robots that perform physical work aren't a matter of IF, but WHEN. No career is truly safe from AI/robots, it's just a matter of time.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!