is XP SP3 still a good OS for today's computing?

By Nguyen07
in Microsoft (Windows)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Subject Delta

Posted
Posted

Examples include any RAM-heavy XP-7 compatible application actually.

There is a ~400 MB difference between RAM usage in XP and 7 (memory that cannot be freed), that is ~400MB of RAM that will be used for the application.

Curious, I run a lot of memory heavy applications, particularly games and I have never noticed any difference. Do you have any evidence to back this claim up?

Mentor

Jen Smith

Posted
Posted
Curious, I run a lot of memory heavy applications, particularly games and I have never noticed any difference. Do you have any evidence to back this claim up?

More or less the same for me; 7 initially starts up a little heavier, but once it "settles down" after a couple minutes, it's more or less on par with XP. After using it a while, stuff moving in and out of swap, etc etc, I'll typically wind up with more free memory available than XP, especially after using heavy applications like Visual Studio 2010 and the like, which is anything but lightweight. Even on an old system that's very resource limited, I've had overall better results with 7 than XP. (Including an old celeron tablet with 512MB, going to be swap-heavy either way but just felt more responsive in 7.) I've seen a couple reasons for mayyyybe keeping XP around, but memory isn't one of them.

As far as the reboot speeds go, again noticing a complete opposite here. From a cold boot, at least on my systems, XP and 7 get to the desktop more or less at the same time, but 7's typically idle and ready to go where XP's still chugging along loading stuff in the background for a while longer. But that's a cold boot; I much prefer just putting the sucker to sleep, and being ready in a second flat. Only time I usually power them down fully is during a storm.

Grand Master

Subject Delta

Posted
Posted

More or less the same for me; 7 initially starts up a little heavier, but once it "settles down" after a couple minutes, it's more or less on par with XP. After using it a while, stuff moving in and out of swap, etc etc, I'll typically wind up with more free memory available than XP, especially after using heavy applications like Visual Studio 2010 and the like, which is anything but lightweight. Even on an old system that's very resource limited, I've had overall better results with 7 than XP. (Including an old celeron tablet with 512MB, going to be swap-heavy either way but just felt more responsive in 7.) I've seen a couple reasons for mayyyybe keeping XP around, but memory isn't one of them.

As far as the reboot speeds go, again noticing a complete opposite here. From a cold boot, at least on my systems, XP and 7 get to the desktop more or less at the same time, but 7's typically idle and ready to go where XP's still chugging along loading stuff in the background for a while longer. But that's a cold boot; I much prefer just putting the sucker to sleep, and being ready in a second flat. Only time I usually power them down fully is during a storm.

Precisely. 7 is a more complex OS than XP, it's natural that it will have a slightly higher memory footprint, but it does not cause applications to use more memory, and I don't know why people claim it does!

Veteran

Frylock86

Posted
Posted

Precisely. 7 is a more complex OS than XP, it's natural that it will have a slightly higher memory footprint, but it does not cause applications to use more memory, and I don't know why people claim it does!

Keep in mind XP and 7 deal with memory differently. Application that use XX amount of RAM on XP could end up using XY amount of RAM on 7, but it won't be too much of a difference.

Look at FF4 for example, same application, two different operating systems. Firefox 4 has features that work on 7, but don't on XP.

Mentor

Jen Smith

Posted
Posted
Hey, is there a way to uninstall Windows XP Sp3? I wanna go back to RTM, I've found that RTM will use less RAM than SP3. I hate seeing almost a GB of my 4 used up. :(

Be careful going that route, the only flavor of XP that's still officially supported is SP3. Anything older is officially dead and buried as far as Microsoft is concerned, you're probably going to miss out on some critical security updates and the like that are still being pushed for SP3. (Besides, RTM sucked, personally had better results with Server 2K3 until XP3 SP3 came along, but that's just me.)

Edit for next post below : Yea I hope so too :D

Grand Master

Rigby

Posted
Posted

Be careful going that route, the only flavor of XP that's still officially supported is SP3. Anything older is officially dead and buried as far as Microsoft is concerned, you're probably going to miss out on some critical security updates and the like that are still being pushed for SP3. (Besides, RTM sucked, personally had better results with Server 2K3 until XP3 SP3 came along, but that's just me.)

I think he was being sarcastic, I hope. ;)

Mentor

nekkidtruth

Posted
Posted

I was going to go into this whole drawn out post about all of the silliness being spewed about XP being superior to 7, but decided this was much more fitting.

Let's call a spade a spade guys.

If you think XP is far superior to 7, you're doing it wrong. Very very wrong.

Mentor

nekkidtruth

Posted
Posted

XP if your hardware can't handle 7. Thread over.

Which doesn't even happen that often since 7 runs disgustingly well on a LOT of older hardware. I've got it running on several older P4 machines and it runs like a beast. Sure I have to use the classic look, but it runs circles 'round XP on that older hardware.

  • soonerproud, Skyfrog and Frylock86
  • Like 3
Rising Star

DootDootMan

Posted
Posted

Which doesn't even happen that often since 7 runs disgustingly well on a LOT of older hardware. I've got it running on several older P4 machines and it runs like a beast. Sure I have to use the classic look, but it runs circles 'round XP on that older hardware.

That's what I meant. If you can't get 7 to run on your current hardware use XP, Linux, etc.

Grand Master

Udedenkz

Posted
Posted

Curious, I run a lot of memory heavy applications, particularly games and I have never noticed any difference. Do you have any evidence to back this claim up?

Think about it... 400MB of RAM vs. 400 MB extra Swap... RAM vs HD.

Do I have to prove to you that disk trashing is worse than having more free RAM?

Grand Master

Subject Delta

Posted
Posted

Think about it... 400MB of RAM vs. 400 MB extra Swap... RAM vs HD.

Do I have to prove to you that disk trashing is worse than having more free RAM?

And I repeat, evidence? I have neither problems with excessive memory usage, or disk thrashing

Grand Master

Rigby

Posted
Posted

Think about it... 400MB of RAM vs. 400 MB extra Swap... RAM vs HD.

Do I have to prove to you that disk trashing is worse than having more free RAM?

Do I have to point out that RAM is dirt cheap and with systems having 4-8GB these days your argument is completely absurd.

I have Windows 7 and only 2 GB of RAM and I have no thrashing in any programs or games. You either have a very crappy system or you're just making stuff up. Go back to Windows 98 and have fun, it only requires something like 16 MB.

  • Frylock86, Skyfrog and soonerproud
  • Like 3
Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted

Yeah, I might do that. If I don't get an extra 2gb of ram, it's still wise to go with the 64 bit? I won't be screwed in terms of driver support?

I have only 3 GB now, and had only 2 GB when I crossgraded, so RAM isn't now (and wasn't then) the issue.

While large amounts of RAM are *a* reason for making the move, it's not the only one, and in some cases (like mine) it wasn't evne close to being a major reason.

Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted

Which doesn't even happen that often since 7 runs disgustingly well on a LOT of older hardware. I've got it running on several older P4 machines and it runs like a beast. Sure I have to use the classic look, but it runs circles 'round XP on that older hardware.

And if you have GPUs that are newer than R300 (Radeon 9600/9700/9800), why would you need Classic? Aero requires, at most, DX9c (which even GPUs that old support); further, all their successors support at least DX9c as well (AMD 85xx, nV 6xxx, and Intel 8xx are the respective Aero floors).

There are some decent GPUs *today* that can be had for the AGP, and even the (don't laugh) *PCI* (not PCIe) bus - they aren't spendy, either; some can be had, depending on where you look, for less than $30 new.

Which doesn't even happen that often since 7 runs disgustingly well on a LOT of older hardware. I've got it running on several older P4 machines and it runs like a beast. Sure I have to use the classic look, but it runs circles 'round XP on that older hardware.

True. Mom had inherited my old P4 workhorse desktop when I crossgraded (I had been running Vista x32 on it) she followed me to Windows 7 when it launched (I went with 7 x64, while her P4 then went to 7 x32).

She has since moved to a newer P4 which is x64-ready (Prescott in LGA775 - specifically the P4 3.0-E) and, like me, runs 7 Ultimate x64 today.

Rising Star

XP1

Posted
Posted

Hey, is there a way to uninstall Windows XP Sp3? I wanna go back to RTM, I've found that RTM will use less RAM than SP3. I hate seeing almost a GB of my 4 used up. :(

Be careful going that route, the only flavor of XP that's still officially supported is SP3. Anything older is officially dead and buried as far as Microsoft is concerned, you're probably going to miss out on some critical security updates and the like that are still being pushed for SP3. (Besides, RTM sucked, personally had better results with Server 2K3 until XP3 SP3 came along, but that's just me.)

Edit for next post below : Yea I hope so too :D

Sarcasm alarm bells:

  • Going back to RTM.
  • Trying to use the full 4 GB RAM on 32-bit XP.

Two unrelated issues.

Rising Star

muratoner

Posted
Posted

Oh no, what am I going to do now every time I want to open services and drag the window border back and forth really fast?

I guess I'll have to go back to XP. :rolleyes:

it's not just the services box.It's for everything that needs 2D.I've noticed this and hated the responsiveness of W7.It's even worse if you have a folder with 200+ video files and click the folder and wait for about a minute (every freakin time) to process.It's the most annoying thing ever.I don't want any preview handlers checking folders.I just want to see my files.Is it too much to ask for

Rising Star

muratoner

Posted
Posted

Why don't you just turn the previews off then, it's a very simple setting.

i did.But it still processes the folders anyway.It takes like 10sec on a 300gb folder with avi files where in xp it just shows your files in a sec

Grand Master

LiquidSolstice

Posted
Posted

i did.But it still processes the folders anyway.It takes like 10sec on a 300gb folder with avi files where in xp it just shows your files in a sec

I think you're talking about the thumbnail cache being deleted and rebuilt. If so, that's pretty easy to fix.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Politically funny images of the World

      By +primortal · Posted

    • Subtitle Edit 5.0.0

      By Copernic · Posted

      Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Subtitle Edit is a powerful, free, and user-friendly subtitle editing tool designed for creating, editing, and converting subtitles for videos. It supports a wide range of subtitle formats, including SRT, ****, and SUB, allowing users to easily modify and adjust subtitles for accurate timing and formatting. With its intuitive interface, Subtitle Edit provides a variety of features such as waveform audio display, spell-check, subtitle synchronization, and real-time video preview, making it an ideal choice for both beginners and professionals. The software also includes powerful tools for batch processing, translating subtitles, and converting between different subtitle formats. Subtitle Edit features: Create/adjust/sync/translate subtitle lines Convert between SubRib, MicroDVD, Advanced Sub Station Alpha, Sub Station Alpha, D-Cinema, SAMI, youtube sbv, and many more (300+ different formats!) Cool audio visualizer control - can display wave form and/or spectrogram Video player uses mpv, DirectShow, or VLC media player Visually sync/adjust a subtitle (start/end position and speed) Audio to text (speech recognition) via Whisper or Vosk/Kaldi Auto Translation via Google translate Rip subtitles from a (decrypted) dvd Import and OCR VobSub sub/idx binary subtitles Import and OCR Blu-ray .sup files - bd sup reading is based on Java code from BDSup2Sub Can open subtitles embedded inside Matroska files Can open subtitles (text, closed captions, VobSub) embedded inside mp4/mv4 files Can open/OCR XSub subtitles embedded inside divx/avi files Can open/OCR DVB and teletext subtitles embedded inside .ts/.m2ts (Transport Stream) files Can open/OCR Blu-ray subtitles embedded inside .m2ts (Transport Stream) files Merge/split subtitles Adjust display time Fix common errors wizard....and more. Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 changelog: Subtitle Edit 5 is a major new release and a big step for the project. For the first time, Subtitle Edit runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single, modern, cross-platform codebase. The builds are self-contained, so no separate .NET installation is required, and on macOS and Linux the needed media components (mpv/ffmpeg) are bundled in. Please read before upgrading: Subtitle Edit 5 is a new application, not just an update of Subtitle Edit 4. It has been rebuilt from the ground up to be cross-platform, so: It is not 100% the same app. The look, layout, and some workflows have changed. Some things are in different places, and a few behave differently than in SE4. Not every SE4 feature exists in SE5 yet. SE5 covers all the core editing, conversion, sync, video playback, OCR, and online services, but some of the more specialized SE4 tools are not available yet. Features will continue to be added. If you rely on a specific SE4 feature that is missing, please keep SE4 installed alongside SE5. The easiest way to run both side by side is to use the Portable versions of SE4 and SE5, which keep their settings separate and do not interfere with each other. Which version should I use? Subtitle Edit 5: recommended for most users on Windows 10 (22H2) or newer, macOS 12+, and Linux. Subtitle Edit 4: please continue to use SE4 if you are on an older Windows version (Windows 7/8), or on older / slower computers where SE5 may not run well. SE4 remains available and is the right choice in those cases. To run SE4 and SE5 at the same time, use the Portable versions - you can try SE5 while keeping SE4 as a fallback. Download: Subtitle Edit 5.0.0 | ARM64 | ~60.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Subtitle Edit Portable | 103.0 MB View: Subtitle Edit Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect

      By Hamid Ganji · Posted

      Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • AMD confirms 26.6.2 FSR driver breaks on many Windows PCs

      By +Eternal Tempest · Posted

      At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends. @WaltC - Memories, 2x Voodoo in SLI with a Riva TNT with an Aureal A3D soundcard.
    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option

      By Snake Doc · Posted

      So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!