is XP SP3 still a good OS for today's computing?


Recommended Posts

Examples include any RAM-heavy XP-7 compatible application actually.

There is a ~400 MB difference between RAM usage in XP and 7 (memory that cannot be freed), that is ~400MB of RAM that will be used for the application.

Curious, I run a lot of memory heavy applications, particularly games and I have never noticed any difference. Do you have any evidence to back this claim up?

Curious, I run a lot of memory heavy applications, particularly games and I have never noticed any difference. Do you have any evidence to back this claim up?

More or less the same for me; 7 initially starts up a little heavier, but once it "settles down" after a couple minutes, it's more or less on par with XP. After using it a while, stuff moving in and out of swap, etc etc, I'll typically wind up with more free memory available than XP, especially after using heavy applications like Visual Studio 2010 and the like, which is anything but lightweight. Even on an old system that's very resource limited, I've had overall better results with 7 than XP. (Including an old celeron tablet with 512MB, going to be swap-heavy either way but just felt more responsive in 7.) I've seen a couple reasons for mayyyybe keeping XP around, but memory isn't one of them.

As far as the reboot speeds go, again noticing a complete opposite here. From a cold boot, at least on my systems, XP and 7 get to the desktop more or less at the same time, but 7's typically idle and ready to go where XP's still chugging along loading stuff in the background for a while longer. But that's a cold boot; I much prefer just putting the sucker to sleep, and being ready in a second flat. Only time I usually power them down fully is during a storm.

More or less the same for me; 7 initially starts up a little heavier, but once it "settles down" after a couple minutes, it's more or less on par with XP. After using it a while, stuff moving in and out of swap, etc etc, I'll typically wind up with more free memory available than XP, especially after using heavy applications like Visual Studio 2010 and the like, which is anything but lightweight. Even on an old system that's very resource limited, I've had overall better results with 7 than XP. (Including an old celeron tablet with 512MB, going to be swap-heavy either way but just felt more responsive in 7.) I've seen a couple reasons for mayyyybe keeping XP around, but memory isn't one of them.

As far as the reboot speeds go, again noticing a complete opposite here. From a cold boot, at least on my systems, XP and 7 get to the desktop more or less at the same time, but 7's typically idle and ready to go where XP's still chugging along loading stuff in the background for a while longer. But that's a cold boot; I much prefer just putting the sucker to sleep, and being ready in a second flat. Only time I usually power them down fully is during a storm.

Precisely. 7 is a more complex OS than XP, it's natural that it will have a slightly higher memory footprint, but it does not cause applications to use more memory, and I don't know why people claim it does!

Precisely. 7 is a more complex OS than XP, it's natural that it will have a slightly higher memory footprint, but it does not cause applications to use more memory, and I don't know why people claim it does!

Keep in mind XP and 7 deal with memory differently. Application that use XX amount of RAM on XP could end up using XY amount of RAM on 7, but it won't be too much of a difference.

Look at FF4 for example, same application, two different operating systems. Firefox 4 has features that work on 7, but don't on XP.

Hey, is there a way to uninstall Windows XP Sp3? I wanna go back to RTM, I've found that RTM will use less RAM than SP3. I hate seeing almost a GB of my 4 used up. :(

Be careful going that route, the only flavor of XP that's still officially supported is SP3. Anything older is officially dead and buried as far as Microsoft is concerned, you're probably going to miss out on some critical security updates and the like that are still being pushed for SP3. (Besides, RTM sucked, personally had better results with Server 2K3 until XP3 SP3 came along, but that's just me.)

Edit for next post below : Yea I hope so too :D

Be careful going that route, the only flavor of XP that's still officially supported is SP3. Anything older is officially dead and buried as far as Microsoft is concerned, you're probably going to miss out on some critical security updates and the like that are still being pushed for SP3. (Besides, RTM sucked, personally had better results with Server 2K3 until XP3 SP3 came along, but that's just me.)

I think he was being sarcastic, I hope. ;)

I was going to go into this whole drawn out post about all of the silliness being spewed about XP being superior to 7, but decided this was much more fitting.

Let's call a spade a spade guys.

If you think XP is far superior to 7, you're doing it wrong. Very very wrong.

XP if your hardware can't handle 7. Thread over.

Which doesn't even happen that often since 7 runs disgustingly well on a LOT of older hardware. I've got it running on several older P4 machines and it runs like a beast. Sure I have to use the classic look, but it runs circles 'round XP on that older hardware.

  • Like 3

Which doesn't even happen that often since 7 runs disgustingly well on a LOT of older hardware. I've got it running on several older P4 machines and it runs like a beast. Sure I have to use the classic look, but it runs circles 'round XP on that older hardware.

That's what I meant. If you can't get 7 to run on your current hardware use XP, Linux, etc.

Curious, I run a lot of memory heavy applications, particularly games and I have never noticed any difference. Do you have any evidence to back this claim up?

Think about it... 400MB of RAM vs. 400 MB extra Swap... RAM vs HD.

Do I have to prove to you that disk trashing is worse than having more free RAM?

Think about it... 400MB of RAM vs. 400 MB extra Swap... RAM vs HD.

Do I have to prove to you that disk trashing is worse than having more free RAM?

And I repeat, evidence? I have neither problems with excessive memory usage, or disk thrashing

Think about it... 400MB of RAM vs. 400 MB extra Swap... RAM vs HD.

Do I have to prove to you that disk trashing is worse than having more free RAM?

Do I have to point out that RAM is dirt cheap and with systems having 4-8GB these days your argument is completely absurd.

I have Windows 7 and only 2 GB of RAM and I have no thrashing in any programs or games. You either have a very crappy system or you're just making stuff up. Go back to Windows 98 and have fun, it only requires something like 16 MB.

  • Like 3

Yeah, I might do that. If I don't get an extra 2gb of ram, it's still wise to go with the 64 bit? I won't be screwed in terms of driver support?

I have only 3 GB now, and had only 2 GB when I crossgraded, so RAM isn't now (and wasn't then) the issue.

While large amounts of RAM are *a* reason for making the move, it's not the only one, and in some cases (like mine) it wasn't evne close to being a major reason.

Which doesn't even happen that often since 7 runs disgustingly well on a LOT of older hardware. I've got it running on several older P4 machines and it runs like a beast. Sure I have to use the classic look, but it runs circles 'round XP on that older hardware.

And if you have GPUs that are newer than R300 (Radeon 9600/9700/9800), why would you need Classic? Aero requires, at most, DX9c (which even GPUs that old support); further, all their successors support at least DX9c as well (AMD 85xx, nV 6xxx, and Intel 8xx are the respective Aero floors).

There are some decent GPUs *today* that can be had for the AGP, and even the (don't laugh) *PCI* (not PCIe) bus - they aren't spendy, either; some can be had, depending on where you look, for less than $30 new.

Which doesn't even happen that often since 7 runs disgustingly well on a LOT of older hardware. I've got it running on several older P4 machines and it runs like a beast. Sure I have to use the classic look, but it runs circles 'round XP on that older hardware.

True. Mom had inherited my old P4 workhorse desktop when I crossgraded (I had been running Vista x32 on it) she followed me to Windows 7 when it launched (I went with 7 x64, while her P4 then went to 7 x32).

She has since moved to a newer P4 which is x64-ready (Prescott in LGA775 - specifically the P4 3.0-E) and, like me, runs 7 Ultimate x64 today.

Hey, is there a way to uninstall Windows XP Sp3? I wanna go back to RTM, I've found that RTM will use less RAM than SP3. I hate seeing almost a GB of my 4 used up. :(

Be careful going that route, the only flavor of XP that's still officially supported is SP3. Anything older is officially dead and buried as far as Microsoft is concerned, you're probably going to miss out on some critical security updates and the like that are still being pushed for SP3. (Besides, RTM sucked, personally had better results with Server 2K3 until XP3 SP3 came along, but that's just me.)

Edit for next post below : Yea I hope so too :D

Sarcasm alarm bells:

  • Going back to RTM.
  • Trying to use the full 4 GB RAM on 32-bit XP.

Two unrelated issues.

Oh no, what am I going to do now every time I want to open services and drag the window border back and forth really fast?

I guess I'll have to go back to XP. :rolleyes:

it's not just the services box.It's for everything that needs 2D.I've noticed this and hated the responsiveness of W7.It's even worse if you have a folder with 200+ video files and click the folder and wait for about a minute (every freakin time) to process.It's the most annoying thing ever.I don't want any preview handlers checking folders.I just want to see my files.Is it too much to ask for

Why don't you just turn the previews off then, it's a very simple setting.

i did.But it still processes the folders anyway.It takes like 10sec on a 300gb folder with avi files where in xp it just shows your files in a sec

i did.But it still processes the folders anyway.It takes like 10sec on a 300gb folder with avi files where in xp it just shows your files in a sec

I think you're talking about the thumbnail cache being deleted and rebuilt. If so, that's pretty easy to fix.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!