Recommended Posts

yeah and not to mention the very distinct "keyhole" design.

and chrome's UI looks like it's from the windows xp luna days rather then windows 7/2008 aero or mac osx aqua era

Just more and more ridicolous. Among all the things firefox could have copied from chrome, they took its fugly UI. very well done

To be fair it looked like that in all versions of Firefox before Firefox 4. Firefox 3 had "native" buttons with some custom back-forward ones with the keyhole design.

I prefer "native" to system design anyday. see the bug for some example I provided. if you don't wanna dig through the mess compare openoffice ('system' styled) to anything like IE9/windows live essentials, Fx, WMP, etc.....

I prefer "native" to system design anyday. see the bug for some example I provided. if you don't wanna dig through the mess compare openoffice to anything like IE9/windows live essentials, Fx, WMP, etc.....

Not sure what the correct term even is, but all previous versions of Firefox had that button design. I'm not sure why they would waste so much time designing and implementing all these new designs just to revert back to the old days.

Nothing in Vista/7 even uses this button design so it is really odd.

Don't worry Mozilla is making Firefox ugly in an attempt to get Chrome users back.

LOL.

To be honest though, I've always found Firefox to be somewhat ugly up until Fx4, and even then it was just okay.

Even though I don't care for the resemblance to Chrome I'm just glad they're putting more resources into the UI other than just mockups.

Some people swear blind that IE9 is the prettiest, some say Opera ... to a reasonable extent UI and UX is a personal preference. Personally, I've already applied a stylish to remove button backgrounds (except on hover), because I fail to see the need for them. It's just extra lines.

Just because Chrome does something isn't a reason *not* to do it. Following others blindly is never a good approach, but this is not evidence of that.

Also, the UX build is a testing ground, not a *if it's in here, it'll be in a future release (unchanged, or even at all)*.

Some people swear blind that IE9 is the prettiest, some say Opera ... to a reasonable extent UI and UX is a personal preference. Personally, I've already applied a stylish to remove button backgrounds (except on hover), because I fail to see the need for them. It's just extra lines.

Just because Chrome does something isn't a reason *not* to do it. Following others blindly is never a good approach, but this is not evidence of that.

Also, the UX build is a testing ground, not a *if it's in here, it'll be in a future release (at all, or just unchanged)*.

Some people fail to realize that Chrome didn't invent borderless buttons.

Not sure if you're implying I think they did? Cause that's certainly not what I'm implying, nor would it matter. (But it's a fair point at anyone who thinks they did).

That's not what I meant. I was simply agreeing with you in a way, I probably shouldn't have quoted. It seems a lot of people complain that Mozilla is using borderless buttons. All version of Firefox prior to Firefox 4 had them, then they got changed in Firefox 4, now apparently they want them back. I've read so many complaints that Firefox is copying Chrome in this aspect, but it simply isn't the case.

I dont like the curved tabs either but the last screenshot on that website I think is REALLY sharp.

But mockups... We all know what happens with them. So many things were trashed for Fx4, including some things that actually made it in the nightlies.

I wish they would come up with one decent design and stick with it, at least for a year.

http://people.mozilla.com/~shorlander/ux-presentation/ux-presentation.html does look interesting.

With the massive caveat that they are mockups, and that doesn't mean Firefox will look like that ... the full screen views make a lot of sense, and the OSX menu design is fairly novel. Not sure about the 'flowing' tabs, but just because Chrome has them doesn't mean they're a bad design. Certainly to many they are more attractive than box tabs.

But mockups... We all know what happens with them. So many things were trashed for Fx4, including some things that actually made it in the nightlies.

I wish they would come up with one decent design and stick with it, at least for a year.

Product design just doesn't work like that, unfortunately. You find issues during implementation, or you find a better way to do something, or time constraints prevent you from coding it. It would be *nice*, and often the closer you can stick to mockups, the better, but it's rare to stick to a design over the course of several months of coding (especially in a rapidly changing market).

And indeed, with regular code releases, it doesn't often make sense to hold back new UI work just so you can do it all at once (for one, that would likely be a development nightmare).

^I understand changes are needed when it goes from mockups to actual implementation but at the moment it seems they're changing the design depending on their mood and they're not small changes so it can be implemented properly, either.

From the 4.0 mockups to the final release of Fx4 I thought they did a pretty good job of implementing what they set out to do and they're already scrapping most of it which I think is a shame.

^I understand changes are needed when it goes from mockups to actual implementation but at the moment it seems they're changing the design depending on their mood and they're not small changes so it can be implemented properly, either.

From the 4.0 mockups to the final release of Fx4 I thought they did a pretty good job of implementing what they set out to do and they're already scrapping most of it which I think is a shame.

I wouldn't say they are 'scrapping' it, really - tweaking and refining it, more like. Design work is a lot of iteration, and to have gone from Fx 3.6 to the new design seen above would be far too disruptive to the code and user experiences - so what happens are steps on a long road. Fx4 did make a variety of very good changes to the UI, but even Fx4's original designs were somewhat more radical than we got (e.g. no home tab yet, and other stuff on http://areweprettyyet.com).

In any case, yeah I agree that it would be nice to settle on a single design for a long period of time ... but it'll never happen, and rarely happens in any software, especially not browsers. (I would argue Firefox's previous feeling of more stable design was born more out of slow release schedules, than intent.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!