Recommended Posts

firefox button>web developer>error console

firefox button>web developer>web console

try any of those.

if nothing's bad please file a bug report with bugzilla.

firefox button>web developer>error console

firefox button>web developer>web console

try any of those.

if nothing's bad please file a bug report with bugzilla.

I have already made a report with bugzilla today.

This is the error that I get in the web console when the pics stop loading:

[02:19:20.333] this.cache.image[this.position] is undefined @ http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v1/yG/r/DNJ-r_UMuc6.js:16

Looks like it could be a problem with thier CDN. I sometimes have hangs with that. I think FB might be changing stuff with images again.

Please provide your bug number and URL. I will take a look.

Thanks a lot for providing the link!

have you also tried all the stuff like:

ipconfig /flushdns

becuase your connection to thier CDN could be bad. I did that and I had improved performance on FB. It seems as they change the IPs quite often. I have the ShowIP addon and the IP addresses assigned to certain parts of FB change a lot.

This might clear out some of that mess that they did.

Thanks a lot for providing the link!

have you also tried all the stuff like:

ipconfig /flushdns

becuase your connection to thier CDN could be bad. I did that and I had improved performance on FB. It seems as they change the IPs quite often. I have the ShowIP addon and the IP addresses assigned to certain parts of FB change a lot.

This might clear out some of that mess that they did.

flushdns did not fix it

Like I said in the other post, it's working fine in Opera 12 so I don't think that it's a problem with the connection.

Also if I restart firefox in Safe Mode it's working fine.

Mind me asking what exactly they fixed for the Mac? It looks great btw. I do not have OSX but planning on it very soon and love Firefox's look.

#667476 [Firefox:Theme]-[10.7] Update Firefox?s Toolbar Gradient to match OS X Lion?s [Mac]

#667480 [Firefox:Theme]-[10.7] Update Firefox?s Toolbar Button Style for OS X Lion [Mac]

Another memory bug fix fixed (soon in Nightly - maybe land in FF7 as well).

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=678422

Read Comment 2:

Some for Nightly users:

Pros: - Saves a few MB of wasted memory on small pages (like gmail) and up to 700MB on very large pages. - Roughly halves the number of allocations done by nsPresArena, which can only speed things up (I have no idea how much, though).

Mind me asking what exactly they fixed for the Mac? It looks great btw. I do not have OSX but planning on it very soon and love Firefox's look.

Before, they drew the background gradient and toolbar buttons manually (using the colours and such from the system), but now they ask the OS to draw those parts (In Lion, Apple added a noise texture to the toolbar gradient, so you really need to get the OS to draw it)

Anyone getting "Update Failed" with FF6 b5 ?

Checking for updates says there is a 2.3mb update, but it fails, gives me a link to download it which takes me to the FF5 final download page

I have downloaded the latest FF6b5 installer - is there another page for latest updated ones or is this a bug ?

Another memory bug fix fixed (soon in Nightly - maybe land in FF7 as well).

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=678422

Read Comment 2:

Some for Nightly users:

That's a good step forward for Firefox, but it can be better...

I just ran a bench to compare browsers with the very big page in bug 678376 and :

- Firefox 8.0a1 before patch jump to 2.0 GB of ram used

- Firefox 8.0a1 after patch lose exactly 700MB and stabilize at 1.3 GB of RAM

but...

- Latest Chrome canary build and dev (15.0.849.0) stay at 1.1GB

- Webkit2Process of Safari 5.1 used 1.05 GB

- Internet Explorer 9.0.2 (with all patch) stay at 838 MB

and the winner is :

- Latest Opera Next 12.00 use only... 727 MB

That's a good step forward for Firefox, but it can be better...

I just ran a bench to compare browsers with the very big page in bug 678376 and :

- Firefox 8.0a1 before patch jump to 2.0 GB of ram used

- Firefox 8.0a1 after patch lose exactly 700MB and stabilize at 1.3 GB of RAM

but...

- Latest Chrome canary build and dev (15.0.849.0) stay at 1.1GB

- Webkit2Process of Safari 5.1 used 1.05 GB

- Internet Explorer 9.0.2 (with all patch) stay at 838 MB

and the winner is :

- Latest Opera Next 12.00 use only... 727 MB

Lets wait, once all P1 Mem Bugs fixed, it will use really lower RAM. Incremental GC and some others are ready to go but Developers holding back to land them in FF9 (since chances are their that FF9 uses MSVC2010).

Another Memory bug fixed:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673795

FF8 got another feature after Tab detach animation:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596343

firefox-add-on-compatibility.png

^ Nice!

A similar add-on bug landed, as well: Bug 476430.

addOnLocalInstall-i2.png

Why switch to full tab-size notification? When are they going to start using the notification bar-type popups you see in chrome and IE9? These are far less intrusive and better streamlined.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It's nearly time to replace my aging Founders Edition 3080, it doesn't OC as nicely as it used to and it's running around 10c warmer than it did when I first bought it.  I don't have budget for much more than what I spent on the 3080 and locally, that means the best GPU I can manage is a 9070XT. On this basis I have a few questions: 1. At present I don't use ray tracing, if this was to change, would this GPU be an issue? 2. How does it compare on a performance basis? 3. Are the drivers worse or better than those for nVidia? 4. Linux support, is it there? 5. Anything else I should be aware of if I were to make this change? 6. Is it a good idea or shall I try and keep the 3080 a little longer.
    • What OS is that? It looks a bit like Mac OS but the command line suggests it isn't, either way I like it!
    • Outlook classic is inherently better than new outlook, for a number of reasons. That said, if the only reason people need office is to read email, they should just use thunderbird.
    • Windows 11 is a big thumbs down from me. I used for a period of a few days while it was in insider and windows 10 was the main OS, and realised it wasn't for me. I am still waiting for Windows to be tolerable again, a shame as at one point I was very pro Microsoft.  
    • Classic outlook, not only does it have a much fuller feature set, it doesn't include Microsoft attempting to sync my emails from my servers to theirs. If classic outlook is ever removed from office, and the version I paid for in 2021 stops working for some reason, I'll use Thunderbird.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      74
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!