Recommended Posts

Any way to change the way click-to-play behaves? I like the old one where you only need to click to the part where the plug-in was to run it. Currently, on Aurora, you have to click "Allow now" on the address bar as well. 

Try plugin link mentioned here: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=12957575#p12957575

anyone know of a way to Totally Disable that " Allow " button?  that pops up? its rather annoying

I actually didn't get what you asking for but read this blog post: http://www.ghacks.net/2013/07/09/how-to-make-sure-that-a-firefox-plugin-never-activates-again/

I actually didn't get what you asking for but read this blog post: http://www.ghacks.net/2013/07/09/how-to-make-sure-that-a-firefox-plugin-never-activates-again/

it hasnt done it since i made a New Profile/ New install of UX so they either Backed it out or something else but it was annoying. it was like, when you typed a URL or clicked on a link to go to a new page it'd popup this " allow " button  to allow the page to open, but if it does it again i shall get a screenshot of it an show you

This is bugging the hell out of me...

Aurora.png

If I click on either of these more than once, too fast, i.e double click, then it scrolls a whole windows width worth of tabs, rather than just 1 tab per click. This only happens in Aurora, not firefox (with the same set of ad-ons). Anybody know how I can disable this new feature?

Thanks.

I still haven't found a suitable solution for this. Can it be "fixed"?

I still haven't found a suitable solution for this. Can it be "fixed"?

 

You can't right-click an empty part of the menu bar and click Customize, then drag both of the icons off?

 

Have you tried using a different theme?

You can't right-click an empty part of the menu bar and click Customize, then drag both of the icons off?

Have you tried using a different theme?

Thanks, but I don't want to get rid of them compleatly, rather I want to change the way they function, whereby double clicking on them does not scroll a whole windows worth of tabs.

No matter how many times I click, or how fast, I only want it to scroll 1 tab at a time, like it used to be.

Did Australis hit nightly yet?

Nope, its related two performance regression recently got fixed and landed these bug fixes in Nightly 25, I think it is too late for it to be in Nightly 25 now, it will land in Nightly 26 and then if not mature enough backout before merger to Aurora 26 and finally will be in Firefox 27.

Nope, its related two performance regression recently got fixed and landed these bug fixes in Nightly 25, I think it is too late for it to be in Nightly 25 now, it will land in Nightly 26 and then if not mature enough backout before merger to Aurora 26 and finally will be in Firefox 27.

what i dont get is, why Mozilla cant Enable the Australis Tabs in Firefox as Default now an keep testing the other crap 

what i dont get is, why Mozilla cant Enable the Australis Tabs in Firefox as Default now an keep testing the other crap 

 

The issue is that if they roll it out, after that if they have to backout, even previous theme will not work as working currently, means totally useless. To fix it up, they either have to maintain two separate branches which was proposed like Australis + mozilla central and mozilla central simple without Australis, so that if some mess up happen, they can roll out other one.

 

But they think that delaying it further to fix more issues like now it is on Milestone 8, previously it was thought to roll out on achieving Milestone 7. So they are fixing more and more bugs.

 

From my side, in one sentences, what is worthless will remain worthless, Australis is crap and with it Firefox will become crap.

 

You can witness this happening with new useless Click to Play.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!