[Official] Apple WWDC 2011 Keynote


Recommended Posts

I have honestly no idea where they are going with it. It looks like something you would see on Linux. :x

Sure does look weird...

That thing must be breaking Apple own interface guidelines :p

Wish they would just make it (and itunes) better instead of just give a new look.

Why can't I click an artist and the click and play just one album? (Can in iTunes by using the column browser but it's far from as nice as the grid view)

Why if I start a (video) podcast from the Music app (old and probably new one too) go to the Video app afterwards? Kind of makes sense, it's a video, but if they are going to do that couldn't they make sure podcast are displayed in chronological order in the Video app (like in music) instead of alphabetical...

Also, thanks KeR for posting that screenshot, been looking on different iOS forum for a bigger picture of it, I noticed it in the keynote and on Apples site but there were no decent pictures of it anywhere...

Are there any complete pages such as that one for iOS? Would love to know what all the smaller changes are.

They always do that, some of the new "features" are pretty laughable :D

If they called it '250 changes' then it would be a whole lot more interesting than the claim of 250 new features.

Meh, oh well, I'm happy with the refinement and price tag but too bad they've really put a lot of effort in trying to turn rudimentary refinements into something revolutionary.

^Thanks. I think apple really messed with the upgrade cycles this time. Usually iOS update is released in july now we have to wait couple of months more.

It seems like everything (other than Lion) is a little behind the "normal" schedule right now.

I love how no-one clapped during the keynote section about Launchpad, despite loving everything else :p

I can't see what everyone has against it :p

It's obviously an improvement over the app stack, more space and easier to create folders for organizing, don't get why they have to limit the amount of apps in folders though, is scrolling so hard for common users? They can handle a browser :p

I am not a OS X user (i won't count my VM) though so maybe that's why? :p

Lion looks really interesting and I think ill be getting a new MacBook air whenever they come around

Well, yea, can't argue with that.

Odd that animations are bad, rest of lion seem to animate so smoothly.

And yea, would be nice to be able to remove icons for Launchpad.

Besides from those I actually do have a problem with it, the icon, hate it and the rest of the icons like it they introduced, it looks so wrong in the dock and they are just bland and ugly.

Oh well, it's at least better than the one we saw in october launchpad_icon.jpg?w=60&h=60

2. There's no way to remove applications from Launchpad without deleting them from your system.

I think they want to to work just like iOS, which is a shame for power users but it does improve the consistency between the two platforms.

I think they want to to work just like iOS, which is a shame for power users but it does improve the consistency between the two platforms.

Power users? The other day I accidentally downloaded and added an application to Launchpad > deleted said application and now I'm stuck with a "?" in Launchpad. There's no way to get rid of it except Trashing the entire support file. Also, for some bizarre reason Keynote as been added twice to Launchpad. Again with no way to get rid of it.

epryh1.png

This has nothing to do with Launchpad being consistent with iOS, as these problems don't occur in iOS. It has everything to do with Launchpad being a complete and utter mess since day one. Unlike iOS the App Store isn't the only way to install applications on your Mac, hence the reason these problems exist. What works for iOS clearly doesn't work on Mac OS X.

It's terribly implemented really.

Power users? The other day I accidentally downloaded and added an application to Launchpad > deleted said application and now I'm stuck with a "?" in Launchpad. There's no way to get rid of it except Trashing the entire support file. Also, for some bizarre reason Keynote as been added twice to Launchpad. Again with no way to get rid of it.

epryh1.png

This has nothing to do with Launchpad being consistent with iOS, as these problems don't occur in iOS. It has everything to do with Launchpad being a complete and utter mess since day one. Unlike iOS the App Store isn't the only way to install applications on your Mac, hence the reason these problems exist. What works for iOS clearly doesn't work on Mac OS X.

It's terribly implemented really.

Those are obviously Launchpad bugs, but by the time that Launchpad ships, I imagine it'll work exactly as you'd expect: You hit the X, click "Delete", and the app is deleted from your system. Done. No in-between where the app is gone from Launchpad but still on your system.

What you were inferring ("no way to remove applications from Launchpad without deleting them from your system") was removing an application from Launchpad without actually deleting the app from the system, which is inconsistent with iOS's Springboard behavior.

Launchpad working properly isn't exactly a concern of developers since there are no APIs involved in Launchpad. It's probably the least of Apple's concerns right now in the DP's.

That's a Launchpad bug, but by the time that Launchpad ships, I imagine it'll work exactly as you'd expect: You hit the X, click "Delete", and the app is deleted from your system.

Except I don't want to delete Keynote from my system, I just want to get rid of the double icon...

What you were inferring ("no way to remove applications from Launchpad without deleting them from your system") was removing an application from Launchpad without actually deleting the app from the system, which is inconsistent with iOS's Springboard behavior.

Your point being? Fact is dat unlike on iOS there are a lot of applications present on any given Mac OS X installation (like iTunesHelper, update checkers, launch helpers, all kinds of Developer utilities without icons etc.) you would never want in your Dock or Launchpad. If for whatever reason you accidentally add one of those to Launchpad you're screwed: You can't get rid of it anymore without trashing the entire support file or edit its contents manually.

Like I said, making Launchpad work identical to iOS' home screen is a tragedy on Mac OS X: It simply won't work for all the above reasons. Mac OS X ? iOS. And if they really want to make it consistent with iOS you shouldn't be able to add applications manually to Launchpad to begin with.

Also, we're allowed to remove/hide icons from the Dock, Finder Sidebar and Dashboard Dock. Being able to do the same on Launchpad is suddenly too much? It makes no sense.

Except I don't want to delete Keynote from my system, I just want to get rid of the double icon...

Again, that is a bug. (Hopefully) When it's final, that kind of thing won't happen.

Your point being? Fact is dat unlike on iOS there are a lot of applications present on any given Mac OS X installations (like iTunesHelper, Update checkers, all kinds of Developer utilities without icons etc.) you would never want in your Dock of Launchpad. If for whatever reason you accidentally add one of those to Launchpad you're screwed: You can't get rid of it anymore without trashing the entire support file or edit its contents manually.

I'm actually surprised Apple has let users add their own apps to Launchpad. With the design philosophy they're going for, they should really just let it be a list of applications in /Developer, /Applications, and ~/Applications. That's it.

Like I said, making Launchpad work identical to iOS' home screen is a tragedy on Mac OS X: It simply won't work for all the above reasons. Mac OS X ? iOS.

Also, we're allowed to remove icons from the Dock, Finder Sidebar and Dashboard Dock. Being able to do the same on Launchpad is suddenly too much?

I didn't say I agreed with Apple's decision, but it's the path of least resistance and makes the most sense for technophobes. It's just another way to abstract the file system (since Apple absolutely hates file systems). They want Launchpad to be the list of installed applications.

They want Launchpad to be the list of installed applications.

Which isn't going to work simply because Mac OS X doesn't work the same way as iOS in this department.

Next to that it's possible to dual boot. Launchpad doesn't play nice with applications installed on another Mac OS X partition. If you accidentally add an application from another partition to Launchpad you're once again screwed. Doesn't matter how you look at it, this concept isn't working on a Mac and it never will unless you lock the entire thing down like iOS.

Surely if I can see the implications, Apple must realize this as well?

I didn't say I agreed with Apple's decision, but it's the path of least resistance and makes the most sense for technophobes. It's just another way to abstract the file system (since Apple absolutely hates file systems). They want Launchpad to be the list of installed applications.

Then why are we allowed to hide things from the Dock, Dashboard, Finder sidebar etc.? Like I said, being able to do so with Launchpad is suddenly too much? Apple could easily go the same route as Dashboard allowing you to hide certain applications the same you can you hide widgets.

Which isn't going to work simply because Mac OS X doesn't work the same way as iOS in this department.

Next to that it's possible to dual boot. Launchpad doesn't play nice with applications installed on another Mac OS X partition. If you accidentally add an application from another partition to Launchpad you're once again screwed.

Doesn't matter how you look at it, this concept isn't working on a Mac.

I wouldn't worry too much about it. Lion is the testing ground for this crap and they will make it better in the next version. Expect a radical change to something iOS like after Lion, because you can tell with Lion that Apple has no where else to go with Mac OSX.

Just a quick question because I've had a mac less than a year and never had to use time machine yet (touch wood).

If I completely wipe my hard drive, install lion and restore from time machine, will I have issues if I then do a clean install of Leopard (i.e. does time machine not like going backwards OS versions)? Or are there any downsides to doing this at all other than the obvious time it will take to copy data back from time machine?

I've currently got it installed on a separate partition but it's got the the point where I am fancying it as my main OS, until we get the GM, but don't fancy losing all my data/having a nightmare with time machine

Which isn't going to work simply because Mac OS X doesn't work the same way as iOS in this department.

Next to that it's possible to dual boot. Launchpad doesn't play nice with applications installed on another Mac OS X partition. If you accidentally add an application from another partition to Launchpad you're once again screwed. Doesn't matter how you look at it, this concept isn't working on a Mac and it never will unless you lock the entire thing down like iOS.

Surely if I can see the implications, Apple must realize this as well?

You're coming up with a lot of scenarios that theoretically break it but that a normal user will never see. For a normal user, Launchpad will work and it will be invaluable.

Again, I think the perfect implementation of Launchpad would be one that just aggregates current installation (to avoid dual boot issues) applications from /Developer, /Applications, and ~/Applications. Don't allow users to add their own applications to it. Don't allow users to remove apps from it without deleting the application from their system.

For a normal user, Launchpad will work exactly like I've described in the final version of Lion, but it almost seems like Apple has tried to make Launchpad too smart, and now there are plenty of scenarios where it breaks or operates less-than-desirably for power users.

You're coming up with a lot of scenarios that theoretically break it but that a normal user will never see. For a normal user, Launchpad will work and it will be invaluable.

Nonsense. In fact the first time a friend of mine used Mac OS X Lion he managed to accidentally add the Perian launch supporter to Launchpad. Absolutely nothing theoretical about that.

Again, I think the perfect implementation of Launchpad would be one that just aggregates current installation (to avoid dual boot issues) applications from /Developer, /Applications, and ~/Applications. Don't allow users to add their own applications to it. Don't allow users to remove apps from it without deleting the application from their system.

For a normal user, Launchpad will work exactly like I've described in the final version of Lion, but it almost seems like Apple has tried to make Launchpad too smart, and now there are plenty of scenarios where it breaks or operates less-than-desirably for power users.

Any normal user will experience these issues more than us simply because they're even less experienced with using their computers. Apple explicitly said in the keynote that Launchpad will work with applications regardless of where they are on your system: So that's the problem right there.

I said it before and I'll say it again: Every single part of Mac OS X allows you to hide or remove things. The Desktop, Dock, Dashboard, Finder sidebar, Toolbars etc. Hell, in Mac OS X Lion even System Preferences allows you to hide preference panes from view. It doesn't really matter how you spin things around, it makes no sense at all that Launchpad is pretty much the only one that doesn't allow for this. Especially not seen the implications. Period.

There's such an easy fix for this: Do the same as in Dashboard and System Preferences.

post-128385-0-12919800-1307563433.png

That's all really terrible, .Neo but err... it's not final. It's a pre-version. It is allowed to have bugs that (hopefully) by the time it gets released, which could be anywhere from the 1st of July til the 31st, will be gone... so there is still time, especially since it's being released in the App Store which, as many have pointed out, gives Apple more time because they don't need to account the time for shipping and production and all...

You are right with everything you say, it can't stay that way but I don't think it will, those bugs will be gone..

Also, and that's the greatest thing, you don't HAVE to use it once it comes out. So if you don't like it... don't use it. :) It's clearly not for everyone. Maybe it's marketed that way but it's not... I like the idea and I also like that it seems to be supposed to be like THE go-to place for all you apps and not just a "launcher" in the traditional sense, meaning shortcuts.

Don't get me wrong: I fully realize this is still a developer preview. However these issues have been present from the very start. With Mac OS X Panther, Tiger, Leopard and even Snow Leopard everyone expected certain issues to be addressed but in the end they weren't. I don't have a lot of faith that Launchpad will be much improved before Mac OS X Lion hits the App Store. But here's to hoping...

The thing is I like Launchpad and see myself using it regularly, however currently it's just broken. Also if I were to ignore Launchpad not that much is left that makes upgrading to Mac OS X Lion worthwhile. :laugh: (just kidding)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it by Hamid Ganji There’s no question that AI has become the hottest trend in workplaces, and every company is trying to adopt AI-driven solutions across its operations. While some industry leaders repeatedly say AI won’t lead to massive layoffs, recent data suggest that AI is actually one of the main reasons some companies are reducing their workforce. According to Oracle’s annual regulatory filing, the company has laid off about 21,000 employees, or 13% of its workforce, amid increasing AI adoption. “The adoption and deployment of AI technologies across our operations have resulted, and may continue to result, in reductions to our workforce,” Oracle said in the filing. The software giant now has approximately 141,000 full-time employees, a notable decrease from 162,000 during the same period last year. Restructuring expenses, including severance payments, cost Oracle $1.84 billion in fiscal 2026. Additionally, around 49,000 Oracle employees were based in the U.S., while approximately 92,000 were employed internationally. Like many other companies, Oracle has fully embraced AI and concentrated much of its efforts on the technology. The company is also a key participant in the United States’ $500 billion Stargate Project, which aims to build multiple AI data centers across the country. When it comes to AI adoption and its impact on the workforce, opinions remain divided. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI boom, recently said in an interview that attributing job cuts to AI is a “lazy” narrative. “The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it – it is just too lazy. AI has just arrived, how is it possible they're already losing jobs?” Huang said. However, statistics and recent reports tell a different story. According to Layoffs.fyi, 196 tech companies have laid off about 119,800 employees so far this year. Reducing staff and replacing roles with AI agents could become one of the most significant trends in the job market in the years ahead.
    • Zoom Workplace 7.1.0.41345 by Razvan Serea Zoom Workplace for Windows is a reliable video conferencing tool that makes it easy to connect and collaborate. With features like messaging, file sharing, and app integrations, it’s designed to streamline teamwork. You’ll get high-quality audio and video, strong security with end-to-end encryption, and an intuitive interface—all of which help remote teams and businesses stay productive and connected. Zoom Workplace key features: High-Definition Video & Audio: Provides clear, reliable communication for virtual meetings. End-to-End Encryption: Ensures secure communication with strong data protection. Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds an extra layer of security for user accounts. Integration with Productivity Apps: Supports seamless integration with Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, and more. File Sharing: Easily share files during meetings for efficient collaboration. Real-Time Messaging: Enables team chat for ongoing communication. Collaborative Whiteboarding: Allows teams to brainstorm and collaborate visually. Webinar Support: Host large webinars with interactive features. Administrative Controls: Manage user permissions, meeting settings, and security features. Cloud Storage: Automatically stores meetings and files in the cloud for easy access. Cross-Platform Support: Available on Windows, macOS, and mobile devices. Meeting features: Virtual Backgrounds: Customize your background for meetings to maintain privacy or enhance professionalism. Touch Up My Appearance: Automatically smoothens skin tone for a more polished video appearance. Breakout Rooms: Divide meetings into smaller sessions for group discussions or workshops. Live Transcription: Automatically generate real-time captions during meetings for accessibility. Zoom Apps: Integrate third-party applications directly into Zoom for enhanced functionality. Meeting Reactions: Participants can use emojis for quick, non-verbal feedback during meetings. Polling: Conduct live polls during meetings to gather instant feedback from participants. Attention Tracking: Monitors participant attention during meetings to ensure engagement. Closed Captioning: Enable manual or automatic captions for a more inclusive experience. Webinar Replay: Record and share webinars with analytics for audience engagement. Download: Zoom 64-bit | 145.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: Zoom Website | Zoom ARM64 | Zoom Installers | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
    • If I were them, I'm gonna hold out until the prices of these semiconductor parts normalize. $1,049 for a ~5 year old hardware is DoA, more so for gamers. On a deeper note, if Steam Machine is priced like this, we are soo effed up for the next gen Xbox console and PS6. With great AAA titles releasing at the end of the year, this just creates more demand...and more tears for me. Lol.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      183
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!