Lets hear it! Iimmersive UI (Start Panel) in Windows 8 (Desktop) Good?


This poll applies to Metro UI on the DESKTOP (not Tablets or touch devices)  

321 members have voted

  1. 1. I think the Iimmersive UI (Start Panel) is a great innovation for the desktop PC

    • Yes!
      137
    • No!
      184


Recommended Posts

BTW, does the green metro UI background remind anyone else of the Whistler beta title bars? :)

Hadn't really noticed, but now you mention it.... :)

I want them to hurry up and give me the ability to change that background so I can get rid of that green... not quite sure who chose that colour but it's hideous :)

preview-1-1134.gif

Hadn't really noticed, but now you mention it.... :)

I want them to hurry up and give me the ability to change that background so I can get rid of that green... not quite sure who chose that colour but it's hideous :)

Well, at least we have something that we definitely agree on here. I loved the purple! I also loved the whistler look but then they released XP with fisher price lunar. I didn't bother with XP until decent themes began to be released!

Also, have they increased the saturation of the tiles in the DEV build from what we saw on the purple builds? They look far too bright to me. Perhaps it's the combination of the green and the colour of the tiles throwing my sight off.

There was an option in earlier builds to change the colour - seems disabled now.

Hopefully one of those in-preview updates they'll be pushing in the coming weeks will re-introduce a few small features like that.

I assume they took them out because they weren't yet up to the quality level required for a public release.

I'm sure there are features missing, but it needs to have the ablity to drag-scroll with the mouse for those without touch peripherals.

I have to agree 100% with that one. It is very inconsistent between the login screen and the Start screen. And yes, I know you can use the scroll wheel to go between pages of the Start screen, but not all pointing devices have one (trackpads and some trackballs don't).

Hadn't really noticed, but now you mention it.... :)

I want them to hurry up and give me the ability to change that background so I can get rid of that green... not quite sure who chose that colour but it's hideous :)

preview-1-1134.gif

I love the green :)

I am watching the presentation on metro style apps and MS showed how the metro UI scales from 10" tablets to 30" monitors. Those who think that all space will be wasted on large monitors need to watch it on buildwindows.com

  • Like 2

I am watching the presentation on metro style apps and MS showed how the metro UI scales from 10" tablets to 30" monitors. Those who think that all space will be wasted on large monitors need to watch it on buildwindows.com

It scales by making everything bigger. How is filling a 30" monitor with HUGE buttons not wasting space? Yes, they're using the space but it's not necessarily the best way!

It scales by making everything bigger. How is filling a 30" monitor with HUGE buttons not wasting space? Yes, they're using the space but it's not necessarily the best way!

What are you talking about mate?!? How the feck do you know how apps will fill the screen? There are none yet.

I have to agree 100% with that one. It is very inconsistent between the login screen and the Start screen. And yes, I know you can use the scroll wheel to go between pages of the Start screen, but not all pointing devices have one (trackpads and some trackballs don't).

I saw some App had arrows on the left and right side of the screen that you could click on to navigate. I think a lot of users would prefer that to the scrollbar or scrollwheel.

I saw some App had arrows on the left and right side of the screen that you could click on to navigate. I think a lot of users would prefer that to the scrollbar or scrollwheel.

Or even some kind of grab and drag type interface... to be honest it's the first thing I tried to do after installing it. Was a bit disappointed that I had to use a scrollbar.

Though to be absolutely fair, nobody but Microsoft know what the user interaction will actually be like at this stage. For all we know, all these other methods of interacting using a mouse may already be in the plan for future builds.

Let's just wait and see :)

It scales by making everything bigger. How is filling a 30" monitor with HUGE buttons not wasting space? Yes, they're using the space but it's not necessarily the best way!

because it doesn't - or at least the start screen doesn't. It includes more tiles in the UI if you use it on a larger screen. Watch that video before jumping to conclusions.

  • Like 2

because it doesn't - or at least the start screen doesn't. It includes more tiles in the UI if you use it on larger screen. Watch it before jumping to conclusions.

Whoah, how dare you bring logic and facts to this conversation? Shame on you.

Lol, seriously though... don't waste your breath trying to convince DP... I think he's already made his mind up.

Out of interest also, the "For" vote has gained nearly 2 percentage points since last night. Almost 46% FOR Metro now. Clearly as people are getting used to it, and getting passed the whole "whoah, thats different, I don't like change" attitude, they are seeing the potential of the interface going forward.

  • Like 1

Nope, I have not made my mind up. I have had both good and bad things to say. My current take on it all is cautiously optimistic. I don't see how complex apps fit into Metro, maybe they never will, as you've stated. If how your personal vision of very basic versions of apps running under Metro becomes true, on the desktop it seems not much better than dashboard on OSX to me. If Microsoft are better than that and they really pull off a totally new way of using apps for the desktop, then I'm all for it. As for your logic:

"What are you talking about mate?!? How the feck do you know how apps will fill the screen? There are none yet. "

This could have been applied to dhan as well as myself if it's what you believe, but you decided to say it to me. Why? Because you HAVE made your mind up, you only have good things to say. That's fine, I really don't care but we're here to have a discussion about windows 8 and not everyone will love everything about it.

BTW, appox 3 more people made a vote, I'd hardly call that a massive difference.

Who said I love everything about it? I don't, it has plenty of flaws... however from what I HAVE seen, I think I'm going to like it when it is released. I have a clear vision in my head of how it'll all tie together when all my apps support Metro. Everything I'm running on the PC right now will work perfectly well in Metro, as will my games. The only reason I'm on classic desktop now is because none of the apps support Metro yet.

The thing is, it's very much easier to go from liking something to disliking it based on changes going forward. It is much much harder by orders of magnitude to overcome initial negative impressions and word of mouth.

I think it has excellent potential, and I feel it already works well on a desktop with a keyboard and mouse. I don't understand why people feel it shouldn't be on the desktop because while the tiles are big in order for the user interface to work well on touchscreens, they're also big in order for them to be able to display all of the information that makes them so useful. The Start Screen is fantastically useful, and much more so than Windows 7's taskbar, because the tiles don't just display an overlay icon when something has happened, they can display a lot more information about any update or upcoming event. It means that we don't have to open any application to see the latest update, and the fact notifications are evident in this developer preview adds to this idea that we no longer have to open any app to see the latest update. I can just glance at my Start Screen, see all of the latest updates in one glance, carry on with my work, then glance at the Start Screen again whenever I feel like it, or whenever I receive a notification to see more about that notification (it seems). In regard to other asepects of the Immersive experience, I also don't see why so many people believe it doesn't belong on the desktop. It works very well with a keyboard and mouse, so why do people say this; is it merely because certain elements are now a bit larger?

Some Mayan Predictions:

  1. Asteroid will hit earth in early 2012
  2. Earth will be destroyed in 2012
  3. Microsoft will release the best OS ever in 2012.

I thought the end of the world was scheduled for December 21st 2012?

)

Whoah, how dare you bring logic and facts to this conversation? Shame on you.

Lol, seriously though... don't waste your breath trying to convince DP... I think he's already made his mind up.

Out of interest also, the "For" vote has gained nearly 2 percentage points since last night. Almost 46% FOR Metro now. Clearly as people are getting used to it, and getting passed the whole "whoah, thats different, I don't like change" attitude, they are seeing the potential of the interface going forward.

The big reason why I'm even trying to use the Developer Preview as a user (not just as a developer) is that a developer, when feasible, should be prepared to fully test out his own applications first. The problem for garage developers is that, especially now, they don't have the extra resources to add tablets, slates, or even touch devices, in addition to a development desktop. Larger developers can - garage developers usually can't. That means that if a garage developer wants to be able to test his Immersive application prototypes himself, he needs the Immersive UI, warts and all, at his disposal, on the same computer that he uses for development.

Yes - there is also the sheer amount of curiosity as to whether Immersive works at all - let alone as well as it has so far - without the touch-interface.

Parts of Immersive are, in fact, rather old, and have been around either in previous iterations of specific Windows SKUs, or even Windows itself - Immersive IE, for example, is basically the "kiosk" (F11) mode that has been in IE for over a decade. The virtual keyboard has a long history as well - as part of the Accessibility package that has been part of Windows since 9x. However, except for the never-really-fleshed out Windows Media Center, there has been no real alternative *from Microsoft* to the desktop-centered/Start menu-focused UI since it launched with Windows 95. (Even Media Center Edition 2002 typically defaulted not to Media Center, but to the same desktop that Windows XP used almost everywhere else.)

My history with the Start menu is rather long - I was part of the beta-2 wave of Windows 95 beta testers. That means seventeen years of history with the Start menu. (Beta 2 of Wiindows 95 shipped to testers in October 1994.) Despite trying other user interfaces, and even other operating systems, nothing has been able to knock Windows, and the Start menu, from place of primacy over those seventeen years. OS/2 failed. Various Linux desktop environments failed. Solaris failed. Even OS X (Leopard, Snow Leopard, and Lion) failed.

I said it earlier in another thread, and I will repeat it - for me personally, Windows 7 x64 is Officially In Trouble.

That means that whatever hold Windows has maintained over me, it doesn't center around it's signature feature - the Start menu.

The very fact that Immersive also wins out over even alternative UIs for Windows from third parties (including Stardock, by the way) speaks volumes as well.

Apparently Microsoft got *something* right in Immersive to the point that even someone with as long a history as I do with the Start menu (which is, as I said, the signature feature of Windows on desktops since Windows 95) would even consider kicking the Start menu curbside (now, not in 2012) would be a longshot of longshot predictions. From what I've seen in this thread (and others), I have company.

Notice I didn't say to make Immersive the default. In fact, I'm saying to offer the choice - even without the touch devices, to use Immersive as the individual user's default.

  • Like 1

Think about it from a business perspective. Why is any of the Metro crap needed by any office environment?

How many offices took advantage of the Gadget thingy in WinVista and Win7?

It's largely useless and not productive and hence, by definition, not professional.

Think about it from a business perspective. Why is any of the Metro crap needed by any office environment?

How many offices took advantage of the Gadget thingy in WinVista and Win7?

It's largely useless and not productive and hence, by definition, not professional.

From a business perspective, buisnesses' can use the start screen to pin only their business apps on it. Simples. The immersive programs may not be necessary for them, in that case they don't have to use them. It's not exactly hard to see how it fits in.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Zoom Workplace 7.1.0.41345 by Razvan Serea Zoom Workplace for Windows is a reliable video conferencing tool that makes it easy to connect and collaborate. With features like messaging, file sharing, and app integrations, it’s designed to streamline teamwork. You’ll get high-quality audio and video, strong security with end-to-end encryption, and an intuitive interface—all of which help remote teams and businesses stay productive and connected. Zoom Workplace key features: High-Definition Video & Audio: Provides clear, reliable communication for virtual meetings. End-to-End Encryption: Ensures secure communication with strong data protection. Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds an extra layer of security for user accounts. Integration with Productivity Apps: Supports seamless integration with Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, and more. File Sharing: Easily share files during meetings for efficient collaboration. Real-Time Messaging: Enables team chat for ongoing communication. Collaborative Whiteboarding: Allows teams to brainstorm and collaborate visually. Webinar Support: Host large webinars with interactive features. Administrative Controls: Manage user permissions, meeting settings, and security features. Cloud Storage: Automatically stores meetings and files in the cloud for easy access. Cross-Platform Support: Available on Windows, macOS, and mobile devices. Meeting features: Virtual Backgrounds: Customize your background for meetings to maintain privacy or enhance professionalism. Touch Up My Appearance: Automatically smoothens skin tone for a more polished video appearance. Breakout Rooms: Divide meetings into smaller sessions for group discussions or workshops. Live Transcription: Automatically generate real-time captions during meetings for accessibility. Zoom Apps: Integrate third-party applications directly into Zoom for enhanced functionality. Meeting Reactions: Participants can use emojis for quick, non-verbal feedback during meetings. Polling: Conduct live polls during meetings to gather instant feedback from participants. Attention Tracking: Monitors participant attention during meetings to ensure engagement. Closed Captioning: Enable manual or automatic captions for a more inclusive experience. Webinar Replay: Record and share webinars with analytics for audience engagement. Download: Zoom 64-bit | 145.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: Zoom Website | Zoom ARM64 | Zoom Installers | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
    • If I were them, I'm gonna hold out until the prices of these semiconductor parts normalize. $1,049 for a ~5 year old hardware is DoA, more so for gamers. On a deeper note, if Steam Machine is priced like this, we are soo effed up for the next gen Xbox console and PS6. With great AAA titles releasing at the end of the year, this just creates more demand...and more tears for me. Lol.
    • I suspect one reason its hard to justify subsidising is that it's not a locked down device like a traditional console is. In this climate sadly if it was a "good deal" you'd get people hoarding them for anything but gaming. The Lenovo Legion Go 2 with the Ryzen Z2 Extreme is £1300 here ($1720) for some context on how other SteamOS like devices are now priced. I got the older Z1 Extreme model for £300 with a dock, just shows how insane prices have got recently.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      450
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      93
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!