Recommended Posts

I can see the comparisons to Fallout because of the RPG elements, etc., and the whole nuclear wasteland backfrop, but even though I am only a little in to the game itself, I can say the actual gunplay of Rage is way better than Fallout, at least IMO. The gun handling in Fallout just never felt right to me, where in Rage, it feels spot on so far.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594358934
Share on other sites

Yea i missed the wolfenstein 3d room and doesnt seem like i can go back to the floor its on, just past the arera for the Quake 1 room and going to go back in the wasted garage to find it.

And i want a DoomGuy Bobble Head

Fun depends,, i didnt care for Duke Nukem, but i find Rage verry fun so far. The 3rd town called wellspring has 4 mini games that i have found so far. As well as races for items/upgrades/cash, and delivery missions for cash.

From whay i have seen and read of Fallout Rage seems alot like, so if you loked Fallout, then youll like rage.

Only thing i can really recomend is if your friends have it, check it out on their rig and "test" if youll like it

Unfortunately , it isn't a close friend. He just said it looks amazing and is fun. I like games like Fallout, Borderlands, Crysis, Duke, and almost any FPS that isn't total COD style.. just can't get into realistic military shooters much. I love Doom 3 still. Basically, if this has classic ID style gameplay, I should be happy...

I can see the comparisons to Fallout because of the RPG elements, etc., and the whole nuclear wasteland backfrop, but even though I am only a little in to the game itself, I can say the actual gunplay of Rage is way better than Fallout, at least IMO. The gun handling in Fallout just never felt right to me, where in Rage, it feels spot on so far.

DL, we seem to enjoy some of the same types of games. You enjoying it?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594358936
Share on other sites

Going Slightly OT (but on topic since it relates to this game and all games overall), This is BY FAR the thing I hate most about having an SLi setup. SLi support is weak at best, and almost no games launch with a proper SLi profile.

My experience is the complete opposite to be honest. NVIDIA had an SLI profile out for Battlefield 3 days before the Open Beta started for example. Every game I've had for the past 24 months has had an SLI profile at launch. Of course I don't have Rage.

You know you can create your own SLI profiles through? It's quite easy from inside the control panel.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594358950
Share on other sites

Unfortunately , it isn't a close friend. He just said it looks amazing and is fun. I like games like Fallout, Borderlands, Crysis, Duke, and almost any FPS that isn't total COD style.. just can't get into realistic military shooters much. I love Doom 3 still. Basically, if this has classic ID style gameplay, I should be happy...

DL, we seem to enjoy some of the same types of games. You enjoying it?

If you liked those games as well as D3 then i think you will like Rage, hope you dont get happening what some others are getting.

Its far from CoD style, only thing in common with CoD is Iron Sights ( its almost nothing like CoD imo ).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594358960
Share on other sites

DL, we seem to enjoy some of the same types of games. You enjoying it?

Yep, very much so. Really enjoying it.

My experience is the complete opposite to be honest. NVIDIA had an SLI profile out for Battlefield 3 days before the Open Beta started for example. Every game I've had for the past 24 months has had an SLI profile at launch. Of course I don't have Rage.

You know you can create your own SLI profiles through? It's quite easy from inside the control panel.

Besides the BF3 Beta, I can only think of one game that has had the profile on release, and that is Deus Ex Human Revolution.

Every other game I can recall did not have a SLi profile on release....

Crysis 2

Dead Island

Bulletstorm

The Witcher 2

Those are just the games I can think off of the top of my head,

And yep, I know how to make my own SLi profiles, but they never seem to provide the same performance as the official profiles do. And actually they just downright do not work some times. In fact I read more than a few comments on the Steam forums of people saying when they forced SLi on Rage, dropped down to 10-15 FPS and made the game unplayable.

So yeah, maybe we play different games, but my experience with having SLi ready on launch day has not been a positive one. Same goes for creating my own SLi profiles. That is hit or miss as well. if you count making your own profiles as having them on launch, then sure, I can have SLi profiles before launch.

I also wind up using the EVGA SLi Enhancement patch a decent amount. Just the fact that it exists says SLi support is not that good. If it was, there would be no need for it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594359034
Share on other sites

I want to get this but am on the fence as far as XBox 360 or PC version. My PC is a bit dated, but games do tend to look better on it than on the XBox 360.

PC -

nVidia GeForce 6800GT 512MB

Intel Q6600 Core 2 Quad

4GB Ram

+ Can play without taking over the television which means I can play this while my gf's kids are around...

XBox 360 -

+ I enjoy playing on the larger (albeit lower resolution) screen

+ I enjoy playing while kicking back in an easy chair as I work at a computer all day most days anyway and am anxious for a break.

Thanks for input.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594359042
Share on other sites

Got the game running well now with newest ati drivers, but as soon as I got to wellsprings everything is **** again. NPC's are glitched to all hell, shaking, flickering, and glitching. Many others seem to be seeing this too. Was starting to have fun with this game just to run into this crap.

I really don't get people's hatred towards this game.

1. It's an amazingly optimized game. If you name me one other game that looks as good as runs as well, go ahead (bugs aside).

The game does run very well, but to be fair the game literally seems to have no dynamic lighting. its 2011... And the megatexture tech is rather.. underwhelming.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594359490
Share on other sites

The game does run very well, but to be fair the game literally seems to have no dynamic lighting. its 2011... And the megatexture tech is rather.. underwhelming.

Try the config file that I linked in my previous post, it sets pretty much all the graphical options (that we know of anyways) to max. They do improve the graphics but the performance hit (for me anyways) was next to none. Then again I don't have the texture popping bug so it might make it worse, or it might fix it (the amount of textures that can be streamed in one go has been quadrupled so).

Here's a breakdown of the settings

com_AllowConsole 1	  <- Enables console
com_SkipIntroVideo 1	  <- Allows you to skip intro video, I don't think this works
image_usecompression 0	  <- Sets image compression to 0, so best quality
g_showplayershadow 1	  <- Turns on player shadows (doesn't seem to work)
r_displayRefresh 60	  <- Refresh rate
vt_qualityhdplossless 1	  <- Lossless HD photos, 1 is on, 0 is off
vt_qualityhdppower 0	  <- 0 is best, 255 is worst  
vt_qualityhdpspecular 0	  <- 0 is best, 255 is worst
vt_qualityhdpnormal 0	  <- 0 is best, 255 is worst
vt_qualityhdpdiffuse 0	 <- 0 is best, 255 is worst
vt_qualitydctpower 100	  <- 100 is best, 0 is worst
vt_qualitydctspecular 100	  <- 100 is best, 0 is worst
vt_qualitydctnormal 100	  <- 100 is best, 0 is worst
vt_qualitydctchroma 100	  <- 100 is best, 0 is worst
vt_qualitydctluma 100	   <- 100 is best, 0 is worst
vt_usecudatranscode 2	 <- If you have an nVidia GPU set this is to 1 or 2 (2 being better). If you don't, or you have CUDA disabled set it to 0
vt_maxppf 1024	   <- Number of transcoded frames per second. This will help with the texture popping issue. Set it too high however, and your game will crash. Set it too low and it might pop so mess around till you find the best number for your computer.
vt_maxlockedpages 256	  <- Same thing as above.
vt_pageimagesizeuniquediffuseonly2 8192	  <- Dimensions of the textures. Apparently 8192 is the largest.
vt_pageimagesizeuniquediffuseonly 8192	<- Dimensions of the textures. Apparently 8192 is the largest.
vt_pageimagesizeunique 8192	  <- Texture dimension again..
vt_pageimagesizevmtr 8192	  <- Same thing again...
vt_minlod -1	  <- Finest mip that can be accessed.
vt_uncompressedvmtr 1	 <- Use uncompressed data
vt_uncompressedphysicalimages 1	  <- Use uncompressed images
vt_vmtrcompression none	  <- No compression
vt_maxaniso 16	  <- Max anisotropic filtering. 16 being highest, 0 being lowest
vt_restart	  <- Whenever you change a vt_ setting, the virtual texture engine has to be restarted. So you put this in at the end to restart it on the main menu.

As for the megatexture (or well Virtual Texturing since MT is idtech4 and idtech5 uses VT) tech, it isn't running at its full potential. Internally the texture sizes are 128000×128000 and weigh in at about 150gb. The PC version is 8192x8192 and weighs in at about 22gb. The reason it had to be reduced is well obvious lol...nobody would want to install a 150gb game.

It is a really neat idea though and allows you to have massive textures (high detailed ones too) being loaded without much of a performance hit. According to GPU-Z and task manager, my GPU load was at a relatively constant 65-70%, gpu-memory load was 540mb (I have a 3gb video card lol), ram usage for the game was about 550mb.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594359548
Share on other sites

Try the config file that I linked in my previous post, it sets pretty much all the graphical options (that we know of anyways) to max. They do improve the graphics but the performance hit (for me anyways) was next to none. Then again I don't have the texture popping bug so it might make it worse, or it might fix it (the amount of textures that can be streamed in one go has been quadrupled so).

Here's a breakdown of the settings

com_AllowConsole 1	  <- Enables console
com_SkipIntroVideo 1	  <- Allows you to skip intro video, I don't think this works
image_usecompression 0	  <- Sets image compression to 0, so best quality
g_showplayershadow 1	  <- Turns on player shadows (doesn't seem to work)
r_displayRefresh 60	  <- Refresh rate
vt_qualityhdplossless 1	  <- Lossless HD photos, 1 is on, 0 is off
vt_qualityhdppower 0	  <- 0 is best, 255 is worst  
vt_qualityhdpspecular 0	  <- 0 is best, 255 is worst
vt_qualityhdpnormal 0	  <- 0 is best, 255 is worst
vt_qualityhdpdiffuse 0	 <- 0 is best, 255 is worst
vt_qualitydctpower 100	  <- 100 is best, 0 is worst
vt_qualitydctspecular 100	  <- 100 is best, 0 is worst
vt_qualitydctnormal 100	  <- 100 is best, 0 is worst
vt_qualitydctchroma 100	  <- 100 is best, 0 is worst
vt_qualitydctluma 100	   <- 100 is best, 0 is worst
vt_usecudatranscode 2	 <- If you have an nVidia GPU set this is to 1 or 2 (2 being better). If you don't, or you have CUDA disabled set it to 0
vt_maxppf 1024	   <- Number of transcoded frames per second. This will help with the texture popping issue. Set it too high however, and your game will crash. Set it too low and it might pop so mess around till you find the best number for your computer.
vt_maxlockedpages 256	  <- Same thing as above.
vt_pageimagesizeuniquediffuseonly2 8192	  <- Dimensions of the textures. Apparently 8192 is the largest.
vt_pageimagesizeuniquediffuseonly 8192	<- Dimensions of the textures. Apparently 8192 is the largest.
vt_pageimagesizeunique 8192	  <- Texture dimension again..
vt_pageimagesizevmtr 8192	  <- Same thing again...
vt_minlod -1	  <- Finest mip that can be accessed.
vt_uncompressedvmtr 1	 <- Use uncompressed data
vt_uncompressedphysicalimages 1	  <- Use uncompressed images
vt_vmtrcompression none	  <- No compression
vt_maxaniso 16	  <- Max anisotropic filtering. 16 being highest, 0 being lowest
vt_restart	  <- Whenever you change a vt_ setting, the virtual texture engine has to be restarted. So you put this in at the end to restart it on the main menu.

As for the megatexture (or well Virtual Texturing since MT is idtech4 and idtech5 uses VT) tech, it isn't running at its full potential. Internally the texture sizes are 128000×128000 and weigh in at about 150gb. The PC version is 8192x8192 and weighs in at about 22gb. The reason it had to be reduced is well obvious lol...nobody would want to install a 150gb game.

It is a really neat idea though and allows you to have massive textures (high detailed ones too) being loaded without much of a performance hit. According to GPU-Z and task manager, my GPU load was at a relatively constant 65-70%, gpu-memory load was 540mb (I have a 3gb video card lol), ram usage for the game was about 550mb.

I've actually already fixed the texture popping with a combination of the new ati drivers and a smaller config file I was using:

vt_pageimagesizeuniquediffuseonly2 8192

vt_pageimagesizeuniquediffuseonly 8192

vt_pageimagesizeunique 8192

vt_pageimagesizevmtr 8192

vt_maxaniso 4

vt_restart

image_anisotropy 4

I'll try playing around with those other options you posted as well. The game can look amazing in places, but crap in others :/

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594359592
Share on other sites

<snip>

Thanks for posting this. I had downloaded the config file from your other post (I am at work) and realized it did me no good as I did not know what anything other than a few obvious things meant. The breakdown of everything is really helpful, and I am now curious to see what my file is at when I check it out.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594359600
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting this. I had downloaded the config file from your other post (I am at work) and realized it did me no good as I did not know what anything other than a few obvious things meant. The breakdown of everything is really helpful, and I am now curious to see what my file is at when I check it out.

Anytime. If you copy and paste the command into the console it will also give you a more detailed explanation of what some of the settings do.

Thats pretty much the best settings and you should have no problem running it at those. Your comp is a lot better than mine, and if mine can play RAGE at those settings with 8x AA at 60fps yours should be just fine.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594359666
Share on other sites

Sorry to keep chiming in but have a question: I'm reading comparisons to Fallout 3 (which I am playing through again on 360) and from what I've seen of RAGE, I'm not sure I am getting the same impression? I'm sure the videos I've watched aren't really going into the RPG elements but some folks have said the RPG elements are really sparse. If there truly is much more depth to the game than what I've seen in videos then I'll jump on it but, alas, I've yet to get a real good idea of what RPG elements are in the game.

I've never been so on the fence over a game before and it probably has more to do with the number of top games coming out in a short period of time.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594359686
Share on other sites

Sorry to keep chiming in but have a question: I'm reading comparisons to Fallout 3 (which I am playing through again on 360) and from what I've seen of RAGE, I'm not sure I am getting the same impression? I'm sure the videos I've watched aren't really going into the RPG elements but some folks have said the RPG elements are really sparse. If there truly is much more depth to the game than what I've seen in videos then I'll jump on it but, alas, I've yet to get a real good idea of what RPG elements are in the game.

I've never been so on the fence over a game before and it probably has more to do with the number of top games coming out in a short period of time.

Besides the setting I didn't get much of a fallout vibe from it. RPG elements go about as far as the fact that it has quests and an inventory. Its a definitely a shooter at the core.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594359713
Share on other sites

I want to get this but am on the fence as far as XBox 360 or PC version. My PC is a bit dated, but games do tend to look better on it than on the XBox 360.

PC -

nVidia GeForce 6800GT 512MB

Intel Q6600 Core 2 Quad

4GB Ram

+ Can play without taking over the television which means I can play this while my gf's kids are around...

XBox 360 -

+ I enjoy playing on the larger (albeit lower resolution) screen

+ I enjoy playing while kicking back in an easy chair as I work at a computer all day most days anyway and am anxious for a break.

Thanks for input.

Does anyone have any feedback on this? I'm thinking about picking it up tonight and am still on the fence between PC and XBox 360. Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594359749
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any feedback on this? I'm thinking about picking it up tonight and am still on the fence between PC and XBox 360. Thanks.

*edit - just read that your vid is below minimum, so yea definatly get the Xbox Version

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594359769
Share on other sites

*edit - just read that your vid is below minimum, so yea definatly get the Xbox Version

Wooops! I actually have an 8800GT 512MB.

EVGA 512-P3-N802-A1 GeForce 8800GT 512MB 256-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Supported Video Card

Which is the minimum... what do you say to that? Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594359805
Share on other sites

Okay, having played a bit I can safely say the game is......VERY GOOD! I can't see where all the complaints are coming from at all? Maybe I just get lucky with games all the time or something? :p

Yes, up close some textures look low quality but you are rarely eyeballing surfaces when playing anyway and from a close enough distance, say a few feet, everything looks really crisp and sharp. I got no tearing out of the box and I only enabled the additional text file mod mentioned on various sites:

seta vt_pageimagesizeuniquediffuseonly2 "8192"

seta vt_pageimagesizeuniquediffuseonly "8192"

seta vt_pageimagesizeunique "8192"

seta vt_pageimagesizevmtr "8192"

I enabled transcoding and am using 4xFSAA' date=' at no point did the framerate stutter or fluctuate outside of 60fps. I also note that there is absolutely no texture pop-in for me.

I played using a GTX460 and 4.3GHz i5 and 16GB RAM.

I noted that my GPU meter widget for Windows on the 2nd screen reporting VRAM usage being around 250-300MB while outside in the wasteland. Quite remarkable really as I was expecting it to be higher going by the guides saying if you use the additional config file mods you should have ideally a 1.5GB card.

Loading times were also very fast, only a few seconds to load everything so far.

I'm glad to be buying this :D

Also, I noticed that if you crash in the buggy you get some cool physics deaths like in another certain driving game :p

(skip to 2:37)

[media']

[/media]

(I've enabled the console to try fov changing using a guide online so be wary of that as it disables achievements)

The shotgun sounds so sublime, my speaker's woofers absolutely love it! So much recoil feedback :p

Oh and just like with BF3, the GTX 460 continues to amaze me as it can keep up with today's titles easily :p

Also I can see how some people can get motion sickness, the game is almost too smooth, it's so smooth that I initially felt a bit woozy but adjusted quite quickly.

I have many 1920x1200 screenshots here too.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1026726-rage/page/8/#findComment-594359963
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!