Battlefield 3 Cracked To Run Without Origin, EA Sheds A Tear


Recommended Posts

the ripping group finds which files were moddified during the update and they upload them. then the end user extracts them to thier battlefield folder and they are now updated. by looking at the bf3 folder it seems they store all update information in one folder which makes it dead simple to figure out and upload.

This is turning into a pointless discussion if you ask me. It's coming down to what one person prefers; not installing additional software because they're already using Steam. Afraid of anything EA releases because oh noes, everyone these days is out to read sensitive data! Like a company like EA cares about your sensitive data :/ And people who actually want to do it all legitimately (like myself). At least the latter won't have to fear that our keys might get banned, or have a sloppy patch ruining the game, or having to wait for the guys who patch the game whenever there's an update.

As I said before, it is completely illegal to take a companies software, repackage it and redistribute it. You agree to that when you sign into Origin and Battlelog, it will simply be a matter of time before EA does a quick system check for Origin, then ban those that have circumvented the program all with your approval. Not worth it.

You think an outfit that cracks and releases the latest games before they are even out cares that repackaging and distributing software is illegal?

Ok, then what happens when EA patches the game again?

They will recrack it most likely.

Well, seeing as a lot of folks in this thread (and the guy I was responding to) seem to be from the US, I figured it was easier if I just quoted the US $ price. ;) It's actually 40 pounds here, which is still way too much for a game as far as I'm concerned. I don't pay more than ?30 tops for games, ever, especially considering these days you'd be lucky to get more than 8 hours SP play from them...

Didn't you guys have the option to order from VAT free locations too? Wasn't one of the UK isles a tax evasion place at one point? :p

Guys, I think it's time to give this thread a rest. All the Origin fanboys are showing no signs of listening to common sense after 8 goddamn pages.

No, but you will when your key is banned.

The game is so terrible that I quite frankly don't care in the slightest.

Guys, I think it's time to give this thread a rest. All the Origin fanboys are showing no signs of listening to common sense after 8 goddamn pages.

Not having a senseless hate for EA is "fanboying"?

Interesting, I'll have to keep that in mind the next time I discuss politics.

Not having a senseless hate for EA is "fanboying"?

Interesting, I'll have to keep that in mind the next time I discuss politics.

The fact that you are all defending Origin, a piece of software with literally no technical purpose, states so. I'm not going to go through this for the fifteenth time.

@Reacon: We should especially stop now, now that we're being called fanboys only cause we say nothing negative about EA. It's really lame how people who don't say anything negative about something, are instantly called fanboys. Another reason to stop this discussion now is because you seem to think that only your way of thinking is common sense, and the ones who are giving reasons why one should use Origin don't have common sense. Really, nice way of having a discussion is to downtalk on people, isn't it?

Nice comeback.

Not a comeback just the truth.

<Snipped>

The game is so terrible that I quite frankly don't care in the slightest.

So you proved my point, you are arguing to just argue. Superstar.

Edited by Anaron

Not a comeback just the truth.

A: I dont use the crack

B: I couldnt give a toss

BF3 was supposed to be the big return of Battlefield to the PC, it was supposed to be the 'true' sequel to BF2.

Its just Bad Company 3, in a somewhat modern and realistic setting, half the maps only suit one mode of play, if you try and play the other mode they are ridiculously biased towards attacking or defending. Rocket and grenade spamfest, its closer to CoD than it is BF2.

If i got banned, big deal.

The fact that you are all defending Origin, a piece of software with literally no technical purpose, states so. I'm not going to go through this for the fifteenth time.

No one is defending anything, I am just simply stating that EVERYTHING you have said up to this point makes no sense what so ever and that your blatant spreading of FUD should stop, everything you have said up to this point is mere opinion, not fact and you are trying to blame a piece of software for your poor PC performance.

A: I dont use the crack

B: I couldnt give a toss

BF3 was supposed to be the big return of Battlefield to the PC, it was supposed to be the 'true' sequel to BF2.

Its just Bad Company 3, in a somewhat modern and realistic setting, half the maps only suit one mode of play, if you try and play the other mode they are ridiculously biased towards attacking or defending. Rocket and grenade spamfest, its closer to CoD than it is BF2.

If i got banned, big deal.

So what does your opinion about the game matter about Origin? This thread is about Origin, go over to the BF3 thread and you can discuss the game there. So like others you are simply arguing to argue and spreading FUD. Good Job.

Lets just drop it guys. One groups likes to use it through Origin and others don't. Everyone's allowed to make their own choice about it. Lets not make this a hate party :/

<Snipped>

Lets just drop it guys. One groups likes to use it through Origin and others don't. Everyone's allowed to make their own choice about it. Lets not make this a hate party :/

The issue is what happens in three weeks when a new patch comes out, un suspecting users read about this new patch here on Neo, patch their game and it no longer works or worse, they get banned??? I could care less about Origin, I care about my game working as it should.

Edited by Anaron

Although I wont be installing this crack, I do find Origin completely and utterly useless. It is beyond unnecessary. Why on earth EA couldn't just release the game via Steam, an already well established distribution platform, is beyond me. Their sales would have been much higher in my opinion and it would have eliminated one extra piece of garbage software which acts as another point of failure.

An extremely poor move by EA. :crazy:

@Reacon: We should especially stop now, now that we're being called fanboys only cause we say nothing negative about EA. It's really lame how people who don't say anything negative about something, are instantly called fanboys. Another reason to stop this discussion now is because you seem to think that only your way of thinking is common sense, and the ones who are giving reasons why one should use Origin don't have common sense. Really, nice way of having a discussion is to downtalk on people, isn't it?

Don't deceive yourself. To repeat myself for the sixteenth time, Origin has no purpose. Why would you defend a piece of purposeless piece of cumbersome software that you're forced to use for no reason other than the fact that EA says so, and then not call yourself at least slightly a fanboy? Is it not the spirit of both the rights advocate and the geek to request more control over their property?

@Rooster69: Aren't you being a little bit of a hypocrite there, or are you just not reading my posts? I like how every time you quote me, my posts are butchered to the point where it looks like I haven't a clue what I'm talking about. You remove the entire body and main argument and reply to 1-2 sentences that mean little on their own. Read my posts and don't pointlessly derail them, or I won't take you seriously.

I'm arguing because I think that EA is every bit as bad as Activision, and it pains me to see people suck up to them like this.

Sorry, I quote your posts as you originally post them. I can not help 30 mins later when you finally think of something witty to say, you edit them.

I edit my posts when I feel like I should have worded something better, or something needs clarification. Would you rather I proofread each of my posts like they're a paper, or clarify myself in an entire new post? Also, to be fair, the Edit button expires quite quickly.

A quick example. Here, you take the top and bottom of my post and ignore the main body of it. Origin is fundamentally useless in the presence of its superior cousin. Why doesn't EA make something better than Steam, rather than something that overlaps purposes. I'm pretty sure the brilliant minds at EA can think of something to give users an incentive to use it, rather then forcing us to play a game with it.

Yup, because I'm accepting to install Origin to play one of my favourite games. Yup, I'm indeed a fanboy. Because hey, if we don't say anything negative, we're fanboys! The only purpose it serves for me is being able to play Battlefield 3 without losing functionality update-wise and DLC-wise.

It's still funny how you see it as "fanboy-ism" or as "sucking up". For me it's nothing like that. If I was given a choice in the install to use Origin or not, I'd have chosen to not install Origin. But not because I'm having negative thoughts about a distributor, because I don't really care much about them. I only care about the game that they've released which I want to be able to play. Since they've given me no choice, I've accepted to use Origin to be able to play Battlefield 3. I need Origin to actually get updates to the game and get the DLC's I want, redeem the codes I want. This is a choice that I've made, much like the choice you've made. It seems it's hard for you to accept this without being all negative about the choice one has made.

This thread is hillariously stupid. It could have ended ages ago because it's simply

A) Use this crack to remove orgin and risk getting banned somewhere along the line

B) Don't use this crack, but live with a piece of software running in the background.

All of you saying you don't care if you get banned, clearly care enough about the game to have an opinion on having orgin running whist you are playing it =/

<Snipped>

@Capric0rn: I consider you a fanboy because despite all the evidence against it, you choose to believe that Origin is the best platform for this. Isn't it common sense to want to improve on something?

Edited by Anaron

Where did I say it's the best platform for this? I rather have BF3 in Steam but I'm not given that option. I've only accepted that I have to use Origin without losing the update function and whatnot. I even said that if I had been given the choice of install Origin or not during install, I'd not have done it.

Whatever though dude. If you want to call me a fanboy, go ahead and do whatever pleases you. It just seems like all you care about is your own opinion, and are all negative about someone else's.

<Snipped>

@Capric0rn: I consider you a fanboy because despite all the evidence against it, you choose to believe that Origin is the best platform for this. Isn't it common sense to want to improve on something?

The problem is that your "evidence" is opinion. No one can answer how they will update their game, how they will receive DLC ect.... All I get is assumptions. No one has released the patch for the release day patch yet?????

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Surgie matched da Vinci precision in live trials; Unitree’s DoD listing complicates hospital adoption Teleoperated humanoid robots completed live in-vivo surgery for the first time in medical history, UC San Diego researchers reported in Nature on July 8, 2026 — a proof of concept that could eventually extend surgical care to rural communities, battlefields, and remote settings where surgical specialists are absent. But the specific robot at the center of the breakthrough, the Unitree G1, was added to the U.S. Department of Defense's list of Chinese military companies just 30 days before the paper was published, carries a documented wormable security exploit affecting all units ever manufactured, and continuously transmits sensor data to servers in China without notifying the operator. The achievement is real, and the complications are real. Institutions evaluating this technology need to understand both. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/320157/20260711/humanoid-robots-perform-first-live-surgery-pentagon-flags-hardware-chinese-military-tech.htm  
    • Failed to open \EFI\ubuntu\ - Not found That message keeps popping up every time I boot the computer. Stays there for a few seconds than vanishes and the PC loads Linux Mint, but its really annoying the hell out of me, so, does anyone here know and can tell me how to fix that or get rid of it please? Thank you  
    • It's in fashion to bash Microsoft for even existing. It's getting old fast. People talk like other vendors' products are flawless and without issues.
    • Could God or aliens actually be real as new theory says we shouldn't even exist by Sayan Sen Image by cottonbro studio via Pexels A study published in July 2025 examined one of science's biggest unanswered questions: how life first emerged from non-living matter on early Earth. The research, led by Robert G. Endres of Imperial College London, used mathematics to examine how difficult it would have been for the first living system, known as a protocell, to form before Darwinian evolution began. The origin of life remained an open question in physics and chemistry. Scientists had already studied how simple molecules might have formed under early Earth conditions, but this study focused on a different challenge: how those molecules could have become organized into a functioning living system. To investigate this, Endres developed a mathematical framework based on information theory and algorithmic complexity. Information theory is a branch of mathematics that studies how information is stored, measured and organized. In this study, it was used to estimate how much meaningful information a biological system would have needed to function. Algorithmic complexity measures how much information or how many instructions are required to describe or recreate something. More complex systems require more detailed organization. The study applied these ideas to a protocell, a simple cell-like structure that scientists considered a possible early step toward life. A protocell would have needed basic features, such as a boundary separating its internal chemical environment from its surroundings, before more advanced biological processes could develop. Using modern computational estimates, the research evaluated how difficult it would have been to assemble the organized biological information needed for a protocell under plausible prebiotic conditions. Prebiotic conditions referred to Earth's chemical and physical environment before life existed, including oceans, minerals and energy sources that might have supported chemical reactions. The findings suggested that forming a viable protocell would have faced major informational and physical barriers during the relatively limited time available in Earth's early history. As biological systems became more complex, the amount of organized information required also increased, making spontaneous assembly through random processes increasingly difficult. The study compared this challenge to trying to write an article about the origins of life for a well-renowned space-based website by randomly placing letters onto a page. Individual letters might have appeared by chance, but producing a complete and meaningful article became vastly less likely as more information was required. The comparison illustrated why assembling a highly organized biological system presented such a significant scientific challenge. The research also examined entropy, a concept in physics that describes the number of possible arrangements within a system and is often associated with increasing disorder. Because natural processes tend to move toward states with greater entropy, explaining how the highly organized structures found in living systems developed from non-living matter remains a major scientific challenge. The study did not conclude that life could not have originated naturally on Earth. Instead, it suggested that current scientific understanding might have been incomplete and that additional physical principles or mechanisms might have been needed to explain how biological organization first emerged. The paper stated that "Ultimately, uncovering physical principles for life's spontaneous emergence remains a grand challenge for biological physics." Biological physics is the field that applies the principles of physics to understand living systems, from molecules and cells to larger biological structures. The study also discussed directed panspermia, a speculative hypothesis suggesting that life might have been intentionally introduced to Earth by an advanced extraterrestrial civilization. Directed panspermia was originally proposed by Francis Crick and Leslie Orgel. The idea remained a possible but unconfirmed explanation and had not been supported by direct evidence. The paper stated, "While the idea of Earth being terraformed by advanced extraterrestrials might violate Occam's razor from within mainstream science, directed panspermia -- originally proposed by Francis Crick and Leslie Orgel -- remains a speculative but logically open alternative." Occam's razor is the scientific and philosophical principle that, when multiple explanations fit the available evidence, the one requiring the fewest assumptions is generally preferred. The study noted that directed panspermia introduced more assumptions than natural origin models. The research did not present directed panspermia as the preferred explanation, nor did it rule out the possibility that life emerged naturally on Earth. Instead, it measured the scale of the informational challenge and suggested that further discoveries might be needed to identify mechanisms that could explain the transition from non-living chemistry to life. Scientists continued investigating the origin of life through chemistry, biology, geology and physics. Previous research had explored environments such as hydrothermal vents, shallow pools and mineral surfaces where early chemical processes might have taken place. This study did not directly test those ideas. Instead, it examined the broader requirements that any successful explanation would have needed to meet. By combining mathematics with biology, the research aimed to provide a more quantitative way of studying the origin of life. Although it did not answer how life began, it highlighted the complexity of the problem and the need for further research into one of science's most enduring mysteries. Source: Imperial College London via Universe Today, arXiv This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rising Star
      ExPat went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • Reacting Well
      Gideon Waxfarb earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      pahariyaseo earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pahariyaseo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      431
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      146
    3. 3
      Nick H.
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      87
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!