Rate the Windows 8 Consumer Preview


  

405 members have voted

  1. 1. Rate the Windows 8 Consumer preview

    • 1 - Utter failure.
      100
    • 2
      21
    • 3
      58
    • 4
      30
    • 5
      25
    • 6
      24
    • 7
      42
    • 8
      61
    • 9
      23
    • 10 - Perfect.
      21


Recommended Posts

After using it for a few hours now, i'm not sure where a lot of peoples issues are, i installed all the programs i use frequently and pinned them to the taskbar which is pretty much what i did in windows 7 anyway. Once this is done there is hardly any need to go into the start screen or use the metro apps - stay in the desktop environment and use the programs the way that you're used too.

post-29254-0-37065400-1330548399_thumb.j

However I found the new start screen very familiar because i have WP7 and pretty intuitive, but i have to agree with a lot of the comments that the metro environment is very much suited to a tablet and touch screen, and doesn't translate very well to the desktop. Some of the apps i downloaded from the store where quite well designed though.

Overall I think Microsoft has done a good job here, they have managed to combine to separate OS environments in one bundle, you can stay in either depending on what form factor you are using, be it tablet or desktop and you don't need to venture into the other if you don't want to.

  • Like 3

After using it for a few hours now, i'm not sure where a lot of peoples issues are

a lot of people who complain have not used it or have only used it for a hour or two and have not even setup there programs yet.

even if you were to install Windows 7 now and not set it up for everyday use its boring as hell

No, sorry. That's not my thing. Never in the history of microsofts systems my impression was so bad like windows 8. The start screen is absolute awful. Else I don't see a reason to upgrade to Windows 8. For Desktop PC users no interesting things, no interesting technology, nothing what you can not have for windows 7. I'm sure IE10 and new DirectX versions will also coming for Windows 7.

  • Like 3

Considering it is a Beta, and considering I hated WDP, I'm impressed,

Metro seems to make more sense now, desktop seems less important somehow, cleverly back benched without disabling access

I did a clean install on my laptop, its running great, decided to try an upgrade on my desktop with 800GB of crap installed and around 20 minutes later I am fully upgraded, what happened to the 5 hours for an upgrade ? Nice work.

Couple of app crashes on the upgraded machine - to be expected, I actually expected it to be unusable, but amazingly everything I have tried so far has still worked, apart from the odd small program that doesn't recognise the OS version

For a Beta of this size OS overhaul, not bad at all

7/10

10 being RTM

  • Like 2

OMG! Here we go again! Those of you that are complaining, "Quit being so damn afraid of change!!!!!" It looks like the naysayers are going to ruin a Windows version again because they are afraid to move on or are simply to afraid to spend the money on something new because it is soon! GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!!! DAMN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :angry:

There are a lot of good things about Windows 8. It's definitely very responsive and quick. I've noticed that switching between the Desktop and the Start screen is very fluid and fast (and the Windows key toggles between them; if you're on the Start screen and hit Windows key, you get back to the Desktop). You can pretty quickly get used to closing Metro Apps by dragging them from the top down to the bottom of the screen. The new Task Manager is pretty slick, and frankly I like the new Explorer with the ribbon. The Music app is kind of wonky. I have plenty of music; I really don't want a page opening advertising more artists and albums. And I don't need the reminder every time that it would be better if I changed my settings to sign into my account instead of using a local account. The weather App on the other hand is awesome, and it located where I live automatically! Still, the Start screen on the whole seems almost gimmicky. One thing I liked about the Windows 7 Start menu was you could pin Jumplist capable apps to it and quickly launch a document or spreadsheet (I have Word, Excel, and Access pinned to my Start menu for just that reason). This functionality is gone now completely. Jumplists are only on the Taskbar. That's kind of a step back if you ask me. I think if you make the Metro Start screen a little more richer from that standpoint, it would only be better. Now, it behaves like you need it to behave on a Windows phone; you select a tile, and something comes up from the bottom of the screen to click for its options. But on a PC interface, you want a menu right there where the mouse cursor is. That's just my feeling on it. I'll keep playing with it.

On a final note, trying to install it was a bit of a Rube Goldberg. I selected a partition on one of my hard drives, and since Windows 7 was installed completely on my SSD (boot files and system, ntldr, etc.) I got an error message trying to install Windows 8 on a different disk drive. After I unplugged the other drives (my SSD and a 3TB GPT partitioned drive), then it was no problem. But now of course, I have no dual boot. Just when I want to get back to Windows 7, I change the boot order in the BIOS setup. It's not a big deal and actually maybe it's better; when I'm ready to chung Windows 8, I just format the partition and nothing else!

After using it for a few hours now, i'm not sure where a lot of peoples issues are, i installed all the programs i use frequently and pinned them to the taskbar which is pretty much what i did in windows 7 anyway. Once this is done there is hardly any need to go into the start screen or use the metro apps - stay in the desktop environment and use the programs the way that you're used too.

post-29254-0-37065400-1330548399_thumb.j

However I found the new start screen very familiar because i have WP7 and pretty intuitive, but i have to agree with a lot of the comments that the metro environment is very much suited to a tablet and touch screen, and doesn't translate very well to the desktop. Some of the apps i downloaded from the store where quite well designed though.

Overall I think Microsoft has done a good job here, they have managed to combine to separate OS environments in one bundle, you can stay in either depending on what form factor you are using, be it tablet or desktop and you don't need to venture into the other if you don't want to.

Can you put softwares shortcuts in your desktop? or it's not possible? how can I drag drop my installed software's shortcut to the desktop(I don't want to pin them to taskbar!!)?

One of the most inexplicable omissions on the start screen is any power shortcuts, here's some help if you want shutdown/restart shortcuts...

http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/quick-tip-create-shutdown-restart-lock-icons-in-windows-vista/

http://www.howtogeek.com/74331/how-to-create-your-own-windows-8-shortcuts-for-shutdown-perhaps/

Really? Mouse to bottom left corner, right-click... Power options!

OMG! Here we go again! Those of you that are complaining, "Quit being so damn afraid of change!!!!!" It looks like the naysayers are going to ruin a Windows version again because they are afraid to move on or are simply to afraid to spend the money on something new because it is soon! GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!!! DAMN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :angry:

Nerd rage? How about you get over it, people have a right to their own opinion. It has nothing to do with being afraid of change, for me Metro simply sucks as a desktop UI. It's a huge step backwards in usability and brings nothing worth upgrading from Windows 7.

  • Like 3

start screen is stupid. they are actually planning on releasing a desktop OS without a start menu?

also windows won't connect to our enterprise WPA wifi here at work...

Tell us, what exactly did you use the Start Menu for that does not exist in the Start Screen?

Picking an app from a list? Check, that's in the Start Screen.

Pinned Apps on the start menu? Check, that's in the Start Screen.

Quick access to any setting, app, document by typing the first few letters? Check, that's in the Start Screen.

For those saying they can't live without the Start Menu, stop being so melodramatic. Windows 8 is just different, nobody is pretending otherwise. It'll take some getting used to, but NO functionality has been lost.

  • Like 1

3. The grade you'd get writing a poem for a math test.

Haha. Except I doubt any teacher would give anything but an F for that.

I gave it a 2. Metro is a complete failure, but there are a few enhancements to the desktop here and there. Nothing worth upgrading to this when it comes out, though.

1. Metro UI sucks.donkey.nutz

2. Using the Boot to VHD in Windows 7 for this is sweet. Only annoyance so far: using the Windows 8 bootloader, when I click on Windows 7, it reboots the machine to load Windows 7. Anyone else seeing this? Seems a bit redundant to reboot again.

3. Did I mention the Metro UI sucks.donkey.nutz?

I'd probably like a Windows 8 tablet for casual use, but on a desktop it's definitely a massive failure! I usually can adapt to new stuff and I've beta tested many Windows versions, but I don't think I'll get used to this one. The start menu is the main thing I miss; I have no clue why they had to replace it with the Start screen, especially on a desktop without touch screen.

I'll just play with it a bit on VirtualBox, but I'll stick with Windows 7 as long as I can.

  • Like 2

Tell us, what exactly did you use the Start Menu for that does not exist in the Start Screen?

Picking an app from a list? Check, that's in the Start Screen.

Pinned Apps on the start menu? Check, that's in the Start Screen.

Quick access to any setting, app, document by typing the first few letters? Check, that's in the Start Screen.

For those saying they can't live without the Start Menu, stop being so melodramatic. Windows 8 is just different, nobody is pretending otherwise. It'll take some getting used to, but NO functionality has been lost.

you think that instead of moving my house just a few centimers and a couple of clicks isn't as efficient as dragging my damn cursor across the screen slowly to get to a pinned app is more efficient? there is NOTHING efficient about the start screen as a desktop user no matter how hard you try spin it. you don't work enterprise IT do you? you don't actually realize how stupid people are with computers do you? there's nothing efficient about this design. at all. people are talking ish at apple for slowly turning OSX into iOS, but now we have microsoft literally throwing a tablet UI at you and telling you to deal with it as a desktop user.

i never said start screen doesn't do everything the start menu does. it does, just in a really really dumb way.

it will have a lot of leverage in enterprise.. It will allow for deployments of tablets/docking stations and setups that embrace the technology already in place and allow people to be fully mobile or interactive.

just because the start bar has changed doesn't mean that corporations won't embrace it. it will just come in through different channels and 3rd party companies will fill in the gaps as they always do.

well I work at a corporation with about 80000 users and everyone of the guys running this place things its stupid. what leverage are you talking about exactly? What will this thing do OS wise that ipad's and android tablets aren't already doing? when it comes to tablets, ipads are owning the enterprise market. i can see microsoft's strategy of having one OS for both types of devices. better app support, same os, etc etc. but the medium they are dishing out so far is terrible. start screen is good for tablets only, that's it.

i don't get how you people who aren't using a touch device thing the start screen is good. what are you guys on? acid? the colours and big boxes are really pretty to you guys and you like playing with it?

  • Like 3

I'm enjoying it a lot so far. Windows 8 feels faster than 7 ever did on my system, and the desktop-level improvements such as the file copy dialogs, task manager, etc. are great. Microsoft took care of the "hot spot" issues I was having with full screen applications. StarCraft was impossible to play because of this feature and all is well now.

As far as the new Start Page goes I'm a fan. The apps look very clean and the ones included are very nice functionality-wise. I'd really like to see apps for services like Netflix and Pandora developed sooner rather than later.

I always used the search feature in the old start menu so not much has changed for me. I didn't lose the ability to do anything I did before. I can imagine the live tiles being an incredibly easy way to keep up to date while using my physical desk to do work.

What will this thing do OS wise that ipad's and android tablets aren't already doing? when it comes to tablets, ipads are owning the enterprise market. i can see microsoft's strategy of having one OS for both types of devices. better app support, same os, etc etc. but the medium they are dishing out so far is terrible. start screen is good for tablets only, that's it.

Sounds like you are contradicting yourself here. If ipad are owning the enterprise market with their limited functionality how much better would a Windows 8 tablet be? How about Office, legacy applications, website creation, database management, etc. What exactly makes an ipad a better solution when a W8 x86 tablet can be managed just like any other pc while providing the same fast, intuitive UI of the ipad along with compatibility with an enterprise's current applications? Any IT department that rejects Windows 8 solely on its UI alone without evaluating its obvious advantages sounds quite unprofessional and frankly unqualified for the job.

  • Like 3

On MSDN there is a "debug/checked" build

What is the difference between that and the normal download with apps version ?

The checked builds are built without compiler optimization and are designed for debugging (as in, breaking into with a debugger).??Unless you are a developer, there is absolutely no need to get this.??And even then, most developers would not need this (driver devs might).

As for my rating of 3, I don't care if the Start Screen can do the "same things".??Nobody addresses the fact that (1) it breaks the flow and (2) it doesn't work well for long hierarchical listings (hey, some people have those).??Most importantly, I don't like things being forced down my throat.??Give people an option (make a hidden, hard-to-reach-one, if you must), and I'll be happy.??But this kind of forced shoveling of something that I don't want!??You know, this is why I hate Steve Jobs.??Looks like the other two Steves are turning into him.

Haven't had much of a play yet, but one thing has already ticked me off.

I clicked on a jpeg file in explorer and got thrown back to Metro to view it. Because there are no obvious shortcuts, i had to take the long way back to where i was. (yes i tried throwing my mouse to every corner and edge of the screen first)

that sort of thing is bound to catch people off guard.

I'm getting on just fine. I started using the DP on my laptop with an open mind - after 2 days of not liking it at first (using it in VMware + sticking to mainly desktop mode rather than metro through fear of change etc), I got used to it and liked it more + can now (after months of solid use on DP) see why it's so much better.

Windows 7 is "old" to me now - there will be enormous changes to your UX when the apps get opened up properly in 'Metro Mode'.

The time it takes to navigate around apps + the general OS has reduced greatly with the CP & I have now bought into this OS fully.

The concepts driving it are the way of the future. In 17 months time we will all be happy that MS progressed in this way. I guarantee.

The only gripe I have is that the UK was not included in the functions that were opened to the USA, France, Japan etc - this needs sorting asap...I have already emailed Steve Ballmer himself about this...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!