Rate the Windows 8 Consumer Preview


  

405 members have voted

  1. 1. Rate the Windows 8 Consumer preview

    • 1 - Utter failure.
      100
    • 2
      21
    • 3
      58
    • 4
      30
    • 5
      25
    • 6
      24
    • 7
      42
    • 8
      61
    • 9
      23
    • 10 - Perfect.
      21


Recommended Posts

After using it for a few hours now, i'm not sure where a lot of peoples issues are, i installed all the programs i use frequently and pinned them to the taskbar which is pretty much what i did in windows 7 anyway. Once this is done there is hardly any need to go into the start screen or use the metro apps - stay in the desktop environment and use the programs the way that you're used too.

post-29254-0-37065400-1330548399_thumb.j

However I found the new start screen very familiar because i have WP7 and pretty intuitive, but i have to agree with a lot of the comments that the metro environment is very much suited to a tablet and touch screen, and doesn't translate very well to the desktop. Some of the apps i downloaded from the store where quite well designed though.

Overall I think Microsoft has done a good job here, they have managed to combine to separate OS environments in one bundle, you can stay in either depending on what form factor you are using, be it tablet or desktop and you don't need to venture into the other if you don't want to.

  • Like 3

After using it for a few hours now, i'm not sure where a lot of peoples issues are

a lot of people who complain have not used it or have only used it for a hour or two and have not even setup there programs yet.

even if you were to install Windows 7 now and not set it up for everyday use its boring as hell

No, sorry. That's not my thing. Never in the history of microsofts systems my impression was so bad like windows 8. The start screen is absolute awful. Else I don't see a reason to upgrade to Windows 8. For Desktop PC users no interesting things, no interesting technology, nothing what you can not have for windows 7. I'm sure IE10 and new DirectX versions will also coming for Windows 7.

  • Like 3

Considering it is a Beta, and considering I hated WDP, I'm impressed,

Metro seems to make more sense now, desktop seems less important somehow, cleverly back benched without disabling access

I did a clean install on my laptop, its running great, decided to try an upgrade on my desktop with 800GB of crap installed and around 20 minutes later I am fully upgraded, what happened to the 5 hours for an upgrade ? Nice work.

Couple of app crashes on the upgraded machine - to be expected, I actually expected it to be unusable, but amazingly everything I have tried so far has still worked, apart from the odd small program that doesn't recognise the OS version

For a Beta of this size OS overhaul, not bad at all

7/10

10 being RTM

  • Like 2

OMG! Here we go again! Those of you that are complaining, "Quit being so damn afraid of change!!!!!" It looks like the naysayers are going to ruin a Windows version again because they are afraid to move on or are simply to afraid to spend the money on something new because it is soon! GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!!! DAMN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :angry:

There are a lot of good things about Windows 8. It's definitely very responsive and quick. I've noticed that switching between the Desktop and the Start screen is very fluid and fast (and the Windows key toggles between them; if you're on the Start screen and hit Windows key, you get back to the Desktop). You can pretty quickly get used to closing Metro Apps by dragging them from the top down to the bottom of the screen. The new Task Manager is pretty slick, and frankly I like the new Explorer with the ribbon. The Music app is kind of wonky. I have plenty of music; I really don't want a page opening advertising more artists and albums. And I don't need the reminder every time that it would be better if I changed my settings to sign into my account instead of using a local account. The weather App on the other hand is awesome, and it located where I live automatically! Still, the Start screen on the whole seems almost gimmicky. One thing I liked about the Windows 7 Start menu was you could pin Jumplist capable apps to it and quickly launch a document or spreadsheet (I have Word, Excel, and Access pinned to my Start menu for just that reason). This functionality is gone now completely. Jumplists are only on the Taskbar. That's kind of a step back if you ask me. I think if you make the Metro Start screen a little more richer from that standpoint, it would only be better. Now, it behaves like you need it to behave on a Windows phone; you select a tile, and something comes up from the bottom of the screen to click for its options. But on a PC interface, you want a menu right there where the mouse cursor is. That's just my feeling on it. I'll keep playing with it.

On a final note, trying to install it was a bit of a Rube Goldberg. I selected a partition on one of my hard drives, and since Windows 7 was installed completely on my SSD (boot files and system, ntldr, etc.) I got an error message trying to install Windows 8 on a different disk drive. After I unplugged the other drives (my SSD and a 3TB GPT partitioned drive), then it was no problem. But now of course, I have no dual boot. Just when I want to get back to Windows 7, I change the boot order in the BIOS setup. It's not a big deal and actually maybe it's better; when I'm ready to chung Windows 8, I just format the partition and nothing else!

After using it for a few hours now, i'm not sure where a lot of peoples issues are, i installed all the programs i use frequently and pinned them to the taskbar which is pretty much what i did in windows 7 anyway. Once this is done there is hardly any need to go into the start screen or use the metro apps - stay in the desktop environment and use the programs the way that you're used too.

post-29254-0-37065400-1330548399_thumb.j

However I found the new start screen very familiar because i have WP7 and pretty intuitive, but i have to agree with a lot of the comments that the metro environment is very much suited to a tablet and touch screen, and doesn't translate very well to the desktop. Some of the apps i downloaded from the store where quite well designed though.

Overall I think Microsoft has done a good job here, they have managed to combine to separate OS environments in one bundle, you can stay in either depending on what form factor you are using, be it tablet or desktop and you don't need to venture into the other if you don't want to.

Can you put softwares shortcuts in your desktop? or it's not possible? how can I drag drop my installed software's shortcut to the desktop(I don't want to pin them to taskbar!!)?

One of the most inexplicable omissions on the start screen is any power shortcuts, here's some help if you want shutdown/restart shortcuts...

http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/quick-tip-create-shutdown-restart-lock-icons-in-windows-vista/

http://www.howtogeek.com/74331/how-to-create-your-own-windows-8-shortcuts-for-shutdown-perhaps/

Really? Mouse to bottom left corner, right-click... Power options!

OMG! Here we go again! Those of you that are complaining, "Quit being so damn afraid of change!!!!!" It looks like the naysayers are going to ruin a Windows version again because they are afraid to move on or are simply to afraid to spend the money on something new because it is soon! GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!!! DAMN!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :angry:

Nerd rage? How about you get over it, people have a right to their own opinion. It has nothing to do with being afraid of change, for me Metro simply sucks as a desktop UI. It's a huge step backwards in usability and brings nothing worth upgrading from Windows 7.

  • Like 3

start screen is stupid. they are actually planning on releasing a desktop OS without a start menu?

also windows won't connect to our enterprise WPA wifi here at work...

Tell us, what exactly did you use the Start Menu for that does not exist in the Start Screen?

Picking an app from a list? Check, that's in the Start Screen.

Pinned Apps on the start menu? Check, that's in the Start Screen.

Quick access to any setting, app, document by typing the first few letters? Check, that's in the Start Screen.

For those saying they can't live without the Start Menu, stop being so melodramatic. Windows 8 is just different, nobody is pretending otherwise. It'll take some getting used to, but NO functionality has been lost.

  • Like 1

3. The grade you'd get writing a poem for a math test.

Haha. Except I doubt any teacher would give anything but an F for that.

I gave it a 2. Metro is a complete failure, but there are a few enhancements to the desktop here and there. Nothing worth upgrading to this when it comes out, though.

1. Metro UI sucks.donkey.nutz

2. Using the Boot to VHD in Windows 7 for this is sweet. Only annoyance so far: using the Windows 8 bootloader, when I click on Windows 7, it reboots the machine to load Windows 7. Anyone else seeing this? Seems a bit redundant to reboot again.

3. Did I mention the Metro UI sucks.donkey.nutz?

I'd probably like a Windows 8 tablet for casual use, but on a desktop it's definitely a massive failure! I usually can adapt to new stuff and I've beta tested many Windows versions, but I don't think I'll get used to this one. The start menu is the main thing I miss; I have no clue why they had to replace it with the Start screen, especially on a desktop without touch screen.

I'll just play with it a bit on VirtualBox, but I'll stick with Windows 7 as long as I can.

  • Like 2

Tell us, what exactly did you use the Start Menu for that does not exist in the Start Screen?

Picking an app from a list? Check, that's in the Start Screen.

Pinned Apps on the start menu? Check, that's in the Start Screen.

Quick access to any setting, app, document by typing the first few letters? Check, that's in the Start Screen.

For those saying they can't live without the Start Menu, stop being so melodramatic. Windows 8 is just different, nobody is pretending otherwise. It'll take some getting used to, but NO functionality has been lost.

you think that instead of moving my house just a few centimers and a couple of clicks isn't as efficient as dragging my damn cursor across the screen slowly to get to a pinned app is more efficient? there is NOTHING efficient about the start screen as a desktop user no matter how hard you try spin it. you don't work enterprise IT do you? you don't actually realize how stupid people are with computers do you? there's nothing efficient about this design. at all. people are talking ish at apple for slowly turning OSX into iOS, but now we have microsoft literally throwing a tablet UI at you and telling you to deal with it as a desktop user.

i never said start screen doesn't do everything the start menu does. it does, just in a really really dumb way.

it will have a lot of leverage in enterprise.. It will allow for deployments of tablets/docking stations and setups that embrace the technology already in place and allow people to be fully mobile or interactive.

just because the start bar has changed doesn't mean that corporations won't embrace it. it will just come in through different channels and 3rd party companies will fill in the gaps as they always do.

well I work at a corporation with about 80000 users and everyone of the guys running this place things its stupid. what leverage are you talking about exactly? What will this thing do OS wise that ipad's and android tablets aren't already doing? when it comes to tablets, ipads are owning the enterprise market. i can see microsoft's strategy of having one OS for both types of devices. better app support, same os, etc etc. but the medium they are dishing out so far is terrible. start screen is good for tablets only, that's it.

i don't get how you people who aren't using a touch device thing the start screen is good. what are you guys on? acid? the colours and big boxes are really pretty to you guys and you like playing with it?

  • Like 3

I'm enjoying it a lot so far. Windows 8 feels faster than 7 ever did on my system, and the desktop-level improvements such as the file copy dialogs, task manager, etc. are great. Microsoft took care of the "hot spot" issues I was having with full screen applications. StarCraft was impossible to play because of this feature and all is well now.

As far as the new Start Page goes I'm a fan. The apps look very clean and the ones included are very nice functionality-wise. I'd really like to see apps for services like Netflix and Pandora developed sooner rather than later.

I always used the search feature in the old start menu so not much has changed for me. I didn't lose the ability to do anything I did before. I can imagine the live tiles being an incredibly easy way to keep up to date while using my physical desk to do work.

What will this thing do OS wise that ipad's and android tablets aren't already doing? when it comes to tablets, ipads are owning the enterprise market. i can see microsoft's strategy of having one OS for both types of devices. better app support, same os, etc etc. but the medium they are dishing out so far is terrible. start screen is good for tablets only, that's it.

Sounds like you are contradicting yourself here. If ipad are owning the enterprise market with their limited functionality how much better would a Windows 8 tablet be? How about Office, legacy applications, website creation, database management, etc. What exactly makes an ipad a better solution when a W8 x86 tablet can be managed just like any other pc while providing the same fast, intuitive UI of the ipad along with compatibility with an enterprise's current applications? Any IT department that rejects Windows 8 solely on its UI alone without evaluating its obvious advantages sounds quite unprofessional and frankly unqualified for the job.

  • Like 3

On MSDN there is a "debug/checked" build

What is the difference between that and the normal download with apps version ?

The checked builds are built without compiler optimization and are designed for debugging (as in, breaking into with a debugger).??Unless you are a developer, there is absolutely no need to get this.??And even then, most developers would not need this (driver devs might).

As for my rating of 3, I don't care if the Start Screen can do the "same things".??Nobody addresses the fact that (1) it breaks the flow and (2) it doesn't work well for long hierarchical listings (hey, some people have those).??Most importantly, I don't like things being forced down my throat.??Give people an option (make a hidden, hard-to-reach-one, if you must), and I'll be happy.??But this kind of forced shoveling of something that I don't want!??You know, this is why I hate Steve Jobs.??Looks like the other two Steves are turning into him.

Haven't had much of a play yet, but one thing has already ticked me off.

I clicked on a jpeg file in explorer and got thrown back to Metro to view it. Because there are no obvious shortcuts, i had to take the long way back to where i was. (yes i tried throwing my mouse to every corner and edge of the screen first)

that sort of thing is bound to catch people off guard.

I'm getting on just fine. I started using the DP on my laptop with an open mind - after 2 days of not liking it at first (using it in VMware + sticking to mainly desktop mode rather than metro through fear of change etc), I got used to it and liked it more + can now (after months of solid use on DP) see why it's so much better.

Windows 7 is "old" to me now - there will be enormous changes to your UX when the apps get opened up properly in 'Metro Mode'.

The time it takes to navigate around apps + the general OS has reduced greatly with the CP & I have now bought into this OS fully.

The concepts driving it are the way of the future. In 17 months time we will all be happy that MS progressed in this way. I guarantee.

The only gripe I have is that the UK was not included in the functions that were opened to the USA, France, Japan etc - this needs sorting asap...I have already emailed Steve Ballmer himself about this...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
    • Welcome to Neowin! Enjoy your stay!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      272
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!