Recommended Posts

I really don't like it either. I gave it a chance, but it just doesn't work as good as the 'classic' Windows interface does with a mouse and keyboard.

Metro apps are incredibly dumbed down, very counter-intuitive with a mouse and keyboard and just look out of place.

I have a 13" notebook with a 1600x900 display, so everything is already relatively small in Windows 7 because of the high DPI. In Windows 8, however, everything looks HUGE. Really HUGE. I went for a high resolution because my efficiency is just much higher when I have more pixels available, on Windows 8 it just didn't provide any improvements.

If the final version won't contain a registry key to go back to the classic UI I'll be sticking with Windows 7.

I disagree. It never really made much sense to display search results in the Start Menu and the new Start Screen corrects that issue. Additionally, it made no sense to have gadgets on the desktop where they were obscured by running applications but the Start Screen fixes that by replacing gadgets with live tiles. The Start Menu only offered limited scope to pin and group apps and the Start Screen gives you a lot more screen real estate to do this properly.

I too agree with both things that you said... I never use gadgets on the desktop and rarely search in the start menu. But even with your statement MS should/could evolve the start menu, what they have now is too large of a space for simple functionality that requires me to scan the whole 30" desktop and mouse around on this real estate. The idea of the start menu was much more efficient.

Also with all this attention to the Metro look (I have a Samsung Focus which I love) MS has not looked at improving the functionality of most of the core applications and their interfaces. (fonts, images, videos, icon representations, etc.) I feel MS got 'off-track'.

I am what be termed a silver surfer, I am well on the wrong side of sixty, I enjoy new tech now as much as ever, I do own a windows phone, so am used to tiles, I have a 22" touch screen, have had it for a couple of years now, I am now making more use of the "touch" though after umpty years using a mouse it is still difficult to use touch to it's full, but after twenty four hours I am finding my way around Windows 8 and am enjoying the experience, I loved windows 7, I thought windows 3.1 was good, at the time, I would hate to use it now, I think I will buy windows 8 when the time comes, by then I will really have found out what it can or can't do, I installed Links 2003 golf game and it runs fine, that's a game that came out 2002, just give it time. Jim ; )

made it about one day with it (well less then that) already frustrated with it... it's not fluid, its too single task oriented when you are immersive mode... and having to switch back and forth to do things is annoying... MS needs to make a FULL immersive OS for phones and consumer tablets.. and a full desktop for workstation users that only multitask all day and the ability to switch between the two or a mixture depending on preference...

some stuff that I use to be able to do in two clicks are taking me way too much time now... go from a second of time to multiples of that to do the same task isn't an improvement...

The Metro UI could so easily have been, like active desktop where the tiles are overlayed on desktop itself instead of having separate screen.

Obviously Windows 8 wasn't your idea. Too bad because that would have been a better implementation.

  • Like 2

i dunno, been playing with it for about 8 hours total, and initially i didn't like - but once i wrapped my head around the 'flow' of things [mostly using the start button on kb] this thing is starting grow on me... let's see in another 8 hours...

I honestly don't understand; this UI seems very intuitive. You don't need to learn any keyboard shortcuts to navigate around at all. You can get to anywhere you want by simply clicking on the top and bottom edges of the screen. Most of my time is still spent in the browser but the only difference me is email checking which is done in the email app now instead of Hotmail's website.

Compare all of this complianing to what we heard during the transition to Windows 95 and the Start Menu that you all are so fond of. When 95 came out, the world was ending for a lot of people.

I'm not sure what you're remembering but the Windows 95 launch was a huge success. It made computers drastically more usable compared to Windows 3.1, whereas Metro seems more like a clumsy step back to the Windows 1.x days. I don't see Windows 8 being successful at all if it launches like this.

Compare all of this complianing to what we heard during the transition to Windows 95 and the Start Menu that you all are so fond of. When 95 came out, the world was ending for a lot of people. The sort of research and design decisions that went into the Start Screen concept really hinge a lot on repeated use and wearing footpaths to things you use. Calm down and give it the time it deserves. It's not easy to make a big paradigm switch overnight. Roll with it and as time passes, you will not only become more comfortable with the Start Screen, but you will definitely appreciate it when you have to go to another machine and go back to using the Start Menu. Two hours is not enough. Two days is not enough. Work through the pains of change for a couple weeks in order to appreciate what's been done here.

We "IT" guys normally we aren't against new things because simply not, when enjoy playing with new things indeed. The problem here is non optional removal of a key feature, please note, non optional. The mighty Start Menu, that iconic thing that made windows so popular. If people want touch features so badly, so be it, let them have them even on "default mode" but allow us to have or very simple yet very efficient full fledged desktop option in the OS.

Compare all of this complianing to what we heard during the transition to Windows 95 and the Start Menu that you all are so fond of. When 95 came out, the world was ending for a lot of people.

Rubbish, I know it was a long time ago but that isn't what happened at all. Windows 95 was incredibly popular and well received. Seems like some of you need to rewrite history to make Metro seem like not a big deal.

  • Like 2

I have to say, Microsoft, are seriously upping their game, I dump Android and an iPhone for Windows Phone 7, and I love it. With windows 8 yes there is a big change, which will require a learning curve, and I'm growing to like it. Although I'm a techy I find it easy to look at new products in this way, however I'm thinking of the normal home user, and I think Microsoft are playing a risky one.

Having said that, if we don't approach new ideas with open minds we'll never advance, look at Windows 3.11 compared to Windows 95 massive difference, nearly 20 years later we're stuck with the same old thing (to a certain extent), Windows 8 is taking another revolutionary step. It's like moving from a Automatic car to a manual, we'll curse the gears up and down, but we grow to love the control.

I've used 8 now for nearly 24 hours, a fair chance for the massive change, and yes I like it :-)

I hope they bring the start menu back. I believe they said metro will be disabled by default for desktops and non-touch screen laptops, so people can transition into it.

Well see though. I hear way too many requests to bring back the start menu.

I hadn't heard this, but that would definitely be preferable... I really want to like Windows 8 and for a tablet I'm in love with it, but I cannot imagine using it on my desktop for extended periods...

Totally, I was expecting it much more 'fluid' but I felt like I had to hard learn how to do weird mouse gestures just to go around my desktop, it's stressing.

I feel the same way. It's rather weird with a mouse...

I hadn't heard this, but that would definitely be preferable... I really want to like Windows 8 and for a tablet I'm in love with it, but I cannot imagine using it on my desktop for extended periods...

I feel the same way. It's rather weird with a mouse...

yeah it's too weird with a mouse, I find myself trying to do touch gestures with a mouse and it not doing them, but I bet if I had a touch screen they'd work fine... this whole two or more ways to do the same thing but depending on what you have is a bit of an annoyance... and I would go nuts with a desktop touch screen, my arms would be killing me after a day using them in the air to do what I do with a mouse in a day... its being made too touch like for the sake of being touch like

played around a bit on my friends touch screen laptop... like everyone says here.. the Start > Metro UI is just effing annoying. The metro apps such as music etc are soo superbasic that it almost seems lke a joke.

Metro implementation on Win8 might be 'fast and fluid' but it is not pretty.. The Metro UI could so easily have been, like active desktop where the tiles are overlayed on desktop itself instead of having separate screen.

IE10 is nice, fast but still no word on extension system. anyway, i think MS messed this one up royally :(

So I'd have to minimise all my open apps every time I want to access a live tile? That would be a complete disaster. As I said previously, gadgets already failed to take off because they sit on the desktop, sticking live tiles there would simply be unworkable.

I too agree with both things that you said... I never use gadgets on the desktop and rarely search in the start menu. But even with your statement MS should/could evolve the start menu, what they have now is too large of a space for simple functionality that requires me to scan the whole 30" desktop and mouse around on this real estate. The idea of the start menu was much more efficient.

Taking up less space on the screen doesn't automatically make the Start menu efficient. In the case of search it makes it inefficient and in the case of the full app list it borders on unworkable at the moment as you're forced to navigate through a tree in a narrow, tiny area of the screen. If you've got 30 inches to use why not use it rather than trying to squeeze a whole lot of information (badly) into a small corner of the screen? I rarely use the Start menu these days (I probably only use it a few seconds a day) but I could see myself using the Start Screen more often because it's now more useful.

Also with all this attention to the Metro look (I have a Samsung Focus which I love) MS has not looked at improving the functionality of most of the core applications and their interfaces. (fonts, images, videos, icon representations, etc.) I feel MS got 'off-track'.

Again, I disagree. The Start Screen and immersive apps may be getting a lot of attention from the lets-judge-an-OS-based-on-screenshots crowd but it's clear that Microsoft have been doing a lot of work behind the scenes. The new task manager, copy and paste, storage spaces, improved networking, etc are all examples where MS are fixing and extending features in the core OS.

I don't understand; Metro doesn't hard to use at all with mouse. How is sliding up a lock screen worst then how it was prior in Windows 7? It seems rather easy to switch between apps just as it was in 7.

You don't have to slide the lock screen. Just hit a key.

After using it for a day, the thing that really gets me is, what was wrong with the Windows 7 desktop? What is "better" for the desktop user in Windows 8, that cannot work in Windows 7? Maybe it's just a plan to get all of us "trying" Metro, then they will divide it once people are familiar with it? I simply do not believe this is how a corporate desktop computer install of Windows 8 will act at all.

I'll be honest here, the search lacks functionality. When I was searching shell32.dll I wasnt able to right click it and open its location?? Thats a fail in my book. And all the pretty colors on the tiles make the metro interface look's worst than freakin' XP! They need to make the UI more professional and user friendly. The shutdown (power buttons) should be placed under the user icon whenever you click on the user icon. The point of windows 8 is to make things easier for us not complicate what we believe is obvious to do! Also the font is not smooth at all on the metro screen. It looks hafta** and lazy! I cant wait to custmize this OS to my likings. The UI just looks weak IMO and took almost to no effort to create. I surprise this OS isn't coming out much sooner. ************** :\

yeah it's too weird with a mouse, I find myself trying to do touch gestures with a mouse and it not doing them, but I bet if I had a touch screen they'd work fine... this whole two or more ways to do the same thing but depending on what you have is a bit of an annoyance... and I would go nuts with a desktop touch screen, my arms would be killing me after a day using them in the air to do what I do with a mouse in a day... its being made too touch like for the sake of being touch like

After using it for a day, the thing that really gets me is, what was wrong with the Windows 7 desktop? What is "better" for the desktop user in Windows 8, that cannot work in Windows 7? Maybe it's just a plan to get all of us "trying" Metro, then they will divide it once people are familiar with it? I simply do not believe this is how a corporate desktop computer install of Windows 8 will act at all.

I have to agree with both of these here. I just cannot imagine using this on a daily basis productively... And I shudder to even imagine trying to roll this out in a corporate environment...

I'm really disappointed. I wanted to like it so bad... lol I really hope that the post earlier in the thread that said this will be turned off on desktop by default holds true. It just seems so integrated that this would be a problem at this point. It seems an "all in" approach for Microsoft at this point and that concerns me. I just cannot imagine getting any real work done in this.

When it took 10 minutes to figure out how to restart or shutdown....

Yeah, I downloaded a picture and haven't any idea where it went... lol

Yeah, I downloaded a picture and haven't any idea where it went... lol

Lol! Yeah, that's progress for ya ;)

If I wanted my PC to look, act, or operate like an XBox or Windows 7 Phone, then I would have bought one or all of the aforementioned, apart from the PC, as it is a PC, and I own it, and want it to remain so, as in a PC, with a proper PC OS software running on it!

  • Like 3

Compare all of this complianing to what we heard during the transition to Windows 95 and the Start Menu that you all are so fond of. When 95 came out, the world was ending for a lot of people.

Please, tell me where were you in when Windows 95 launched, because from what I remember, it was the single biggest launch for Microsoft. Stores openned at midnight to let people buy Win95, it was simply crazy. MS never had that since then.

From what I'm seeing, not sure that MS will have close to the same success with Win8, in fact, I'm affraid it's going to be a dud like ME or Vista.

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Transmission 4.1.2 by Razvan Serea Transmission is a fast, easy-to-use bittorrent client with support for encryption, a web interface, peer exchange, magnet links, DHT, µTP, UPnP and NAT-PMP port forwarding, webseed support, watch directories, tracker editing, global and per-torrent speed limits, and more. Transmission has one of the lowest memory & resource footprints of any major BitTorrent client. Transmission's light overhead is one reason why it is so well suited for home NAS and media servers. Having been used by Western Digital, Zyxel and Belkin, Transmission gives truly impressive performance on almost any compatible hardware. Transmission is an open source, volunteer-based project. Unlike some BitTorrent clients, Transmission doesn't play games with its users to make money. Transmission doesn't bundle toolbars, pop-up ads, flash ads, twitter tools, or anything else. It doesn't hold some features back for a payware version. Its source code is available for anyone to review. Transmission doesn't track users, the website and forums have no third-party ads or analytics. Transmission 4.1.2 changelog: This is Transmission 4.1.2, a bugfix release. It fixes 20+ bugs and has a few performance improvements too. All users are encouraged to upgrade to this version. Highlights Fixed 4.1.0 bug that could cause duplicate HTTP announces to be sent to trackers. (#8639) All Platforms Reject benc data that has invalid characters. (#8577) Fixed a bug during the startup sequence where if one torrent failed to parse, subsequent torrents would also fail. (#8605) Fixed a bug that stalled some downloads at 99%. (#8654) Fixed a 4.1.0 upgrade bug that could overwrite utp_enabled and tcp_enabled settings. (#8658) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash that could happen when a peer supplied reqq value smaller than 32 in LTEP handshake. (#8713) Fixed a 4.1.0 regression that periodically wrote upload & download stats to disk even when Transmission had been idle since the last write, preventing the stats file's disk from hibernating while idle. (#8722) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that prevented TCP peer connections on some systems. (#8748) Added safeguards to HTTP responses to prevent clickjacking. (#8749) Fixed edge case that didn't preserve the order of a batch of torrents when moving their queue position up or down. (#8782) Added sanitization for UTF-8 client names provided by peers during handshake. (#8809) Stopped appending redundant zeros to blocklist files when downloaded from a remote URL. (#8819) Fixed a build failure that occurred when building with link-time optimization. (#8540) macOS Client Fixed a 4.1.0 memory leak. (#8613) Fixed navigation focus issues in the Inspector. (#8792, #8810) Improved UI code to use less CPU. (#8832, #8833, #8835, #8836, #8842, #8846, #8851) Qt Client Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when parsing some RPC responses from older Transmission servers. (#8618) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that saved both deprecated and current settings names to settings.json. (#8623) GTK Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that did not show translated logging level strings. (#8611) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when toggling alternative speed limits. (#8709) Web Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that displayed timestamps in some dropdowns as 6.75:45 instead of 6:45. (#8624) Fixed a bug that could show incorrect torrent status when reconnecting to the server after a lost connection. (#8780, #8783) transmission-remote Improved transmission-remote console output for JSON-RPC 2. (#8799, #8805) Download: Transmission 64-bit | Qt 5 Setup ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Transmission 32-bit | Qt 5 Setup Links: Transmission Homepage | Other OSes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!