Recommended Posts

"Why didn't MS segregate the tablet UI from the desktop UI?" Because you are mistaken about Windows 8 and you don't understand it. It isn't a "tablet UI," and you referring to it as one shows that you do not understand it. They didn't separate the Metro experience from the Desktop experience because the Metro experience works very well on desktop and notebook PCs. Both are there, rather than just the Metro experience, because the Desktop is needed for some programs and features. Many of us would miss out tremendously if Microsoft didn't include the Metro experience on desktop and notebook PCs. I'd for sure switch to Mac OS X, if Windows 8 on desktops and notebooks consisted of just the Desktop experience, and that is because I quite dislike the Windows 7 and Windows 8 Desktop experiences (especially compared to the Windows 8 Metro experience).

Please, please - stop doing such a thing and telling us that we don't understand just because we believe that pushing tablet/touch ui into classic desktop is plainly wrong idea; i prefectly understand why Microsoft pushes Metro into desktop - just because they don't have any better idea for their next operating system and they switched to the faster release cycle after delay between XP and Vista, which pushes them to sell their top product in 2-3 year cycle. Stop doing metrollvangelism.

This is the major difference. Just look at Metros huge tiles these are designed for large fingers,

No, they make touch easier, but it's not their primary or only purpose. their primary purpose is as live information tiles. If they had been designed just for touch, they would have been 1/4th the size.

No, they make touch easier, but it's not their primary or only purpose. their primary purpose is as live information tiles. If they had been designed just for touch, they would have been 1/4th the size.

I am sure that if they wanted they could have incorporated this live update feature into shortcuts in Aero. Metro was conceived for touch devices and so is touch centric. With a mouse, i feel I am better off without it.

How's about you don't speak for anyone apart from yourself, Callum.

IMO. And how I use my computer, I assure you, Metro does not work. I don't like it, I don't find it easy to use, I don't find it helpful for my productivity. Personally, I think MS has completely dropped the ball. They are being arrogant, they are forcing this major change on their users without actually seeing what their users think.

Which doesn't make any sense from the haters. since you can use the start screen EXACTLY like the start menu, except you have a massive list of your favorite apps instead of a tiny list of 7 or 8 favorite(pinned) apps. And a far better search for when you're openign any of the others, or alternatively a nice categorized all apps.

this is no different to the start menu, just quicker access to more of your most used/important programs. This is an evolution and joining of the start menu and the pinned taskbar. created form what they learned from how people use their computers with anonymous usage statistics, people never use the start menu, they use pinned apps, on the taskbar or the start menu.

I thought Vista was fine also. Drivers weren't an issue for me either.

Haha soooo true!

There is no familiarity! Screw all this PC 2.0 bullsh*t, I want something I can easily navigate around in. Metro is simply not good enough for a power user.

For example - Try finding the classic control panel in the Metro UI, or even the Desktop environment without having to resort to searching in the Metro UI. That's something power users / geeks will be going to most days of their Windows 8 life....

Windows 7 -

1. Start menu

2. Control Panel

Windows 8 -

1. Press Desktop on the Metro UI

2. Go to the libraries icon on the taskbar

3. Press Computer on the left file tree

4. Hover over the first tab (skip this step if you prefer the ribbon expanded like me)

5. Press Control Panel

2 or 3 extra unnecessary steps to get to the same place in both Windows 7 and Windows 8. Microsoft have literally given no design thought for the Geeks and power users. They just thought, oh lets shove their stuff in the corner and haul all the consumer bullsh*t in.

Microsoft has really dropped the ball on Windows 8 so far. The Metro UI, simply doesn't work efficiently enough for me and others (reference the Front page poll 60|40). It feels like Microsoft is leaving the power users in the dirt trail behind them in the search for Dumb users. In fact now I think of it, they can't be searching designing it for dumb users either as there is no intuitiveness, how on earth are regular joes expected to shut down their PC's at night time? How are they supposed to know how to find out or know what the charm bar is? Who the f**k have Microsoft designed Windows 8 for?!

Callums reply saying I haven't used it long enough in 3...2...1...

I kid :p

Why would geeks and power users go to the control panels multiple times a day ? I don't think you know what a geek or power user is.

also, mouse lower left corner, right click. click control panel. voila. faster than win7 even, and as a bonus I have that same fast access direcly to the computer management tools and a whole lot of other neat power user tools as well. Seems like Win8 is for power users.

And sorry, but power users don't need to use the start menu, the start screen works great for power users to.

Have you watched the video's where you download the consumer.preview on mouse and keyboard its easier than your post suggests. ( I have a touchsmart but use the mouse and keyboard most the time) if you really have a problem add My Computer and all the old icons. And its not like Microsoft won't remove the old start button before RTM they removed it now so you can provide feedback on the Metro interface not complain about the start button. And as moving the lock screen up pressing the "up arrow" key or sliding your mouse up is easier for corporate users than ctrl+alt+delete and it gives extra protection against dictionary attacks.

Help me understand why users should be forced to "have an open mind" when evaluating a product that wants them to spend their money on it. I don't need to try Windows 8 with an open mind, though I feel I have, or anything else for that matter. Microsoft chose to make huge changes that I don't see as beneficial in the slightest. I have used them and I don't feel I want to learn a plathora of new stupid "gestures" and "hot spots" and whatever else they thought statistics told them I should want...

Luckily for me I have a wallet and I'll ignore the Windows 8 release on my desktop (though I am considering a tablet still) :).

I'm not going to force myself to like Windows 8. I don't force myself to like things I spend my money on. That's not how it works.

That's the most ignorant statement I've ever read. SERIOUSLY. You're not even willing to try a new product. You're not even willing to have an open mind because you're so set in your old fashioned ways you don't want to learn a new, better and more efficient way of doing something because you've decided in your close minded prejudiced fashion that "it is worse".

Which doesn't make any sense from the haters. since you can use the start screen EXACTLY like the start menu, except you have a massive list of your favorite apps instead of a tiny list of 7 or 8 favorite(pinned) apps. And a far better search for when you're openign any of the others, or alternatively a nice categorized all apps.

umm you can use small icons and make more programs available than that. I have 16 and in small icon mode. Works fine for me...

umm you can use small icons and make more programs available than that. I have 16 and in small icon mode. Works fine for me...

I have 36 available on the first page of my start screen, dividied in 3 categorized rows, and they're not even full and some of them use a wide tile. so I could have at least 46. And they actually show a lot of information there. without waiting for popups or jumplists, right there, on each tile at the same time.

The Start screen is IMO great, but ....

The right side of the Start screen where all the apps are at is a big disorganized mess. I see all the Office apps mixed in with say, Windows Live Messenger or Yahoo Messenger and its uninstaller or AIM and its uninstaller - all into individual tiles for each one.

Microsoft needs to make it more organized according to the folder-like view. If they can make folder-like tiles of all the Start-menu-era apps into the Start screen, then I'd be a happy camper. Click on a folder tile and it'd expand into more tiles like the Start menu folders.

QFT.

No functionality was removed with the removal of the start button and menu. It works exactly the same way just requires more screen real estate to do it. I also find the the All Apps screen to be 100x better than the puny cramped All programs menu of before and 1000x better than those annoying accordian menus from XP.

No functionality removed? How about cascading menus for Control Panel and Administration tools? How about Jumplists for programs on the Start menu in Windows 7, either pinned or in the recent programs list? Or how about a recent programs list? Or how about individual folders for program installations on the Start menu instead of just every shortcut created by a program installation just plastered on the Start screen? No functionality removed? All of the useful functionality was removed and for no other reason than they thought everyone would like a giant tablet screen instead of the efficient Start menu. Although you're right, the XP Start menu was a drag. But they just tossed out some of the best parts of the Windows 7 Start menu. So please do not say 'no functionality was removed'. It was!

The Start screen is IMO great, but ....

The right side of the Start screen where all the apps are at is a big disorganized mess. I see all the Office apps mixed in with say, Windows Live Messenger or Yahoo Messenger and its uninstaller or AIM and its uninstaller - all into individual tiles for each one.

Microsft needs to make it more organized according to the folder-like view. If they can make folder-like tiles of all the Start-menu-era apps into the Start screen, then I'd be a happy camper. Click on a folder tile and it'd expand into more tiles like the Start menu folders.

You see the titles for uninstallers just like you would see the entries in the Win7/Vista Start-> All programs menu. It will be up to the program developers to stop having the entries show up. Im sure the new Office will have the apps organized when it comes.

  • Like 1

You see the titles for uninstallers just like you would see the entries in the Win7/Vista Start-> All programs menu. It will be up to the program developers to stop having the entries show up. Im sure the new Office will have the apps organized when it comes.

Yes, but they shouldn't just leave them like that. Right now as I see it, it's a big jumbled mess. No way to organize them into folders like in Win 7/Vista (XP Start Menu sucks b/c of no automatic alphabetical order of program folders like Vista/7 have). Regarding Office 15 (2013?), probably.

I have 36 available on the first page of my start screen, dividied in 3 categorized rows, and they're not even full and some of them use a wide tile. so I could have at least 46. And they actually show a lot of information there. without waiting for popups or jumplists, right there, on each tile at the same time.

I could make mine 36 freq. apps as well but I don't want it any bigger. I have 16 freq. used and then 18 pinned apps on the top.

Yes, but they shouldn't just leave them like that. Right now as I see it, it's a big jumbled mess. No way to organize them into folders like in Win 7/Vista (XP Start Menu sucks b/c of no automatic alphabetical order of program folders like Vista/7 have). Regarding Office 15 (2013?), probably.

Microsoft cant do anything is a developer wants multiple shortcuts that all point diffrent executable files or one executable file with multiple arguments like VLC player for me. You are installing software that is really for Win 7/Vista. You can organize the titles into new groups by dragging them and unpin titles with right click.

  • Like 1

The Start screen is IMO great, but ....

The right side of the Start screen where all the apps are at is a big disorganized mess. I see all the Office apps mixed in with say, Windows Live Messenger or Yahoo Messenger and its uninstaller or AIM and its uninstaller - all into individual tiles for each one.

Microsoft needs to make it more organized according to the folder-like view. If they can make folder-like tiles of all the Start-menu-era apps into the Start screen, then I'd be a happy camper. Click on a folder tile and it'd expand into more tiles like the Start menu folders.

You can move tiles around and organize them into separate groups yourself to fit your personal organization you know.

No functionality removed? How about cascading menus for Control Panel and Administration tools? How about Jumplists for programs on the Start menu in Windows 7, either pinned or in the recent programs list? Or how about a recent programs list? Or how about individual folders for program installations on the Start menu instead of just every shortcut created by a program installation just plastered on the Start screen? No functionality removed? All of the useful functionality was removed and for no other reason than they thought everyone would like a giant tablet screen instead of the efficient Start menu. Although you're right, the XP Start menu was a drag. But they just tossed out some of the best parts of the Windows 7 Start menu. So please do not say 'no functionality was removed'. It was!

Sorry to break it to you, but you are the only person who used cascading control panel menus and start menu jump lists. People didn't use it, so they remove it. Personally the cascading control panel made no sense. It was slower than just opening the control panel, and far slower than just writing what you're looking for and getting right to it with search.

I could make mine 36 freq. apps as well but I don't want it any bigger. I have 16 freq. used and then 18 pinned apps on the top.

I'd like to see a start menu with 32 pinned apps in it. Please. Remember it also has to be eas to navigate and find each app, and sorted into groups depending on how I group them so I can easily sort them out.

So just imagine what Windows 8 would be without Metro: Just some under the hood changes, improved task manager, improved copy/pasting interface, refresh and reset features, fast boot times, etc. That would be it.

And that would not be enough to upgrade from Windows 7 to Windows 8. So Microsoft had to take a big step, a big bet, a risk, that would really make people's decision easy to upgrade to Windows 8. Now the question is whether they got success in doing so? Overall, the answer is Yes! Metro works, at least, if not big time. It is at its initial stage at the moment, but In the future it will all be polished. Metro is here to stay.

As far as criticism of people regarding Metro interface, it s nothing but a fear of change. I respect their opinions but if we had to take a leap, we have to change the way we do things. It is 2012, new era, new ways to do things, hence new Windows.

  • Like 1

You can move tiles around and organize them into separate groups yourself to fit your personal organization you know.

Sorry to break it to you, but you are the only person who used cascading control panel menus and start menu jump lists. People didn't use it, so they remove it. Personally the cascading control panel made no sense. It was slower than just opening the control panel, and far slower than just writing what you're looking for and getting right to it with search.

I'd like to see a start menu with 32 pinned apps in it. Please. Remember it also has to be eas to navigate and find each app, and sorted into groups depending on how I group them so I can easily sort them out.

just googled 'cascading control panel' , totally forgot about it

it sure as hell :x sucks

would either use searchbox or switch control panel to icon view

I hate saying this but I think "power users" like you are...how to say this... plain stupid. :D If you are a power user as you claim, you should be able to figure out that traditionally Windows users can login by dismissing "lock screen" (surprise, Apple didn't invent lock screen as you claimed in this thread) with Ctrl + Alt + Del.

Any "power user" who can't figure out keyboard or simple mouse gestures is a freaking dumb user.

Don't want to be insulting, but if you are really power user - customize the power user menu in Windows 8 and make it look like Win7 start menu. Done.

/end rant :p

If you read the guy I was quoting he was the one that started calling me a power user. Which is why I replied the way I did. So I think it is you who is "plain stupid" for failing to understand the context of my message. But er "Don't want to be insulting"

And I never claimed Apple invented anything. I said that Apple provides the text "Slide to Unlock" to indicate to a user how they can unlock their device. Something Windows 8 does not do. Reading comprehension fail?

Which doesn't make any sense from the haters. since you can use the start screen EXACTLY like the start menu, except you have a massive list of your favorite apps instead of a tiny list of 7 or 8 favorite(pinned) apps. And a far better search for when you're openign any of the others, or alternatively a nice categorized all apps.

this is no different to the start menu, just quicker access to more of your most used/important programs. This is an evolution and joining of the start menu and the pinned taskbar. created form what they learned from how people use their computers with anonymous usage statistics, people never use the start menu, they use pinned apps, on the taskbar or the start menu.

You know what I'd rather have? A start menu that doesn't take up my entire 30" screen whenever I want to launch an app that I don't use often enough to pin to my task bar.

It is very annoying when 100% of the apps I'm going to be using are desktop apps and yet I am having to open this full screen kiddie interface that covers my entire display just to launch something new. If I am watching a video in my media player or reading an IRC chat, waiting for a reply on MSN or even playing a game I now can't see any of that while I search for the app in Metro.

This wasn't the case with the Start Menu. If I wanted to launch a rarely used app I could still see my video from the corner of my eye I could still see my IRC chats moving I could still see incoming MSN messages and with these things in my peripheral vision I could quickly look at them and see what happened while still having the start menu open and then I could continue my search for the app I wanted.

In Metro if the same thing happened like for example I'm watching a youtube video and I open Metro to look for something I want to launch then I hear something cool happening in that video through my speakers. I have to now completely exit Metro to view what just happened and then start my search all over again afterwards. This is annoying, having it full screen is annoying. It wastes so much space on my screen it is ridiculous.

I find the fact that Microsoft doesn't include an off switch for Metro incredibly arrogant. I have no problem with those of you who are sipping the Microsoft Koolaid using Metro just provide an off switch that brings back the Start Menu and I'd be happy. This is a hugely controversial feature and everyone I know that has seen it does not like it except you guys posting here. All my friends think it is a total failure and I did not convince them of that, they came to that conclusion on their own.

So, are you suggesting that you should be able to criticise Windows 8, but I shouldn't defend it when people criticise it? That's all I've been doing, and I haven't "talked down" others' opinions.

That's all you do. I've read through this thread and all I see from people like you and others is the same arrogant condescending prattle, because people don't like Metro they obviously don't "get it" like you do like you are some superior intellect on your high horse. All you are doing is riling people up and if you talk to people like you do on here in real life then, well.......

The problem is you think you are right and the people who don't like Metro are wrong. Maybe its you that should have an "open mind" as you like to tell people.

This product is going to fail hard against Apple and the tech community will move on to the next trending fad, from MIDs to UMPCs to Netbooks to Tablets to whatever comes next and those who use a desktop PC will be stuck with a less than experience all for the sake of trying to take on tablets.

That's all you do. I've read through this thread and all I see from people like you and others is the same arrogant condescending prattle, because people don't like Metro they obviously don't "get it" like you do like you are some superior intellect on your high horse. All you are doing is riling people up and if you talk to people like you do on here in real life then, well.......

The problem is you think you are right and the people who don't like Metro are wrong. Maybe its you that should have an "open mind" as you like to tell people.

I don't get why he even feels he needs to defend it. He didn't make it, he isn't working at Microsoft. His sense of protecting his baby is totally misguided and he should see it with objective eyes like the rest of us.

Yeah you already said that to another poster. When I boot my computer I want to login and start using it. I don't need to see that information at a glance because if I'm turning my computer on the first thing I'm going to do is check my email and I'd rather do that than see a summary of how many I received. That kind of screen is only useful on a tablet where you would press the sleep/wake button to see at a glance if you had received any new messages. Pointless on a desktop/notebook.

In your opinion. I think it's perfect on a desktop/notebook and have wanted this functionality for years. I often have my PC locked (some places I work have a policy of locking the desktop automatically after 5 minutes of inactivity) and it will be great to be able to see how many emails I've received, what my next appointment is, etc. from the lock screen.

No where on the lock screen does it say you can press a keyboard button to get passed that screen. NO WHERE. I used the OS for a whole week. And this is just the problem with the OS. It is not intuitive - at all - just trying to find a shutdown switch in the OS is like going on a cross-country journey. It took me over 5 minutes to find something so simple in Metro.

Where does it say that you have to swipe up? Oh that's right, it doesn't but you still think that this is a tablet UI shoehorned onto a PC. The fact is that the UI works equally well as a tablet OR a PC UI. Use the keyboard on a PC and the touchscreen on a tablet. Perfect.

Personally, I can't think of anything more intuitive than hitting a random key on your keyboard to interact with a screen with no obvious controls.

That's all you do. I've read through this thread and all I see from people like you and others is the same arrogant condescending prattle, because people don't like Metro they obviously don't "get it" like you do like you are some superior intellect on your high horse. All you are doing is riling people up and if you talk to people like you do on here in real life then, well.......

The problem is you think you are right and the people who don't like Metro are wrong. Maybe its you that should have an "open mind" as you like to tell people.

This product is going to fail hard against Apple and the tech community will move on to the next trending fad, from MIDs to UMPCs to Netbooks to Tablets to whatever comes next and those who use a desktop PC will be stuck with a less than experience all for the sake of trying to take on tablets.

Your post is completely wrong. I haven't ever suggested that my opinion on the Metro experience is right and others' opinions on it are wrong. Clearly, the problem with you is that you don't understand my posts. I suggest you please ensure you understand them before you incorrectly judge and lie about me. Further, I haven't talked down anyone's opinion, which is what you erroneously suggest is "all I do."

Please ensure you understand my posts in future.

In your opinion. I think it's perfect on a desktop/notebook and have wanted this functionality for years. I often have my PC locked (some places I work have a policy of locking the desktop automatically after 5 minutes of inactivity) and it will be great to be able to see how many emails I've received, what my next appointment is, etc. from the lock screen.

Of course it is my opinion. And I totally see why you would find that feature useful.

Your post is completely wrong. I haven't ever suggested that my opinion on the Metro experience is right and others' opinions on it are wrong. Clearly, the problem with you is that you don't understand my posts. I suggest you please ensure you understand them before you incorrectly judge and lie about me. Further, I haven't talked down anyone's opinion, which is what you erroneously suggest is "all I do."

Please ensure you understand my posts in future.

When you constantly tell people they don't understand things? - That is belittling them. Try not to do that. Set a better example and stop telling people what they don't understand.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!