Recommended Posts

If you can't see movement in your peripheral vision then you should see a doctor as humans are much much much more sensitive to subtle movement in the peripheral vision than they are in the central focus of the eye.

I can see movement around me, yes, but when I am focusing on a task at hand (writing this comment), my focus is here. I can see quite a few things changing on my screens, but that gets ignored until I finish my task at hand. They're nothing more than a distraction until I'm done typing this up. It's the same for any other task that I do on the PC.

If something exists and works on a desktop or notebook PC, it is clearly not "a tablet UI." It may not be suited to a desktop or notebook PC, but it's all down to how people communicate their view. "A tablet UI" would be something that only exists on a tablet.

Oh dear lord, just because it 'works' on a PC doesn't mean its NOT a UI that was conceived entirely as a touch UI for phones and tablets.

I can use my hairdryer to dry my clothes, that doesnt now mean its a clothes dryer, it was conceived to be used as a hairdryer just because i adapted it to a different use it doesnt stop being a hair dryer.

Idiotic analogy I know.

Of course my argument isn't flawed and you just proved it yourself. You're not focussing on the TV show while you're replying to me because you can't. Watching something out of the corner of your eye is not the same as watching something and paying attention to it. As such, I'm sure you could live with the momentary distraction of the Start screen popping up, especially since the situation you described will happen extremely infrequently..

Great picture by the way :laugh:

I think we will just have to agree to disagree on this one. I don't think I'm super man but I can certainly do multiple things at once. I don't need to look at my keyboard while I type I don't need to look at this reply box while I'm typing I am quite capable of looking and reading something else while typing this out to you as I am doing right now.

Windows 8 on my multiscreen is horrible. I do that to me being paralysed and find it very difficult to switch between keyboard and mouse I rely on the mouse most of the time.

Before anybody says anything I speak my text in.

So what you're saying is that almost every post of yours in this thread hasn't been "You're wrong." "You're wrong", and "You're wrong".?

Trying to tell people they're wrong for calling Metro a "tablet-UI" is ridiculous. To expand on that, as I explained before, Metro is a "Design Language" which is designed from the ground up to make things touch-friendly. It was designed originally to be implemented as a new way of experiencing touch devices, windows phone , upcoming tablets and the like. Telling people they're wrong for succinctly saying it is a "tablet-UI" is splitting hairs when they are in fact right in the spirit of what's being said, and you're simply trying to laud it over other people with some sanctimonious holier-than-thou attitude because you don't have much to say of any substance to peoples reasonable criticisms of the product.

It would be more beneficial to the discussion to come up with some objective reasoning to counter peoples objections rather than trying to split hairs over terminology for which your argument is weak at best.

I'd honestly expect more from staff of this site than what is clearly nothing more than flamebait and argumentative drivel for the most part.

The problem with people calling it "a tablet UI" is that it leads others, especially the average user, to believe it's a UI that should only exist on tablets. People should say what they mean, so those who are easily influenced don't assume before trying it out. Referring to it as "a tablet UI" could be dangerous for that and other reasons. There is no harm in people posting "this is a UI that only works best on tablets," but they don't post that. I might disagree with that opinion of theirs, and I might suggest they give it more of a chance to see if that opinion changes (it's been two weeks since the release of the Consumer Preview and there aren't really yet any apps that one can use to produce productive work :/) but I wouldn't tell them they're wrong for thinking that about the UI.

Oh dear lord, just because it 'works' on a PC doesn't mean its NOT a UI that was conceived entirely as a touch UI for phones and tablets.

Actually, Metro was conceived way before Windows Phone and Zune. How many in here used Media Center with a keyboard and mouse? Guess what, you have been using Metro's older brother!

I think we will just have to agree to disagree on this one. I don't think I'm super man but I can certainly do multiple things at once. I don't need to look at my keyboard while I type I don't need to look at this reply box while I'm typing I am quite capable of looking and reading something else while typing this out to you as I am doing right now.

No worries :)

Actually, Metro was conceived way before Windows Phone and Zune. How many in here used Media Center with a keyboard and mouse? Guess what, you have been using Metro's older brother!

I have used it with a remote control in the past never a keyboard and mouse.

Sorry to say I'm just looking through posts and I think you come off as extremely sactimonious. Your support for MS and the Metro UI is so vociferous you should get a paycheck from them. Based on all the posts from you the UI is great and anyone who doesn't agree either "doesn't understand it" or "isn't using it correctly". You leave no room for other opinion - just yours.

I haven't even used the W8 CP and read threads like this for information and to gauge opinions - yours seem to strike me as so curiously one-sided I felt the need to post about it - I don't post much although I check the site about a dozen times a day.

I honestly would have expected a Global Mod to be a little more open minded. Just because you love it doesn't mean others can't have difficulty or find the W7 interface better. How about you try this? Aknowledge the opinions of others and maybe suggest things they could do instead of browbeating them?

Please ensure you understand my post before you reply.

(Yeah, that doesn't sound sactimonious at all does it?)

This is the problem. I post in support of Windows 8 and some of those who don't like Windows 8 believe that support is sanctimonious, just because it's a positive post about the product, or because I'm using terms Microsoft use to describe it :s It makes no sense. I'm defending the product because I love what Microsoft are doing, and if someone posts something about it I disagree with, I will post why I disagree with their opinion.

I always leave room for others' opinions, but there is nothing wrong with challenging an opinion; it's how discussions and debates thrive. When I suggest people give it more of a chance and open their minds more, I don't usually suggest their opinion is wrong; I suggest it might be wrong because other parts of their post have made it clear they do not understand the concept. Me telling someone their opinion might be wrong does not mean I'm "not leaving room" for their opinion.

I have no problem with people who merely don't like the concept, after taking the time to understand it, and I am sure there are some of those people on Neowin.

Oh dear lord, just because it 'works' on a PC doesn't mean its NOT a UI that was conceived entirely as a touch UI for phones and tablets.

I can use my hairdryer to dry my clothes, that doesnt now mean its a clothes dryer, it was conceived to be used as a hairdryer just because i adapted it to a different use it doesnt stop being a hair dryer.

Idiotic analogy I know.

If a UI is being used on a desktop, how is that a tablet UI? It's a desktop, not a tablet. The UI may work best on a tablet, but the user is using it on a desktop; that would be "a UI that works best on a tablet," not "a tablet UI".

If a UI is being used on a desktop, how is that a tablet UI? It's a desktop, not a tablet. The UI may work best on a tablet, but the user is using it on a desktop; that would be "a UI that works best on a tablet," not "a tablet UI".

If trousers are being used as a hat, how are they leg wear? It's a head not a leg. The trousers may work best on legs but the user is using it on their head. that would be a "a pair of trousers that work best on the legs" not "trousers for legs".

So does Android, but I don't see that turning it into less of a mobile/tablet UI.

It is also wrong because Metro has been used since the mid 2000's in the zune software interface and media center both of which are not touch interfaces. The first time metro was used with touch was in the last year ro so, before that it was used on standard programs.

If trousers are being used as a hat, how is that not a hat? It's a head not a leg. The trousers may work best on legs but the user is using it on their head. that would be a "a pair of trousers that work best on the legs" not "trousers for legs".

You've just backed up my point, unknowingly. Someone cannot refer to trousers as "trousers for legs" because they fit on other parts of the body, and they may be used on those other parts. Similarly, someone cannot refer to the Metro experience as "a tablet UI" because it is used on desktop and notebook PCs.

That isn't a relative analogy. They're still pants, but they're on your head. A hat is different to pants. A UI is not different to a UI.

Metro is still a Tablet UI, it just runs on a desktop substituting the finger for a mouse pointer and an on-screen keyboard for a physical one.

You've just backed up my point, unknowingly. Someone cannot refer to trousers as "trousers for legs" because they fit on other parts of the body, and they may be used on those other parts. Similarly, someone cannot refer to the Metro experience as "a tablet UI" because it is used on desktop and notebook PCs.

Dude I was being sarcastic.To take a note out of your own book, maybe you should understand my post before replying, like you keep telling us to do.

If trousers are being used as a hat, how are they leg wear? It's a head not a leg. The trousers may work best on legs but the user is using it on their head. that would be a "a pair of trousers that work best on the legs" not "trousers for legs".

Bad analogy. pants =/= hat. A UI is a UI, is a UI.

Metro is still a Tablet UI, it just runs on a desktop substituting the finger for a mouse pointer and an on-screen keyboard for a physical one.

No, no, no, and no. Metro is not a tablet UI. It was on the desktop before it was ever on a mobile device, dude. It's been in Media Center since 2004.

[. . .]

Dude I was being sarcastic.To take a note out of your own book, maybe you should understand my post before replying, like you keep telling us to do.

I know you were being sarcastic, which is why I said you unknowingly backed up my point. I used your sarcastic response to prove why I believe I am correct (in this case).

I can see movement around me, yes, but when I am focusing on a task at hand (writing this comment), my focus is here. I can see quite a few things changing on my screens, but that gets ignored until I finish my task at hand. They're nothing more than a distraction until I'm done typing this up. It's the same for any other task that I do on the PC.

So you don't care about what goes on while you are typing that. That's telling about how you use your computer, not about whether people can multitask with their computers or if being able to do so is important.

What for you is "nothing more that a distraction" for me could be a tail -f of some log or a running watch command where a single output change is relevant.

You know, I thought that the You Don't Need That? meme was exclusive to poking certain Linux users' answers on forums, but it seems to be alive and strong on the Windows camp as well.

I can run iOS on my Mac in the iOS Simulator with a mouse and keyboard. By your logic iOS is a desktop operating system too.

That isn't the same as running iOS natively on your Mac, and you know that. You're running it in a simulator. The Metro experience is not being run in any kind of simulator; it is being natively run on desktop and notebook PCs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!