Recommended Posts

Prove it. Show me where Metro as we know it today was used on desktop computers before Windows Phone showed up.

And actually use facts please.

Metro "as we know it today", wasn't around until last year, but Metro on desktops has been around since 2003/4.

Windows_Media_Center_on_Windows_XP.png

Windows_Media_Center_on_Windows_7.png

I can't say that for sure until I've used it for a few months and until I've tried all of the tasks I usually do (including software developing) using it. So far, I've found it great and I haven't had any problems using it with a mouse and keyboard.

I wouldn't say you're wrong for saying that, though, as I am just mentioning my own experience :)

Swiping left and right is most ergonomic for a hand, not a scroll wheel.

Which is why Metro needs to bring back up and down scrolling for the desktop.

It is nice for you to admit you were wrong. Thank you.

Your the one who threw in the "As we know today" crap I'm talking about the Metro UI and your trying to change what your saying to specify only the recent variations of metro, which are still being used on non touch devices like the Xbox 360.

It seems you an I have two different definitions of multitasking. Which is fine, but even as an IT student, I have yet to have a need to focus on a multiple windows at once.

Do you know GNU Screen? It an app developed to multiplex terminals, so you can have more than one session visible in a single terminal window.

Just the fact alone that such kind of utils are developed shows that the "you only ever need to focus on one thing a time" is false.

The resemblance is uncanny! how could I have been so blind!

/sarcasm

I said post facts not screenshots of your opinion come to life.

What's so different about them? I see two similar screens with similar functionality. Metro "as we know it today", wasn't around until last year, but Metro on desktops has been around since 2003/4.

It is nice for you to admit you were wrong. Thank you.

Actually, he's not wrong. Zune software and UI (Zune HD) has been using the Metro style for years. Metrotwit (my twitter application) is based off of Metro design. Windows Media Center uses it as well. Metro != Touch. If you believe that, you are wrong. Plain and simple. It's not an opinion or anything like you guys have been saying. It is a FACT. It's a design language, and you can use it as you want.

http://en.wikipedia....Design_Language <--- There are some things in there that you may want to read. The only time "touch" was mentioned was for iPod Touch.

EDIT: And you say "as we know it today"? Uhm...metro can look different for different uses. Just like MetroTwit doesn't look like Metro for ZuneHD's UI.

  • Like 2

Metro "as we know it today", wasn't around until last year, but Metro on desktops has been around since 2003/4.

Windows_Media_Center_on_Windows_XP.png

Windows_Media_Center_on_Windows_7.png

Your wasting your time he attempted to trap his argument by say "As We Know Today" which is completely irrelevanet to what we were talking about. He knew he was wrong and then used "As we know today" as an out for himself to keep arguing.

Metro "as we know it today", wasn't around until last year, but Metro on desktops has been around since 2003/4.

Metro design on apps don't do window management. You might like the Metro style or not, but no one is complaining about the looks, they are complaining about the Metro implementation of the desktop environment, and that has nothing to do with Zune or WMC.

What's so different about them? I see two similar screens with similar functionality. Metro "as we know it today", wasn't around until last year, but Metro on desktops has been around since 2003/4.

MythTV should sue.

Ahp3pl.jpg

So should Boxee:

lL2ip.jpg

Big full screen UI's have existed for years.

MythTV should sue.

Ahp3pl.jpg

So should Boxee:

lL2ip.jpg

Big full screen UI's have existed for years.

Still got nothing to do with the fact Metro has been around for years, Zune and WMC center aren't just similar to metro, MS actually calls them all metro design. It's there ui they developed it is also a design language what your seeing today is simply an evolution of metro that has been around for years.

Still got nothing to do with the fact Metro has been around for years, Zune and WMC center aren't just similar to metro, MS actually calls them all metro design. It's there ui they developed it is also a design language what your seeing today is simply an evolution of metro that has been around for years.

Again, the Window8 issue is not with Metro, it's with the implementation of the desktop environment. They could have used the Metro style to implement the desktop in a lot of different ways.

The Windows8 UI is not "The Metro UI", it's an implementation of the Windows UI using the Metro style.

I'm done, too. I'm disappointed you cannot understand what I'm saying.

I'm disappointed that you still think we don't understand what you're saying. You are totally oblivious to other peoples opinions. How you got GM I'll never know.

To put it another way, just because we don't agree with your opinions doesn't mean we don't understand them. You have the arrogant assertion that your opinion is right so if we don't agree we must just not understand what you're saying.

I keep seeing reference to desktop apps as legacy apps as if they are going somewhere. That is a little strange. Desktop apps are not legacy apps. In fact they are far superior in functionality and looks when compared to Metro Apps and they are not going anywhere... unless something revolutionary comes up in metro which I don't see happen very soon. Metro was only created keeping touch in perspective... remove that aspect and the whole metro experience looks legacy to me... :p

Don't expect apps like Photoshop or excel or games of this generation with that much amount of functionality to show up for metro, possibly ever...

And one thing the detractors have over looked is that Win32 applications, games, etc. work at least as well on the Windows 8 Consumer Preview as they did on Windows 7 - if not better - on the same hardware.

Why are desktop applications functionally superior? That's easy enough to answer - they have been in development use for years, if not decades, their APIs are documented and known. Windows 8 didn't ignore Win32. Win32 is supported *everywhere except WOA*. While the UI is radically different, the APIs are not. Windows is NOT Linux (where the desktop environment, APIs, and UI are largely the same thing).

That backward compatibility is, in fact, the biggest advantage of Windows 8 (again, everywhere except WOA) - not just the same UI, but the same applications (including all the Win32 applications/games/etc. from as far back as XP). Can you run OS X-native productivity applications on an iPad? Can you run Linux applications *as is* on Android? How much backward compatibility is there between ICS and Froyo? Or even between ICS and Gingerbread?

Windows 8 is not *just* about Metro - or even just about WinRT, let alone just about touch, tablets, and slates. If you think that, you are (nearly literally) missing the forest for the trees.

I'm disappointed that you still think we don't understand what you're saying. You are totally oblivious to other peoples opinions. How you got GM I'll never know.

To put it another way, just because we don't agree with your opinions doesn't mean we don't understand them. You have the arrogant assertion that your opinion is right so if we don't agree we must just not understand what you're saying.

You stated I believe something is not a tablet UI if it works with a keyboard and mouse. I haven't ever stated or suggested that. That proves you didn't understand what I was saying. It's hilarious that you're trying to deny that, considering the posts are here. It's a shame because decent people admit when they're wrong. In this case, I believe I am right, so I am refuting what everyone replies to me. If someone replies to me with a rebuttal that cannot be refuted, that'd be great; however, no one has.

Ahh well. As I said, I'm done here because I have things to get on with, and you either aren't understanding my posts or you're intentionally being awkward.

Well done for trying to insult me, by the way, by wondering why I was asked to become a Global Moderator. Very classy (Y) Perhaps you should instead be wondering why you haven't ever been asked (I'm not suggesting you'd want to be a moderator, I'm just pointing that out, considering you attempted to insult me so).

Bye :)

Well done for trying to insult me, by the way, by wondering why I was asked to become a Global Moderator. Very classy (Y) Perhaps you should be wondering why you haven't ever been asked.

Bye :)

If I had to think everyone on Neowin was stupid to get the job I'd not want the position. Cya. :)

JO4O6.jpg

The resemblance is uncanny! how could I have been so blind!

/sarcasm

I said post facts not screenshots of your opinion come to life.

That's not a screenshot of Metro, it's a screenshot of the Windows 8 Start screen. There are elements of Metro design in both the Start screen and the WMC screenshots that Dot Matrix posted. As mentioned previously the Zune client is another example of an app that uses Metro design.

No it is configured perfectly. It merely is a power monster as I said originally. I have a lot of hardware in it and three 250 Watt TDP graphics cards that even at idle each consume around 40 watts each. Combined with my CPU which is highly overclocked but still manages around 30 watts at idle, my motherboard has separate NF200 chips which each consume around 8 watts idle bringing the total system board power to around 30 watts at idle.and the inefficiencies present in the power supply leaves my system drawing just over 200 watts from the wall when idle.

I really find it shocking on Neowin how some people like you feel themselves the experts on other peoples computers and setups when you don't even know anything about them. You claim my computer doesn't consume 200 watts at idle without even knowing the components I use. What a joke.

Sorry, but properly setup and configured in bios and windows that computer shouldn't need touse 200 watts at idle.

In any case, assuming your commuter hardware is missing the usual power saving features of modern hardware, you completely ignored my point about sleep mode anyway.

Sorry, but properly setup and configured in bios and windows that computer shouldn't need touse 200 watts at idle.

In any case, assuming your commuter hardware is missing the usual power saving features of modern hardware, you completely ignored my point about sleep mode anyway.

My motherboard has a bug where when it enters S1 or S3 power states it locks up and needs to be hard reset. This is a known issue with the motherboard that Asus has not fixed in over 10 Bios updates. They will not RMA the board for it because there is no board they can replace it with that would work. This is not too uncommon in high end self builds where the bleeding edge components have bugs.

Trust me everything in my system is configured properly the power consumption is so high due to the hardware I use. If I had a 6970 or a 7970 or a Core i7 1155 system (I'm using first generation x58 hardware from 2009) I would not have such high power use. No offence to you buy I know my computer pretty damn well right down to every chip on my motherboard. The whole system is water cooled by me, I fitted my own blocks to all my components and built my own loop I braided my own power supply cables. Please don't try to tell me what my computer should be consuming. I wonder do you even know what an NF200 chip is or does? Just a random question.

Again, the Window8 issue is not with Metro, it's with the implementation of the desktop environment. They could have used the Metro style to implement the desktop in a lot of different ways.

The Windows8 UI is not "The Metro UI", it's an implementation of the Windows UI using the Metro style.

But you can still use windows 8 as standard desktop OS and use the start screen as just a start menu, arguably a better one.

Metro style apps are designed to be touch-first. That's a fact.

Except for the fact it's not and metro is older than touch, i.e. WMC

For fast app switching, Microsoft should use the Windows key press to cycle through every application open by default.

Applications need a big X near the top to be closed.

And shutting down needs to be more obvious. Option in the top right corner should do the trick.

And of course, up and down scrolling is needed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!