Recommended Posts

Metro is going to be a big flop. Look at the hate users had when Microsoft just put a glass pane around windows and changed the control panel layout (With Vista). Now they have got rid of the start menu that millions of people know how to use and replaced it with Metro where everything is hidden behind hot corners and swipes.

Public opinion of this OS is going to be dire. I've watched a bunch of videos on YouTube of average people using Windows 8 for the first time and none of them know how to use it. A lot of them can't even get passed the login screen and if they manage that they don't know how to launch apps or get the Metro screen back up to launch a different app that isn't pinned.

The whole thing is just a disaster from inception to execution.

  • Like 2

Metro is going to be a big flop. Look at the hate users had when Microsoft just put a glass pane around windows and changed the control panel layout (With Vista). Now they have got rid of the start menu that millions of people know how to use and replaced it with Metro where everything is hidden behind hot corners and swipes.

Public opinion of this OS is going to be dire. I've watched a bunch of videos on YouTube of average people using Windows 8 for the first time and none of them know how to use it. A lot of them can't even get passed the login screen and if they manage that they don't know how to launch apps or get the Metro screen back up to launch a different app that isn't pinned.

The whole thing is just a disaster from inception to execution.

But it has a mail, messaging, and weather app in FULL SCREEN. That's new and exciting right? That kind of thing has never been done before.

But it has a mail, messaging, and weather app in FULL SCREEN. That's new and exciting right?

You know it's funny but I can get Mail, Messaging and Weather on my 3.5" Smart Phone but apparently Microsoft thinks that's not good enough and wants to take that same information and put it on my 30" display in full screen. This is innovation apparently.

  • Like 3

Metro is going to be a big flop. Look at the hate users had when Microsoft just put a glass pane around windows and changed the control panel layout (With Vista). Now they have got rid of the start menu that millions of people know how to use and replaced it with Metro where everything is hidden behind hot corners and swipes.

Public opinion of this OS is going to be dire. I've watched a bunch of videos on YouTube of average people using Windows 8 for the first time and none of them know how to use it. A lot of them can't even get passed the login screen and if they manage that they don't know how to launch apps or get the Metro screen back up to launch a different app that isn't pinned.

The whole thing is just a disaster from inception to execution.

You just kinda killed your own reply. People hated AERO at first, and the new Control Panel, but now they're complaining because AERO is going away, and they've adapted to the new layout of the Control Panel. Also, Metro has some killer features which I think users will love. Live tiles are going to be hard to beat.

  • Like 1

You just kinda killed your own reply. People hated AERO at first, and the new Control Panel, but now they're complaining because AERO is going away, and they've adapted to the new layout of the Control Panel. Also, Metro has some killer features which I think users will love. Live tiles are going to be hard to beat.

I disagree with that. And I was wrong with the aero the control panel stuff. What I meant to say was people hated UAC. And with Windows 7, UAC was toned down considerably. I don't actually remember people having a problem with Aero or the Control Panel because you could set both to the classic style anyway.

I'm convinced that Windows 8 will be hated by the public though and will be the butt of jokes for years to come.

This day and age everything that?s different seems to be regarded as bad. I see friends automatically installing Firefox/Chrome without them being aware of IE9, I see friends going to Google instead of Bing.

Hmmm... considering that IE9 is the default, is it not fair to say that Chrome and Firefox are different, sort of nullifying your own point? Same with bing, isn't that IE9's default search?

Are you sure that you're friends are unaware of IE9? I mean, I don't know anyone that installed alternative browsers without knowing why they'd want to.

I'm convinced that Windows 8 will be hated by the public though and will be the butt of jokes for years to come.

I might not go that far, but I think this rough beginning will last a while longer yet. People - maybe even myself - will come around to the idea eventually. Either that or they'll move to another OS, but I can't imagine those numbers being high enough to make Microsoft rethink their decision. More is the pity, in my opinion.

I disagree with that. And I was wrong with the aero the control panel stuff. What I meant to say was people hated UAC. And with Windows 7, UAC was toned down considerably.

Well it was made adjustable but, by default, it was still triggered by the same sort of things. What did happen though was that lots of software became compliant and therefore people got a lot less prompts. The work I did for UAC compliance in our software for Vista didn't need updating for 7.

I'm still keen to see what the desktop looks like in the release build next month - so far we're still using one that looks much like 7.

My main problem with Win 8 is how it makes things that were really quick and simple in Win 7 to require more steps. How do I add a shortcut to the desktop? Shutting down the PC requires a bunch of mouse clicks and no I don't use keyboard shortcuts. When the PC starts I am greeted by a wallpaper than needs to be pushed up like I am using a cell phone. Windows 8 is just ridiculous for a desktop if you ask me.

My main problem with Win 8 is how it makes things that were really quick and simple in Win 7 to require more steps. How do I add a shortcut to the desktop? Shutting down the PC requires a bunch of mouse clicks and no I don't use keyboard shortcuts. When the PC starts I am greeted by a wallpaper than needs to be pushed up like I am using a cell phone. Windows 8 is just ridiculous for a desktop if you ask me.

You haven't used it much, have you?

Problem 1: If an app supports it, a desktop shortcut will be placed automatically, otherwise, you'll have to browse to the Program's folder. You can also right click on its tile in the Start Screen and pin it to the taskbar.

Problem 2: Easily solved by pressing any key on the keyboard, or clicking the mouse.

well people are suggesting that the user interface was made for tablets and touch and that using a keyboard and mouse is only used to emulate the touch experience. well i think people are dead wrong. the UI and winrt are not just for touch. thats what some people are misunderstanding. but until it is actually released,and all the software shows them this, they will continue to repeat the same nonesense over and over.

the app switcher at the left is just like the bar at the bottom in windows 7,except its hidden until you hover to the left corner

you can have 2 windows open at the same time. how many people have 3 windows opens at the same time ?

some apps will let you scroll horizontally instead of vertically, which is possible using the scroll bar on a mouse, whats the big deal?

i have a feeling all these whiners are just bitter android users who dont want to admit they like it because theyve spent considerable amounts of time down talking windows phone, and spent all their time promoting whatever android they have,and now to support windows 8 would be disrespect to their allegiance.

and mac fans will always be mac fans.

You know it's funny but I can get Mail, Messaging and Weather on my 3.5" Smart Phone but apparently Microsoft thinks that's not good enough and wants to take that same information and put it on my 30" display in full screen. This is innovation apparently.

Or just a tab in your web browser, the program that makes up for about 95% of use on most peoples pcs. No extra "apps" needed.

Metro is going to be a big flop. Look at the hate users had when Microsoft just put a glass pane around windows and changed the control panel layout (With Vista). Now they have got rid of the start menu that millions of people know how to use and replaced it with Metro where everything is hidden behind hot corners and swipes.

Public opinion of this OS is going to be dire. I've watched a bunch of videos on YouTube of average people using Windows 8 for the first time and none of them know how to use it. A lot of them can't even get passed the login screen and if they manage that they don't know how to launch apps or get the Metro screen back up to launch a different app that isn't pinned.

The whole thing is just a disaster from inception to execution.

The hate, Vice, is entirely due to it being different. No Start menu. Aero gone going forward. Touch support added.

It's a subjective/emotional and non-logical argument/opinion - which is why it can't be clearly expressed.

And when the illogic of that position is pointed out to them, the reaction is all too human - they get defensive.

I get part of it - there has been change - and a lot of it bad - since the launch of Windows 7 alone. An unchanged Windows 7 is comfort, *because* it hasn't changed.

You haven't used it much, have you?

There's stacks of people who've 'read' about it but not used it and and those who've used it briefly and couldn't be bothered to read anything telling them how it works. I struggled to begin with because things were different but with a little research I got the hang of it quite quickly. I had to do the same with my iPad 3 because there's stacks of 'non obvious' gestures for that too (and nothing to tell me about them). I don't agree with all the choices (can't see the point in removing the start button, but it's easy to add one yourself if you want) but I'm willing to give MS some time to pursue something new because Windows does need to change and move on.

Also, to be fair i've been using the DP and the CP full time at work and apart from the initial speed bump i'm perfectly happy using it. In fact, I now prefer it.

Weirdness.

There's stacks of people who've 'read' about it but not used it and and those who've used it briefly and couldn't be bothered to read anything telling them how it works. I struggled to begin with because things were different but with a little research I got the hang of it quite quickly. I had to do the same with my iPad 3 because there's stacks of 'non obvious' gestures for that too (and nothing to tell me about them). I don't agree with all the choices (can't see the point in removing the start button, but it's easy to add one yourself if you want) but I'm willing to give MS some time to pursue something new because Windows does need to change and move on.

Also, to be fair i've been using the DP and the CP full time at work and apart from the initial speed bump i'm perfectly happy using it. In fact, I now prefer it.

Weirdness.

I struggled too, mainly due to the change, but also due to the roughness of the early builds. But so far in the RP, I'm pretty fluent, and quick to find things now.

I don't see it going down all that well with the general public either. The average person is just going to boot it up and think "where the hell are my desktop and start menu". In essence, Microsoft are bastardising their products because their coders are apparently too lazy to create a different version for tablets.

I struggled too, mainly due to the change, but also due to the roughness of the early builds. But so far in the RP, I'm pretty fluent, and quick to find things now.

Yup, definitely fair - the DP was harder to use and they improved mouse targets considerably. That said i'm a keyboard junkie anyway and since they've added shedloads of shortcuts for power users i'm a happy bunny. Win + X :)

I don't see it going down all that well with the general public either. The average person is just going to boot it up and think "where the hell are my desktop and start menu". In essence, Microsoft are bastardising their products because their coders are apparently too lazy to create a different version for tablets.

:rolleyes:

You guys need to realize something. You are asking general users to adopt change to a new UI paradigm and way of doing things. How many of those general users have jobs? How many of those general users will be using XP/Vista/7 still at that job? Sooner or later, general users ARE forced to upgrade (their computer died and need to get a new one). NOW are are asking general users to learn two different ways of doing things "just because"?

No, I really think Windows 8 will not do so well on the DESKTOP. IT support is going to be fun once Windows 8 is released. I remember trying to help somebody on the phone for 20 minutes trying to find the start menu at the bottom left. Some people just have very difficult time working with computers.

Windows 8 is a very inconsistent OS, and I know a few people that do not want to learn two ways of doing something (work and home). Note: They were able to use Windows 8 just fine, but they did not want to remember two ways of doing things. Ever since Windows 95, things have been pretty much the same. Now they are not.

I see friends automatically installing Firefox/Chrome without them being aware of IE9

I don't know about your friends, but IE9 sucks. Sure, it supports add-ins finally, but most of the addons that I use are not available for it, plus Chrome is much faster, at least to me. The only reason I still use IE at all is because the certain individuals at my company don't know how to make our $500k+ enterprise app work on any other browser.

BS... I've used every version of Windows, and ME was a giant **** show of epic proportions, mostly because it was dropped on computers without people being aware, and it's main feature was that it could BSOD in record time. With no explanation or support from MS, either, and many people had the option to use 2000 or ME at the time, which was like choosing between a pick-up truck or a dead horse, but since MS played the "oh, ME is better for home use" up, too many people went with it.

And, it wasn't even the worst of the Windows OSs. Vista was a complete disaster... I tried running it once years after it came out (during the Windows 7 beta), and hardware support for the PC I had built was the worst I've ever seen out of an OS (and that includes some random Linux distros).

Windows 8? It's actually pretty nice. And that's coming from someone who mostly uses Macs.

see now for me windows ME barely bluescreened and ran pretty well for me, also my old athlon x2 and all my hardware with it ran vista like a dream from day one, its all mixxed bags for everyone hell windows 98 was more unstable for me back on my amd pentium clone.

now with windows 8 i cant wait to play around with it =]

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!