Recommended Posts

Much of America (No, of course not all of it) hates gays, loves guns and violence, rejects evolution and LOVES the god of Abraham.

America = part of the Middle East?

The part about much of America loving guns and violence is simply not true. There are sections of the nation that love having the right to own guns, but only a small part of it is vocal, and most of America actually hates violence unless we are talking about what is shown in our entertainment.

^^____ You noticed that too, 'eh?

We spend hour after hour, year after year, trying to do good works though our church; food kitchens, taking care of pregnant girls, aid to the aged, poor & handicapped, disaster relief, trucking busloads of us hundreds of miles to take part in Freedom March's in the 1960's etc., then get hit with this kind of ignorant crap from online know-nothings.

Yeah, we're really oppressing them.

This is why I was saying that earlier - some on this board are carelessly throwing anything religious into one lump sum, judging all using extremist examples, which is not only insulting to the intelligence of the reader, but to all who consider themselves religious in any way.

I always thought there was a 'don't ask, don't tell' policy in the guides, scouts & services in the U.S.A.

So fracking what if someone like their own sex.

I have a feeling it's those that have a lot to hide don't want to be exposed as homosexual themselves that shout so loud over things like this.

Homophobia is all about bashing people because you don't like the way they live their lives. Why should bigoted asshats be immune from criticism? People might have freedom of speech, but that doesn't give us an obligation to pretend that their bigoted hate is some kind of special flower that needs to be protected from criticism.

I think you've read my comment and assumed I was somehow defending those against gays. I thought my clarification of "bashing people" being unacceptable would have made that obvious. Maybe I should repeat that tidbit in the same obnoxious reverberating tone as Shakey. It certainly is profound.

Don't like the boy scouts stance on homosexuals? Don't let your kids join.

/end discussion

Remove public funding, then it can be called private and truly be free to do what they want. Then you can decree end of discussion.

Half of you people probably 1. don't live in the U.S or don't even have jobs and complain about public funding lol.

It seems to be red herring night on neowin. What you just posted is exactly that. I live in the US and have a job working roughly 16hr days. So now that we have gotten that out of the way, do you have anything actually worthy of saying?

The part about much of America loving guns and violence is simply not true. There are sections of the nation that love having the right to own guns, but only a small part of it is vocal, and most of America actually hates violence unless we are talking about what is shown in our entertainment.

I am quite happy to accept that.

It seems to be red herring night on neowin. What you just posted is exactly that. I live in the US and have a job working roughly 16hr days. So now that we have gotten that out of the way, do you have anything actually worthy of saying?

Why aren't you at work? :p

Just kidding.

Half of you people probably 1. don't live in the U.S or don't even have jobs and complain about public funding lol.

Yeah, that's the usual retort of those that cannot back their viewpoint up with actual logic.

  • Like 3

Thread cleaned

Please do not use derogatory words to refer to groups of people. Thank you.

If only this judicious level of policing is applied to those who slur, attack and denigrate people who profess religious faith. As if there's such a thing as a faithless person, besides smacking of intolerance.

If only this judicious level of policing is applied to those who slur, attack and denigrate people who profess religious faith. As if there's such a thing as a faithless person, besides smacking of intolerance.

You're implying that all faithless people are intolerant?

If only this judicious level of policing is applied to those who slur, attack and denigrate people who profess religious faith. As if there's such a thing as a faithless person, besides smacking of intolerance.

All moderators and supervisors here should take the same action if anyone slurs, attacks, or denigrates a religious person. Religious people are covered in the part of my sentence where I mention "groups of people." If you believe any moderation has been inconsistent in this regard, please do not hesitate to initiate a personal message conversation with me or any other supervisor, and we will investigate :) But discussing it in this thread will derail the thread and take it off-topic, so we can't do that. Thank you.

You're implying that all faithless people are intolerant?

Haha, quite the opposite actually.

But really, as said before, who actually cares about the boy scouts anymore? I don't think I know a single person who was in the boy scouts.

Haha, quite the opposite actually.

But really, as said before, who actually cares about the boy scouts anymore? I don't think I know a single person who was in the boy scouts.

I didn't quote you, I quoted another member.

The part about much of America loving guns and violence is simply not true. There are sections of the nation that love having the right to own guns, but only a small part of it is vocal, and most of America actually hates violence unless we are talking about what is shown in our entertainment.

Thank you. These forums are getting incredibly hostile as of late, especially with these stupid generalizations. Seriously questioning my membership here now too... :/

About as much of a guess as you saying it's not.

How close is 'about' - I already requested being careful about the generalizations and mass groupings of anything religious to this thread, stating that it seems to be looked upon by only using extremist examples.

How close is 'about' - I already requested being careful about the generalizations and mass groupings of anything religious to this thread, stating that it seems to be looked upon by only using extremist examples.

Prob closer then you are willing to accept.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!