Amazing Spider-Man 2

By Rappy
in The Media Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Enthusiast

EmbraceNext

Posted
Posted

^Are you talking about the comic books?

Yes

For those that don't know...

DocOck is now spiderman in the main comic universe. Otto and Parker swapped bodies and Otto killed Parker in the DocOck body. They teased Parker taking back his body but in issue #9, parker is now gone. In an interview with the writer says Parker isn't coming back because Parker is limited and this frees him up to do crazy stuff.

So knowing that, it is hard for me to watch the movie knowing that Marvel has abandoned Peter Parker as spiderman.

Grand Master

Rappy Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

For those that don't know...

DocOck is now spiderman in the main comic universe. Otto and Parker swapped bodies and Otto killed Parker in the DocOck body. They teased Parker taking back his body but in issue #9, parker is now gone. In an interview with the writer says Parker isn't coming back because Parker is limited and this frees him up to do crazy stuff.

x418K.gif

Grand Master

Draconian Guppy

Posted
Posted

Yes

For those that don't know...

DocOck is now spiderman in the main comic universe. Otto and Parker swapped bodies and Otto killed Parker in the DocOck body. They teased Parker taking back his body but in issue #9, parker is now gone. In an interview with the writer says Parker isn't coming back because Parker is limited and this frees him up to do crazy stuff.

So knowing that, it is hard for me to watch the movie knowing that Marvel has abandoned Peter Parker as spiderman.

Yeah it was all over teh internets when this happened... Same thing with captain america.

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Yes

For those that don't know...

DocOck is now spiderman in the main comic universe. Otto and Parker swapped bodies and Otto killed Parker in the DocOck body. They teased Parker taking back his body but in issue #9, parker is now gone. In an interview with the writer says Parker isn't coming back because Parker is limited and this frees him up to do crazy stuff.

So knowing that, it is hard for me to watch the movie knowing that Marvel has abandoned Peter Parker as spiderman.

I don't think Parker is gone for good though. Before issue 9, I thought it was called Superior Spider-Man because Parker would become it again. I'm really hoping Parker returns as Spider-Man.

Also, this movie has no connections with the current comic-books or even the old ones. The movie universe is somewhat a standalone universe kinda like the Ultimate Universe in the comics, etc. I get what you mean though.

Grand Master

Rappy Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

RZ68.png

Emma Stone was spotted on set of The Amazing Spider-Man 2 in very familiar clothes to that of her comic book counterpart Gwen Stacy. This could be a huge spoiler for the movie if it turns out to be true but. Spider-Man was spotted on set filming a scene near a bridge, now we have a photo of Emma Stone in the exact same clothes that

Gwen Stacy was wearing when she died in Amazing Spider-Man #121.

Grand Master

Dinggus

Posted
Posted

Definitely confused with comics, never read them. I just enjoy the movie. Reason for that is because I went to see Iron Man 3 yesterday and the fan reviews on IMDB were pretty upset and one fan even recommended a reboot to save the film.

I wonder how this movie will be compared to the comics, so far I'm learning alot from the spoilers :)

Grand Master

Jamushroom Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Well, that looks... rather interesting. It's going to be somewhat of a let down if it's really going to be an armor.

I was hoping we'd get to see this version of him:

Screenshot-on-2013-05-27-at-10.40.46.png

Oh well, this kindoff makes up for it:

paul-giamatti-the-rhino-amazing-spider-man-2-0514-16-400x470.jpg

:p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Browser vendors pen open letter to Microsoft saying "enough is enough"

      By Primey_ · Posted

      The nerve of Google to sign this.
    • Browser vendors pen open letter to Microsoft saying "enough is enough"

      By s0nic69 · Posted

      I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • Browser vendors pen open letter to Microsoft saying "enough is enough"

      By The Norwegian Drone Pilot · Posted

      The funny thing here is that like 70% or so of the web browser users use 'Google Chrome' as web browser. What I don't understand is that why on earth would ANYONE choose 'Google Chrome' on Windows when 'Microsoft Edge' is not just better in most things, but it's already there right out of the box for the Windows users. Microsoft Edge has less data collection (yes, that's a fact), less RAM usage and is more optimized for Windows (as it's a Microsoft product) right out of the box. I'm sure you will come with the argument of bloat in Microsoft Edge. Sure, but most of that can be fixed with a simple tool (there are many good ones out there for this). Yes, that require a couple of clicks in the same way as it requires several clicks to install 'Google Chrome'. And I'm sure you really love the 4 GB of AI-slop data 'Google Chrome' is downloading for Chrome without you agreeing to it. Fun right? Sure, the way Microsoft is pushing 'Microsoft Edge' on users might not be the best way of doing it and might need to change. But I would never choose 'Google Chrome' over 'Microsoft Edge' today anyways. I'm sure there was a period back in the days when 'Google Chrome' actually was better in most things, but that period is not today.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more

      By David Uzondu · Posted

      JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
    • Browser vendors pen open letter to Microsoft saying "enough is enough"

      By haxasaur · Posted

      That stupid annoying Sign in with Google on all these sites now... get the fk outta here

  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!