Microsoft Could Launch a Start Menu Option in Windows 8


Recommended Posts

From skimming through this thread, I've come to the conclusion that I may be the on,y person that uses the start key on his keyboard to access the start screen. I don't think I've clicked a corner or start orb for years. My usual usage is, Winkey, then type what I need. It's been like that since vista

Steven Sinofsky is no longer head of the Windows division and more and more voices familiar with matter are hinting that a Start Menu option could, after all, land on Windows 8 platforms.

I suspect it will come back now. A week ago I would have said the start menu option was dead in the water but a week ago I would have placed every dime of my money on a bet against Sinofsky leaving Microsoft.

Seems like the OS works perfectly fine to me. Completely usable.

I think you're looking for opinionated words like 'unconventional', 'inconvenient', maybe 'troublesome', etc...

For you my friend, for you. I understand that you adore this way of working buddy, that is great, honestly! Nothing wrong with that at all, no way, but what is completely 'usable' to yourself, might just not be to 'others'?, including myself. :)

What is wrong with that? Is that unconventional, inconvenient, and maybe troublesome all round? Now that is the question? ;)

1. Wall of text...please fix it.

OCD much

2. They didn't talk about it like it was so much code. They had made some serious changes to the OS, and the older start wasn't able to handle some of the changes they made. Their telemetry data was able to tell them how often the start button was actually used. So looking at that data they knew it wasn't really being used, and they already had the start screen ready.

if no one was using it then why put a bigger one that I don't need to use and if I wanted all my icons on the screen Fences is great for that just doble click and they disapear, you don't need the start screen

You should read some of the earlier posts...in particular the post that links to an explanation from one of the folks that worked on OS. It has all this info and more. The reasons for removal were valid.

and if you take out animations, transicions, transparency, and graphics the os will become faster, that's pretty valid to me to make a text OS

Oh, and yeah...they didn't take out Aero. They took out Glass on the frames...but Glass is still present on the taskbar...and Aero is still the primary theme, but with some changes made for Windows 8.

So again...please don't post up something like this without at least checking what you're saying.

really they took out what made Aero Aero without the glass effect guess what it is called "Classic"

1. Nope. It's called being considerate towards people who are going to read your text. People can read things more easily with proper formatting. Not doing that shows contempt and disregard for yourself and potential readers. If you can't take the time to care about what you're presenting...why should they?

2. Evidently I was wrong in point 1 about making it easier to read if the text is well formatted. The point was that people weren't using the start button. That's why that was deprecated. The start menu had issues that were going to take a lot of work to resolve because of other core OS changes. I won't keep repeating this though since it's apparent you don't care.

3. Hmm actually it seems like you have no intention to discuss this. I was reading your post point by point while replying...and I won't waste further time replying to you on this...unless you indicate you actually want to have an honest discussion and not just troll.

From skimming through this thread, I've come to the conclusion that I may be the on,y person that uses the start key on his keyboard to access the start screen. I don't think I've clicked a corner or start orb for years. My usual usage is, Winkey, then type what I need. It's been like that since vista

Actually I use mine all the time, and so do most folks that I know. It seems like it's the people who are resistant to change who don't use it...and since the keyboards have had the WinKey on them for over a decade now it makes sense that they wouldn't want to use it...since back in Windows 95 days most keyboards didn't have that on there.

I suspect it will come back now. A week ago I would have said the start menu option was dead in the water but a week ago I would have placed every dime of my money on a bet against Sinofsky leaving Microsoft.

Considering JL-G is in charge? Nope.

1. Nope. It's called being considerate towards people who are going to read your text. People can read things more easily with proper formatting. Not doing that shows contempt and disregard for yourself and potential readers. If you can't take the time to care about what you're presenting...why should they?

Sorry it's called OCD no one said anythig about it but you, but it's actually weird that you don't OCD about the start screen when it's nothing but a mess of a wall of tiles go figure.

2. Evidently I was wrong in point 1 about making it easier to read if the text is well formatted. The point was that people weren't using the start button. That's why that was deprecated. The start menu had issues that were going to take a lot of work to resolve because of other core OS changes. I won't keep repeating this though since it's apparent you don't care.

oviously it wasn't that difficult to keep it. We already have plenty of third party software doing it so I find it difficult to belive that microsoft a multibillion dollar company can't do it.

3. Hmm actually it seems like you have no intention to discuss this. I was reading your post point by point while replying...and I won't waste further time replying to you on this...unless you indicate you actually want to have an honest discussion and not just troll.

A troll??? just because I don't have the same point of view and I point out some inconsistenciesof the OS.

You still haven't answered why do they keep all the duplicate programs on the desktop since they want to make a lean OS, and why they don't give a choice

and for that I'm a troll :o lol

You tell me. All my icons are organized into groups on the Start Screen. My desktop is as clean as it can be. :D

So you've basically taken what people used to do with the old 9x style start menus, create folders for a task/purpose and group all the relevant shortcuts inside. And you've applied it to the start screen.

That's not progress, that's regression. Search exists for a reason. And honestly, how on earth is that favourites section even useful.

man DM wtf is up with all the IE stuff....? that is a bit messy, do you actually go to every single site that's pinned? I only, have the top 4 I go to most...leaving the others in the browser. See....

AfHV4.jpg

4ti8c.jpg

Not having the start button isn't all that bad, but there are still times I get annoyed that there isn't one. I have contemplated going back to W7, I don't want to go through the headache of getting everything set back up so. I'm sticking to windows 8. Besides I let my mum try it out since she not good with comp's, she likes that it's easier for her to get to things instead of me having to do it for her.

man DM wtf is up with all the IE stuff....? that is a bit messy, do you actually go to every single site that's pinned? I only, have the top 4 I go to most...leaving the others in the browser. See....

AfHV4.jpg

4ti8c.jpg

Not having the start button isn't all that bad, but there are still times I get annoyed that there isn't one. I have contemplated going back to W7, I don't want to go through the headache of getting everything set back up so. I'm sticking to windows 8. Besides I let my mum try it out since she not good with comp's, she likes that it's easier for her to get to things instead of me having to do it for her.

****, stop it! your scaring us.

I really hope they don't bring back the start menu, the start screen is fine, and using metro apps with a start menu would be an even bigger clusterfeck

no it wouldn't be, bring back the start menu, PEOPLE WANT CHOICE

  • Like 3

no it wouldn't be, bring back the start menu, PEOPLE WANT CHOICE

Can we stop focusing on the Start Menu specifically.

I'm willing to bet 90% of the complaints would go away if they added a simple replacement, it doesn't need to be the old start menu. Just a small menu/window with a search box and a couple of "essential" shortcuts. (CPanel etc.)

That would let desktop people use the desktop in peace, the mobile device users can flip between whatever suits the situation and the fanboys can live in Metro and waste their meaningless lives obsessing over their Faycebewk tiles and fawning over images of Sinofsky as usual.

I really hope they don't bring back the start menu, the start screen is fine, and using metro apps with a start menu would be an even bigger clusterfeck

Wrong! move mouse pointer to upper right, bingo! we have the modern UI. why is it so bad to give people what they want or might want? This reminds me of UBISOFT and the ghost recon franchise. we have been wanting the tactical squad based shooter revived but all we get are cinematic, linear trash games and now GR is on the level of Call of duty.

you don't want loyal customers?don't give them what they want. I never or very seldom use modern UI in 8.

Added***. As with all things everyone has their own agenda, this area as well.So we got Modern UI in windows, who's to say the next leader of windows designs something and the modern UI for 8 is out the window?

First Vista's UI was changed with 7, 7 gets changed with 8, 8 will more than likely get changed by 9.... MS hasn't grasped sticking with anything except the start menu. I'm under the impression that MS is somewhat schizophrenic when it comes to UI's and designing the OS overall. wasn't the last head of windows, there when they made 7 and Vista?

A guy could get a freaking headache from all this nonsense :wacko:

Edited by ChrisJ1968

I also prefer my 'favourites' hidden, and where they should be, in my browser lol, and certainly not on my desktop!

You been taking 'e' s lol :D

Start =/= Desktop.

man DM wtf is up with all the IE stuff....? that is a bit messy, do you actually go to every single site that's pinned? I only, have the top 4 I go to most...leaving the others in the browser. See....

More or less. I'm planning to clean up a few later on.

Wrong! move mouse pointer to upper right, bingo! we have the modern UI. why is it so bad to give people what they want or might want? This reminds me of UBISOFT and the ghost recon franchise. we have been wanting the tactical squad based shooter revived but all we get are cinematic, linear trash games and now GR is on the level of Call of duty.

you don't want loyal customers?don't give them what they want. I never or very seldom use modern UI in 8.

Added***. As with all things everyone has their own agenda, this area as well.So we got Modern UI in windows, who's to say the next leader of windows designs something and the modern UI for 8 is out the window?

First Vista's UI was changed with 7, 7 gets changed with 8, 8 will more than likely get changed by 9.... MS hasn't grasped sticking with anything except the start menu. I'm under the impression that MS is somewhat schizophrenic when it comes to UI's and designing the OS overall. wasn't the last head of windows, there when they made 7 and Vista?

A guy could get a freaking headache from all this nonsense :wacko:

So far the only people crying over the decrepit Start Menu are a few techies. A vocal minority who will cry very loudly.

If anything Start will be streamlined in Windows 9, as JL-G is now heading the division. She worked with Sinofsky to develop the Metro UI. So, no, it's not going away.

There just isn't anyway the old menu is coming back at all. It doesn't make sense in the slightest to bring it back. You move computing forward, not back.

Derp Matrix at it again, I see. Yet, no comment from him on the low sales of Windows 8. Oh wait, "Microsoft doesn?t comment on rumors or speculation." Pathetic.

Low OEM sales? Nothing new there. Not an indication of anything. It's just before the holidays.

Not sure why you keep slamming me, but Start is here, and not going anywhere. It's pretty obvious you guys aren't designers or developers. The Metro UI will be improved upon for Windows 9. That's how things go.

It's pretty obvious you guys aren't designers or developers.

Indeed, the abomination known as Metro is a result of developers thinking they are designers.

Not sure why you keep slamming me, but Start is here, and not going anywhere. It's pretty obvious you guys aren't designers or developers. The Metro UI will be improved upon for Windows 9. That's how things go.

I'm a web/graphic designer actually and I think Modern UI is crap.

Let me present a scenario: Graphic designer works on a very detailed graphic which require his attention, he needs an additional app for something

a) In Windows 7 he opens the small (start) menu find what he need and continue his work with as small as possible distraction.

b) In Windows 8 he opens the colorful full screen menu which completely distract him from his work.

How Metro UI will be non-distractive?

Why Microsoft try to force the new UI on their customers?

Microsoft could made the finishing of the setup wizard with user input of selecting UI with or without start menu, it is not that hard as they already have 99% of everything needed.

Let me present a scenario: Graphic designer works on a very detailed graphic which require his attention, he needs an additional app for something

a) In Windows 7 he opens the small (start) menu find what he need and continue his work with as small as possible distraction.

b) In Windows 8 he opens the colorful full screen menu which completely distract him from his work.

How Metro UI will be non-distractive?

Why Microsoft try to force the new UI on their customers?

Microsoft could made the finishing of the setup wizard with user input of selecting UI with or without start menu, it is not that hard as they already have 99% of everything needed.

The reason for this has already been posted at least twice in this thread. It wasn't a random removal.

Will everyone stop posting about how easy this is until after you read the post from Brandon about this.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!