Former LAPD officer goes over the edge


Recommended Posts

Yea im just reading tweets saying no body was found too, from LAPD apparently. CBS have bad informants it seems.

I think all the major news outlets jumped the gun...CNN, ABC and Fox all reported / cited an AP "source".

Get the gas and burn it down

http://m.youtube.com...Dyoutu.be&gl=GB

Just saw the video from another source. There you go ladies and gents, police will get away with murder. They obviously didn't want any questions asked if they caught him alive.

Maybe that's the reason why now they are saying they didn't find his body :rolleyes:

Burn that ****** out

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=1T6cG7FC71c&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D1T6cG7FC71c%26feature%3Dyoutu.be&gl=GB

From a tweet:

@YourAnonNews: MSM is theorizing, so are we: Did media helicopters get called back to prevent footage of cops starting cabin fire to burn #Dorner alive?

If there really was a conspiracy it wouldn't be done over freely accessible radio frequencies that are monitored. The real issue is a systemic lack of accountability that allows police officers to believe they are above the law, made worse by overly emotional officers with poor training. Clearly setting fire to a building to flush out a suspect is illegal and idiotic - especially when monitored by the media. Officers shouldn't be allowed to run around like headless chickens, acting on whatever comes into their head. I can't believe for a second that any police protocol recommends setting a building on fire with somebody inside, which means that the chain of command and poor discipline are to blame - likely it's a combination of arrogance, incompetence, corruption and panic.

If there really was a conspiracy it wouldn't be done over freely accessible radio frequencies that are monitored. The real issue is a systemic lack of accountability that allows police officers to believe they are above the law, made worse by overly emotional officers with poor training. Clearly setting fire to a building to flush out a suspect is illegal and idiotic - especially when monitored by the media. Officers shouldn't be allowed to run around like headless chickens, acting on whatever comes into their head. I can't believe for a second that any police protocol recommends setting a building on fire with somebody inside, which means that the chain of command and poor discipline are to blame - likely it's a combination of arrogance, incompetence, corruption and panic.

According to what they said over the radio, they planned for this eventuality. I assume they would have used the same 'burn plan' if they found him in a cabin through their searches. Not due panic or incompetence. Well planned and executed and came prepared with the tools to do it.

According to what they said over the radio, they planned for this eventuality. Not due panic or incompetence. Well planned and executed.

They planned to set fire to a building with him inside? I knew US policing was bad but that's ridiculous.

Unfortunately it backs up the reason he went on this rampage to begin with, ironically if he is dead, he died in exactly the way he was trying to prove happens in the police force.

Well, his beef was with LAPD. Not sure which department planned and executed the burning.

Cabin burned, and they expect to find a charred body inside. Unless it's another victim / accomplice & he split that's it.

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2013/02/12/authorities-responding-to-big-bear-home-on-report-of-hostage-situation-unknown-if-connected-to-dorner/

What he did was wrong, wrong, wrong, but it's looking like LA PD & city govt. has a lot of explaining to do too. Hopefully there is a real tough investigative team empaneled by the Feds as IMO no one in California has the credibility to mount one.

This whole thing stinks to High Heaven.

  • Like 2

The fire could have been set by him, started by a tear gas canister or by a flash-bang (stun) grenade.

"Pushed back inside"?!?

By return fire (as in he came out shooting), fine. No problem.

Pushed back by unprompted firing by police and/or physically, then we have another problem.

If there really was a conspiracy it wouldn't be done over freely accessible radio frequencies that are monitored. The real issue is a systemic lack of accountability that allows police officers to believe they are above the law, made worse by overly emotional officers with poor training. Clearly setting fire to a building to flush out a suspect is illegal and idiotic - especially when monitored by the media. Officers shouldn't be allowed to run around like headless chickens, acting on whatever comes into their head. I can't believe for a second that any police protocol recommends setting a building on fire with somebody inside, which means that the chain of command and poor discipline are to blame - likely it's a combination of arrogance, incompetence, corruption and panic.

Well, they asked all media outlets to cut the live feed. Then a few minutes later, we hear reports of the cabin burning down.

Suspicious no ?

I've got to admit that I've not been keeping track of this incident, but is it really considered a legitimate tactic to burn a building down for one guy? Would setting up a siege not have been more appropriate, followed by a night assault?

EDIT: I'm still trying to wrap my head around this. Legitimate or not, it's certainly barbaric.

I've got to admit that I've not been keeping track of this incident, but is it really considered a legitimate tactic to burn a building down for one guy? Would setting up a siege not have been more appropriate, followed by a night assault?

EDIT: I'm still trying to wrap my head around this. Legitimate or not, it's certainly barbaric.

If they did that, then whoever made that decision, and whoever actually DID it, should be tried for murder.

  • Like 1

The fire could have been set by him, started by a tear gas canister or by a flash-bang (stun) grenade.

"Pushed back inside"?!?

By return fire (as in he came out shooting), fine. No problem.

Pushed back by unprompted firing by police and/or physically, then we have another problem.

That pretty much sums it up. If the fire was non-deliberate (i.e. grenade or flashbang) and he tried to make a run for it without surrendering but was forced back by suppressing fire then that doesn't sound unreasonable given the danger he posed, though depending on the circumstances the police are maybe still culpable for his death (i.e. negligence). If the fire was started deliberately then that's attempted murder / murder, especially if he was physically forced inside the building in order to burn to death. Either way there are serious questions that need to be asked about the policing in this situation.

Given the media presence and monitoring of police radio frequencies I suspect a much more complete picture will emerge. Just because police officers talked about setting the cabin on fire in the heat of the moment (no pun intended) doesn't mean that they carried out such actions, as I imagine there was a degree of panic and anger at the scene after the shooting of two officers.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
    • 1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices by Fiza Ali Amazon is now offering the 1TB variant of Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSD at great prices with limited-time 38% and 39% discounts, respectively, so you may want to check them out if you have been looking to upgrade your storage solution. The Samsung T9 connects via a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) interface and delivers sequential read speeds of up to 2,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,950MB/s, making it suitable for transferring large files, backing up data, and handling high-resolution media content. When it comes to the security features, the SSD includes AES 256-bit hardware encryption to help protect sensitive data. Designed for portability, the drive is reportedly resistant to drops from heights of up to 3 metres. Furthermore, it operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 60°C and can be stored at temperatures between -40°C and 85°C. Samsung Magician Software is included for drive management, firmware updates, performance optimisation, and health monitoring. Finally, the T9 is certified to multiple international standards, including CE, FCC, UL, UKCA, and RoHS 2 compliance, and is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 1TB Samsung T9 SSD: $179.99 (Amazon US) - 38% off The Samsung 9100 PRO uses the M.2 2280 form factor and connects through a PCIe 5.0 x4 interface with NVMe 2.0 support. Built with Samsung V-NAND TLC flash memory, an in-house controller, and 1GB of low-power DDR4X cache memory, the 9100 PRO is engineered for high-performance computing and gaming workloads. Furthermore, the SSD delivers sequential read speeds of up to 14,700MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 13,300MB/s. Random performance is rated at up to 1,850,000 IOPS for reads and up to 2,600,000 IOPS for writes, depending on system hardware and configuration. The drive supports TRIM, S.M.A.R.T monitoring, automatic garbage collection, and device sleep mode to help maintain performance and efficiency over time. In terms of security features, it includes AES 256-bit encryption, TCG Opal support, and IEEE 1667 compliance. The 9100 PRO operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 70°C, is rated for 1.5 million hours MTBF, and can reportedly withstand shocks of up to 1,500G for 0.5 milliseconds. Finally, Samsung Magician Software is also included for firmware updates, performance monitoring, drive management, and optimisation. 1TB Samsung 9100 PRO SSD: $206.99 (Amazon US) - 39% off Alternatively, you can also check out other SSD deals here. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • This is about the already discredited 2025 announcement. Not the current one, which I've heard nothing negative about in the academic literature.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!