Former LAPD officer goes over the edge


Recommended Posts

Yea im just reading tweets saying no body was found too, from LAPD apparently. CBS have bad informants it seems.

I think all the major news outlets jumped the gun...CNN, ABC and Fox all reported / cited an AP "source".

Get the gas and burn it down

http://m.youtube.com...Dyoutu.be&gl=GB

Just saw the video from another source. There you go ladies and gents, police will get away with murder. They obviously didn't want any questions asked if they caught him alive.

Maybe that's the reason why now they are saying they didn't find his body :rolleyes:

Burn that ****** out

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=1T6cG7FC71c&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D1T6cG7FC71c%26feature%3Dyoutu.be&gl=GB

From a tweet:

@YourAnonNews: MSM is theorizing, so are we: Did media helicopters get called back to prevent footage of cops starting cabin fire to burn #Dorner alive?

If there really was a conspiracy it wouldn't be done over freely accessible radio frequencies that are monitored. The real issue is a systemic lack of accountability that allows police officers to believe they are above the law, made worse by overly emotional officers with poor training. Clearly setting fire to a building to flush out a suspect is illegal and idiotic - especially when monitored by the media. Officers shouldn't be allowed to run around like headless chickens, acting on whatever comes into their head. I can't believe for a second that any police protocol recommends setting a building on fire with somebody inside, which means that the chain of command and poor discipline are to blame - likely it's a combination of arrogance, incompetence, corruption and panic.

If there really was a conspiracy it wouldn't be done over freely accessible radio frequencies that are monitored. The real issue is a systemic lack of accountability that allows police officers to believe they are above the law, made worse by overly emotional officers with poor training. Clearly setting fire to a building to flush out a suspect is illegal and idiotic - especially when monitored by the media. Officers shouldn't be allowed to run around like headless chickens, acting on whatever comes into their head. I can't believe for a second that any police protocol recommends setting a building on fire with somebody inside, which means that the chain of command and poor discipline are to blame - likely it's a combination of arrogance, incompetence, corruption and panic.

According to what they said over the radio, they planned for this eventuality. I assume they would have used the same 'burn plan' if they found him in a cabin through their searches. Not due panic or incompetence. Well planned and executed and came prepared with the tools to do it.

According to what they said over the radio, they planned for this eventuality. Not due panic or incompetence. Well planned and executed.

They planned to set fire to a building with him inside? I knew US policing was bad but that's ridiculous.

Unfortunately it backs up the reason he went on this rampage to begin with, ironically if he is dead, he died in exactly the way he was trying to prove happens in the police force.

Well, his beef was with LAPD. Not sure which department planned and executed the burning.

Cabin burned, and they expect to find a charred body inside. Unless it's another victim / accomplice & he split that's it.

http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2013/02/12/authorities-responding-to-big-bear-home-on-report-of-hostage-situation-unknown-if-connected-to-dorner/

What he did was wrong, wrong, wrong, but it's looking like LA PD & city govt. has a lot of explaining to do too. Hopefully there is a real tough investigative team empaneled by the Feds as IMO no one in California has the credibility to mount one.

This whole thing stinks to High Heaven.

  • Like 2

The fire could have been set by him, started by a tear gas canister or by a flash-bang (stun) grenade.

"Pushed back inside"?!?

By return fire (as in he came out shooting), fine. No problem.

Pushed back by unprompted firing by police and/or physically, then we have another problem.

If there really was a conspiracy it wouldn't be done over freely accessible radio frequencies that are monitored. The real issue is a systemic lack of accountability that allows police officers to believe they are above the law, made worse by overly emotional officers with poor training. Clearly setting fire to a building to flush out a suspect is illegal and idiotic - especially when monitored by the media. Officers shouldn't be allowed to run around like headless chickens, acting on whatever comes into their head. I can't believe for a second that any police protocol recommends setting a building on fire with somebody inside, which means that the chain of command and poor discipline are to blame - likely it's a combination of arrogance, incompetence, corruption and panic.

Well, they asked all media outlets to cut the live feed. Then a few minutes later, we hear reports of the cabin burning down.

Suspicious no ?

I've got to admit that I've not been keeping track of this incident, but is it really considered a legitimate tactic to burn a building down for one guy? Would setting up a siege not have been more appropriate, followed by a night assault?

EDIT: I'm still trying to wrap my head around this. Legitimate or not, it's certainly barbaric.

I've got to admit that I've not been keeping track of this incident, but is it really considered a legitimate tactic to burn a building down for one guy? Would setting up a siege not have been more appropriate, followed by a night assault?

EDIT: I'm still trying to wrap my head around this. Legitimate or not, it's certainly barbaric.

If they did that, then whoever made that decision, and whoever actually DID it, should be tried for murder.

  • Like 1

The fire could have been set by him, started by a tear gas canister or by a flash-bang (stun) grenade.

"Pushed back inside"?!?

By return fire (as in he came out shooting), fine. No problem.

Pushed back by unprompted firing by police and/or physically, then we have another problem.

That pretty much sums it up. If the fire was non-deliberate (i.e. grenade or flashbang) and he tried to make a run for it without surrendering but was forced back by suppressing fire then that doesn't sound unreasonable given the danger he posed, though depending on the circumstances the police are maybe still culpable for his death (i.e. negligence). If the fire was started deliberately then that's attempted murder / murder, especially if he was physically forced inside the building in order to burn to death. Either way there are serious questions that need to be asked about the policing in this situation.

Given the media presence and monitoring of police radio frequencies I suspect a much more complete picture will emerge. Just because police officers talked about setting the cabin on fire in the heat of the moment (no pun intended) doesn't mean that they carried out such actions, as I imagine there was a degree of panic and anger at the scene after the shooting of two officers.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The laptop in the bedroom is an Acer with i7-10510U CPU. Acer's website states they will not be upgrading it so I had little choice other than disable secure boot. I know next to nothing on these matters so hopefully it will be fine.
    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!