Sexual Orientation (2003 to 2006)

By CtotheJ
in Poll Station

 Share

I AM A / WHO LIKES  

1956 members have voted

  1. 1. I AM A / WHO LIKES

    • Male / Male
      131
    • Male / Female
      1392
    • Male / Male & Female
      103
    • Female / Male
      31
    • Female / Female
      15
    • Female / Male & Female
      13
    • Other (Asexual/Autosexual)
      21

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Samoa

Posted
Posted
ok, i agree w/ that you said... i guess im being close minded by saying that.. basically im just trying to get my point across that people say that b/c of the morals they grew up w/... and usually those morals are based on culture and religion.

585157001[/snapback]

Is there anything wrong with having morals? I think not. Trustworthy people have a system by which they choose what is right and wrong, morals.
Experienced

The Grasshopper

Posted
Posted
No confusion, your position is obviously too weak to withstand any questioning, (as is common with these things) but it is your position to take, and I respect that. Keep your mind closed

That has nothing to do with being "closed minded".

that is an ignorant statement.

just because someone diagrees with you or your opinon or sexuality doesn't make them close minded. I however think that you are close minded for uttering it!

Grand Master

Samoa

Posted
Posted
No confusion, your position is obviously too weak to withstand any questioning, (as is common with these things) but it is your position to take, and I respect that. Keep your mind closed  :rolleyes:

audiosheine you have basically said exactly what my opinion is on this subject  :yes:

585157004[/snapback]

(sigh) typical...I expected as much from you.

Proficient

SOB BOT

Posted
Posted
That has nothing to do with being "closed minded".

that is an ignorant statement.

just because someone diagrees with you or your opinon or sexuality doesn't make them close minded. I however think that you are close minded for uttering it!

585157018[/snapback]

Not close minded for having the opinion, close minded for not discussing it.

It's like me saying

"Everyone should be gay"

then someone asks "Why?" and I get all upset over it and dont discuss it.

This would be keeping my mind closed

Experienced

The Grasshopper

Posted
Posted
Not close minded for having the opinion, close minded for not discussing it.

It's like me saying

"Everyone should be gay"

then  someone asks "Why?" and I get all upset over it and dont discuss it.

This would be keeping my mind closed

585157027[/snapback]

didn't he answer the question?

Grand Master

Samoa

Posted
Posted
Not close minded for having the opinion, close minded for not discussing it.

It's like me saying

"Everyone should be gay"

then? someone asks "Why?" and I get all upset over it and dont discuss it.

This would be keeping my mind closed

585157027[/snapback]

You apparenty aren't able to discuss anything, as you are set to attack anyone who has an opinion different from yours. Being open minded does not mean you have to be willing to discuss things. Your arguements are circular and hostile.

I'm hardly upset, I've stated my belief, and I do not have to discuss it if I don't want to, or discuss it with you.

Grand Master

Samoa

Posted
Posted
No, he got upset and accused me of stalking.

I asked for some clarification, politely, if you read a couple pages back.

585157046[/snapback]

OK, I take it back, you weren't posting stalking then. I'm sorry. However you are being what you are accussing me of.. ;)

Proficient

SOB BOT

Posted
Posted
You apparenty aren't able to discuss anything, as you are set to attack anyone who has an opinion different from yours. Being open minded does not mean you have to be willing to discuss things. Your arguements are circular and hostile.

I'm hardly upset, I've stated my belief, and I do not have to discuss it if I don't want to, or discuss it with you.

585157044[/snapback]

No one is making you validate your views to me. I *asked* you to. If you don't want to, no problem, but don't go telling me I am attacking or stalking you with absolutely nothing to back it up with.

Grand Master

Fresh

Posted
Posted

I find this discussion to be out of bounds, this is the same thing as having gay marches and demanding people to accept things they do behind closed doors......

If this is truely a thing of "love" or whatever...keep it to yourself and your lover...do not ask others for approval of what you do....not for public discourse. If you bring it to the table be prepared for people to judge.

I do not discuss my sex life with "folks" somethings belong in the closet.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Google DeepMind AI Control Roadmap: When Alignment Fails, Defense-in-Depth Takes Over

      By +TRS-80 · Posted

      Google DeepMind published a document on June 18, 2026, that may be the most consequential admission yet from a frontier AI lab: alignment training alone cannot guarantee that AI agents will remain under human control, so structural containment must be built before more capable models arrive.............. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318758/20260620/google-deepmind-ai-control-roadmap-when-alignment-fails-defense-depth-takes-over.htm  
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By Taliseian · Posted

      I've got a SoundBlasterX G6 that I use in my streaming setup. Sounds great to me and I've had zero issues with the ancient software package so far in Win11. That G6 has 7.1, Dolby, fully working SPDIF and since it's a USB device it's outside of my rig so I don't have to worry about EMF distortion. Looks like for now this is a pass for me as I think I have better hardware....
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By OldGuru · Posted

      How do you connect 5.1 Speakers to this thing?
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed

      By Taliseian · Posted

      I agree with both of you... It's absolutely imperative that science is completely based on actual proven facts and hard evidence and is not considered dogmatic in any way. Science is not a religion and it will never be, and that's exactly how it's supposed to be.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed

      By Chugworth · Posted

      I'd basically agree. The only point I would add is to be careful not to treat science as a religion, complete with priests, dogma, and blasphemy. Humans are highly susceptible to religious-oriented ways of thinking since it aids in forming communities of like-minded people. The problem is that when this happens, nobody wants to be ostracized from the group by saying that a deeply-held idea is wrong. Science and "peer review" are not immune to this behavior, unfortunately. In the end, finding truth is our own responsibility and we can't depend on others to hand it to us. Skepticism is key, along with curiosity and the willingness to critically evaluate and consider ideas both new and old.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!