Sexual Orientation (2003 to 2006)


I AM A / WHO LIKES  

1956 members have voted

  1. 1. I AM A / WHO LIKES

    • Male / Male
      131
    • Male / Female
      1392
    • Male / Male & Female
      103
    • Female / Male
      31
    • Female / Female
      15
    • Female / Male & Female
      13
    • Other (Asexual/Autosexual)
      21


Recommended Posts

I find this discussion to be out of bounds, this is the same thing as having gay marches and demanding people to accept things they do behind closed doors......

If this is truely a thing of "love" or whatever...keep it to yourself and your lover...do not ask others for approval of what you do....not for public discourse. If you bring it to the table be prepared for people to judge.

I do not discuss my sex life with "folks" somethings belong in the closet.

585157078[/snapback]

Being gay or straight isn't only your sex life, it's your interests. If you are attracted to the same sex, you are homosexual, not confined to having sex with the same sex.

Being gay or straight isn't only your sex life, it's your interests. If you are attracted to the same sex, you are homosexual, not confined to having sex with the same sex.

585157085[/snapback]

However you miss your own point, discuss this with your peers with the same intrests...bring it outside of that just opens others hostility....would you not agree?

I'm straight. Sorry, but the thought of a hairy, smelly man ass doesn't appeal to me. It's and exit hole people. An EXIT hole!!!!! It's for teh poopoo to come out of!!!1!!11oneone!1

585138706[/snapback]

Not all gay guys are into teh poopoohole... :x :laugh:

However you miss your own point, discuss this with your peers with the same intrests...bring it outside of that just opens others hostility....would you not agree?

585157109[/snapback]

It *can* but it doesn't have to. The trick is to present your opinion and views in a way that doesn't rub people the wrong way, something that I apparently have to learn how to do :blush:

It *can* but it doesn't have to. The trick is to present your opinion and views in a way that doesn't rub people the wrong way, something that I apparently have to learn how to do  :blush:

585157117[/snapback]

ah...you never have to rub people the wrong way, just know what is personal and keep it as such. If the topic comes up for debate then prepare for a debate. Always be honest in your debate...or you are only convincing yourself.

ah...you never have to rub people the wrong way, just know what is personal and keep it as such. If the topic comes up for debate then prepare for a debate. Always be honest in your debate...or you are only convincing yourself.

585157146[/snapback]

Yeah, what I wanted was someone to convince me why/how homosexuality is wrong. I'm challenging everyone here :p hehe

thats not opinion, thats dictionary ;)

585157062[/snapback]

dictioinary.com

o?pen-mind?ed (pn-mndd)

adj.

Having or showing receptiveness to new and different ideas or the opinions of others. See Synonyms at broad-minded.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

where does it say you have to discuss it? Hardly going to dicuss it with someone who has already been insulting. What id does mean however is what I've already posted. That you accept others have thier own beliefs, you don't have to agree with em.

dictioinary.com

o?pen-mind?ed (pn-mndd)

adj.

Having or showing receptiveness to new and different ideas or the opinions of others. See Synonyms at broad-minded.

585157173[/snapback]

You weren't very receptive to my ideas. In fact you didn't even let me compare my opinions to your own.

make your own thread on the topic, as it seems you aren't secure with your own beliefs. ;)

585157182[/snapback]

You are right, I am not secure. I always question myself and what I believe. That's one of the benefits of discussing things on a forum as other people's opinions help shape my own :)

You weren't very receptive to my ideas. In fact you didn't even let me compare my opinions to your own.

585157188[/snapback]

Receptive? I accept you have yours, which are different than mine and I do not feel I need to "discuss" it with you. Open minded does not mean I have to discuss yours or my beliefs if I choose not to. Open mindedness is simply accepting that others have their own beliefs, and respecting that they are entitled to have them.

Yeah, what I wanted was someone to convince me why/how homosexuality is wrong. I'm challenging everyone here  :p  hehe

585157163[/snapback]

No need to challenge, this is a personal thing......if I were to stumble on such an act...I would be embarrassed for the participants...why....it is a gut feeling...I am not a very religious person...but we all have a core that tells us what is right or wrong. If we all were gay or bent we would not be....

Some folks like doing things that are perverted....I am not saying anything here....but most folks know what I mean....doing sex acts with animals, children, consenting adults, (some countries adult age is 12) dolls, or whatever....that person and that person alone knows.....if what they are doing is right or wrong...not up to the rest of us.

No need to challenge, this is a personal thing......if I were to stumble on such an act...I would be embarrassed for the participants...why....it is a gut feeling...I am not a very religious person...but we all have a core that tells us what is right or wrong. If we all were gay or bent we would not be....

Some folks like doing things that are perverted....I am not saying anything here....but most folks know what I mean....doing sex acts with animals, children, consenting adults, (some countries adult age is 12) dolls, or whatever....that person and that person alone knows.....if what they are doing is right or wrong...not up to the rest of us.

585157204[/snapback]

You have a good point, but not everybody is uncomfortable discussing these things.

Nobody should think less of you if you are not willing to clarify or explain your position, especially with a topic such as this. But I would like somebody who has the same general opinion as Samoa, to explain their position to me so I can understand what they are basing it on, because as you all know, not everybody thinks the same.

I like to question everything people say, not to attack them but to learn. I do the same thing to myself, my beliefs are not set in stone and are open to influence from what other people have to say and what I learn going through life.

So, let's talk

^ it would seem much of the world has my general opinion. Just ask someone you know.. ;)

besides, discussing ones's beliefs here on neowin only leads to trolls and what not bashing you for what you believe. It's a setup, why do it? It's clearly a topic that only someone who is insecure in what they believe feels the need to discuss.

You have a good point, but not everybody is uncomfortable discussing these things.

Nobody should think less of you if you are not willing to clarify or explain your position, especially with a topic such as this. But I would like somebody who has the same general opinion as Samoa, to explain their position to me so I can understand what they are basing it on, because as you all know, not everybody thinks the same.

I like to question everything people say, not to attack them but to learn. I do the same thing to myself, my beliefs are not set in stone and are open to influence from what other people have to say and what I learn going through life.

So, let's talk

585157228[/snapback]

Some things can only be learned through exactly what you ask for....I hope I have helped...others will?.Ultimately you will take things through your own life experiences...and come to your own conclusions....but what matters is how you live your life and if you have children how you want them to live theirs....Merry Christmas and goodnight....

It is always best...

i find this kinda thing "questioning sexual orientation" irritating, and nobody elses business. but im glad everyone else is having fun plz don't let me spoil it. carry on

^ it would seem much of the world has my general opinion. Just ask someone you know.. ;)

besides, discussing ones's beliefs here on neowin only leads to trolls and what not bashing you for what you believe. It's a setup, why do it? It's clearly a topic that only someone who is insecure in what they believe feels the need to discuss.

585157257[/snapback]

I know there are a lot of immature people here but maybe you aren't giving enough credit to the mature people that can discuss without getting offended or flaming.

Edit:

You don't seem to understand. It's not about being "insecure" its about keeping an open mind and hearing what other people have to say.

What harm is there in explaining yourself, or listening to someone's point of view? I am not afraid of somebody attacking my views, so I am saying again, I am open to discussing this with anybody, privately if you want, it is all the same to me.

Edited by Aaryn Kasra
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      580
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!