George Zimmerman has been found not guilty!


Recommended Posts

In every call that Zimmerman made to police the "suspect" was always black. Zimmerman never called the police on a white person. It's in the trial proceedings. I simply made a deduction based on an established pattern. 

 

And generalization is way Trayvon Martin is dead.

 

 

 

So if generalization is why Martin is dead, and you are generalizing...who are you going to off?

In every call that Zimmerman made to police the "suspect" was always black. Zimmerman never called the police on a white person. It's in the trial proceedings. I simply made a deduction based on an established pattern. 

 

And generalization is way Trayvon Martin is dead.

 

Gee golly with your expert eye witness testimony you'd think they would have nailed Zimmerman to the wall and put him on death row for sure. You seem to know exactly what his frame of mind was, what he was thinking, doing, and what his intent was.

From 1976 to 2011, there were 279,384 black murder victims. Of those, 262,621 were committed by other blacks. Being black, I think I have more to fear from the dude down the street, than from someone like Zimmerman.

So if generalization is why Martin is dead, and you are generalizing...who are you going to off?

 

Understanding that I am black male, on the large side, and understanding that there are certain perceptions of being a black male, on the large side, is why I've lived to be 45. My parents had me late in life, they grew up in the South when there wasn't a whole of debate in the matter, "Colored Entrance" was their way of life until they were in their 40s. People routinely boast that they don't care about what other's think of them. I submit that having an understanding of how other perceive you and dealing with it appropriately can keep you breathing. 

 

If Trayvon Martin had understood that he was dealing with a guy with racial issues he may still be alive today. If a white guy is following me at my age I KNOW he probably has a problem with black people. So I say "Yes, sir" and "No, sir" even though I may want to rip the heart of the guy knowing full well he is a bigot. But that was before today. I used to think that you can appease these guys. Now I'm not so sure.

Understanding that I am black male, on the large side, and understanding that there are certain perceptions of being a black male, on the large side, is why I've lived to be 45. My parents had me late in life, they grew up in the South when there wasn't a whole of debate in the matter, "Colored Entrance" was their way of life until they were in their 40s. People routinely boast that they don't care about what other's think of them. I submit that having an understanding of how other perceive you and dealing with it appropriately can keep you breathing. 

 

If Trayvon Martin had understood that he was dealing with a guy with racial issues he may still be alive today. If a white guy is following me at my age I KNOW he probably has a problem with black people. So I say "Yes, sir" and "No, sir" even though I may want to rip the heart of the guy knowing full well he is a bigot. But that was before today. I used to think that you can appease these guys. Now I'm not so sure.

 

So in your view any and all white people who just happen to be going the same direction as you are not only a bigot but also a potential murderer?

 

Then again you have that mind reading talent so you know what everyone else is thinking and what their intent is.

From 1976 to 2011, there were 279,384 black murder victims. Of those, 262,621 were committed by other blacks. Being black, I think I have more to fear from the dude down the street than someone like Zimmerman.

 

But on February 26, 2012 Trayvon Martin was being followed by a guy that wasn't black. Only when these kinds of cases occur does the issues of black on black crime seem to matter beyond the black community. Obviously black on black violence is a huge problem, for blacks. In this case the defense made an unarmed teenager that wasn't doing anything out to be a thug. It's hard to have it both ways.

 

Again, it only seems to reinforce my point, once your spotted as black, you're a threat. Even to blacks. There's no safe haven. 

I guess that if you want to kill somebody and get away with it, do it in Florida.

Most US states have very similar self-defense laws to Florida, including Stand Your Ground (which also exists in Federal law), the Castle Doctrine and a feature that provides self-defenders with civil immunity from lawsuits by the person they shoot, their estate or their families.

So in your view any and all white people who just happen to be going the same direction as you are not only a bigot but also a potential murderer?

 

Then again you have that mind reading talent so you know what everyone else is thinking and what their intent is.

 

You do understand that the even Zimmerman's defense acknowledge that Zimmerman was following Marin and pointed out that following someone is not a crime. I'm 45 years old, I figure out if I'm being followed. It the a 17 year old old in this case had no problem in making that determination. 

I'm going to say this, "reasonable doubt" is and has always been the statute by which our criminal court verdicts are to be reached. And, the fact is that there was reasonable doubt as to whether Zimmerman murdered Martin. That being said, I'm fine with the jury's decision based on the available facts. However, I believe the prosecution perhaps made a mistake in their pursuit of 2nd degree murder and should have pursued manslaughter with a lesser charge of negligent homicide to be considered.

 

To that end, I believe the latter charge to be more akin to what Zimmerman did. Race aside, that evening/night Zimmerman believed he saw someone behaving suspiciously. He phoned 911 to report a suspicious person, gave out a description and the actions of said suspicious person. This is where things should have ended.

 

At that point and time, George Zimmerman should have awaited the police as no crime was being committed and no person was being harmed. Upon the arrival of the police, Zimmerman should have relayed any further information he had to aid THEM in investigating the suspicious person. The police would have thanked him for his vigilance as a member of the neighborhood watched and sent him on his way. They would have then canvased the neighborhood to try and determine the potential threat. However, he chose not to do this. He also chose to follow Martin through the neighborhood, ignoring the advice of the 911 dispatcher. This was a poor decision and negligent on Zimmerman's part. It wasn't just negligent because of what actually happened, but let's think about what could have happened.

 

What if Trayvon had a gun at that time? What if Trayvon shot and killed Zimmerman? Sure, Trayvon would be on trial, but Zimmerman would be dead due to actions he most likely should not have taken. What I'm saying is this, I believe Zimmerman overstepped his bounds. I think he put himself in danger and endangered the life of Trayvon, which he took, and possibly the lives of others. His actions were reckless and showed no regard for anyone, not even himself.

 

He was clearly angry as per his 911 call. In speculating, the firearm emboldened him to do something he may not have otherwise done. But, most of all, he allowed his anger and emotion to override his better judgment. That to me is the very definition of negligent and reckless. In the end, someone is dead, and he has lived through a traumatic ordeal himself with who knows what's left to come.

  • Like 2

You do understand that the even Zimmerman's defense acknowledge that Zimmerman was following Marin and pointed out that following someone is not a crime. I'm 45 years old, I figure out if I'm being followed. It the a 17 year old old in this case had no problem in making that determination. 

 

Yeah, following some one isn't a crime? Still, I'm not sure how that means they're a bigot? Which are your words, not mine.

Most US states have very similar self-defense laws to Florida, including Stand Your Ground (which also exists in Federal law), the Castle Doctrine and a feature that provides self-defenders with civil immunity from lawsuits by the person they shoot, their estate or their families.

 

And that's my point. Being a black person, if I am being followed I think that I have every reason to believe that I have grounds for self defense because of this case simply by being followed. I have to fear for my life at the very instant I know that I am being followed because I would have to assume that the person that is following me means no harm. I don't think that most gun owners I know would assume that, they certainly would be preparing for a conflict at that point by removing the safety. 

The jury instructions clearly stated that you can ot convict someone of manslaughter, much less murder, based on negligence.

 

Please understand that coming from a guy with 7 guns in his sig, this is EXTREMELY troubling. 

Yeah, following some one isn't a crime? Still, I'm not sure how that means they're a bigot? Which are your words, not mine.

 

Again, as soon as Zimmerman saw Martin he made the determination that these "###### always get away." Who exactly are these "######"? How do you know someone is an "######" that you've never met?

And that's my point. Being a black person, if I am being followed I think that I have every reason to believe that I have grounds for self defense because of this case simply by being followed. I have to fear for my life at the very instant I know that I am being followed because I would have to assume that the person that is following me means no harm. I don't think that most gun owners I know would assume that, they certainly would be preparing for a conflict at that point by removing the safety. 

 

Please understand that coming from a guy with 7 guns in his sig, this is EXTREMELY troubling. 

 

Again, as soon as Zimmerman saw Martin he made the determination that these "*******s always get away." Who exactly are these "*******s"? How do you know someone is an "*******" that you've never met?

 

We're talking about you here, not Zimmerman. You're the one saying that if a white person follows you they are a bigot. And not only that, but a potential murderer. You went to great length talking about how you feel unsafe because you're a black man and white people can kill you however they please and get away with it.

But on February 26, 2012 Trayvon Martin was being followed by a guy that wasn't black. Only when these kinds of cases occur does the issues of black on black crime seem to matter beyond the black community. Obviously black on black violence is a huge problem, for blacks. In this case the defense made an unarmed teenager that wasn't doing anything out to be a thug. It's hard to have it both ways.

 

Again, it only seems to reinforce my point, once your spotted as black, you're a threat. Even to blacks. There's no safe haven. 

Well from his background, he is a thug; Though it may not have direct relevance in the case.

If Zimmerman exploits this for monetary gain the Martin family can (I believe) sue for wrongful death.  Zimmerman will be in the poor house with the legal and attorney fees. Also he may still face federal charges for violating Martin's civil rights.  This is not over for Zimmerman.

 

And heatlesssun, I can understand you're strong feelings about this very tragic and unfortunate event, but the state's murder case is finished, no reason to continue rehashing things. 

I'm going to say this, "reasonable doubt" is and has always been the statute by which our criminal court verdicts are to be reached. And, the fact is that there was reasonable doubt as to whether Zimmerman murdered Martin. That being said, I'm fine with the jury's decision based on the available facts. However, I believe the prosecution perhaps made a mistake in their pursuit of 2nd degree murder and should have pursued manslaughter with a lesser charge of negligent homicide to be considered.

 

To that end, I believe the latter charge to be more akin to what Zimmerman did. Race aside, that evening/night Zimmerman believed he saw someone behaving suspiciously. He phoned 911 to report a suspicious person, gave out a description and the actions of said suspicious person. This is where things should have ended.

 

At that point and time, George Zimmerman should have awaited the police as no crime was being committed and no person was being harmed. Upon the arrival of the police, Zimmerman should have relayed any further information he had to aid THEM in investigating the suspicious person. The police would have thanked him for his vigilance as a member of the neighborhood watched and sent him on his way. They would have then canvased the neighborhood to try and determine the potential threat. However, he chose not to do this. He also chose to follow Martin through the neighborhood, ignoring the advice of the 911 dispatcher. This was a poor decision and negligent on Zimmerman's part. It wasn't just negligent because of what actually happened, but let's think about what could have happened.

 

What if Trayvon had a gun at that time? What if Trayvon shot and killed Zimmerman? Sure, Trayvon would be on trial, but Zimmerman would be dead due to actions he most likely should not have taken. What I'm saying is this, I believe Zimmerman overstepped his bounds. I think he put himself in danger and endangered the life of Trayvon, which he took, and possibly the lives of others. His actions were reckless and showed no regard for anyone, not even himself.

 

He was clearly angry as per his 911 call. In speculating, the firearm emboldened him to do something he may not have otherwise done. But, most of all, he allowed his anger and emotion to override his better judgment. That to me is the very definition of negligent and reckless. In the end, someone is dead, and he has lived through a traumatic ordeal himself with who knows what's left to come.

No it wasn't negligence bro. You apply negligence to the act of the crime, not what happened prior. He has no legal obligation to not follow Martin. At no point prior to the physical altercation was any crime committed by both parties.

If Zimmerman exploits this for monetary gain the Martin family can (I believe) sue for wrongful death.  Zimmerman will be in the poor house with the legal and attorney fees. Also he may still face federal charges for violating Martin's civil rights.  This is not over for Zimmerman.

 

And heatlesssun, I can understand you're strong feelings about this very tragic and unfortunate event, but the state's murder case is finished, no reason to continue to rehashing things. 

 

 

What civil rights did he violate?

And that's my point. Being a black person, if I am being followed I think that I have every reason to believe that I have grounds for self defense because of this case simply by being followed. I have to fear for my life at the very instant I know that I am being followed because I would have to assume that the person that is following me means no harm. I don't think that most gun owners I know would assume that, they certainly would be preparing for a conflict at that point by removing the safety.

Of course if Martin had gone straight back to his dads house by sidewalk without weaving between and behind houses '& buildings he might not have attracted anyones attention. That kind of behavior will, be it from cops, residents or whoever. Especially in areas where there have been break-ins or home invasions. Doesn't matter if they're white, black. hispanic or blue with yellow polka dots.

Please understand that coming from a guy with 7 guns in his sig, this is EXTREMELY troubling.

I didn't say it, I just reported what the judges jury instructions were, which are standard and published in a jurists handbook. Big difference.

We're talking about you here, not Zimmerman. You're the one saying that if a white person follows you they are a bigot. And not only that, but a potential murderer. You went to great length talking about how you feel unsafe because you're a black man and white people can kill you however they please and get away with it.

 

Why would a white person be following me if I wasn't doing anything but minding my own business?

Why did he follow the kid and why would a 17 year old attack someone holding a gun while they are on the way home? I am convinced that he wanted to shoot someone and a neighborhood watch is suppose to do just that...watch. I hope his life is miserable. 

he followed the kid because he believed  himself to be neighborhood watch.

 

Zimmerman had his gun in a holster

 

I bet it won't be five years before people forget about it.

Why would a white person be following me if I wasn't doing anything but minding my own business?

How do you know they're following you? They could be going in the same direction but to a destination near yours. Of course if you're going the cross- country route through the sub, cutting behind houses & community buildings off the normal pathways you ARE going to draw attention and suspicion.

Hell, black folks here would be raising the alarm too given the problems in the Detroit area. There was a story on the news tonight about members of a black community going up to suspicious cars in their neighborhood and challenging their intentions.

It isn't race, it's behavior.

plus it was middle of the night and pouring rain, and you are aware that zimmermans community had been hit by a series of break ins and theft by black people no? I would certainly say someone walking through the neighborhood like trayvon was doing while fitting the race of EVERY break in incident that had been happening that month would be suspicious

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I forgot to add on my comment that when robots will take physical jobs, it's when they become more cheaper to manufacture and sell. That will be the starting point of the end to lanscaping, trash pickup, factory jobs, etc.
    • How many people can actually use a 2.5gig ethernet port? Most people do not have more than a 1gig internet connection, heck most have less than that. Most people at home do not have a switch that has multiple 2.5gig ports either.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!