"Threshold" to be Called Windows 9, Ship in April 2015


Recommended Posts

Well its subjective opinion, but the mass majority will agree that the Task Manager, Explorer and many other smaller changes are very accepted.

 

My other fact still remains, they've not removed anything from Windows which made it great.

So a majority of the people.. support removing the start menu from explorer?  Then why are there so many people refusing to buy windows 8?  A majority of users have NOT upgraded to 8. A majority of a minority is still a minority of the whole. I am not saying that some things like improved task manager, better file copy control, etc are not improvements.  But things like Aero being removed, start being removed, forced full screen apps, etc are NOT an improvement.

Then make it 3 way.. but make it a choice to have.  I want a start MENU, Aero, no full screen unless I set the window properties to full screen, etc.  

 

Again, as long as the choice is there for either the Screen, or a Modern-style menu. If a text list becomes the only option again I'm sticking with 8.1

 

Rather than having the hybrid removed, I want it improved upon. I don't like feeling like I'm running programs in a virtual machine. I'd much rather have them integrated into the main OS interface, even if it's just making the sidebar program list more aware of what's running on the desktop. And if Microsoft or someone else came up with a wrapper that let desktop programs run in Modern, I'd almost never see the desktop. (Like Modern Mix, but in the opposite direction.)

 

Nothing's keeping me on the desktop except the greater range of available programs. And  I haven't found a good file manager for Modern yet. But until developers release more robust programs for Modern, I can't do without the desktop just yet.

Again, as long as the choice is there for either the Screen, or a Modern-style menu. If a text list becomes the only option again I'm sticking with 8.1

 

Rather than having the hybrid removed, I want it improved upon. I don't like feeling like I'm running programs in a virtual machine. I'd much rather have them integrated into the main OS interface, even if it's just making the sidebar program list more aware of what's running on the desktop. And if Microsoft or someone else came up with a wrapper that let desktop programs run in Modern, I'd almost never see the desktop. (Like Modern Mix, but in the opposite direction.)

 

Nothing's keeping me on the desktop except the greater range of available programs. And  I haven't found a good file manager for Modern yet. But until developers release more robust programs for Modern, I can't do without the desktop just yet.

 

Definitely a different strokes for different folks scenario.  Makes it much harder to code for, but with the changes they made to 8.. it's definitely a screwed if you do, screwed if you don't.  

Then make it 3 way.. but make it a choice to have.  I want a start MENU, Aero, no full screen unless I set the window properties to full screen, etc.

Do you actually want the start menu or the start search box and pinned links?

Just curious as I'm really surprised anyone uses the menu itself anymore. Last time I used it was XP and even then I eventually installed a program that did what Vista/7/8 do now. The start menu was a clunky and inefficient way of launching software back then and it still is now, so I don't get why anyone would use that instead of pinning/searching.

Do you actually want the start menu or the start search box and pinned links?

Just curious as I'm really surprised anyone uses the menu itself anymore. Last time I used it was XP and even then I eventually installed a program that did what Vista/7/8 do now. The start menu was a clunky and inefficient way of launching software back then and it still is now, so I don't get why anyone would use that instead of pinning/searching.

 

Start menu.  I don't always pin apps as I like the task bar clean.   But I also don't want to have a full screen app selector.  my windows 7 has some common apps pinned to the top of the start menu, I can launch them without even looking.  I actually still use the start menu to quickly open up apps, while still being able to focus on what's happening outside the menu.  I use the search for quick launching (ie calc, cmd, etc) but I do still use the menu itself.

So a majority of the people.. support removing the start menu from explorer?  Then why are there so many people refusing to buy windows 8?  A majority of users have NOT upgraded to 8. A majority of a minority is still a minority of the whole. I am not saying that some things like improved task manager, better file copy control, etc are not improvements.  But things like Aero being removed, start being removed, forced full screen apps, etc are NOT an improvement.

From your very bleak description of Windows 8 you're describing that it's a massive flop which has literally no following. From looking at the stats on steam, where the majority will be more dedicated PC enthusiasts, there's a massive group who are using 8 and 8.1.

 

Regarding remove the start menu from the explorer, that's why I was saying I can understand your dislike towards that. Although, from a functional point of view, you can use it in the very same way that the start menu was used. The only functional and big difference there is that it's full screen. Although from a UI point of a view, that's non-effecting since if the start menu was open, it couldn't exist open if your main focus was outside of the menu. 

 

You don't have to use the apps, so the argument isn't valid there. I find them quite refreshing and a cool advancement to the eco-system but they need improving.

 

With Aero, there's many plugins existing which revert the old Aero transparency back. That's a minor preference issue.

 

I feel like you're set on disliking it, just because you do. Windows 8.1 is a very, very good OS.

From your very bleak description of Windows 8 you're describing that it's a massive flop which has literally no following. From looking at the stats on steam, where the majority will be more dedicated PC enthusiasts, there's a massive group who are using 8 and 8.1.

 

Regarding remove the start menu from the explorer, that's why I was saying I can understand your dislike towards that. Although, from a functional point of view, you can use it in the very same way that the start menu was used. The only functional and big difference there is that it's full screen. Although from a UI point of a view, that's non-effecting since if the start menu was open, it couldn't exist open if your main focus was outside of the menu. 

 

You don't have to use the apps, so the argument isn't valid there. I find them quite refreshing and a cool advancement to the eco-system but they need improving.

 

With Aero, there's many plugins existing which revert the old Aero transparency back. That's a minor preference issue.

 

I feel like you're set on disliking it, just because you do. Windows 8.1 is a very, very good OS.

 

Honesly, I dislike it.. because I shouldn't have to pay for a third party app to do what first party should.  If apps like startisback, modernmix, winaero revivers, etc where free I wouldn't really have any complaints.  I dislike the direction they went.  It's the same with a phone provider.. if I have to pay extra for something that another version, plan, company, etc provides for free.. why would I support that?

Honesly, I dislike it.. because I shouldn't have to pay for a third party app to do what first party should.  If apps like startisback, modernmix, winaero revivers, etc where free I wouldn't really have any complaints.  I dislike the direction they went.  It's the same with a phone provider.. if I have to pay extra for something that another version, plan, company, etc provides for free.. why would I support that?

That's fair enough. I personally feel like you're ditching a considerably improved OS from the desktop point of view for something quite trivial and functionality that can be achieved differently. Like people before me have said, pinning to start bar etc. For example, I run Windows 7 at work and I never use the start menu, at all.

 

It's your call though, obviously the start screen is a deal breaker for you.

So a majority of the people.. support removing the start menu from explorer?  Then why are there so many people refusing to buy windows 8?  A majority of users have NOT upgraded to 8. A majority of a minority is still a minority of the whole. I am not saying that some things like improved task manager, better file copy control, etc are not improvements.  But things like Aero being removed, start being removed, forced full screen apps, etc are NOT an improvement.

 

What is so great about aero? I'm using windows 7 right now and honestly I don't get it. 

What is so great about aero? I'm using windows 7 right now and honestly I don't get it. 

 

I like the transparency.  I am not an artist by any means.. but I like graphics.  I like a little extra "bling".  

I actually like the idea behind Windows 8, I just think they made a few really bad decisions, and it sounds like Windows 9 may fix it. An OS that can switch between different UIs is a great idea for devices that can switch between being a tablet, a netbook/laptop, or desktop. The problem with the WinRT API is that the apps are stuck in a full-screen mode. Allowing WinRT/Modern apps to run in windows on the desktop as well (and be able to switch modes while the program is running) would pretty much fix my biggest problem with the OS... most apps don't need to be full-screen, sure it works ok on a small device when touch is the sole method for interacting, but that is rarely the case for anything except my phone. Even my Surface RT I rarely use as a true "tablet", as for someone that can type with all 10 figures (is that still called touch-typing?) no on-screen keyboard can replace a real one (none that I've seen so far anyway). So what happens is I actually use the desktop more often than not, even on this 10" device, but also still use touch a lot (on the desktop) to compliment the other input methods. Basically what I'm saying is that such an OS needs to be flexible to how the user wants to interact with it. And it needs to be something the user can configure and change.

What is so great about aero? I'm using windows 7 right now and honestly I don't get it. 

 

Many of the functional elements of Aero are actually still present in 8 - the program thumbnails still show up on mouseover, for instance. The only thing that really seems missing is the transparency, which while cool-looking is a bit superfluous IMO.

Regarding the start menu, I agree with Firey.  MS needs to add the classic Start Menu back.  It will not cost them billions (Start8, classicshell, startisback did not cost billions), and it will not be a support nightmare.  Windows 8 is already a support nightmare.  "Are you in desktop or metro right now?".  Why would a start menu change that?  8.1 already boots directly to the desktop if you let it, so again, how does a stat menu cause support nightmare?

 

However, I cannot stand Aero (transparency specifically) now.  I do prefer the Windows 8 desktop UI changes to Windows 7.  

 

Also, how does different OSes cause a problem?  Phones, tablets, desktops, xbox, ... they are NOT running the same OS.  Windows RT is not Windows Pro.  Can't you only get Windows pro on laptops/desktops and high-end MS tablets?  The phone cannot run Windows Pro right?

 

What about Windows Enterprise?  That is a different OS too.  Just add a start menu there and everybody will be happy.  

 

There is no....NO reason for apps to be full screen (or full screen split) on a desktop with 2560x1440 resolution.  Is it just pointless.  I got a 27" monitor for a reason, not to run Music on a larger screen STILL at full screen.

Whiplash, what does it matter which side the user is on? You can reach any point in the OS with Search, or a few clicks.

 

I have yet to meet a general user that knows that they can search.  Every time I go to the start screen and just start typing, they ask me how I did that.  Then they ask me how I could have known about it since there is no visual indication of a search functionality.

I have yet to meet a general user that knows that they can search.  Every time I go to the start screen and just start typing, they ask me how I did that.  Then they ask me how I could have known about it since there is no visual indication of a search functionality.

 

As much as I like Windows 8, I really think Microsoft dropped the ball by not providing a "cheat sheet" for users, and recommending for the OEMs to include one. Just a pamphlet to show users the basics would have alleviated a good 70% of the average users' complaints I've seen.

Start menu.  I don't always pin apps as I like the task bar clean.   But I also don't want to have a full screen app selector.  my windows 7 has some common apps pinned to the top of the start menu, I can launch them without even looking.  I actually still use the start menu to quickly open up apps, while still being able to focus on what's happening outside the menu.  I use the search for quick launching (ie calc, cmd, etc) but I do still use the menu itself.

So you still go to All Programs > Company Name > Program Name > Whatever to launch something? Or you just use the pinned shortcuts that are above All Programs (what I meant by pinned links)?

As soon as I got to Vista/7 I never went to All Programs unless I was desperately trying to remember the precise name of something so I could search for it instead (still needs fixing).

So you still go to All Programs > Company Name > Program Name > Whatever to launch something? Or you just use the pinned shortcuts that are above All Programs (what I meant by pinned links)?

As soon as I got to Vista/7 I never went to All Programs unless I was desperately trying to remember the precise name of something so I could search for it instead (still needs fixing).

Yes, I still go to all programs sometimes.  I don't pin everything.  I mean, I know what I install, and the company that makes it.  I also keep the start menu sorted alphabetically, so it's easy to find what I need.  I mean, more often than not I definitely use the search, but I can keep watching the video, or reading the book, or whatever it may be as I launch the app from the start menu.

I found Windows 8.1 to be a massive improvement over Windows 8 in functional terms. Here's to hoping "Threshold" will do the same. Metro and the Windows Store has been a joke for a while. Let's either get it right or get rid of it. Oh, and absolutely 100% get rid of it on servers. It's absolutely ridiculous to me that this ###### is on Windows 2012 Datacenter.

Every customer that asks me for new computer buying advice starts by asking me ...

 

"Which Windows do you recommend I get? I've heard bad things about Windows 8. I've heard its hard to use"

 

I'm not making this up. This has been my experience from people contacting me on computer buying advice. I tell them that if they buy a computer in the store they will be getting Windows 8 / 8.1. If they did want to get Windows 7. Their best bet is to shop online.

 

I'm guessing Dot Matrix will say everyone he knows Loves Windows 8. This is not to say some people don't legitimately like Windows 8. But if the people who love Windows 8 are acquaintances of DM i'm also guessing there might be some coolaid drinking involved

All they need to do for Windows 9 is bring the desktop and start screen together. Windows 8.1 is a lot better than 8.0, but the two still feel so disconnected.

I'd also like to see some of Windows older features begin to be modernized, replaced or removed where they make sense. I know this is difficult due to legacy support, but be smart and try to find suitable solutions rather than just slapping yet another coat of paint on the same OS. Desktop computing needs to advance in the same way other electronic devices are so it keeps some relevance.

I have yet to meet a general user that knows that they can search.  Every time I go to the start screen and just start typing, they ask me how I did that.  Then they ask me how I could have known about it since there is no visual indication of a search functionality.

On that train of thought - I have yet to meet a "general user" that knows they can search in start menu. In Windows 7.

 

Windows 8/8.1 is not a problem here. User is.

  • Like 3

On that train of thought - I have yet to meet a "general user" that knows they can search in start menu. In Windows 7.

 

Windows 8/8.1 is not a problem here. User is.

 

Windows 7 has a search box. While most users don't know they can search its not for a lack of not seeing a search box. In windows 8.1 there is no search box to see, they just have to know to start typing into thin air.

Windows 7 has a search box. While most users don't know they can search its not for a lack of not seeing a search box. In windows 8.1 there is no search box to see, they just have to know to start typing into thin air.

Win 8 search can also be invoked from the Charms menu in addition to the Win Q shortcut (which regressed substantially in functionality during the 8.0 to 8.1 transition IMHO).

Win 8 search can also be invoked from the Charms menu in addition to the Win Q shortcut (which regressed substantially in functionality during the 8.0 to 8.1 transition IMHO).

 

Correct there again they have to know about the charms bar, they have to know about windows key + Q  (or even just the windows key in general) and it's still not on the same page (Visually) when you click start as with windows 7 / vista. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!