"Threshold" to be Called Windows 9, Ship in April 2015


 Share

Recommended Posts

Well its subjective opinion, but the mass majority will agree that the Task Manager, Explorer and many other smaller changes are very accepted.

 

My other fact still remains, they've not removed anything from Windows which made it great.

So a majority of the people.. support removing the start menu from explorer?  Then why are there so many people refusing to buy windows 8?  A majority of users have NOT upgraded to 8. A majority of a minority is still a minority of the whole. I am not saying that some things like improved task manager, better file copy control, etc are not improvements.  But things like Aero being removed, start being removed, forced full screen apps, etc are NOT an improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then make it 3 way.. but make it a choice to have.  I want a start MENU, Aero, no full screen unless I set the window properties to full screen, etc.  

 

Again, as long as the choice is there for either the Screen, or a Modern-style menu. If a text list becomes the only option again I'm sticking with 8.1

 

Rather than having the hybrid removed, I want it improved upon. I don't like feeling like I'm running programs in a virtual machine. I'd much rather have them integrated into the main OS interface, even if it's just making the sidebar program list more aware of what's running on the desktop. And if Microsoft or someone else came up with a wrapper that let desktop programs run in Modern, I'd almost never see the desktop. (Like Modern Mix, but in the opposite direction.)

 

Nothing's keeping me on the desktop except the greater range of available programs. And  I haven't found a good file manager for Modern yet. But until developers release more robust programs for Modern, I can't do without the desktop just yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, as long as the choice is there for either the Screen, or a Modern-style menu. If a text list becomes the only option again I'm sticking with 8.1

 

Rather than having the hybrid removed, I want it improved upon. I don't like feeling like I'm running programs in a virtual machine. I'd much rather have them integrated into the main OS interface, even if it's just making the sidebar program list more aware of what's running on the desktop. And if Microsoft or someone else came up with a wrapper that let desktop programs run in Modern, I'd almost never see the desktop. (Like Modern Mix, but in the opposite direction.)

 

Nothing's keeping me on the desktop except the greater range of available programs. And  I haven't found a good file manager for Modern yet. But until developers release more robust programs for Modern, I can't do without the desktop just yet.

 

Definitely a different strokes for different folks scenario.  Makes it much harder to code for, but with the changes they made to 8.. it's definitely a screwed if you do, screwed if you don't.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then make it 3 way.. but make it a choice to have.  I want a start MENU, Aero, no full screen unless I set the window properties to full screen, etc.

Do you actually want the start menu or the start search box and pinned links?

Just curious as I'm really surprised anyone uses the menu itself anymore. Last time I used it was XP and even then I eventually installed a program that did what Vista/7/8 do now. The start menu was a clunky and inefficient way of launching software back then and it still is now, so I don't get why anyone would use that instead of pinning/searching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you actually want the start menu or the start search box and pinned links?

Just curious as I'm really surprised anyone uses the menu itself anymore. Last time I used it was XP and even then I eventually installed a program that did what Vista/7/8 do now. The start menu was a clunky and inefficient way of launching software back then and it still is now, so I don't get why anyone would use that instead of pinning/searching.

 

Start menu.  I don't always pin apps as I like the task bar clean.   But I also don't want to have a full screen app selector.  my windows 7 has some common apps pinned to the top of the start menu, I can launch them without even looking.  I actually still use the start menu to quickly open up apps, while still being able to focus on what's happening outside the menu.  I use the search for quick launching (ie calc, cmd, etc) but I do still use the menu itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a majority of the people.. support removing the start menu from explorer?  Then why are there so many people refusing to buy windows 8?  A majority of users have NOT upgraded to 8. A majority of a minority is still a minority of the whole. I am not saying that some things like improved task manager, better file copy control, etc are not improvements.  But things like Aero being removed, start being removed, forced full screen apps, etc are NOT an improvement.

From your very bleak description of Windows 8 you're describing that it's a massive flop which has literally no following. From looking at the stats on steam, where the majority will be more dedicated PC enthusiasts, there's a massive group who are using 8 and 8.1.

 

Regarding remove the start menu from the explorer, that's why I was saying I can understand your dislike towards that. Although, from a functional point of view, you can use it in the very same way that the start menu was used. The only functional and big difference there is that it's full screen. Although from a UI point of a view, that's non-effecting since if the start menu was open, it couldn't exist open if your main focus was outside of the menu. 

 

You don't have to use the apps, so the argument isn't valid there. I find them quite refreshing and a cool advancement to the eco-system but they need improving.

 

With Aero, there's many plugins existing which revert the old Aero transparency back. That's a minor preference issue.

 

I feel like you're set on disliking it, just because you do. Windows 8.1 is a very, very good OS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From your very bleak description of Windows 8 you're describing that it's a massive flop which has literally no following. From looking at the stats on steam, where the majority will be more dedicated PC enthusiasts, there's a massive group who are using 8 and 8.1.

 

Regarding remove the start menu from the explorer, that's why I was saying I can understand your dislike towards that. Although, from a functional point of view, you can use it in the very same way that the start menu was used. The only functional and big difference there is that it's full screen. Although from a UI point of a view, that's non-effecting since if the start menu was open, it couldn't exist open if your main focus was outside of the menu. 

 

You don't have to use the apps, so the argument isn't valid there. I find them quite refreshing and a cool advancement to the eco-system but they need improving.

 

With Aero, there's many plugins existing which revert the old Aero transparency back. That's a minor preference issue.

 

I feel like you're set on disliking it, just because you do. Windows 8.1 is a very, very good OS.

 

Honesly, I dislike it.. because I shouldn't have to pay for a third party app to do what first party should.  If apps like startisback, modernmix, winaero revivers, etc where free I wouldn't really have any complaints.  I dislike the direction they went.  It's the same with a phone provider.. if I have to pay extra for something that another version, plan, company, etc provides for free.. why would I support that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honesly, I dislike it.. because I shouldn't have to pay for a third party app to do what first party should.  If apps like startisback, modernmix, winaero revivers, etc where free I wouldn't really have any complaints.  I dislike the direction they went.  It's the same with a phone provider.. if I have to pay extra for something that another version, plan, company, etc provides for free.. why would I support that?

That's fair enough. I personally feel like you're ditching a considerably improved OS from the desktop point of view for something quite trivial and functionality that can be achieved differently. Like people before me have said, pinning to start bar etc. For example, I run Windows 7 at work and I never use the start menu, at all.

 

It's your call though, obviously the start screen is a deal breaker for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So a majority of the people.. support removing the start menu from explorer?  Then why are there so many people refusing to buy windows 8?  A majority of users have NOT upgraded to 8. A majority of a minority is still a minority of the whole. I am not saying that some things like improved task manager, better file copy control, etc are not improvements.  But things like Aero being removed, start being removed, forced full screen apps, etc are NOT an improvement.

 

What is so great about aero? I'm using windows 7 right now and honestly I don't get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is so great about aero? I'm using windows 7 right now and honestly I don't get it. 

 

I like the transparency.  I am not an artist by any means.. but I like graphics.  I like a little extra "bling".  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually like the idea behind Windows 8, I just think they made a few really bad decisions, and it sounds like Windows 9 may fix it. An OS that can switch between different UIs is a great idea for devices that can switch between being a tablet, a netbook/laptop, or desktop. The problem with the WinRT API is that the apps are stuck in a full-screen mode. Allowing WinRT/Modern apps to run in windows on the desktop as well (and be able to switch modes while the program is running) would pretty much fix my biggest problem with the OS... most apps don't need to be full-screen, sure it works ok on a small device when touch is the sole method for interacting, but that is rarely the case for anything except my phone. Even my Surface RT I rarely use as a true "tablet", as for someone that can type with all 10 figures (is that still called touch-typing?) no on-screen keyboard can replace a real one (none that I've seen so far anyway). So what happens is I actually use the desktop more often than not, even on this 10" device, but also still use touch a lot (on the desktop) to compliment the other input methods. Basically what I'm saying is that such an OS needs to be flexible to how the user wants to interact with it. And it needs to be something the user can configure and change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is so great about aero? I'm using windows 7 right now and honestly I don't get it. 

 

Many of the functional elements of Aero are actually still present in 8 - the program thumbnails still show up on mouseover, for instance. The only thing that really seems missing is the transparency, which while cool-looking is a bit superfluous IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the start menu, I agree with Firey.  MS needs to add the classic Start Menu back.  It will not cost them billions (Start8, classicshell, startisback did not cost billions), and it will not be a support nightmare.  Windows 8 is already a support nightmare.  "Are you in desktop or metro right now?".  Why would a start menu change that?  8.1 already boots directly to the desktop if you let it, so again, how does a stat menu cause support nightmare?

 

However, I cannot stand Aero (transparency specifically) now.  I do prefer the Windows 8 desktop UI changes to Windows 7.  

 

Also, how does different OSes cause a problem?  Phones, tablets, desktops, xbox, ... they are NOT running the same OS.  Windows RT is not Windows Pro.  Can't you only get Windows pro on laptops/desktops and high-end MS tablets?  The phone cannot run Windows Pro right?

 

What about Windows Enterprise?  That is a different OS too.  Just add a start menu there and everybody will be happy.  

 

There is no....NO reason for apps to be full screen (or full screen split) on a desktop with 2560x1440 resolution.  Is it just pointless.  I got a 27" monitor for a reason, not to run Music on a larger screen STILL at full screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whiplash, what does it matter which side the user is on? You can reach any point in the OS with Search, or a few clicks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whiplash, what does it matter which side the user is on? You can reach any point in the OS with Search, or a few clicks.

 

I have yet to meet a general user that knows that they can search.  Every time I go to the start screen and just start typing, they ask me how I did that.  Then they ask me how I could have known about it since there is no visual indication of a search functionality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have yet to meet a general user that knows that they can search.  Every time I go to the start screen and just start typing, they ask me how I did that.  Then they ask me how I could have known about it since there is no visual indication of a search functionality.

 

As much as I like Windows 8, I really think Microsoft dropped the ball by not providing a "cheat sheet" for users, and recommending for the OEMs to include one. Just a pamphlet to show users the basics would have alleviated a good 70% of the average users' complaints I've seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Start menu.  I don't always pin apps as I like the task bar clean.   But I also don't want to have a full screen app selector.  my windows 7 has some common apps pinned to the top of the start menu, I can launch them without even looking.  I actually still use the start menu to quickly open up apps, while still being able to focus on what's happening outside the menu.  I use the search for quick launching (ie calc, cmd, etc) but I do still use the menu itself.

So you still go to All Programs > Company Name > Program Name > Whatever to launch something? Or you just use the pinned shortcuts that are above All Programs (what I meant by pinned links)?

As soon as I got to Vista/7 I never went to All Programs unless I was desperately trying to remember the precise name of something so I could search for it instead (still needs fixing).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you still go to All Programs > Company Name > Program Name > Whatever to launch something? Or you just use the pinned shortcuts that are above All Programs (what I meant by pinned links)?

As soon as I got to Vista/7 I never went to All Programs unless I was desperately trying to remember the precise name of something so I could search for it instead (still needs fixing).

Yes, I still go to all programs sometimes.  I don't pin everything.  I mean, I know what I install, and the company that makes it.  I also keep the start menu sorted alphabetically, so it's easy to find what I need.  I mean, more often than not I definitely use the search, but I can keep watching the video, or reading the book, or whatever it may be as I launch the app from the start menu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found Windows 8.1 to be a massive improvement over Windows 8 in functional terms. Here's to hoping "Threshold" will do the same. Metro and the Windows Store has been a joke for a while. Let's either get it right or get rid of it. Oh, and absolutely 100% get rid of it on servers. It's absolutely ridiculous to me that this ###### is on Windows 2012 Datacenter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every customer that asks me for new computer buying advice starts by asking me ...

 

"Which Windows do you recommend I get? I've heard bad things about Windows 8. I've heard its hard to use"

 

I'm not making this up. This has been my experience from people contacting me on computer buying advice. I tell them that if they buy a computer in the store they will be getting Windows 8 / 8.1. If they did want to get Windows 7. Their best bet is to shop online.

 

I'm guessing Dot Matrix will say everyone he knows Loves Windows 8. This is not to say some people don't legitimately like Windows 8. But if the people who love Windows 8 are acquaintances of DM i'm also guessing there might be some coolaid drinking involved

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All they need to do for Windows 9 is bring the desktop and start screen together. Windows 8.1 is a lot better than 8.0, but the two still feel so disconnected.

I'd also like to see some of Windows older features begin to be modernized, replaced or removed where they make sense. I know this is difficult due to legacy support, but be smart and try to find suitable solutions rather than just slapping yet another coat of paint on the same OS. Desktop computing needs to advance in the same way other electronic devices are so it keeps some relevance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have yet to meet a general user that knows that they can search.  Every time I go to the start screen and just start typing, they ask me how I did that.  Then they ask me how I could have known about it since there is no visual indication of a search functionality.

On that train of thought - I have yet to meet a "general user" that knows they can search in start menu. In Windows 7.

 

Windows 8/8.1 is not a problem here. User is.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On that train of thought - I have yet to meet a "general user" that knows they can search in start menu. In Windows 7.

 

Windows 8/8.1 is not a problem here. User is.

 

Windows 7 has a search box. While most users don't know they can search its not for a lack of not seeing a search box. In windows 8.1 there is no search box to see, they just have to know to start typing into thin air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Windows 7 has a search box. While most users don't know they can search its not for a lack of not seeing a search box. In windows 8.1 there is no search box to see, they just have to know to start typing into thin air.

Win 8 search can also be invoked from the Charms menu in addition to the Win Q shortcut (which regressed substantially in functionality during the 8.0 to 8.1 transition IMHO).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Win 8 search can also be invoked from the Charms menu in addition to the Win Q shortcut (which regressed substantially in functionality during the 8.0 to 8.1 transition IMHO).

 

Correct there again they have to know about the charms bar, they have to know about windows key + Q  (or even just the windows key in general) and it's still not on the same page (Visually) when you click start as with windows 7 / vista. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Usama Jawad96
      Microsoft will soon begin throttling Exchange mailboxes
      by Usama Jawad

      Microsoft's proprietary email hosting service Exchange Online - typically utilized by Outlook - has had an upper limit for emails received by "hot recipients" for quite some time. This term encompasses users who receive over 3,600 messages in their mailbox per hour. So far, this has been a soft-limit that Microsoft has not really enforced, but starting from April, this situation will change.

      Microsoft has stated that in order to optimize email flow across mailboxes and to ensure capacity across the Exchange services, it will begin enforcing its existing limit of being able to receive 3,600 messages per hour. The company says that when tenants and mailboxes go beyond this limit, services for other customers are disrupted as well, causing delays in emails being received due to network resources being utilized by "hot recipients".

      The Redmond tech giant says that once it begins to throttle tenants, emails sent to full mailboxes will receive a non-delivery report. The threshold will be automatically reset every hour. According to the dedicated webpage, this limit applies to all of the following subscriptions:

      Microsoft 365 Business Basic Microsoft 365 Business Standard Office Office 365 Enterprise E1 Office 365 Enterprise E3 Office 365 Enterprise E5 Office 365 Enterprise F3 As Microsoft begins to enforce this limit starting in April 2021, it has encouraged admins to keep an eye on activity across mailboxes. The firm will start with a higher threshold and keep lowering it incrementally until it reaches the official limit of 3,600 messages per hour so organizations have time to adapt to the change.

      Admins will also receive new insights and reports about the process in the Exchange Admin Center, allowing them to track mailboxes going over the threshold. Microsoft does not expect a significant number of mailboxes to be affected by this change.

    • By Usama Jawad96
      YouTube announces changes to its monetization policy
      by Usama Jawad

      Following the Logan Paul suicide forest controversy a couple of weeks ago, YouTube has come under fire for improperly vetting its content. While Google severed ties with the popular content creator, it was also reported that the firm would be manually scrutinizing its most popular channels for offensive content, among other things.

      Now, some of these changes have come to light, courtesy of a blog post from Google.

      Google notes that while 2017 was a tough year in many aspects, there was a 40% year-over-year increase in the number of content creators earning money in six figures from the site. In 2018, in an effort to ensure that "bad actors" do not harm their audience, and that worthy content creators continue to be rewarded, the firm is changing its monetization policy.

      Starting from today, only those channels will earn ad money through the YouTube Partner Program (YPP) which have over 4,000 hours of watchtime in the past 12 months, and at least 1,000 subscribers. This is a considerably higher threshold than the previous one, which allowed monetization based only on the requirement that the channel has 10,000 lifetime views.

      While these changes currently apply only to newcomers, they will be implemented for existing channels from February 20, 2018 as well. Channels that reach this threshold will now also be manually screened for potentially offensive before they are inducted into the YPP.

      Google hopes that through these changes, it'll be able to divert money from bad actors and prevent offensive content from being monetized. The company went on to say that:

      Although the new threshold may potentially affect a large number of content creators, Google says that these channels can utilize the Creator Academy, Help Center, and Creator Site to grow their audience. The firm also noted that 99% of the channels falling below this threshold were making less than $100 per year in 2017, and 90% earned less than $2.50 in the last month.

    • By gcaw
      Windows 10 Mobile Insider Preview build 10586.36 rolls out to Fast and Slow rings
      by Andy Weir



      Yesterday, Microsoft rolled out its latest Windows 10 Insider Preview for PCs, build 11082 - the first build for those on the preview program to come from the Redstone (RS1) development branch. Today, the company is pushing out a new Mobile build - but this new release is an incremental Cumulative Update to the Threshold (TH2) branch, rather than a new Redstone-based build.

      Significantly, Windows 10 Mobile build 10586.36 is rolling out today to Insiders on both the Fast and Slow rings. Microsoft's Gabe Aul said in a blog post today:

      Gabe Aul said that this will be the last announcement of a Cumulative Update preview to be published on the Windows Blog. In the future, this type of update will instead be detailed via the Insider Hub app on Windows 10, although Gabe will also notify his followers of such updates via his Twitter feed.

      Anticipating the need for some much-needed (and well-earned) peace and quiet over the rest of the holiday season - both for himself and his colleagues - Gabe made it clear that there will be no further Insider Preview releases, for PCs or Mobile, until the new year.

    • By Ian S.
      Windows Technical Preview Discussion Thread
      With September 30th coming up, Windows 9 (or just "Windows"), codenamed Threshold, has leaked. I think its time to start a thread specifically for the Technical Preview and leaks.
       



    • By +Frank B.
      Microsoft set to unveil Windows 9 on September 30th
       
      Microsoft is planning to unveil its Windows 8 successor next month at a special press event. Sources familiar with Microsoft?s plans tell The Verge that the software maker is tentatively planning its press event for September 30th to detail upcoming changes to Windows as part of a release codenamed "Threshold." This date may change, but the Threshold version of Windows is currently in development and Microsoft plans to release a preview version of what will likely be named Windows 9 to developers on September 30th or shortly afterwards. The date follows recent reports from ZDNet that suggested Microsoft is planning to release a preview version of Windows 9 in late September or early October.
       
      The early technology preview will give developers a first look at the new mini Start Menu in Windows 9, alongside the removal of the Charms bar feature and several UI changes. Microsoft is currently compiling builds of Threshold ready for the preview that include an early version of Cortana, but it?s not clear if this particular feature will be made available as part of the technology preview.
       
      While Threshold is likely to be named Windows 9, it?s unlikely that Microsoft will name its upcoming Windows release at its press event. Instead, Microsoft is said to be planning an overview of key new features of the upcoming operating system, with a technical preview ready for developers and enthusiasts. Microsoft is also building a separate combined version of Windows RT and Windows Phone, and the company may take the time to detail this work during its press event. Either way, Microsoft?s next version of Windows is nearing completion and the company will be ready to talk more about it next month.
       
      Source: The Verge