Malaysia Airlines 'loses contact with plane' (and search effort updates)


Recommended Posts

Probably another 2 weeks until they can pull up boxes or wreckage.

 

More than that probably. Could be as much as more than a month. Do they even have the proper equipment there? It could take as much as 1 week to get the proper equipment on the site. Then finding the boxes wont be easy as the signal will probably die before they start the search.

I don't think the Ocean Shield is too happy about the way the search is going.

 

t1NfvZ1.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

OT:      Shouldn't the box be dead by now? If not, does anyone have an idea as to why they would be so infrequent?

  • Like 2

The black boxes are CERTIFIED for 30 days. They can put out a signal for weeks longer, though as the battery drains their output volume decreases. The frequency and ping rate remain the same.

With a lower volume, and water stratification due to temperature and salinity differences, that sound can get "lost" (meaning redirected due to refraction) and be hard to pick up.

Example using active sonar, but it happens in both directions.

Refraction.jpg

And this is how detailed side-scan sonar can be once they have a location.

lelia_inverted.png

advanced-sonar-imaging-submerged-aircraf

  • Like 3

lol looks like it's mumbling about something

I don't think the Ocean Shield is too happy about the way the search is going.

 

t1NfvZ1.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

OT:      Shouldn't the box be dead by now? If not, does anyone have an idea as to why they would be so infrequent?

 

To be honest, I don't think they will ever find it.  Oh somebody might accidentally come across it in 50 years or so, but I can't see the intentional search going on for much longer.  How many planes and boats have disappeared in the Bermuda Triangle and never been accounted for?  They're spending boatloads of money and the battery on the black box has most likely died by now, which means there won't be any signal to listen for so they'll just have to go by sight/sonar.

To be honest, I don't think they will ever find it.  Oh somebody might accidentally come across it in 50 years or so, but I can't see the intentional search going on for much longer.  How many planes and boats have disappeared in the Bermuda Triangle and never been accounted for?  They're spending boatloads of money and the battery on the black box has most likely died by now, which means there won't be any signal to listen for so they'll just have to go by sight/sonar.

 

They will most definitely find it... likely within the next 30 days.

To be honest, I don't think they will ever find it.  Oh somebody might accidentally come across it in 50 years or so, but I can't see the intentional search going on for much longer.  How many planes and boats have disappeared in the Bermuda Triangle and never been accounted for?  They're spending boatloads of money and the battery on the black box has most likely died by now, which means there won't be any signal to listen for so they'll just have to go by sight/sonar.

I think many countries are writing this Search off as a training exercise, which they would have done anyway, on a smaller scale.

 

It is hard to imagine dredging up a Boeing 777 from miles beneath the ocean.

 

If MH 370 did crash where they say, it is a wonder that parts of it did not wash up on the coast of Australia.

Malaysia plane MH370: Possible new signal in search

A plane searching for missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 has detected a possible new underwater signal, Australian officials say.

An Australian P-3 Orion aircraft picked up the signal in the same area where an Australian vessel detected audio pings earlier this week, officials said.

The signal would require further analysis, but could have been from a "man-made source", officials said.

source: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-26972045

 

This would mark the 1st time a SAR plane has picked up any sort of signal. so looks promising that they are in the right area.

? Flight 370's pilot, Capt. Zaharie Ahmad Shah, was the last person on the jet to speak to air-traffic controllers, telling them "Good night, Malaysian three-seven-zero," Malaysian sources told CNN. The sources said there was nothing unusual about his voice, which betrayed no indication that he was under stress. One of the sources, an official involved in the investigation, told CNN that police played the recording to five other Malaysia Airlines pilots who knew the pilot and co-pilot. "There were no third-party voices," the source said.


 


? Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 disappeared from military radar for about 120 nautical miles after it crossed back over the Malaysian Peninsula, sources say. Based on available data, this means the plane must have dipped in altitude to between 4,000 and 5,000 feet, a senior Malaysian government official and a source involved in the investigation tell CNN.


 


http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/10/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-plane/index.html?hpt=hp_t1


The cause is whatever caused the flight to be in the Indian Ocean in the first place.  And he's right. If you'd lost a loved one, you would NOT be going "oh well, they're dead."  Not unless you're some kind of sociopath.

 

I would cry the day I lost a loved one, and the funeral, and that's probably it. Death is part of life. That doesn't make me a sociopath, obviously I handle death better than others.

 

 

For starters, the MH370 is suppose to head to Beijing, not Indian Ocean.

 
Well, someone deleted my post, which means my response could have been true.

 

Well, someone deleted my post, which means my response could have been true.

 

 

 

Not sure what you posted but what ever theory you had, the deletion of your post in no way reflects its being true. That would imply that who ever deleted it would have knowledge about what happened that others here dont have. I think it's pretty safe to say that no one on neowin has any special knowledge of what happened to 370. 

Does not look good ...

 

The underwater pulses that were detected Saturday, and again Tuesday, came from the ocean floor 15,000 feet below the surface. That's 2.8 miles (4.5 kilometers). On Thursday, said officials said another signal may have been detected from sonar buoys.

 

How deep is 2.8 miles? It's deeper than an inverted Statue of Liberty (305 feet), deeper than an inverted Eiffel Tower (1,063 feet), deeper even than an inverted Burj Khalifa, the tallest building in the world (2,717 feet).

 

The pressure at nearly 15,000 feet is crushing -- so much so that very few manned submarines can withstand it.

"There are only about half a dozen subs that can go to half the ocean depth with a number of countries having that capability."

 Finding the plane is daunting. Bringing it back from the deep will be even more difficult.

"At these depths ... there's no recovery like it," said Mary Schiavo, a former inspector general for the U.S. Department of Transportation.

 

http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/10/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-ocean-depth/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

I personally believe the plane landed pretty much intact, possibly a soft land, if done on purpose by the pilot.  Maybe that's why there's no debris, considering all the junk and trash they've found in the ocean so far.  If it's that deep I think the only thing they'll recover is just the black boxes and call it a day.  If it does come out that the plane crashed as a result of pilot suicide, then I think the Malaysian government will end up helping the airline with the lawsuit that's sure to come.


^ I wonder if this location was deliberately chosen.

 

Someone wanted to make the jet disappear and never be recovered.

 

I wonder if there was a 'soft landing', did the hijackers manage to escape to a waiting ship ... ?

 

At best, the black boxes will have evidence suggesting a hijacking, and little else.

You have to remember that this planes is fairly old...777-200's have been produced since 1993...back then a large HDD was what..16GB and probably wasn't all that reliable (compared with modern day).

 

Now this plane is newer, 2002 I believe.

However the Black boxes don't use HDD's (might not withstand a crash), but rather they use flash memory...now what was flash in 2002....maybe a 128MB USB drive was about as big as you could get... now that's not really all that much.

 

Personally I agree with you, I'm surprised that the black boxes haven't been upgraded over the years...but going on the logic that they've not, then actually its not that much of a surprise that 2hours is the max.

 

They upgrade and switch out recorders all the time with new tech.

This highlights some massive flaws in the aviation industry, and one I think we will see change very soon.

To be honest, I don't think they will ever find it.  Oh somebody might accidentally come across it in 50 years or so, but I can't see the intentional search going on for much longer.  How many planes and boats have disappeared in the Bermuda Triangle and never been accounted for?  They're spending boatloads of money and the battery on the black box has most likely died by now, which means there won't be any signal to listen for so they'll just have to go by sight/sonar.

 

How many large passenger jets have gone missing in the Bermuda triangle?

It is international law that requires Australia to search for this plane as it is in their world search zone.  The Chinese want it because of the amount of Chinese people on board.  They're not going to call it off, Australia has stated that constantly, and the people here want it found also.

How many large passenger jets have gone missing in the Bermuda triangle?

It is international law that requires Australia to search for this plane as it is in their world search zone.  The Chinese want it because of the amount of Chinese people on board.  They're not going to call it off, Australia has stated that constantly, and the people here want it found also.

 

What would be nice though, is a little gratitude from the families for the huge effort being spent in searching for the plane.

What would be nice though, is a little gratitude from the families for the huge effort being spent in searching for the plane.

 

It's probably easy to judge when we're not in that situation.

Not to say I don't agree with exactly what you're saying.

^ I wonder if this location was deliberately chosen.

 

Someone wanted to make the jet disappear and never be recovered.

 

I wonder if there was a 'soft landing', did the hijackers manage to escape to a waiting ship ... ?

 

At best, the black boxes will have evidence suggesting a hijacking, and little else.

perhaps the plane was then sunk but not before the black box was removed and deactivated/destroyed and then [insert someone] escaped on a boat like you say.

perhaps the plane was then sunk but not before the black box was removed and deactivated/destroyed and then [insert someone] escaped on a boat like you say.

 

 

The boxes are not something anyone can just go up to and grab. They are usually located in the tail of the plane somewhere in the cargo hold or ceiling or the tail itself. That's a hell of a lot of factors happening even before you get the the idea of the retrieving the black boxes being remotely possible. Might as well add Godzilla to the list of causes for this disappearance. 

Might as well add Godzilla to the list of causes for this disappearance. 

 

Well, wouldn't you know .......

 

Malaysia-Airlines-MH370-Godzilla-2014032

 

... and I thought it was Bigfoot that was responsible ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • google, meta, microsoft, true cancers of modern society
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 changelog: Fixed a bug where Overwrite behaved as Overwrite All during same-drive move operations. AdvancedInstaller fixed the installer’s security vulnerability: EXE Bootstrapper resolved the %appdata% location incorrectly for the System account. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 | 14.6 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • First exciting thing to come to Windows in a long time ! This is the kind of things they should focus on, instead of cramming as much AI as they can in everything.
    • New AMD graphics driver fixes install issues and FSR 4.1 crashes on RX 7000 GPUs by Taras Buria AMD is rolling out yet another graphics driver. Version 26.6.4 is now available for download, bringing two important fixes. One is for those still using Windows 10 and having trouble installing driver 26.6.2. In fact, this patch is coming from the recently released hotfix, so it is not new if you are already running version 26.6.3. The second fix is for RX 7000 owners. AMD recently brought FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen graphics cards, but there was a bug with certain games crashing when using FSR 4.1. I experienced this issue with Forza Horizon 6, so today's driver should take care of that. Here is the official changelog: Intermittent install issue seen when installing AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 on Windows® 10 systems for Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Intermittent application crash may be observed in some games with AMD FSR Upscaling 4.1 enabled on Radeon™ RX 7000 series graphics products. Known issues include the following: Intermittent application crash or driver timeout may be observed while playing Battlefield™ 6 on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. AMD is actively working on a resolution with the developer to be released as soon as possible. Texture flickering or corruption may appear while playing Battlefield™ 6 with AMD Record and Stream on some AMD graphics products. AMD FSR Upscaling and AMD FSR Frame Generation may show as inactive in AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition while playing Battlefield™ 6 when enabled on Radeon™ RX 9000 series graphics products. Failure to install may be observed while installing AI Bundle components in some regions with limited access to HuggingFace and GitHub. Model flickering or rendering failure may be observed in Maxon Cinema 4D and Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. Intermittent application crash may be observed on some models while running Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. You can download the AMD Radeon driver 26.6.4 from the official website here. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!