Malaysia Airlines 'loses contact with plane' (and search effort updates)


Recommended Posts

I understand the families are unhappy but they just don't realise how technically complex an operation like this is. I really hope they find this plane before the FDR pingers die otherwise it will take a very long time to find. They had a reasonable idea where the Titanic went down and it still took a long time to locate the wreckage.

MovieBeards-LethalWeapon-CopBeard.jpg

 

dang.....thats just awful for the families more than anyone else.

 

an interesting engineering task though, if it is down there.

KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - Investigators probing the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 suspect that the co-pilot of the jetliner tried to make a call with his cellphone after the plane was diverted from its scheduled route, Malaysia's New Straits Times reported sources as saying on Saturday.

The newspaper cited unidentified investigative sources as saying the attempted call from co-pilot Fariq Abdul Hamid's phone was picked up by a cellphone tower as the plane was about 200 nautical miles northwest of the west coast state of Penang. That was around where military radar made its last sighting of the missing jet at 2:15 a.m. local time on March 8.

"The telco's (telecommunications company's) tower established the call that he was trying to make. On why the call was cut off, it was likely because the aircraft was fast moving away from the tower and had not come under the coverage of the next one," the New Straits Times cited a source as saying.

 

http://news.yahoo.com/malaysia-flights-co-pilot-tried-cellphone-call-report-141056213--sector.html

KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - Investigators probing the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 suspect that the co-pilot of the jetliner tried to make a call with his cellphone after the plane was diverted from its scheduled route, Malaysia's New Straits Times reported sources as saying on Saturday.

The newspaper cited unidentified investigative sources as saying the attempted call from co-pilot Fariq Abdul Hamid's phone was picked up by a cellphone tower as the plane was about 200 nautical miles northwest of the west coast state of Penang. That was around where military radar made its last sighting of the missing jet at 2:15 a.m. local time on March 8.

"The telco's (telecommunications company's) tower established the call that he was trying to make. On why the call was cut off, it was likely because the aircraft was fast moving away from the tower and had not come under the coverage of the next one," the New Straits Times cited a source as saying.

 

http://news.yahoo.com/malaysia-flights-co-pilot-tried-cellphone-call-report-141056213--sector.html

 

It's possible that a flight attendant told him to put his phone on airplane mode.

  • Like 2

"The telco's (telecommunications company's) tower established the call that he was trying to make. On why the call was cut off, it was likely because the aircraft was fast moving away from the tower and had not come under the coverage of the next one," the New Straits Times cited a source as saying.

http://news.yahoo.com/malaysia-flights-co-pilot-tried-cellphone-call-report-141056213--sector.html

I'm waiting for someone to suggest we stick mobile towers in the middle of the ocean to avert crises like these...

Pop them on buoys :D

There are serious proposals for communications over large areas or in remote regions to be augmented with solar-electric high altitude long operations (HALO) aircraft with ground and satellite comm gear. They could stay aloft for years over their assigned zones. Think of them as atmospheric geosynchronous commsats.

I'm waiting for someone to suggest we stick mobile towers in the middle of the ocean to avert crises like these...

What we need is uninterruptable constant GPS lock-on all such airplanes.

I would think a 5 minute burst of microwave signal to a satellite would be better than a 30-40 day pinger.

I would also have it go off when there is a sudden jolt, or contact with surface water.

  • Like 1

My question is why did no one do anything when they noticed the plane was off course? The plane basically did a 360 and flew for 7hrs....

 

Most of the passengers wouldn't have noticed until the flight lasted longer than it should have.  By then, clearly it was too late.

Most of the passengers wouldn't have noticed until the flight lasted longer than it should have.  By then, clearly it was too late.

 

Isn't that what air control towers are for?

 

I've seen big screens with planes all on them, giving their speed, altitude along with how far out.

Isn't that what air control towers are for?

 

I've seen big screens with planes all on them, giving their speed, altitude along with how far out.

 

Have you actually been following this story? At all?

Yeah. Look at number 2, that should have been a sign something could be wrong.

 

MH370-latest_map_WEB.svg

 

But, not much because I don't really care if they find a plane or not.

 

And what makes you think the passengers knew anything about the comms system being shut off or the plane turning off course?  

And what makes you think the passengers knew anything about the comms system being shut off or the plane turning off course?  

 

Where did I say anything about passengers knowing anything?

 

I'm asking why didn't the airline company do anything right then and there? Is comms system being shut off normal? I truly doubt that.

Where did I say anything about passengers knowing anything?

 

I'm asking why didn't the airline company do anything right then and there? Is comms system being shut off normal? I truly doubt that.

 

Umm... They did?  I guess you just haven't actually been following events.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yes, it was amusing at the time because even then dbrand was well known for stealing the designs of products from other companies. That’s what they do.
    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      57
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!