Neowin Uptime Project Group


Recommended Posts

Blah..I joined, but it won't let me add it to my sig. It keeps sayin tags arent allowed. I remove them from the code, but it still doesnt work. Umm..I'm a noobie still, sorry! (Maybe it's because my other sig is too big?)

Ontop of that, how do you join Neowin on this update thing? It won't let me chose a leaque..or does it do that automatically?

Blah..I joined, but it won't let me add it to my sig. It keeps sayin tags arent allowed. I remove them from the code, but it still doesnt work. Umm..I'm a noobie still, sorry! (Maybe it's because my other sig is too big?)

Ontop of that, how do you join Neowin on this update thing? It won't let me chose a leaque..or does it do that automatically?

well, since your sig is probably already too big.. you can make a custom sig that sticks the uptime info into the lower right-hand corner..

as to join the Neowin league.. once you log in, there should be an option to the left that says 'Join League'.

well, since your sig is probably already too big.. you can make a custom sig that sticks the uptime info into the lower right-hand corner..

as to join the Neowin league.. once you log in, there should be an option to the left that says 'Join League'.

It asked for a password when I click to join a leaque..so what's the password? Or is it somewhere and I've just skipped over it?

I do plan on resizing my sig, it's been too big for awhile now..but keep forgetting around to doin it. Will make a postie note and slap it to the monitor to remind me tomorrow.

Alright guys....I'm having serious trouble getting this Uptime Sig to work at all. I tells me to remove the tags, I do, it doesn

http://uptimeimgserv.0rd.net/img/5/13131.png' alt='13131.png'>

So what do I need to remove to get it to work? :angry:

Edit: Um, okay, strange..it works when I post it in my post o_O ...but doesn't work when I put it in my sig...

- 13131.png-

Ignore my entire last post....I figured it out. Oi.....feel free to bash me over being such an idiot.  :boo:  :argh:

Edit: How come it's saying I'm running XP home, when I have XP pro?  :huh:

where do u see it displaying Home? on the site all it says is Windows XP, doesnt say neither home or pro :huh:

Ignore my entire last post....I figured it out. Oi.....feel free to bash me over being such an idiot. :boo: :argh:

Edit: How come it's saying I'm running XP home, when I have XP pro? :huh:

dude, your sig is already too big.. so I took the liberty of putting the data inside your sig..

forsakendecay.php

let me know the exact font you used if you want it to match the existing text.

Just signed up and joined the Neowin League too .......

"Change successfully.

The change was successfully taken over. "

LOL Babel Fish makes me laugh sometimes

After reading this thread, I kinda lost track of all the other related threads, do i need to read em? or are they just for specific things like custom sigs and stuff?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google DeepMind published a document on June 18, 2026, that may be the most consequential admission yet from a frontier AI lab: alignment training alone cannot guarantee that AI agents will remain under human control, so structural containment must be built before more capable models arrive.............. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318758/20260620/google-deepmind-ai-control-roadmap-when-alignment-fails-defense-depth-takes-over.htm  
    • I've got a SoundBlasterX G6 that I use in my streaming setup. Sounds great to me and I've had zero issues with the ancient software package so far in Win11. That G6 has 7.1, Dolby, fully working SPDIF and since it's a USB device it's outside of my rig so I don't have to worry about EMF distortion. Looks like for now this is a pass for me as I think I have better hardware....
    • How do you connect 5.1 Speakers to this thing?
    • I agree with both of you... It's absolutely imperative that science is completely based on actual proven facts and hard evidence and is not considered dogmatic in any way. Science is not a religion and it will never be, and that's exactly how it's supposed to be.
    • I'd basically agree. The only point I would add is to be careful not to treat science as a religion, complete with priests, dogma, and blasphemy. Humans are highly susceptible to religious-oriented ways of thinking since it aids in forming communities of like-minded people. The problem is that when this happens, nobody wants to be ostracized from the group by saying that a deeply-held idea is wrong. Science and "peer review" are not immune to this behavior, unfortunately. In the end, finding truth is our own responsibility and we can't depend on others to hand it to us. Skepticism is key, along with curiosity and the willingness to critically evaluate and consider ideas both new and old.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!