Recommended Posts

Just now, jasondefaoite said:

How does the auto lyrics download work? I have it enabled under settings/online but it doesn't appear to be working.

If no lyrics appear, it probably didn't find lyrics for that artist/title combination. The source for the lyrics is http://lyrics.wikia.com/wiki/Lyrics_Wiki. You could try a manual search for that artist and title to verify if they have lyrics.

1 hour ago, jasondefaoite said:

Thanks Raphaël.

 

Once enabled, does it scan the entire library at once, or only when I play a song does it attempt to perform a look up.

 

If it finds lyrics, does it embed them into the mp3/mp4 file?

 

Cheers!

It only performs a lookup when playing a song. Once it got lyrics, they are not automatically stored in the files. On the lyrics screen, right click, and choose "Save in audio file".

1 hour ago, Raphaël G. said:

– [Changed] Removed song covers from playlists. They were in fact albums covers and were confusing for users.

The irony...   (I hate the change and find it confusing)

 

Anyway, I had the lyrics editor crash on the same song three times in a row...

 

Dopamine crashes if the lyrics have an empty line at the end of the song that you're putting time stamps in.

2 hours ago, Ned said:

The irony...   (I hate the change and find it confusing)

 

Anyway, I had the lyrics editor crash on the same song three times in a row...

 

Dopamine crashes if the lyrics have an empty line at the end of the song that you're putting time stamps in.

You have no idea how many times I got the question why the cover wasn't updated after the user updated the cover in the file :rofl:. It was not change for the sake of change though. Keeping those covers up to date was a complicated job, and a performance hit.

I'll look into the lyrics editor issue.

7 minutes ago, Kronephon said:

But wouldn't replacing the tag with various artists just erase all the info I have there?

Not necessarily. Be sure to alter the "Album artists" tag, not the "Artists" tag. Those are two different fields.

 

For example, take a compilation album. Each track is from a different artist, therefore the "Artist" tag will be different for every file. If you put "Various Artists" in the "Album Artists" tag, Dopamine will group the tracks in that album and still keep the artists information in every song.

6 hours ago, Ned said:

The irony...   (I hate the change and find it confusing)

 

Anyway, I had the lyrics editor crash on the same song three times in a row...

 

Dopamine crashes if the lyrics have an empty line at the end of the song that you're putting time stamps in.

Personally I prefer it not showing the album art in the playlist. To me it makes no sense to show the album art up top, and then also show the same album art for every track.

 

EDIT: Although I guess my logic breaks down a bit if you have more than one album in your playlist. What I've seen some players do is showing an album art/album information 'header' above each album in the playlist (musicbee has an option for this as an example)

  • Like 2

Yet another build of Dopamine is available: 1.2 build 793 (Preview)


It fixes some bugs, and this is the change log:

 

- [Fixed] Refreshing of covers is more fluid
- [Fixed] Lyrics editor causes crash when the lyrics end in an empty line
- [Fixed] Lyrics timing now has an accuracy of milliseconds instead of seconds

 

Get it while it's hot!

39 minutes ago, jasondefaoite said:

Comment on the lyrics support... is there a way to differentiate between songs which already have lyrics embedded in the file, versus ones Dopamine downloaded? Just trying to understand when I should 'save in audio file'. Cheers!

I would never save anything that  I don't have to inside my music files, the smaller they are and more light weight they are the better they are usually as far as that kind of stuff goes.  If Dopamine does it automatically then why save it in the file?

15 hours ago, jasondefaoite said:

Comment on the lyrics support... is there a way to differentiate between songs which already have lyrics embedded in the file, versus ones Dopamine downloaded? Just trying to understand when I should 'save in audio file'. Cheers!

There's is currently no indication. I could add some subtle element that would make that clear for the user.

 

Edit: this is the issue on GitHub: https://github.com/digimezzo/Dopamine/issues/203

  • Like 2
9 hours ago, Ravensky said:

I would never save anything that  I don't have to inside my music files, the smaller they are and more light weight they are the better they are usually as far as that kind of stuff goes.  If Dopamine does it automatically then why save it in the file?

The text from lyrics probably ads around 1.5kB to the file. Yes, kilobyte. You won't notice it. If smaller was better we'd all be using 64kbit/s mp3 encodes.

 

I prefer to have album art, metadata and lyrics embedded into the file if possible. The reason is I share the library across devices, and the capability of the players vary. There is no Dopamine for iOS yet ;) 

 

 

2 hours ago, jasondefaoite said:

The text from lyrics probably ads around 1.5kB to the file. Yes, kilobyte. You won't notice it. If smaller was better we'd all be using 64kbit/s mp3 encodes.

 

I prefer to have album art, metadata and lyrics embedded into the file if possible. The reason is I share the library across devices, and the capability of the players vary. There is no Dopamine for iOS yet ;) 

 

 

I didn't mean to sample down the file for less quality obviously, I just prefer to keep my files top quality with no album art, etc saved to the file...  in fact I prefer .flac files which are just amazing sound quality with nothing else added.

Another build of Dopamine is available: 1.2 Build 804 (Preview)

 

It fixes several bugs and adds some small handy features.

 

This is the change log:

– [Added] Possibility to re-order songs by drag and drop in playlists and Now Playing
– [Added] A more visible tray icon for systems which are not running Windows 10
– [Fixed] It is now possible to edit tags in Now Playing screen and Mini Player
– [Fixed] Scaling of Now Playing screen background is incorrect
– [Fixed] Embedded lyrics only shown when “Download lyrics automatically” option is enabled
– [Fixed] Unable to fetch album covers if artist name or album title contain “&”
– [Fixed] Unrating a song is now easier

 

As usual, download here.

The search online musicmatch and youtube links don't seem to do anything anymore.

hmm...looks like it depends on the song?

yep, found a song that I can't edit/add lyrics.

(After refreshing the database the problem file seems to have fixed itself, so I can't really figure out what was going on there.)

 

Actually, I think I just killed my playlist...

 

"Open playlist" crashes dopamine if the playlist already exists in the database.

 

 

2 hours ago, Ned said:

The search online musicmatch and youtube links don't seem to do anything anymore.

hmm...looks like it depends on the song?

yep, found a song that I can't edit/add lyrics.

(After refreshing the database the problem file seems to have fixed itself, so I can't really figure out what was going on there.)

 

Actually, I think I just killed my playlist...

 

"Open playlist" crashes dopamine if the playlist already exists in the database.

 

 

The search providers (musicmatch, youtube) and lyrics search need tags "artist" and "title" filled in. Otherwise they don't know what to look for. If you ever have an issue with those again, coudl you check if those tags are filled in?

 

As for the open playlist issue. Indeed, I could just reproduce it. Thanks for reporting it! This is the issue on github: https://github.com/digimezzo/Dopamine/issues/211

A nother preview of Dopamine is available: 1.2 build 806 (preview)

 

It fixes multiple bugs:

– [Fixed] Opening a playlist causes a crash
– [Fixed] Multiple metadata editing issues
– [Fixed] Fixed “Username” and “Password” are not translatable
– [Fixed] Songs ordered randomly when adding to playlists
– [Fixed] Notification options unreliable
– [Fixed] Improved online lyrics search. It will now provide results for more songs.

 

Download here

  • Like 3

Question, does shuffle all on the right side above the song lists in Artists/Genre/Albums areas shuffle all the songs in the entire collection or just the currently visible songs in the list?

 

For instance, I clicked shuffle all when I had a Christmas genre selected, but it looks to shuffle all songs in the entire collection instead.  I wasn't sure if that is a bug or the intended action.  Thanks!

1 hour ago, jackslade said:

Question, does shuffle all on the right side above the song lists in Artists/Genre/Albums areas shuffle all the songs in the entire collection or just the currently visible songs in the list?

 

For instance, I clicked shuffle all when I had a Christmas genre selected, but it looks to shuffle all songs in the entire collection instead.  I wasn't sure if that is a bug or the intended action.  Thanks!

It's intended behavior to shuffle all songs. However I had multiple reports that this is confusing. I have to find another location for the shuffle all button. See https://github.com/digimezzo/Dopamine/issues/218

1 hour ago, Raphaël G. said:

It's intended behavior to shuffle all songs. However I had multiple reports that this is confusing. I have to find another location for the shuffle all button. See https://github.com/digimezzo/Dopamine/issues/218

Thanks, I thought it did all and when you added it you asked where the best place was :)  I just used it for the first time and realized it did all songs instead.  

 

I think it is a little confusing since it is part of that area, so you would think the shuffle button would only apply to that current list of songs and not all.  Looking at the current interface, perhaps moving that shuffle all song button the left next to the current tabs main filter (Artists, Albums, Genre) would be better since it would apply to all of those.  You could leave the other so that it would shuffle just the current list.  Just a thought, however, that would mean 3 shuffle options in the interface though.

31 minutes ago, jackslade said:

Thanks, I thought it did all and when you added it you asked where the best place was :)  I just used it for the first time and realized it did all songs instead.  

 

I think it is a little confusing since it is part of that area, so you would think the shuffle button would only apply to that current list of songs and not all.  Looking at the current interface, perhaps moving that shuffle all song button the left next to the current tabs main filter (Artists, Albums, Genre) would be better since it would apply to all of those.  You could leave the other so that it would shuffle just the current list.  Just a thought, however, that would mean 3 shuffle options in the interface though.

I would think only one would be needed to shuffle only the current list as that would be what you are currently listening to anyway...right?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • The funny thing here is that like 70% or so of the web browser users use 'Google Chrome' as web browser. What I don't understand is that why on earth would ANYONE choose 'Google Chrome' on Windows when 'Microsoft Edge' is not just better in most things, but it's already there right out of the box for the Windows users. Microsoft Edge has less data collection (yes, that's a fact), less RAM usage and is more optimized for Windows (as it's a Microsoft product) right out of the box. I'm sure you will come with the argument of bloat in Microsoft Edge. Sure, but most of that can be fixed with a simple tool (there are many good ones out there for this). Yes, that require a couple of clicks in the same way as it requires several clicks to install 'Google Chrome'. And I'm sure you really love the 4 GB of AI-slop data 'Google Chrome' is downloading for Chrome without you agreeing to it. Fun right? Sure, the way Microsoft is pushing 'Microsoft Edge' on users might not be the best way of doing it and might need to change. But I would never choose 'Google Chrome' over 'Microsoft Edge' today anyways. I'm sure there was a period back in the days when 'Google Chrome' actually was better in most things, but that period is not today.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
    • That stupid annoying Sign in with Google on all these sites now... get the fk outta here
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!