Recommended Posts

For a little while now I've been having problems opening Dopamine, with the process just hanging and/or just a black screen. It had made me stop using it cos I couldn't figure out why, but I have just discovered it is because it's conflicting with MSI Afterburner. Once I close that Dopamine opens.

 

Has something changed that might have caused this? I was running the latest Release build.

35 minutes ago, dakn said:

For a little while now I've been having problems opening Dopamine, with the process just hanging and/or just a black screen. It had made me stop using it cos I couldn't figure out why, but I have just discovered it is because it's conflicting with MSI Afterburner. Once I close that Dopamine opens.

 

Has something changed that might have caused this? I was running the latest Release build.

Hi. Sad to hear that another application caused Dopamine to misbehave. It wasn't my doing though. A bit of searching on the web shows that this is not an isolated case. Other WPF applications also fail to work because of MSI Afterburner/Rivatuner. I have no idea what these tools are for though (overclocking?). It seems it's those developers that would need to whitelist Dopamine or something at least.

 

https://discussions.agilebits.com/discussion/77292/crashes-on-windows-10-creators-update-caused-by-riva-tuner

 Thanks for the reply mate. It's not a big deal now I know what's causing it. The only reason I thought to check Afterburner was because I had the same issue when trying to use Handbrake (encoding software) and found the solution online.

 

 I'll have to see if there is a beta version that might fix it !

Cheers.

  • 3 weeks later...

Hey everyone! Dopamine 1.5 has just been released.

Info and download can be found in my blog post: http://www.digimezzo.com/2017/11/20/dopamine-1-5/ 

 

Enjoy!

 

Edit:

 

Embarrassing release is embarrassing. Dopamine 1.5.1 is now available to fix version 1.5's instability on some computers: http://www.digimezzo.com/2017/11/20/dopamine-1-5-1/

1 hour ago, Raphaël G. said:

Hey everyone! Dopamine 1.5 has just been released.

Info and download can be found in my blog post: http://www.digimezzo.com/2017/11/20/dopamine-1-5/ 

 

Enjoy!

Thanks so much for the new update, Raphaël!
I'll take a look at the Spanish translation as soon as I have some time to spare :D

2 hours ago, Raphaël G. said:

Edit:

 

 

Embarrassing release is embarrassing. Dopamine 1.5.1 is now available to fix version 1.5's instability on some computers: http://www.digimezzo.com/2017/11/20/dopamine-1-5-1/

Well here, 1.5.1 did nothing much than 1.5.0 (shows updating DB and then nothing, even after deleting database files), I had to erase all profile files and re-run Dopamine like the first time...

 

EDIT : Mmmmh... Worked well the first time. But the second, back to the non-opening bug :cry:

Edited by 1for-matik
2 hours ago, 1for-matik said:

Well here, 1.5.1 did nothing much than 1.5.0 (shows updating DB and then nothing, even after deleting database files), I had to erase all profile files and re-run Dopamine like the first time...

 

EDIT : Mmmmh... Worked well the first time. But the second, back to the non-opening bug :cry:

I found the issue. It's language related. When using the English translation it works fine. When using anything else, it crashes on startup. I'm fixing it right now.

 

Edit: Dopamine 1.5.2 fixes your issue.

  • Like 2

Awesome, I love the change where it opens in mini mode when playing files from explorer

5 hours ago, Jaybonaut said:

Sorry I am new to this program and have not taken the time to read all 112 pages in this forum.  Can anyone tell me why this program is triggering Windows Defender - it tries to block even the installation of it.

Windows defender smartscreen is overzealous and blocks anything with an 'unknown publisher'

 

you can just click more info and then tell it to continue anyway

Hey everyone! Dopamine 1.5.3 is available! http://www.digimezzo.com/2017/11/22/dopamine-1-5-3/

 

Change log:

 

- [Changed] Updated the French translation
- [Changed] Updated the German translation
- [Changed] Updated the Swedish translation
- [Changed] Updated the Turkish translation
- [Fixed] Korean language file is missing in installable version
- [Fixed] Indexing fails for all files if 1 of the files has a path which is too long
- [Fixed] Some broken files generate faulty artists, genres and albums in the collection during indexing
- [Fixed] Portable version update notification forwards the user to the installer instead of download location
- [Fixed] Files with special characters fail to play
- [Fixed] Buttons don't work on the system notification
- [Fixed] A thick accented window border is displayed when maximized with a hidden Windows Taskbar
- [Fixed] Last selected settings page is not remembered when going back to Settings from the Collection or Information pages

  • Like 2

Hi Raphael,

 

I believe I've found a bug:

 

With the current 1.5.x release, if the folder that a song is in contains a { or } character, dopamine will just totally lock up when you attempt to play a song from that folder (the song will play, but the dopamine UI totally locks up and you have to kill the process).

 

As soon as I remove { or } from the folder that contains the song (and let dopamine re-index) the songs in that folder work without issue.

 

If I go back and re-add the { character (and let dopamine re-index), if I try to play any song from that folder it locks up

 

It doesn't matter whether the file is played from your music library, or if you open the file in dopamine from windows explorer

5 hours ago, ViperAFK said:

Hi Raphael,

 

I believe I've found a bug:

 

With the current 1.5.x release, if the folder that a song is in contains a { or } character, dopamine will just totally lock up when you attempt to play a song from that folder (the song will play, but the dopamine UI totally locks up and you have to kill the process).

 

As soon as I remove { or } from the folder that contains the song (and let dopamine re-index) the songs in that folder work without issue.

 

If I go back and re-add the { character (and let dopamine re-index), if I try to play any song from that folder it locks up

 

It doesn't matter whether the file is played from your music library, or if you open the file in dopamine from windows explorer

That's a strange one. I'll test it out.

5 hours ago, Zagadka said:

I'm really not sure why, so I'm sorry that I can't present a cause, but after a couple of hours, Dopamine starts getting stutters. Have to exit and restart it, it performs perfectly again.

When this happens, could you check in task manager if Dopamine is using a lot of CPU or RAM at that time?

6 hours ago, ViperAFK said:

Hi Raphael,

 

I believe I've found a bug:

 

With the current 1.5.x release, if the folder that a song is in contains a { or } character, dopamine will just totally lock up when you attempt to play a song from that folder (the song will play, but the dopamine UI totally locks up and you have to kill the process).

 

As soon as I remove { or } from the folder that contains the song (and let dopamine re-index) the songs in that folder work without issue.

 

If I go back and re-add the { character (and let dopamine re-index), if I try to play any song from that folder it locks up

 

It doesn't matter whether the file is played from your music library, or if you open the file in dopamine from windows explorer

Oh yes. That is a nasty one. I think it might have been in the 1.3 release already, but I'm not sure.

4 hours ago, ViperAFK said:

Another issue I'm seeing:

 

If you right click a folder > Play with dopamine the track order is scrambled instead of being ordered by track number (attached example screenshot)

 

4 hours ago, ViperAFK said:

Another issue I'm seeing:

 

If you right click a folder > Play with dopamine the track order is scrambled instead of being ordered by track number (attached example screenshot)

Screenshot (12).png

 

That one seems more difficult to reproduce. In all cases, songs are enqueued in the order they appear in the folder on my computer. I've logged an issue. If you had it, there must be something subtle going wrong: https://github.com/digimezzo/Dopamine/issues/576

On 11/23/2017 at 1:57 PM, Raphaël G. said:

That one seems more difficult to reproduce. In all cases, songs are enqueued in the order they appear in the folder on my computer. I've logged an issue. If you had it, there must be something subtle going wrong: https://github.com/digimezzo/Dopamine/issues/576

In testing this further, it only appears to happen if the folder being played is from a network share.

 

If I take that exact same album and right click | play with dopamine from my C:\ drive they are in the right order.

 

If I right click play the same folder, except this time from a samba share the track order is scrambled

 

EDIT: yeah this seems like a fun one, it only seems to happen if the smb share it's being played from is on a linux machine.

 

I copied this same album to a network share (on a windows 10 machine) and to a network share (on an ubuntu 16.04 machine). If I play the folder from the windows 10 smb share they are in the right order, if I play the folder from the linux sbm share the order is scambled

1 hour ago, ViperAFK said:

In testing this further, it only appears to happen if the folder being played is from a network share.

 

If I take that exact same album and right click | play with dopamine from my C:\ drive they are in the right order.

 

If I right click play the same folder, except this time from a samba share the track order is scrambled

 

EDIT: yeah this seems like a fun one, it only seems to happen if the smb share it's being played from is on a linux machine.

 

I copied this same album to a network share (on a windows 10 machine) and to a network share (on an ubuntu 16.04 machine). If I play the folder from the windows 10 smb share they are in the right order, if I play the folder from the linux sbm share the order is scambled

That's interesting. No idea how to solve it though. I just added extra sorting by filename for the songs of the processed directory, as, until now, I just relied on the order in which a standard .NET function fetches the file. The extra sorting might solve this issue. This will be in Dopamine 1.5.4.

 

Edit: 1.5.4 has just been released. You can get it here.

6 hours ago, Raphaël G. said:

That's interesting. No idea how to solve it though. I just added extra sorting by filename for the songs of the processed directory, as, until now, I just relied on the order in which a standard .NET function fetches the file. The extra sorting might solve this issue. This will be in Dopamine 1.5.4.

 

Edit: 1.5.4 has just been released. You can get it here.

awesome, that did seem to do the trick, tested that album again from the linux samba share (using 1.5.4) and they are in the right order

  • Like 2

mine is not working.. I tried to update to the latest version ( 1.5.4) but nothing happen. The Installer is open twice but do nothing. Windows 10 17043 build 64bit.

I looked for security/rights for your .msi file . All seems good.

 

PS: never mind, just ignore this reply...I found what is wrong...It's not your .msi file, it's the Windows Installer from my win10....I seems to be somehow not working anymore in this win10 version. I tried another app installer/updating...No working.

Bad bad Microsoft :)

 

Many thanks and congratulation for your awesome app. I'm using every day since you give us the first the opportunity to testing and using it.

Edited by Just Elevation
found the issue

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!