Recommended Posts

T3XAS said:

 While you're at it, grab a copy of Office 2016.

 

Been there; did that.  On 8.1 and both installs of 9926 (Pro and Enterprise).  Thanks to 2013, I was able to banish all my non-x32 add-ins and plug-ins, so I could migrate with confidence.

 

I haven't had so much as ONE backward-compatibility issue with any of my 2013-sourced data files.  None.

 

However, Jared's point is quite valid - if you MUST have official support, keep the beta and earlier software in a VM.  (However, how do you test beta games for compatibility in a VM?)

Depends on what you're doing, really.  Win10 has been stable for me, only really having trouble streaming .mkv files to my Xbox (and that's more of a feature issue).  

 

I did have issues when I installed Win10 as an upgrade to Win8.  I later did a clean install (using the recovery option in Win10) and since then things have been really good.  

 

No crashes.

No odd screens.

Some broken/not ready features.

 

I don't play a huge amount of games (Steam and Fez work, though).

In a technical or scientific field, all knowledge should be testable as much as possible.

 

In the last few years there has been an incredible buidup of socially based memes that substitute for testing things (that boring testing stuff that is the "science" part of "computer science")

 

The release of new software versions has a long history of versioning names and number schemes which a long time ago seemed to have some industry wide agreed upon semantic meaning in words like "alpha" and "beta" but now these terms are just food for marketing.

 

The example given of pre-release Windows 7 being more stable than "realeased" versions of Windows was certainly true in my experience as well. To only way to sort through this issue is to test it and see. It really is just that simple other than the testing and roll back process if needed is not as easy as using a mindless social meme such as "never use software until the first service pack"

 

On the plus side, newer versions of software contain bug fixes and feature improvements that can lead to significant productivity gains for an individual or an organization. On the negative side, newer versions can have new bugs worse than the old bugs and also result in productivity loss due to training requirements. And for operating systems, people's and organizations experience can vary greatly in either direction depending on the specific hardware used.

 

In every case there is a testable matrix of gain versus loss that is very specific to every individual and organization. In the case of Windows 7 I am fairly confident that the huge number of enterprise I.T. departments that held off roll-outs due to "wait for the first service pack" cost their organizations very real millions of dollars in net productivity loss.

 

So it is always a reaonable question to wonder if the current Windows 10 version will yield a net gain to a specific person on specific hardware with a specific workflow. Gathering anecdotal user experience from the community is not unreasonable to see if the testing effort here is worth his time.

To offer my own personal anecdotal experience, I have upgraded many computers from Windows 7 to Windows 8. I haven't bothered with 10 yet simply because I have yet to see any Windows 10 feature that seems useful.

 

When they finally get around to implement the full Windows 7 transparency in Windows 10, then I will upgrade as that is a useful productivity improvement for me.

 

One thing to watch out for is that Windows 8/10 does not run well on all of the hardware that runs Windows 7 and people that don't realize this may be screaming about stability when actually they have hardware incompatability.

 

In general Windows 8 (and therefore 10) will run on older hardware with less RAM than Windows 7 but there is a chance of issues with video drivers and motherboard BIOS that permit the O/S to install and run like everything is fine but then there comes a long series of strange crashes and BSODs. The BIOS issues in my case are all connected with Power Management and the O/S can be made stable in these cases by disabling all the Power Management features in the CPU.

 

In the case of previous generation AMD and NVIDIA video cards that exhibit this issue (some don't), I have tried every possible video driver combination and for these particular cards there is no solution but to purchase a new card.

To offer my own personal anecdotal experience, I have upgraded many computers from Windows 7 to Windows 8. I haven't bothered with 10 yet simply because I have yet to see any Windows 10 feature that seems useful.

Apples to Oranges

 

When they finally get around to implement the full Windows 7 transparency in Windows 10, then I will upgrade as that is a useful productivity improvement for me.

Transparency is a productivity improvement?

 

One thing to watch out for is that Windows 8/10 does not run well on all of the hardware that runs Windows 7 and people that don't realize this may be screaming about stability when actually they have hardware incompatability.

99% not true. unless you are speaking about an unsupported CPU

 

In general Windows 8 (and therefore 10) will run on older hardware with less RAM than Windows 7 but there is a chance of issues with video drivers and motherboard BIOS that permit the O/S to install and run like everything is fine but then there comes a long series of strange crashes and BSODs. The BIOS issues in my case are all connected with Power Management and the O/S can be made stable in these cases by disabling all the Power Management features in the CPU.

Strange BSODs and crashes are directly related to issues with your hardware, not the OS. Power management settings on the CPU have NOTHING to do with how stable your system is. You've got hardware problems

 

In the case of previous generation AMD and NVIDIA video cards that exhibit this issue (some don't), I have tried every possible video driver combination and for these particular cards there is no solution but to purchase a new card.

As said previously, you've got hardware problems.

  • Like 3

I hope you're okay with Microsoft monitoring how you use [read: what you do with] Windows for feedback purposes, since this is a preview build and all.

Speaking of which . . .

Privacy Statements for Windows 10 Technical Preview.

xendrome: it's not clear if you actaully read my post or not even though you cut n paste bits of it.

 

I stated that I have upgraded a lot of computers from Windows 7 to Windows 8 and on a small number of them I encountered some specific issues that originally appeared to be random instablility for which I discovered a work around and offered this as something to watch out for when upgrading older equipment.

 

1. Apples etc - I was presenting full disclosure that I had no direct hardware experience with Windows 10 but in that respect they are far more similar to each other than Windows 7.

 

2. Productivity - Transparency is a small but noticeable productivity improvement for me that could very well be of no consequence for others. I notice that there is kind of a "Grand Canyon" type divide in "power users" where some people are constantly opening and closing applications as part of their workflow so that there is only one (or a very small number) window open at any time and then there is the other extreme where people like to keep possibly hundreds of windows open. I am in the "hundreds" camp and use a staggered and layered arrangement across multiple monitors to form a mental cue for my workflow. The transparent edges and top of each window in Windows 7 provides a subtle but significant to me improvement of visually comprhending and viewing my workflow environment by essentially giving a few extra pixels of visibility per window of what is peeking out from behind.

 

3. 99% - I have no idea what percentage of hardware issues are both "tweakable" and blamed on the O/S but I have found two specific cases and have shared this information so that if someone such as the topic poster runs into it, he can fix it and keep on going.

 

4. Strange BSODS - I have described 2 issues that can be located in a toxonomy other than "hardware problems" but like many classifactions that is subjective. A problem that can be fixed by a BIOS setting may be hardware or may be just a crappy BIOS but either way the problem is gone. I have described some very specific issues that are unique in my experience to Windows 8 and later when running on older equipment. The usefullness of this information to anyone will obviously quicky vanish into history.

 

5. Video card incompatibility - your comment is a tad exasperating. I have discovered that in some specific cases that Windows 8 has issues with video cards that work just fine with Windows 7. In previous versions of Windows it was just a matter of finding the right driver or running in some compat mode. So although it is correct to say that a video card issue is a "hardware problem," the information content in that comment appears to be zero. If at some future point in time Google coughs up this forum on a search to some user upgrading from Windows 7, it is possble he can try antother video card in his system to prove his computer is ok, that windows 8/10 is just fine and that his video card is also just fine as well if it is in any Windows 7 computer. That is a solution to something however rare the case might be and has an information content greater than zero.

 

nosense: Microsoft has certainly made many mysterious decisions but it is transparently obvious that they can restore their transparency code and make it a selectable user option just like a million other Windows settings and they have gone on record with an intention to do this in some manner as yet unknown.

 

 

nosense: Microsoft has certainly made many mysterious decisions but it is transparently obvious that they can restore their transparency code and make it a selectable user option just like a million other Windows settings and they have gone on record with an intention to do this in some manner as yet unknown.

Transparency will be coming to task bar and start menu, which have been already spotted. IMO transparency needs to stay away from apps and windows border(aero).

xendrome: it's not clear if you actaully read my post or not even though you cut n paste bits of it.

 

I'm not even going to respond to the rest of your comments, since you seem to think i "cut n paste bits of it" when  in fact I replied DIRECTLY to your post word for word without cutting or pasting any of it, it is complete as you posted it. See your post here: https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1248918-is-windows-10-stable-enough-for-a-main-os/?view=findpost&p=596776054

Media server is a limited use system, so having it do one function isn't the same as running it as a main OS that you do everything on.

 

 

Well i should re-phrase what i said, i was running it for quite a while on my personal machine before i ended up switching over to a mac and coverting my PC into a home server.

 

But i had very little bugs, A few compatiblity issues but other than that ran pretty decent.

Transparency will be coming to task bar and start menu, which have been already spotted. IMO transparency needs to stay away from apps and windows border(aero).

 

I have described what is from my point of view an extremely useful productivity use-case for transparent window borders. A work around is to set the windows border size to 1 pixel but the fuzzy wider transparent border of Windows 7 is still a superior visualization aid in a complicated workflow based window arrangement.

 

Whatever your preference might be, it should be just exactly that - a preference that you set in the Control Panel or registry etc and not something that is mandated to 1.3 billion Windows users because you personally don't like it.

 

The strength of Windows has always been it's tweakability and just because Sinofsky had a strange case of Apple-envy doesn't mean we have to exist in a world of no user settings.

 

As an off-topic musing, I have often wondered if Apple envy had farther reaching effects on the design of things. Because of the "App Revolution" many software developers purchased a Mac to run both OSX and Windows since owning a Mac was a unique Apple restriction on publishing to their App Store. The trendy Mac was the 13" Mac Air which has a small 1400 x 800 resolution on a small 13" screen which in effect required the whole "Less is More" silly school of software design and lack of options becuase you could barely see much information at once on such a device! I suspect it would have a strong influence on your design approach compared to using a powerful Windows computer with 4 27" monitors at 2560x1440 resolution...

I have described what is from my point of view an extremely useful productivity use-case for transparent window borders. A work around is to set the windows border size to 1 pixel but the fuzzy wider transparent border of Windows 7 is still a superior visualization aid in a complicated workflow based window arrangement.

 

Whatever your preference might be, it should be just exactly that - a preference that you set in the Control Panel or registry etc and not something that is mandated to 1.3 billion Windows users because you personally don't like it.

 

The strength of Windows has always been it's tweakability and just because Sinofsky had a strange case of Apple-envy doesn't mean we have to exist in a world of no user settings.

 

As an off-topic musing, I have often wondered if Apple envy had farther reaching effects on the design of things. Because of the "App Revolution" many software developers purchased a Mac to run both OSX and Windows since owning a Mac was a unique Apple restriction on publishing to their App Store. The trendy Mac was the 13" Mac Air which has a small 1400 x 800 resolution on a small 13" screen which in effect required the whole "Less is More" silly school of software design and lack of options becuase you could barely see much information at once on such a device! I suspect it would have a strong influence on your design approach compared to using a powerful Windows computer with 4 27" monitors at 2560x1440 resolution...

 

Give Apple credit where it is due. As locked down as their products are they at least are very very detailed and consistent with great aesthetics and quality.

 

I liken Apple to a cruise ship. A very nice one. Free food, shows, rooms, entertainment and glamor. Everything is produced and directed by the cruiseline while you are an island/prison at sea.  However, you are still stuck on a ship at sea and if you do not like the food or shows ... well hmm. A pc is like a road trip. It is what you make of it and requires work on the driver. Not so glamorous or can be if you find a decent hotel and take the initiative? Take your pick?

 

Windows 7 was the first version of Windows that was gorgeous and blown me away so much I left Linux for good. In many ways it was both Apple like and PC like.

 

I think MS is going in circles with its artwork and direction with no where to turn. The reason is they already had what worked. Now they do nto know what to do with themselves after decades of work that became 7 at their height.

I have it installed on one of my main PCs which is not in production at the moment. I would not install it on a production machine at this point because I have had the mandatory updates mess certain things up for me to the point that I needed to perform a fresh install; one of the updates prevented me from launching any Win32 apps and metro apps were pretty broken as well, and I needed to do a fresh install to get things working again (oddly doing the update the second time did not create any issues). I would say wait.

 

 

I think MS is going in circles with its artwork and direction with no where to turn. The reason is they already had what worked. Now they do nto know what to do with themselves after decades of work that became 7 at their height.

 

UX design takes time, like you said they are starting over again. If you look at the preview builds for any version of Windows that shook up the visual style (namely Chicago [Win95], Neptune/Whistler [XP], and Longhorn [Vista]) you would see that the icon sets and themes changed several times before being finalized; Windows 7 was not a version that changed the visual style  and it simply reused nearly everything from Vista which is why everything looked nice from the preview builds. It will take time, and a lot more redesigns.

Give Apple credit where it is due. As locked down as their products are they at least are very very detailed and consistent with great aesthetics and quality.

 

I liken Apple to a cruise ship. A very nice one. Free food, shows, rooms, entertainment and glamor. Everything is produced and directed by the cruiseline while you are an island/prison at sea.  However, you are still stuck on a ship at sea and if you do not like the food or shows ... well hmm. A pc is like a road trip. It is what you make of it and requires work on the driver. Not so glamorous or can be if you find a decent hotel and take the initiative? Take your pick?

 

 

Something is whatever it is with all its aspects. Using an analogy takes all the complexity out of an item to illustrate some viewpoint into it.

 

So we can liken Apple to a pretty maze in an English country estate with lots of confusing twisty little passages and only one true way to find the boring lifeless center. You can ask a Maze Genius at the clubhouse how to navigate the maze and be told you are stupid for not finding it intuitive and obvious.

 

We can liken Windows to a penthouse suite in Las Vegas with a fancy remote control with buttons to make your environment just the way you want it. You become the King not Steve Jobs.

 

And so on.

 

From an aesetic point of view Windows 7 can be tweaked to make at as subjectively pleasing as anyone would wish from minimalist to gadget freak. (such as: http://www.deviantart.com/browse/all/customization/skins/windows7/visualstyle/?order=9)

 

I'm not sure at the core of things if it is really wise to glorify the lack of choice to the individual that Apple represents. It somehow influenced SInofsky to copy the idea like it was a hit tune and remove many choices that people really enjoyed in Windows. All it really needed was an Options Panel:

 

1. Give me the Sinofsy Mix

2. Make it boring like a Mac

3. Make it super boring like Windows 2000

4. Just give me the Windows 7 look already.

5. Send me to the advanced options for my own personal work of art.

  • Like 2

Been running the Windows 10 preview for over a month, haven't had a single issue.

 

Its very stable works for the things I need it for so it has become my main OS.

 

I went from Win 7 to Win 8, tried Win 8 for a few months and didn't like it and went back to Win 7. Win 8.1 came out and I tried that one for a few months also but ultimately moved back to Win 7 and am now using Win 10 and am happy with it so far.

Hardware monitoring is part of the End-User Licensing Agreement for these preview builds (not even just the current one, but the original one, when the Windows Insider program launched).

 

Further, for all the tweakage that Windows 7 and earlier offered, you were STILL basically stuck with the Start menu as the sole program launcher.  (Serious question - Could it be that the support for tweakability elsewhere may have been to cover up THAT lack?)

 

And there IS transparency by default in 10036 - the default in my case with 10036 is the Royal Purple Taskbar and mini-Start. 

  • 4 weeks later...

Except for my daily game (DC Universe Online) having connectivity issues, the Tech Preview would be my main OS today on my desktop - it already is on my notebook.  Everything else application and gaming-wise works as well or better than Windows 8 (or any other version of Windows back to XP).  Expecting perfect DirectX compatibility in a VM is silly - for ANY OS, beta or otherwise.  (That is true of even Citrix WinFrame, which is the closest thing I have seen from anybody to a gaming-ready virtualization platform.)  The issues with Windows 10 are the same ones that Windows 8.x has been nibbled to death by - aesthetics and the lack of the 7 or earlier Start menu. If you aren't het up over aesthetics and improved stability AND performance is important, not only could you do worse than the Technical Preview, you likely already are.

 

Yeah, who wouldn't want constant hardlocks and blue screens. To get the best stability I've seen people saying they have to use Windows 8.1 WDDM drivers which basically defeats that purpose altogether.

 

It's called a "preview" for a reason... because it's not meant for daily use. Not to mention the fact that it's basically one giant piece of spyware that sends back the content of your documents. Not a great thing if you hold data you want kept secure.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!