Has Windows 10 redeemed Microsoft?


Recommended Posts

A bit fussy about trivial things :p

That's why I said it was a gripe. :laugh:

After having reinstalled windows 8.1, I now am in control of my updates. I hated the Home version (of 10) which is a kin to Russian Roullete. You're forced with updates but I've seen two stories in the last 2 days where Windows 10 updates have thrown users into precarious loops. I believe it was a install or uninstall loop. so to gain back my control and happiness with updates, I set my reinstall of Windows 8.1 to inform me of when updates are available but allow me to decide what to install. All in order to keep from inadvertantly installing a bad update that will mess up my mahcine. I don't know how I got the home edition of win 10 from the update, yes its free, that's NOT my contention. My contention is, Home is like someone pushing you down a hill on a scooter with no steering wheel. No control. no way to stop from being forced to install an update that has to be taken down by MSFT. Plus, my old games work again. I think it was DX12 that broke my old favorites. well, I'm happy with my games working.

as for Windows 10, in order to get edge or DX12, you HAVE to upgrade to 10 which is a dirty low down trick. I come to realize through reading tech forums that MSFT purposely ingrained DX12 and edge. I've been reading around MSFT doesn't plan on releasing edge for windows 8.1 nor DX12. So now I see what this is all about. /SMH

What of Windows 10 fails?

3 reasons why Windows 10 will fail

DX12 had nothing to do with your old games not working. Windows 10 supports DX12, 11.1, 11, 10.1, 10, 9.3, 9.2 and 9.1. The fact that it's exclusive to Windows 10 isn't a bad thing. It uses a new driver model and not supporting older operating systems means Microsoft can focus more on something newer.

No. I loved 8.x, and wish 10 were much more like it. I wanted a refinement of the hybrid UI, and better options to control how desktop UI or Metro it was. Nothing remotely like what we've gotten - a desktop UI with a Metro paint job and questionable security choices.

If anything Microsoft needs to redeem itself for the mess that 10 currently is.

  • Like 2

What the average user wants is no change and no problems.
What their getting with Windows 10 is both.

You will get change with any OS upgrade.

Every.single.time.

 

As for problems, that is ENTIRELY subjective.

Not yet. I find the new start menu to be a hybrid that doesn't really capture the strengths of the old style start menu or the start screen. It's a move in the right direction, but it's not a perfect OS by any means.

  • Like 2

You have no way of saying otherwise other than anecdotal experience.  The ones who don't will stick with 7, and still not want a tweakfest.

I have a simple way of knowing what I say is true: Windows 8 was a failure. If users wanted the ugly metro UI, if they liked apps, if they didn't think the Start Menu in 7 was sleek, then Windows 8 would have been a success - it wasn't. Now Microsoft has simply changed the frosting on the same s**t cake and served it up as Windows 10.

I have a simple way of knowing what I say is true: Windows 8 was a failure. If users wanted the ugly metro UI, if they liked apps, if they didn't think the Start Menu in 7 was sleek, then Windows 8 would have been a success - it wasn't. Now Microsoft has simply changed the frosting on the same s**t cake and served it up as Windows 10.

Windows 8 suffered from bad media too. Many people hated it without ever trying it.

As for a failure, it depends on the benchmark you use, so...

It still stomped OS X and GNU/Linux on the desktop, combined.

"Anyway, my only gripe at the moment is the use of legacy icons."

That is your gripe?  So you don't have any concerns with telemetry and privacy issues.  And using your bandwidth with their p2p update system? Auto sharing wifi networks? Updates causing crash loops on lots of machines?  Your in ability to pick and choose updates, etc. .etc..

Your concerns are the icons are not pretty enough for you?  Really??

I can tell you one thing I am glad I didn't jump.. And will most likely be even pushing off the move until I get a full understanding of all the stuff they are doing - even though I am really interested in some of the networking changes like smb 3.1.1

 

I have personally no issues with telemetry and this privacy FUD you're spreading.

I have not used Windows 10 yet; I'm very cautious. I have windows 8.1; and about a year ago I tried the technical preview, didn't know what I was doing and messed up my computer. I want Microsoft to correct as many details as they can before I even consider using the system. On a liter note; I have been thinking about using the system more, and more each day. I know have a backup disk for problems that I may face on new operating systems. Thank goodness for Amazon.

Windows 10 Start Menu wins IDSA Digital Design Award

hehe...and the start menu in their image is not the one in RTM.

I'm willing to forgo the ugly icons as I see them as something that won't ever change. But what would be awesome, if we could add our own icons. I miss the customization of the OS. 

But if MS would quit screwing the lesser home users over and have the settings feature allow for us to be notified when updates are available. Reason being, this will allow everyone to determine if an update is broken and not install it. sort of a fail safe. I really love updates for what they are in fixing and improving the OS but I swear there have been a lot of broken updates that people are reporting ruining their windows 10 installs. and win 10 home doesn't allow for me to choose whether i want to protect myself from broken updates. But I had to go back to 8.1 so I can keep playing my old games.

DX12 had nothing to do with your old games not working. Windows 10 supports DX12, 11.1, 11, 10.1, 10, 9.3, 9.2 and 9.1. The fact that it's exclusive to Windows 10 isn't a bad thing. It uses a new driver model and not supporting older operating systems means Microsoft can focus more on something newer.

I can see creating this OS to get away from legacy hardware. But software like again, me, a gamer should be able to play Ghost Recon if I so choose. But Windows 10 stopped that. that doesn't make Win10 a favorable viewed OS for my gaming. I guess my beef are these subtle inner workings that MUST be addressed in a future update "IF" I'm to go back to 10. if not, I'm staying with 8.1.

in closing, I'm curious what will become of Windows when we are at that bridge of "do I" or "don't I" and users decide to get left behind? I think we're at the point now.

 

 I'm curious what will become of Windows when we are at that bridge of "do I" or "don't I" and users decide to get left behind? I think we're at the point now.

So long as there isn't a viable, user-friendly, gamer-friendly desktop OS for PCs to compete with Windows, Microsoft will get away with a complete lack of genuine innovation and coherent vision. A lot of users are already willingly being "left behind", by choosing to stick with Windows 7, the last truly PC-centric version of Windows. The real shift will occur once Windows 7 becomes truly obsolete, or until a genuine competing OS appears, and that's years away in both cases. Until then we get to watch Windows slowly become a parody of itself as Microsoft clumsily chases the mobile device market.

We now have with 10, a battle between the control panel on the one hand then the new settings interface on the other.

There is no battle. Control Panel is a legacy bit that will be removed with time.

Has Windows 10 redeemed Microsoft?  No, they never needed redeeming.

THIS! I enjoyed 8.1 on desktop, tablet (Surface Pro 3) and phone. I don't really like 10 on desktop and it's backwards steps on tablet and phone.

No, Microsoft hasn't redeemed itself.

Windows 8 failed primarily because it had an inconsistent UI, forced metro integration, and removed the sleek and efficient Start Menu.

Windows 10 replaces one form of UI inconsistency with another, still has forced metro integration, and is still missing the sleek and efficient Start Menu. To that they've now added a reduction in user control and greater invasion of privacy.

Microsoft says they're listening to users, but they're not. The majority of users made it clear with Windows 8 that they don't want metro apps, they don't want tiles and they want greater control over their OS.

Source? I've not seen data to back up these claims at all during the development phase. Feedback was overwhelmingly positive of the new Start, and windowed apps.

It looks like ######. MDL (Modern Design Language) v2 is just color to the face. There is nothing beautiful about it, it's just color. If you compare it to Google's Material Design, it just loses on everything. 

Oh yes, Android is totally a definition of beauty...

Not.

Microsoft says they're listening to users, but they're not. The majority of users made it clear with Windows 8 that they don't want metro apps, they don't want tiles and they want greater control over their OS.

That is one section of users, in which you are a subsection. The extraordinarily expanding body of users wants apps and tiles and things to be simple and to work across platforms. You know the bell curve? You and I are off to the sides. That big section of the middle? That is who MS is listening to.

So, so much FUD. 

Windows 10 seems fine to me, couple of differences, but pretty much same old Windows. I'm still running 8.1 on my main machine, and probably will continue for some time as everything is running fine and dandy like cotton candy.

I look forward to using 10 when Server 2016 and System Center 2016 are released. 

That is one section of users, in which you are a subsection. The extraordinarily expanding body of users wants apps and tiles and things to be simple and to work across platforms. You know the bell curve? You and I are off to the sides. That big section of the middle? That is who MS is listening to.

Nope, this doesn't follow. If most users wanted tiles and metro apps then Windows 8 and Windows Phone would be roaring successes.

And again, most people don't use the Windows mobile platform - as witnessed by its single digit market share - so they won't be using gimped apps and hideous metro UI "to work across platforms".

I find the desktop as homely as 8.x's, but thankfully, they shed the hideous start screen and the irritating charms that were anything but charming. However, the flat look is terrible. And in some apps, color choices are horrible. (Office 2013 is possibly the ugliest application I've ever seen.) 

I like the improvements under the cover, but I sure wish it looked much better. Did it redeem MS? Nah. But as was said early on, they didn't need redeeming even though Windows 8.x ran me off Windows to OS X and Linux. They make good software. They took a chance with 8.x and it didn't work. Not the only company to do so. Not the last to do it, either. I find more "redemption", of sorts, comes from their multi-platform strategy than from the changes to Windows.

Thankfully, they brought back lower-case menu choices in Office 2016. :-D

 

Nope, this doesn't follow. If most users wanted tiles and metro apps then Windows 8 and Windows Phone would be roaring successes.

And again, most people don't use the Windows mobile platform - as witnessed by its single digit market share - so they won't be using gimped apps and hideous metro UI "to work across platforms".

Your logic makes no sense. You want to rip on Windows 8, but what about the success of Windows 10? Why did people just upgrade 25+ million devices to Windows 10? 

Edited by Dot Matrix

Yes MS needed to redeem itself. why? because "if" windows 10 fails, this will be the 3rd failed OS in almost as many years. the sad part is, MS is a captured audience in that, there's no one who can compete at the moment against MS. never mind numbers 25 million out of almost 7 billion people isn't a lot.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!