Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

And Trump is unfit to be President based on his tax evasion, lack of mental capacity, illegal fund raising and his brazen lies to the American public. Both are terrible candidates. To claim that trustworthiness is a qualifying criteria for President would mean that Trump would be automatically disqualified.

Source Please.

1 hour ago, Gary7 said:

Source Please.

To Trump being untrustworthy? His Politifact scorecard is pretty damning, especially when compared to Clinton's scorecard.

  • Like 2
2 hours ago, Gary7 said:

She has not had a press conference in months.. What is she hiding??

Really ? This is all you have ?

Did you miss the DNC ?

  • Like 1
1 minute ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

To Trump being untrustworthy? His Politifact scorecard is pretty damning, especially when compared to Clinton's scorecard.

Those are opinions and not facts I asked you for a specific source on this:

 

Quote

And Trump is unfit to be President based on his tax evasion, lack of mental capacity, illegal fund raising and his brazen lies to the American public. Both are terrible candidates. To claim that trustworthiness is a qualifying criteria for President would mean that Trump would be automatically disqualified.

 

Just now, Gary7 said:

That was not a press conference and yes I did not watch it.

Ah right cause physically the two are totally different :rolleyes:


Also there's a delicious sense irony when one of neowins biggest conspiracy theorists asking for reliable sources.


All he has to do is post some edited youtube clips to keep up with your arguments.

  • Like 1
2 hours ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

And Trump is unfit to be President based on his tax evasion, lack of mental capacity, illegal fund raising and his brazen lies to the American public. Both are terrible candidates. To claim that trustworthiness is a qualifying criteria for President would mean that Trump would be automatically disqualified.

 

Trump's doctor put out a patently false assessment of his health. Which is worse: an assessment that is over a year old, or an assessment that is demonstrably false? I mean, Trump's doctor claimed he has never drunk alcohol - not only is that demonstrably false—there are pictures of him drinking champagne on the internet—but it is not something that a medical assessment could determine.

 

At the end of the day the health and trustworthiness of a candidate is best determined at the election booth. If people are concerned about Clinton's health then they won't vote for her. But it's worth pointing out that some of the best leaders have had questionable health and serious character flaws.

This is a classic demonstration of cherry picking. Hillary doesn't have to put out a health evaluation, but Trump has to put out his tax records? No, neither of them are obligated to do either of these things. Also, it just goes to show how biased you are that you dismiss Trump's clean bill of health as "patently false" just because you don't like what you hear.

Guess what, my father has diabetes and was given a perfect score on the full body scan evaluation. Something his doctor had only ever seen on a 24 year old ex-marine (and my father is in his 50's). Sometimes people are just exceptionally healthy even if they don't look it. So get your foot out of your mouth.

 

Trump's tax records also have zip to do with his ability to govern the country. So let that one lay as well.

3 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

Those are opinions and not facts I asked you for a specific source on this

The clue is in the name: Politifact. Every claim is researched and sourced. The evidence is clear - Trump is a serial liar and categorically untrustworthy. If you're not willing to consider evidence then there is nothing further to discuss.

  • Like 2
8 minutes ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

To Trump being untrustworthy? His Politifact scorecard is pretty damning, especially when compared to Clinton's scorecard.

Politifact has Hillary more honest than Bernie. So much for a lack of bias there.

2 hours ago, jjkusaf said:

Wait ... when did Hillary have 3 heart attacks?

 

Some people are just reaching now.  Dislike and don't vote for Hillary for her agenda ... but dang ... no need to start spouting off non-truths. 

I only mentioned heart attacks wrt Trump as a counterexample. 

 

OTOH - what she has suffered is three thrombi; two in the legs which can cause a pulmonary embolism and one in the brain, and they also cause most heart attacks. The risk of more of the same is exceedingly high, even with modern treatments which she is not getting by her own papers.

 

Statistics are not on her side.

  • Like 2
Just now, wakjak said:

Facts are facts. Like it or not. 

This just tells me you and others aren't willing to take things with a grain of salt when they fit your agenda.

  • Like 2
Just now, Emn1ty said:

This is a classic demonstration of cherry picking. Hillary doesn't have to put out a health evaluation, but Trump has to put out his tax records? No, neither of them are obligated to do either of these things. Also, it just goes to show how biased you are that you dismiss Trump's clean bill of health as "patently false" just because you don't like what you hear.

Clinton has already put out her health records - she was the first candidate to do so. And I dismissed Trump's health record as false because it is demonstrably false - his doctor claimed he has never drunk alcohol, which is a) false, and b) not something a medical test could show. As for Trump's tax records, he has lied by claiming he can't release them whilst he's being audited, which only supports the claim that he is utterly untrustworthy. Presidential candidates have a long record of releasing their tax returns, yet Trump—who has repeatedly lied about his wealth—refuses to do so.

 

Just now, Emn1ty said:

Trump's tax records also have zip to do with his ability to govern the country. So let that one lay as well.

They speak to his trustworthiness and character. Given that he has repeatedly lied about his wealth and tax affairs it is a valid source of criticism.

  • Like 2
11 minutes ago, TPreston said:

Ah right cause physically the two are totally different :rolleyes:


Also there's a delicious sense irony when one of neowins biggest conspiracy theorists asking for reliable sources.


All he has to do is post some edited youtube clips to keep up with your arguments.

Also there's a delicious sense irony when one of neowins biggest conspiracy theorists asking for reliable sources.

 

The YouTube Videos were of The FBI Director and one was a US Senator Tray Gowdy. If you watched them you can conclude, well a reasonable person can conclude that Clinton Lied to Congress many times. Each lie is worth 5  years in a Feferal Pen if charged and convicted. Now since You feel that I cannot ask for a source, I am done with you. It is like trying to debate a wall. Ta Ta

23 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

Also there's a delicious sense irony when one of neowins biggest conspiracy theorists asking for reliable sources.

 

The YouTube Videos were of The FBI Director and one was a US Senator Tray Gowdy. If you watched them you can conclude, well a reasonable person can conclude that Clinton Lied to Congress many times. Each lie is worth 5  years in a Feferal Pen if charged and convicted. Now since You feel that I cannot ask for a source, I am done with you. It is like trying to debate a wall. Ta Ta

:rofl: That pathetic failure who wasted  millions trying to prove conspiracy theories of a stand down order that had already been debunked before. The same guy who wasted the pentagons time trying to call facebook posters as witness's :laugh: My sides! You are killing me!

 

 

 

Edited by TPreston
  • Like 1
17 minutes ago, wakjak said:

Facts are facts. Like it or not. 

 

Politifact is published by the St. Petersburg, Florida Tampa Bay Times, which started PolitiFact in conjunction with the Congressional Quarterly, is a long time establishment liberal paper (as in, bank friendly etc.)  

 

Neither Trump or Sanders, both of which have moderate-to-liberal positions on many topics if anyone bothered to read them, are their cup of tea and therefore get 'The Treatment ' via selection bias etc. It's their MO.

21 minutes ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

The clue is in the name: Politifact. Every claim is researched and sourced. The evidence is clear - Trump is a serial liar and categorically untrustworthy. If you're not willing to consider evidence then there is nothing further to discuss.

It is an opinion site. c-ya

1 minute ago, DocM said:

 

Politifact is published by the St. Petersburg, Florida Tampa Bay Times, which started PolitiFact in conjunction with the Congressional Quarterly, is a long time establishment liberal paper (as in, bank friendly etc.)  

 

Neither Trump or Sanders, both of which have moderate-to-liberal positions on many topics if anyone bothered to read them, are their cup of tea and therefore get 'The Treatment ' via selection bias etc. It's their MO.

1) Organic Fallacy

2) They gave Obama Lie of the year

3) When you get past generic claims of bias and into specifics these claims invariably boil down to "fact checking has a liberal bias"

  • Like 2
29 minutes ago, DocM said:

I only mentioned heart attacks wrt Trump as a counterexample. 

 

OTOH - what she has suffered is three thrombi; two in the legs which can cause a pulmonary embolism and one in the brain, and they also cause most heart attacks. The risk of more of the same is exceedingly high, even with modern treatments which she is not getting by her own papers.

 

Statistics are not on her side.

Well ... no.  You are just making assumptions...and throwing out "three heart attacks" as a red herring.  People can live very long lives with her particular conditions.  Saying "statistics" isn't on her side ... even with proper treatment (per her physicians) ... where are these "statistics" you speak of?

 

Also, you keep throwing the thrombus out there.  Obviously the one in her head was caused by a transient factor (her hitting her head).  I do not pretend to know what caused her '98 and '09 DVT's  ... but they could have also been transient.  She tested negative for clotting disorders.  She is on Coumadin as a precaution.  You aren't her doctor ... and neither are the thousands of others trying to diagnose her.    

 

Now, if she had mets or pancreatic cancer ... or various other unrecoverable or untreatable conditions ... I would agree.  But having hypothyroidism and clots (though without a clotting disorder) ... doesn't mean "statistics are not on her side".

 

 

 

@theyarecomingforyou Regarding Trump's fund raising (saw you mention it earlier)...
 

Quote

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has his own e-mail scandal.

 

In a complaint filed  Wednesday with the Federal Election Commission, a pair of non-partisan campaign finance watchdogs alleged that the Trump campaign solicited campaign contributions from foreign government officials. Not only is it illegal for a candidate to accept money from foreign nationals, it's also a violation of the law to ask for it.

 

“Donald J. Trump's presidential campaign committee is violating black-letter federal law by sending campaign fundraising emails to foreign nationals,” Paul S. Ryan, deputy executive director of the Washington-based Campaign Legal Center, wrote in a statement announcing the complaint. “It is a no-brainer that it violates the law to send fundraising emails to members of a foreign government on their official foreign government email accounts, and yet, that's exactly what Trump has done repeatedly.”

 

Bloomberg citing the Campaign Legal Center

 

  • Like 3
12 minutes ago, theyarecomingforyou said:

Clinton has already put out her health records - she was the first candidate to do so. And I dismissed Trump's health record as false because it is demonstrably false - his doctor claimed he has never drunk alcohol, which is a) false, and b) not something a medical test could show. As for Trump's tax records, he has lied by claiming he can't release them whilst he's being audited, which only supports the claim that he is utterly untrustworthy. Presidential candidates have a long record of releasing their tax returns, yet Trump—who has repeatedly lied about his wealth—refuses to do so.

 

They speak to his trustworthiness and character. Given that he has repeatedly lied about his wealth and tax affairs it is a valid source of criticism.

First of all, he is under no obligation in the first place to release his tax records. It doesn't matter what his excuse is, he doesn't need to release them. As for the health record on Trump if his health looks like he's never drank alcohol then the doctor can very well say so. The exact quote is "has no history", which in regards to his doctor should obviously mean medical history. I don't think it is a true statement, but it's also unbelievably nitpicky (just as this thread is about Hillary). So because of one single statement you dismiss the entire statement? How convenient (and fallacious).

But again, I will reiterate, just because one candidate does something does not mean the other has to. Just because Trump released more recent health information doesn't mean Hillary has to just as Trump doesn't need to release his tax records just because Hillary has.

 

1 minute ago, jjkusaf said:

@theyarecomingforyou Regarding Trump's fund raising (saw you mention it earlier)...

I hope Hillary is given similar scrutiny with her foundation, considering she's openly admitted to accepting donations and decided to stop accepting them only after she is President (not while campaigning as the nominee).

17 minutes ago, Emn1ty said:

First of all, he is under no obligation in the first place to release his tax records. It doesn't matter what his excuse is, he doesn't need to release them. As for the health record on Trump if his health looks like he's never drank alcohol then the doctor can very well say so. The exact quote is "has no history", which in regards to his doctor should obviously mean medical history. I don't think it is a true statement, but it's also unbelievably nitpicky (just as this thread is about Hillary). So because of one single statement you dismiss the entire statement? How convenient (and fallacious).

It really wasn't a "health record" ... more or less a gushing letter....which started out with ...

 

"To Whom My Concern:"

 

"blood pressure, 110/65, and laboratory test results were astonishingly excellent"

"Physical strength and stamina are extraordinary"

"He has no history of ever using alcohol or tobacco products"

"I can state unequivocally, will be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency "

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/images/uploads/trump_health_record.pdf

 

Now, that blood pressure, if legit, for a 70 year old is really dang good...I admit.  But man ... those adjectives in a "health record" ... makes you go hmmm.  Especially the last line ... since I doubt Bornstein knows the medical history of every former President.

  • Like 3
41 minutes ago, jjkusaf said:

Well ... no.  You are just making assumptions...and throwing out "three heart attacks" as a red herring.  People can live very long lives with her particular conditions.  Saying "statistics" isn't on her side ... even with proper treatment (per her physicians) ... where are these "statistics" you speak of?

>

CVT

 

http://patient.info/doctor/intracranial-venous-thrombosis

 

>



Complications

 

It is important not to miss the diagnosis of intracranial venous thrombosis, as it can result in death and disability. Complications can arise from both the neurological consequences and also from the associated contributory diseases. Complications include seizures, hydrocephalus, intracranial hypertension and neurological deterioration.[10] 

 

Prognosis

 

Long-term follow-up suggests a generally good prognosis but there may be residual pyramidal symptoms, epilepsy, visual field defects and depression.[6] 

 

Recurrence rates of 2.8% and mortality rates of 10% have been reported, despite anticoagulation treatment.[11] 

 

Risk factors for a poorer prognosis and increased mortality include being female, infection, hydrocephalus, intracranial haemorrhage and motor deficits.[12] 

 

Earlier diagnosis using angiography and MRI followed by effective anticoagulation has greatly improved the prognosis.[2][6] 

>

 

DVT

 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1495464/

 



>

Postphlebitic syndrome is a chronic condition characterized by leg swelling, pain, edema, venous ectasia, and skin induration. Studies have shown that it usually manifests itself within the first 2 years after an episode of DVT.2,3 Severe postphlebitic syndrome can lead to intractable venous leg ulcers, which are painful, decrease mobility, and require ongoing medical and nursing care. Even in less extreme cases, the functional status of affected patients may be impaired. Few studies have prospectively assessed the long-term outcome of patients with DVT. Although some investigators have documented the incidence of postphlebitic syndrome in DVT patients, information is lacking on risk factors for this syndrome and its impact on quality of life.

>

Only 1 published study measured quality of life as a long-term outcome after DVT. Beyth et al. interviewed 52 patients from a cohort of 124 patients with DVT who survived for 6 to 8 years.8 As measured by the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), a generic quality-of-life measure, patients with symptoms of postphlebitic syndrome had poorer perceptions of their health, lower levels of physical functioning, and more severe role limitations due to physical health than asymptomatic patients. An earlier study of the long-term effects of iliofemoral DVT showed that among 21 patients followed for 10 or more years, 11 of 12 men were disabled and unable to maintain a steady job because of their leg symptoms, and 7 of 9 women were unable to perform household duties and required a homemaker.26 Although quality of life was not measured using a standardized instrument, the results indicate that this severe form of DVT had a profound effect on patient functioning.

>

 

Etc.

 

59 minutes ago, DocM said:

/snip

So, you are reading just all the bad?  

Regarding CVT ...

Quote

CONCLUSIONS:

There is a clear trend in declining mortality among patients with CVT over time. Possible explanations are improvements in treatment, a shift in risk factors, and, most importantly, the identification of less severe cases by improved diagnostic methods.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24699058?dopt=Abstract

Regarding your DVT ...

Quote

Postphlebitic syndrome is a chronic condition characterized by leg swelling, pain, edema, venous ectasia, and skin induration. 

Only 1 published study measured quality of life as a long-term outcome after DVT.

Does she have "Postphlebitic syndrome?  No ...

"postphlebitic syndrome is established by 1 year after DVT in 17% to 50% of patients."

 

Remember ... there was over 10 years between her two DVTs.  Was it in the same location?

 

Doc, sorry ... but you've presented nothing as neither you or I know her full medical history.  What we do know is what her doctor wrote ...

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/hillary-clinton-medical-records

...mind you ... it is a little less "gushing" than Trump's....but dare I say it is more ... professional?

  • Like 3
8 hours ago, Emn1ty said:

First of all, he is under no obligation in the first place to release his tax records. It doesn't matter what his excuse is, he doesn't need to release them.

He has no legal obligation but he does have a moral one, as tax records have been traditionally released for the sake of transparency. Given Trump's shady financial dealings it is perhaps more important for him to produce them than most previous candidates.

 

8 hours ago, Emn1ty said:

As for the health record on Trump if his health looks like he's never drank alcohol then the doctor can very well say so. The exact quote is "has no history", which in regards to his doctor should obviously mean medical history. I don't think it is a true statement, but it's also unbelievably nitpicky (just as this thread is about Hillary). So because of one single statement you dismiss the entire statement? How convenient (and fallacious).

The entire statement by the doctor was preposterous. The idea that he would be the 'healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency' is laughable and no credible medical doctor would use the term 'astonishingly excellent' or describe his physical strength as 'extraordinary'. It's comical. Do you honest think that the statement from Trump's doctor about his health is at all credible? If so I despair, I really do.

  • Like 3

http://time.com/4462274/donald-trump-cancels-colorado-nevada-oregon-speeches/

 

I wonder if this is health related.

 

He's seemed really low energy since he said he had regrets, and if you slow the video down to half speed of his rally today, his words are really slurred and take a long time to come out.

 

Add that to his orange pale, and I wonder if he may be suffering from hemochromatosis which is 218.16% fatal within 2 years. So why is he running if he might be dead from his failing health?

 

We deserve answers. A lot of smart people are saying that debilitated don isn't healthy enough for the presidency

  • Like 4
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Passkeys: Think of them like a broken heart necklace. Imagine one of those heart necklaces that breaks into two matching pieces. One person keeps one half, and the other person keeps the other half. With passkeys, the website has one half, and you have the other half. If the website gets hacked and someone steals its half, that stolen piece is useless by itself. It cannot unlock your account without your matching half. This particular heart necklace is one of a kind, there is only one in existence. Your half of the necklace has to be stored somewhere. It might be stored on your phone, tablet, computer, security key, or a password manager that can sync it between all your devices. A security key is a small physical device that you keep with you, kind of like a house key, car key, or flash drive. I would not usually recommend a security key as the first option for the average person. For most people, it is easier to use their phone, computer, or a password manager that can sync passkeys between their devices. A security key is more like a spare key you keep in a safe place, just in case you lose access to your other devices or your password manager. Some security keys plug into your computer. Some plug into your phone or tablet. Some get tapped against your device. The idea is simple: a security key can hold another passkey for the same website. Think of it like creating a second one-of-a-kind heart necklace for the same account. One necklace could be paired with your password manager, while another necklace could be paired with your security key. That means the website has more than one matching half on file. One half matches the passkey in your password manager. Another half matches the passkey stored on your security key. So, if you lose access to your phone, computer, or password manager, you would still be able to log in using the passkey stored on your security key. Think of it like keeping an extra special necklace piece on a tiny keychain, stored somewhere safe. The website still has the matching half for that security key, but your half is safely stored inside the little key. A passkey does not automatically exist on every device you own. It lives wherever you save it. If your half is stored on one device, then that device is the one that has the matching piece. For example, if you create the passkey on your Windows computer and it is only saved to that computer, your iPhone does not automatically have that same half. If you create it on your iPhone and it only stays on that iPhone, your Android phone does not automatically have it either. That is where password managers come in. A password manager can act like a protected jewelry box for your passkeys. Instead of your half of the necklace being locked to only one device, the password manager can securely sync that half to your other approved devices. For example, Apple Passwords and iCloud Keychain can sync passkeys between your Apple devices. Google Password Manager can sync passkeys with your Google account. But password managers such as 1Password and Bitwarden can sync passkeys between everything, your phones, tablets and computers. Now, you might ask: “What happens if I lose access to the device that has my passkey?” That depends on where your passkey was saved and what recovery options the website gives you. If your passkey was synced through a password manager, you may be able to sign in from another device that has access to that same password manager. For example, if your passkey is saved in iCloud Keychain, Google Password Manager, 1Password, or Bitwarden, another approved device may still have access to it. If your passkey was saved only on one phone, computer, or security key, and you lose that device, then you may not have your half of the necklace anymore. In that case, you would usually need to use the website’s backup login or account recovery options. A lot of websites that support passkeys still let you fall back to your regular password. So if you lose access to your passkey, the site may still let you log in with your password, a code sent to your email, a text message, a recovery code, or some other account recovery process. That is convenient, but it is also important to understand: if the website still allows password login, then your password still matters. Passkeys are safer than passwords, but if your account still has a password as a backup, you should still use a strong, unique password and turn on two-factor authentication if the website offers it. This is why it is a good idea to have more than one safe way back into important accounts. For example, you might keep your passkey in a syncing password manager, add a second trusted device, save recovery codes somewhere safe, or set up a backup security key. A passkey is very secure, but just like a real key, you need a backup plan in case you lose access to it. Now, you might ask: “What stops a hacker from copying my half of the necklace?” That’s the important part: your half is protected. It is not something you type in, and it is not something the website gets to keep. Think of your half as being locked inside a tiny safe on your phone, computer, security key, or password manager. That safe only opens when you approve it with your fingerprint, face, PIN, or device password. When you log in, the website does not need to see your half. It only needs proof that your half matches its half. Your actual half is not handed over to the website. This is different from a password. With a password, you type the secret into the website. If you type it into a fake website, the hacker now has it. With a passkey, you are not typing your secret into the website. Your device is proving you have the matching half without giving the half away. That also helps protect you from fake websites. If someone makes a fake login page that looks like the real site, your device can tell it is not the real match. It will not use your passkey there. Now, could someone use your passkey if they stole your device, got into your password manager, or somehow unlocked the safe that holds your half? Yes, that is why your device password, PIN, fingerprint, face unlock, and password manager security still matter. But a hacker cannot just steal your passkey from the website or trick you into typing it into a fake page like they can with a password. That is why passkeys are safer than passwords. The two matching pieces have to come together, like two lovebirds who were once separated and are finally reunited.
    • Newegg offers insane combo deal on Amazon Prime Day 2026 that beats Steam Machine by Sayan Sen Building a PC is undoubtedly difficult nowadays but with this epic combo deal, Newegg is trying to make it as easy for you as it is possible. If you are making a new one or even upgrading an old system to a new Windows 11 device, this combo bundle is truly unmissable as you get AMD's Ryzen 9800X3D, a compatible X870 motherboard, a 240mm AIO liquid cooler and finally a Samsung 990 PRO SSD all for under $1000 (purchase link under the specs table down below). This should beat out the newly launched Steam Machine from Valve in terms of performance and performance per dollar especially if you are willing to set Linux up on it. Essentially with this combo you will get the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-core 3D V cache CPU, Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD, the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI ATX Motherboard, and finally the Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240. Thanks to that massive vertically stacked L3 cache, the X3D desktop processors, including the 9800X3D, also come with the benefit of not needing fast memory. Even DDR5-5600 should be plenty for it. The technical specifications of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D are given in the table below: Specification Value Architecture Zen 5 Cores / Threads 8 / 16 Base Clock 4.7 GHz Max Boost Clock Up to 5.2 GHz L1 Cache 640 KB L2 Cache 8 MB L3 Cache 96 MB Total Cache 104 MB CPU Core Process TSMC 4nm FinFET I/O Die Process TSMC 6nm FinFET Socket AM5 Default TDP 120W Max Temperature (Tjmax) 95°C Thermal Solution Not included Memory Type DDR5 Max Capacity 256 GB Memory Speeds 2x1R: DDR5-5600 2x2R: DDR5-5600 4x1R: DDR5-3600 4x2R: DDR5-3600 PCIe Version PCIe 5.0 PCIe Lanes (Total/Usable) 28 / 24 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) 4 USB 2.0 1 Graphics Cores 2 CU RDNA 2 Frequency 2200 MHz DisplayPort over USB-C Yes Overclocking Unlocked Up next we have the tech specs for the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI Motherboard: Specification Value Chipset AMD X870 CPU Support AMD Ryzen 9000 / 8000 / 7000 Series Desktop Processors Socket AM5 Memory Slots 4 × DDR5 UDIMM Maximum Memory Capacity 256GB Memory Support DDR5 8400–5600 MT/s (OC), DDR5 5600–4800 MT/s (JEDEC) Integrated Graphics Outputs 1 × HDMI 2.1 FRL (up to 8K 60Hz) 2 × USB4 Type-C with DisplayPort 1.4 HBR3 (up to 4K 60Hz) Expansion Slots PCI_E1: PCIe 5.0 x16 (CPU) PCI_E2: PCIe 3.0 x1 (Chipset) PCI_E3: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset) Audio Realtek ALC4080 Codec 7.1-Channel USB High Performance Audio Supports up to 32-bit/384kHz playback on front panel S/PDIF output M.2 Slots 4 × M.2 M2_1: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 22110/2280) M2_2: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 2280/2260) M2_3: PCIe 4.0 x2 (Chipset, 2280/2260) M2_4: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset, 2280/2260) SATA Ports 4 × SATA 6Gb/s RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 for M.2 NVMe storage devices Rear USB Ports 4 × USB 2.0 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 2 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 2 × USB4 40Gbps Type-C Front USB Headers 4 × USB 2.0 4 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 20Gbps Type-C LAN Realtek 8126-CG 5G LAN Wireless Wi-Fi 7 (M.2 Key-E module pre-installed) Supports 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz bands Up to 5.8Gbps Supports 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4, MLO, 4KQAM Internal Power Connectors 1 × 24-pin ATX Power 2 × CPU Power Connectors 1 × PCIe 8-pin Power Connector Fan Headers 1 × CPU Fan 1 × Combo Fan (Pump/System) 6 × System Fan RGB Headers 3 × Addressable V2 RGB (JARGB_V2) 1 × RGB LED (JRGB) Other Internal Headers 1 × EZ Conn-header 2 × Front Panel Headers 1 × Chassis Intrusion 1 × Front Audio 1 × TPM 2.0 Header Debug Features 4 × EZ Debug LEDs 1 × EZ Digit Debug LED Rear I/O Ports Clear CMOS Button Flash BIOS Button HDMI 2 × USB 40Gbps Type-C 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 4 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 4 × USB 2.0 5G LAN Port Wi-Fi/Bluetooth Antenna Connectors Audio Connectors Form Factor ATX The Samsung 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification Value Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC DRAM Cache 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,200 TBW MTBF 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink No Get the combo deal at this link: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Samsung 990 PRO 2TB, MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI motherboard, Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240: $784.99 + $25 off with promo code FTTF77: $759.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) Good to know This Newegg deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I heard from a lot of people that driver support for the latest games when RDNA first came out (Radeon 5000 series) was pretty bad, but if you didn't buy the card on day one, or were not trying to play the latest titles, then you were isolated from that issue. Other than that, it's been good and only getting better.
    • Meta launches new AI glasses in 26 styles and Muse Spark multimodal capabilties by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta today announced a new line of Meta Glasses in partnership with EssilorLuxottica. The new AI glasses build on the company’s existing smart glasses portfolio, which is sold under the Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta brands. The new Meta Glasses start at just $299, are compatible with prescription lenses, and will be available in 26 styles across different colors, lenses, and frames. At launch, Meta Glasses will be available in three frame styles. The Meta Adventurer features a clean rectangular design and comes in Standard and Large sizes. The Meta Fury is a bolder frame for users who want a stronger look. Meta Glasses by Kylie is a slim oval frame designed in collaboration with Kylie Jenner. Similar to existing Meta AI Glasses, the new Meta Glasses include a dedicated action button that can be used to quickly access Meta AI or launch a favorite feature. They also feature open-ear speakers for calls, music, and more. Meta has also included a multi-mic array with wind noise reduction for calls and messaging. Users can capture photos and videos hands-free using voice commands. Meta claims more than eight hours of battery life, while the portable charging case can provide up to 40 additional hours. As expected, Meta Glasses come pre-loaded with Meta AI powered by Muse Spark from day one. Muse Spark is the first model from Meta Superintelligence Labs with improved multimodal capabilities. The same Meta AI upgrade is also now available on existing Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta Glasses in the US and Canada via an update. With the Muse Spark-powered AI assistant, Meta AI in the new glasses can provide smarter answers, understand what the user is seeing, and help with daily tasks such as calendar management and navigation. Meta also announced an upcoming feature called the dynamic photo feature, which captures multiple frames and recommends the best one. Pedestrian navigation is also coming soon to these glasses. Meta is also adding support for 14 new live translation languages, including Japanese, Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, and Korean. The new Meta Glasses are available starting today through Meta.com, Best Buy, Amazon, LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut, and select retailers.
    • is that a personal preference? whether it is or isn't, i get where you're coming from. i try to get and use fully open sourced applications whenever i can but there are instances where i find a superior product that is closed sourced. in these cases i do my best to learn about the company, who operates it, their background, parent and sub structure etc. to some extent, depending on "the smell test". i really believe that Syncback is really and truly something great. even if you don't use it, it's always worth a recommendation to someone else, especially if that someone else is not very computer literate. for someone of your calibre you, you'll manage just fine with Syncthing, no doubt about it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      166
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!