Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, SALSN said:

That is all well and good, and I really like the Dream Chaser, but are there any actual advantages to that over Dragon 2? Theoretically Dragon 2 should be able to land even more places than the Dream Chaser with the rocket powered precision touch down.

Dream Chaser's re-entry is low-G, making it best for delicate samples & experiments. med-evac etc. It also has a 1,500 km cross range so it can land on alternate & commercial strips - especially useful since the FAA is gradually integrating spacecraft into the Air Traffic Control system. The ATC transponders have been tested on Dragon for a few years. 

I agree with @ above. :) 

 

And Virgin Galactic is really, really missing the whole point about the word "Galactic". The stupendously lackluster funding, seriously questionable design choices and the ridiculous amount of time it's taking them to get any kind of momentum going is just embarrassing now. Yes, they had an accident. Yes, it was human error. Yes, it was completely preventable on multiple fronts. Seems like Branson & Co. would have had this venture doing something more interesting than test flights for the past 10 years, though. Like, I dunno ... hauling paying customers into near-space by now?? What happened to doing it by 2012?

 

Oh wait .. they didn't actually have a real, workable plan? Meh. More vaporware after all.

9 hours ago, Unobscured Vision said:

Oh wait .. they didn't actually have a real, workable plan? Meh. More vaporware after all.

But the weird thing is that the spaceship one did it over a decade ago, I know scaling up is not just multiplying by 2 but you would think it would be fairly easy considering that the concept has already been proven and they had a lot of funding for it..?!

I really don't think people are going to be as impressed with suborbital flight after all the latest space tech, but hopefully they can morph the concept into some super quick point to point travel.

12 hours ago, SALSN said:

But the weird thing is that the spaceship one did it over a decade ago, I know scaling up is not just multiplying by 2 but you would think it would be fairly easy considering that the concept has already been proven and they had a lot of funding for it..?!

I really don't think people are going to be as impressed with suborbital flight after all the latest space tech, but hopefully they can morph the concept into some super quick point to point travel.

I mean it's got a market ... but not on that small of a scale. We're in the era where people are seriously looking at suborbital hops for intercontinental travel. RAPID intercontinental travel. As in "we need to get someone someplace now.". That was, I believe, the whole reason Branson & Co. invested in Scaled Composites in the first place. To forward this capability.

 

I'm just not seeing a commitment. They haven't given it enough of a push to make it happen. Baby steps? They could have simulated what they needed to find out -- the technology has been there to do simulations. A company like Virgin Airways has the means to pioneer way, way better than this and they just haven't gotten behind it at all. That's what I'm seeing here.

 

Sure, the technology is interesting and useful. But it's "outside the box", perhaps too much outside. There's a lot of ... inconvenience associated with it. It can't take off under its' own power, for instance. The engine does not allow for restarting if you're off-course. Ya burn it out and it's done. It pretty much has all the pitfalls of the Space Shuttle once you're back in the atmosphere.

 

As much as I hate to be the one to say it, this technology tree is a dead end as it currently sits unless there are some breakthroughs. :( 

They are stuck by being too committed to Rutan's winged concepts, which introduces mass penalties, and hybrid rocket engines which are likewise heavy, have non-trivial acoustics, use a potentially spontaneously explosive oxidizer, can explode if a piece of fuel grain dislodges and plugs the nozzle, and by the way they aren't than reusable.

 

Other than those.....

 

Rutan was going to use an XCOR engine, which would have been great as their companies were neighbors at Mojave, but he and Jeff Greason got into a kerfuffle and that was that.

Edited by DocM

Yeah. Too much against it at this point, in this configuration. And time's passing it by when the technologies to do better things are also passing it by. They could have done something like Dream Chaser with engines, on steroids, scaled up and already had it paying bills by now. Adapt the "wing thing" to DC's design if they're that stuck on it ... 

 

Now SC is just looking OCD at this point. And that's a NG.

I've been trying to figure out why there is a need for a 24hr turnaround window for 1st Stages. Is there some commercial viability in this, or is it just a target that Elon wants to meet, just because?

They're going to have a 12,000 satellite internet backbone constellation going uphill soon, replacing 20% (2,400 birds) of it every year. This with Google. The FCC and ITU permitting are making progress, and the factories in Seattle are ramping up and hiring. They're also making their own Hall effect ion thrusters for these.

 

That and FH Red Dragons scouting Mars colony and probe sites where ever; their commercial astronaut program (Crew Dragon to the Moon etc.); their usual satellite, DoD & NASA/ISS business; the ISS partners likely lunar exploration gateway station in lunar orbit will need logistics flights and so on. Another could well be DoD Launch On Need - roll a DoD spec'ed core out of warehouse hangars at KSC or Vandenberg and launch an urgent defense payload within an hour.

 

That stage refurb queue is going to have to move, and quickly.

 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 2
9 hours ago, DocM said:

Guy in Springfield, Louisiana was making a web ad for his hot dog stand and got photobombed by a Falcon 9 :)

 

*snip*

 

"We got Hot Dogs! .....What the heck is that...?"

I lost it.

  • Like 3
  • 2 weeks later...

Gee, wonder what they'd use this for? :woot:

 

Small company in Ohio.

 

Technical article: Composites World....

 

Link....

 

Quote

SpaceX is working with this local company. Heres what you should know about it.

 

Spintech, a spinoff company founded in 2010 from Cornerstone Research Group, has recently announced that Elon Musks SpaceX is watching their company and its specialty shape memory polymer smart tooling solutions.

"Our technology will allow them to make composite parts that have complex geometries and/or or trapped geometry, Craig Jennings," President of Spintech said.

And SpaceX is just the kind of manufacturer that could use lightweight composite parts for, say, a rocket ships body or landing gear.
>

 

SpinTech senior composite technicians Abe McNutt, left, and Jim Leschansky work on tooling for rocket parts.
Spintech%20Composite%20Tooling%20006.jpg

 

  • Like 1
20 minutes ago, SALSN said:

Could not find the thread on the boring company and it was posted by a SpaceX guy, so you get it here:

https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/27/take-a-look-at-the-first-boring-machine-for-elon-musks-boring-company/

Including a picture of the beast :-D

Haha... The Boring Company. Brilliant

Rock is a great radiation shield, so some percentage of tunneled habitats into Martian cliffs make tons of sense. 

 

Some could be initially bored by a SpaceX optimized TBM, Musk thinks he can improve their efficiency by an order of magnitude, and others - or custom-shaped chambers - could be shaped by remote controlled Roadheaders - an off the shelf technology widely used today.

 

618.thumb.jpg.cf3b0322afeab1fa6d0f8fd46aa73dba.jpg

 

8jlmnvhdyi.thumb.jpg.963e4a1a5670ca4d131e54816dd238e4.jpg

 

Another interesting tech is From MIT: Digital Construction Platform, which "prints" structures. Looks good for Earth and offworld habs.

 

It can be fitted with a range of different tools, including a foam insulation gun, a welding attachment, a thermoplastic extruder that squirts out melted plastic, a glorified squirt gun, and even a simple bucket.


The Verge....

 

 

 

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!