Recommended Posts

The very smooth, and even more accurate, CRS-11 stage landing indicated another iteration. The stage GPS provides X/Y and a less precise Z. Radar provides the precision Z, and a few months ago there were extensive radar tests at Hawthorne and McGregor. Seems the results just went live, and the solution for ASDS and Landing Zones is pure KISS.

 

 

  • Like 1

Aaaaand NOW we know why the DoD was watching the NROL and Inmarsat 5 launches ... :yes: :woot:

Article link

SpaceX wins launch of U.S. Air Force X-37B space plane

Quote

x37b.thumb.jpg.eadaf443c19aefcc1d78eb02ae72b6af.jpgx37b2.thumb.jpg.af3f576fa4f4a6b329a2d7e5eee9953d.jpg

FILE PHOTO: The X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle mission 3 space plane is shown after landing at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California October 17, 2014 in this handout photograph provided by Vandenberg Air Force Base. Images (C) REUTERS/Boeing/ Vandenberg Air Force Base/Handout via Reuters/File Photo

 

By Irene Klotz | CAPE CANAVERAL, FLA.

 

Elon Musk's Space Exploration Technologies Corp will fly its first mission for the U.S. Air Force in August when it launches the military's X-37B miniature spaceplane, Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson said on Tuesday.

 

Four previous X-37B missions were launched by United Launch Alliance Atlas 5 rockets. ULA is a joint venture of Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT.N) and Boeing Co (BA.N).

 

"SpaceX will be sending the next Air Force payload up into space in August," Wilson said during webcast testimony before the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee. She later specified that the payload would be one of the Air Force's two X-37B spaceplanes.

 

/giggle

 

ULA are DONE. Losing the USAF?! LMAO .... damn ... how badly do you have to mess up to pull THAT off? Only thing in memory is 1) Don't get it done, and 2) Let the competition bite ya in the rear end. 

 

Guess #2 applies here. :laugh:

  • Like 3

Yessir. :yes: AND more buys are certain to be incoming, but I think that Falcon Heavy is going to find more use as a Mil/Gov launcher for the first half of its' service life -- at least until ITS Junior arrives in 2020/2021 (if the sources are correct).

  • 2 weeks later...

Upcoming SpaceX appearances where exploration news may drop.

 

July 19: Elon Musk; ISS R&D Conference

 

June 21: Gwynne Shotwell; US Senate hearing "Reopening the American Frontier: Promoting Partnerships Between Commercial Space and the U.S. Government to Advance Exploration and Settlement"

 

June 22: Gwynne Shotwell; The Space Show 

 

Sept. 7-10: Tom Mueller; Mars Society Conference

 

Sept. 25-29: Elon Musk; International Astronautical Conference 2017

:yes: And there's a review of SLS incoming ... a HARD review, later this year and if things aren't looking up (and they WON'T), NASA is gonna cancel the SLS program in favor of ITS/BFR/ITS Junior. Orion will be adapted to fly on Falcon Heavy since it's almost done.

 

USAF/NRO/Gov payloads will be rerouted and reworked for cost effectiveness. Those "pork contracts"? DONE. FINISHED. Senator Shelby and the others who have kept the money train rolling will no longer have control of the funding. It'll be handled by the Vice President's Space Council directly.

 

Boeing has begun the process of splitting its' business into divisions in an attempt to "save itself" and isolate those sectors that are losing money. And guess what ... ten-to-one that ULA will be on the chopping block or spurred off into it's own independant corporation? Any takers?

 

Ahh ... the winds of change smell so sweet.

  • Like 1

Actually, if ULA were to be cut loose by Boeing/LM it would only be good for them! It would mean they get to keep their revenue and can finally start doing some R/D for themselves! Then again, IF this scenario were to ever unfold I fear it would be way, WAY, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY to late for them to recover from headstart SpaceX has taken, not to mention that in a few years Blue Origin will no undoubtedly show them their heels as well.

  • Like 2

I would see this as @DocM sees it ... more of a Blue Origin buying out ULA. They get the access to the ULA patents and the proprietary technologies (the Atlas/Delta name, etc) and the talent pool, facilities, all of that. Then Bezos & Co. can really take ULA to the next level and truly be the "United Launch Alliance". Join forces with Orbital ATK, Aerojet Rocketdyne, and the rest of OldSpace. Sign agreements with LockMart, etc. I think it would mark a new beginning. So yeah, I'm with your line of thinking and DocM's.

Edited by Unobscured Vision

Yeah. I think ULA is gonna be worth $3~5 billion. Totally fair market value, given that they don't actually make any money right now. Bezos could make it shine, and Tory Bruno could actually have a fair shot at making things work for once.

True, I think that as far as leading the company goes Tory is doing one hell of a job, it just sucks for him that he is basically forced by the higher ups to achieve 'lowering costs' by means of staff layoffs =/ Ow well, at least he has an awesome voice. His talks and speeches are always a delight to listen to :D

  • Like 1
3 hours ago, Beittil said:

Totally feasible to.. I mean, if he can buy worthless crap like Whole Foods and The Washington Post out of his pocket change :p Why not ULA :D

More like he bought WaPo with $250 million of the CIA's money, transferred from his AWS pocket ($600+ million/year for CIA cloud services) to the Graham family (who have been in bed with CIA for 60+ years.)

 

But we digress...

Edited by DocM

The new South Padre Island amphitheater's plan is now public. General purpose, but also oriented for watching SpaceX launches from Boca Chica.

 

Brownsville Herald....

 

Quote

The amphitheater will be located at Isla Blanca Park, overlooking the dolphin cove area and the ship channel.

 

"It's going to be very nice," said Joe Vega, Cameron County Parks director. "It's also going to be a great location to view SpaceX launches, as well."

He said there will be performing arts and concerts, and people could even have weddings there.

 

 

amphitheater.thumb.jpg.3f00e1404887dd80665562bce71eed7c.jpg

  • Like 3

Hehe! :D Ten years from now, Brownsville and the entire area surrounding it will be jamming. Won't even recognize it ... and the amount of brainpower down there will be literally mind-boggling.

 

It's coming, folks. The next great boom town. :yes: 

And for the record

Falcon 9 now has more successful flights than Delta IV (all variants)

35-34

 

A thought strikes me; what with CRS-12 and other launches moving into August and September leaving just IntelSat 35e in early July (so far),

 

LC-40 may be nearing completion and the planned LC-39A shutdown & upgrades for Falcon Heavy and Commercial Crew is immenent.

 

 

 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!