Recommended Posts

3 sources now; two NSF L2 sources paraphrased in the open forum and a launch photographer on r/SpaceX, reporting that NROL-76 and Inmarsat-5 F4 were Block 3 boosters with a Block 4 upper stage.

 

Also,

 

From KSC, the usual GTO insertion deltaV deficit is GTO -1,800 m/s. The number crunchers say the Inmarsat-5 F4 launch hit GTO -1,570 m/s, which is very close to a 3-stage Proton-M (!!) or Atlas V 541 (4 solid boosters, single engine Centaur upper stage.) Thaicom-8 hit GTO -1,492 m/s, but it only massed 3,100 kg. 

 

Accordingto Spaceflight101, Merlin 1D has a max throttle setting of at least 112%, so perhaps they tapped into that.

 

https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=42941e .msg1679467#msg1679467

 

NSF post 

Quote

#4 by biosehnsucht on 16 May, 2017 18:13

At least two different people have posted that they've heard from reliable sources (but of course, can't name them etc) that the last two flights were Block 4 second stages, but Block 3 first stages

 


r/SpaceX post

https://www.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/6bed12/comment/dhm1o04

 

Quote

OccupyMarsNow
Block 4?


johnkphotos 
AmericaSpace.com Photographer
Block 3 first stage, block 4 second stage.

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1

... and a Tweet from Elon which confirms that they can go at way more than the stated numbers:

SpaceX has been sandbagging the true performance of Block-3. Now we just need to figure out by how much. If we go by the "112% throttle" number being the "real 100%" output of the Falcon 9 as it currently sits -- Block-3, aka "Full Thrust" plus some mods like the new Helium load system and fixes to the engines to prevent microcracking -- they can finally run it at the intended power when needed.

 

Not surprising, when ya think about it. They've done this with the other iterations of Falcon 9, where they understated the power significantly. It's actually prudent to do this, from an Engineering perspective. Be conservative and overengineer your hardware at the same time and you'll have the capability to amaze friends and horrify competitors alike.

 

We shouldn't expect SpaceX to do this every launch yet. As Elon said, it was a "Qualification Test" at the higher thrust level. There's still some work to do (read: probably) for this level of thrust to be useful if they want to get the S1 back.

 

So now we know ... :yes: 

  • Like 2

Sounds like Inmarsat was pleased with SpaceX's service.

 

https://www.universetoday.com/135614/will-launch-reuseable-rocket-exceptional-spacex-performance-inmarsat-ceo-tells-universe-today/

 

Quote

KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FL  Following SpaceXs exceptional performance launching an immensely powerful broadband satellite on their maiden mission for Inmarsat this week on a Falcon 9 rocket, the company CEO told Universe Today that Inmarsat was willing to conduct future launches with SpaceX  including on a reusable rocket in the future!

 

"This has obviously been an absolutely exceptional performance from SpaceX," Inmarsat CEO Rupert Pearce told Universe Today in a post launch interview at the Kennedy Space Center on Monday, May 15.

"They have now earned themselves an immensely loyal customer."
>
"They hit the ball out of the park with this launch for us," Inmarsat CEO Pearce told me regarding the new space company founded by billionaire CEO Elon Musk.
>
Pearce says he has "every confidence in SpaceX."
>
I asked CEO Pearce; What does the future hold regarding further Inmarsat launches with SpaceX?

"They [SpaceX] have now just gained and earned themselves an immensely loyal customer [from Inmarsat]," CEO Pearce replied.

"We will be looking to do further launches with them."
>
Would you consider a used rocket, a previously flown booster?

"I'm sure we will be using a reused rocket," Pearce stated. "And we will be launching on a reusable rocket in the future."

"We will be looking to support them in any way we can with their new innovation programs."
>
Thus there are no landing legs or grid gins attached to the skin of this Falcon 9.

"This rocket that went today was not reusable. That was just a creature of its time," Pearce elaborated.

"We will stay at the cutting edge with SpaceX!"
>

 

 

  • Like 2

How much does re-use save?

 

https://seasia.co/2017/05/01/indonesia-to-use-spacex-to-launch-next-satellite

 


Telkom the largest telecom company in Indonesia, is about to launch a new satellite next year, dubbed Telkom-4.

The satellite is on order from California-based Space Systems Loral and will be equipped with 60 transponders that can transmit 100 Gbps mobile broadband across Indonesia, India, and Southeast Asia.

The total investment was worth US$166 million, including US$10 million insurance. President Director of Telkom, Alex J. Sinaga mentioned to CNN, "Investment in Telkom-4 [satellite] will be cheaper as we use a reusable orbital rocket from SpaceX, so it will be cheaper as much as 40 percent."
>

 

:punk:

  • Like 4

As a side note, I'm currently watching National Geographic channels' "Mars", docu-drama, with lots of interviews with Elon and others, and behind the scenes peeks at SpaceX.  If folks haven't seen it, see it!

  • Like 3

I believe that savings is for a Flight Proven™ block 3 booster and block 4 upper stage. The block 4 upper stage, which has mods for a long cruise after the first burn and before subsequent burns, has only flown twice: NROL-76 and Inmarsat-5 F4.  

 

The original budget for Telkom-4 was over $250 million + insurance and launch services on another rocket, so a ~40% savings for a Flight Proven™ F9 takes it down to $166 million and SpaceX can do the launch services in-house - cheap.

 

The $10m insurance for a Flight Proven™ F9 is within a percent or so of a new F9 or Ariane 5. Proton insurance has ballooned to 5x this or more because of its many...issues.

Edited by DocM

The next few weeks, subject to changes.

 

June 1: CRS-11 (KSC, static fire moved left 1 day)

 

June 15: Bulgariasat-1 (KSC)

 

June 25: Iridium Next #2 (Vandenberg, moved left 5 days)

 

July 1: Intelsat-35e (KSC)
 

  • Like 3
1 hour ago, anthdci said:

is there enough customers for that much?

Yes. There's actually a two-year backlog on flights right now, if memory serves. Probably more than two years and closer to four. They can't get them in the sky fast enough.

Using Falcon 9/Heavy to launch and maintain  the SpaceX/Google internet constellation will require nearly 90 launches a year.  4,425 satellites in the LEO rollout, 7,519 satellites in VLEO. 

 

Odds are a new large fairing, and/or another large SpaceX launcher, will need to be deployed to get that launch count minimized. 

  • Like 2

Road work has started on Hwy 4 leading to and through the Texas launch center. 16 miles of road will be improved, extending the base from 8 feet deep to 16 feet. Should be done by August, then the big builds start.

 

Also, Waco is ~18 miles from the SpaceX test center in McGregor TX

 

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/business/waco-housing-boom-leaves-its-mark-on-tax-appraisals/article_9bc6e987-a841-5927-80a3-ca5a5dc8c066.html

 

Quote

Waco housing boom leaves its mark on tax appraisals

 

It's hard to be too surprised about rising tax appraisals when the superlatives about Waco real estate keep piling up.

Waco-area ZIP codes last year topped the list for most popular searches on Realtor.com, thanks in part to a certain television show. In the first quarter of 2017, the city of Waco saw a record 151 housing permits issued.

And local real estate agents are seeing things they've never seen in Waco, such as bidding wars over coveted homes.

"In 37 years, this is the strongest sellers market I've seen," said Kathy Schroeder, vice president of residential property at Coldwell Banker Jim Stewart Realtors. "I don't remember ever being this low on inventory."
>
"We're starting to see situations where people are bidding up prices on houses," she said. "It's not uncommon to list a house on Friday afternoon and by Sunday to have six offers, four above the asking price."

She said four of the last five houses she has sold have been to people moving in from outside Waco, including Houston and out of state. Some of the action is the result of Fixer Upper, but some has to do with the economy and new jobs at places such as SpaceX.
>

 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1

More on Dragon re-use

 

Bloomberg....

 

Quote

SpaceX Taking Recycling All the Way to Orbit With Cargo Ship

 

Cape Canaveral, Fla. (AP) -- SpaceX is taking recycling to a whole new realm  all the way to orbit.

On this week's supply run to the International Space Station, SpaceX will launch a Dragon capsule that's already traveled there. The milestone comes just two months after the launch of its first reused rocket booster for a satellite.
>
This particular Dragon flew to the station in 2014. SpaceX refurbished it for Thursday evening's planned launch, providing a new heat shield and fresh parachutes for re-entry at mission's end. There were so many X-rays and inspections that savings, if any, were minimal this time, said Hans Koenigsmann, vice president of flight reliability for SpaceX.

>
While this Falcon booster is new, SpaceX will attempt to land it at Cape Canaveral following liftoff so it, too, can be reused. >
The private SpaceX and NASA are discussing the possibility of flying a reused booster on an upcoming delivery mission.

Koenigsmann told reporters more and more reused capsules will carry cargo to the space station, each possibly flying three times. 
>

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!