Recommended Posts

So, has anyone caught this yet? What do you think?

 

I saw the first episode yesterday, unsure what to expect, but I have to say, I absolutely loved it!  Once again, MacFarlane shows he's a comedy master with his writing, and now he shows us he's a pretty good actor too!  I love all the tongue in cheek nods to Star Trek, all done respectfully but humourously, and I love even more the dynamic between the crew!  

 

I love the interesting mix of today's style of speech & pop culture mixed in with 25th century humanity, showing that really, we haven't actually changed all that much!  Far more believable than the "Humanity has evolved" stiff upper lip view or humans that we see in Trek itself.

 

Gonna grab episode 2 tonight, but so far, this show is a keeper! :)  If you love Trek, or even if you don't, I definitely recommend checking this show out.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1342654-official-the-orville/
Share on other sites

I'll probably watch it when I'm alone and the wife is out doing other stuff. But it certainly wasn't great. the jokes where flat or dumb and the acting was cringey bad. certainly not usual mcfarlane quality.  I miss Eureka they did this kind of humor like masters. 

 

 

9 minutes ago, Nefarious Trigger said:

It's basically a TV series based around the "Galaxy Quest" ideas?  People in a spaceship who shouldn't be in those positions?

Yes and no.. It's a very loose parody in the same quality as Galaxy Quest, but they're an official crew of a star ship.  Officially, it's a comedy/drama but with lots of nods to Trek.

 

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, PsYcHoKiLLa said:

I'm a huge Trek fan but I thought this was cringeworthy, like a poor man's Galaxy Quest.

 

1 hour ago, HawkMan said:

I'll probably watch it when I'm alone and the wife is out doing other stuff. But it certainly wasn't great. the jokes where flat or dumb and the acting was cringey bad. certainly not usual mcfarlane quality.  I miss Eureka they did this kind of humor like masters. 

 

 

I'm pretty sure it's kinda meant to be cringey. Also, gotta give a new show a chance to get going. .Look at TNG... The first few seasons were beyond cringey...

It's annoying that Trekkies are trying to equate this show with some sort off off the wall TNG, hoping this will get their fix since they don't want to pay for STD. It's an entirely different show then Trek.

 

I enjoy the Orville, but aside from a few set props and the warp field, it's nothing like Trek, and it shouldn't be. It's a goofy and comedic take on Scifi and that's fine, but setting it up with Trek expectations is probably going to result in disappointment.

 

  • Like 2

Exactly!  I'm approaching it with eyes wide open, knowing full well what it is.  There are some Trek parody elements there, but it's its own show and will develop further as it progresses!

 

So far, I'm halfway through episode 2 right now, and still loving it!

Episode 2, was not as good as the first.  Acting just seems off and bad at times.  Shows start off like this sometimes so hopefully it will get better over the next few episodes.  Also, special effects of the shuttle flying around and some space scenes, you can tell it is fake.  Yes yes, it is fake to begin with but shows like Dark Matter and Killjoys pull of space scenes much better.   Heck, even ST:TNG does a better job.

 

Spoiler

The scene with Captain Mercer's parents was pretty funny tho.

 

I like it.. And for sure will give it more than a couple of episodes to get rolling..  I am curious if they will do any long arch stories or will all just be stand alone episodes, etc.

I keep thinking about watching this but I have to ask, yeah I expect the comedy side of it, but does it also get serious when it has to?  I like witty comedy from characters who also have skills and not just "dumb" comedy from characters who are missing half a brain and can't do anything, if you guys know what I mean?

1 hour ago, George P said:

I keep thinking about watching this but I have to ask, yeah I expect the comedy side of it, but does it also get serious when it has to?  I like witty comedy from characters who also have skills and not just "dumb" comedy from characters who are missing half a brain and can't do anything, if you guys know what I mean?

Yes, the characters do seem quite capable at their jobs, though some are quite green still. Episode 2 is a great example of that, though no spoilers!

 

Watch it. You'll either like it, or not. Nothing will be lost.

 

 

  • Like 2

I like it. It's about as good as Voyager, which I think is a safe comparison as a lot of Trekkers hated Voyager. The acting does leave a little to be desired, but it's a good show.

 

I didn't think I'd get to watch it (I'm an OG cord cutter, haha... moved out of my parents' place and just never got cable/satellite) but it showed up on Hulu. Episodes appear about a day or two after airing. So I'm not paying any extra for it.

 

Can't compare it to STD as that hasn't started yet. STD will be on Netflix outside the US, but in the US, viewers will have to pay an additional fee to watch the show on a proprietary service by CBS. I'm thinking Netflix will get it later, so I'll just wait. Not gonna knock STD until it's been given a fair chance, but I'm loving The Orville.

  • Like 2
On 18/09/2017 at 6:21 PM, shockz said:

It's annoying that Trekkies are trying to equate this show with some sort off off the wall TNG, hoping this will get their fix since they don't want to pay for STD. It's an entirely different show then Trek.

 

I enjoy the Orville, but aside from a few set props and the warp field, it's nothing like Trek, and it shouldn't be. It's a goofy and comedic take on Scifi and that's fine, but setting it up with Trek expectations is probably going to result in disappointment.

 

Are you serious? The music cues, the designs of the ships, the stations, ALL of it just smacks of Trek. Besides which McFarlane is a huge Trekkie and always wanted to be on one of the shows, this is his way I guess.

 

Just don't like this at all, it's like some horrible cringey US comedy show (i.e. The Big Bang) but set in space, I'm just waiting for them to add the canned laughter.

 

I've seen both episodes too, admittedly the second one was better but....what's with the harping on about their previous failed relationship, how long can that actually be funny?

6 minutes ago, PsYcHoKiLLa said:

Are you serious? The music cues, the designs of the ships, the stations, ALL of it just smacks of Trek. Besides which McFarlane is a huge Trekkie and always wanted to be on one of the shows, this is his way I guess.

 

Just don't like this at all, it's like some horrible cringey US comedy show (i.e. The Big Bang) but set in space, I'm just waiting for them to add the canned laughter.

 

I've seen both episodes too, admittedly the second one was better but....what's with the harping on about their previous failed relationship, how long can that actually be funny?

Chill dude. Not everyone will like it, but some will, just like how some people liked Friends and some hate it.

It seems to me, over the years, that trek fans are some of the most annoying high and mighty know it alls out there.   Maybe I'm just old enough to remember, and due to there being no internet at the time, Trek fans were hating on TNG before the show even aired.  They're doing it yet again with STD based off of trailers, because trailers are a perfect indication of how a show/movie is going to turn out, really guys?

 

Cry, moan and overall complain as much as you guys want, the fact is, you so called "die hards" aren't enough to keep a damn trek TV show on the air anymore.  Where were all the fans when Enterprise needed it?  Instead it got canned.   Voyager had to resort to the old trek crutch known as the Borg to keep it going, even introducing Borg v2 and upping the action, the only "exploration" was the fact they were stuck in the delta quadrant just because the writers knew that way when they were starting to run out of ideas, and oh boy did they, they could always just drop the Borg in, boy did that make you guys happy, right?  

 

And for all the praise DS9 gets, what did it end up doing?  We went down the path of war with the dominion, nice action and battles, exploration and peace?  ha!   Something that Paramount and CBS has known for quite some time, and a fact some of you can't seem to come to terms with, the fanbase is small, the core trek fanbase that's been around since close to the start, it's small.  There isn't enough fans out there to support it the way it was back in TNG, scifi costs too much period.  And as far as this show goes, it's another sci-fi show on fox, FOX, of all channels, where scifi goes to die after one season.   Enjoy it while it lasts guys, because with fox's track record on scifi shows, this one, even if it's good, probably won't last long.

  • Like 2
11 hours ago, PsYcHoKiLLa said:

Are you serious? The music cues, the designs of the ships, the stations, ALL of it just smacks of Trek. Besides which McFarlane is a huge Trekkie and always wanted to be on one of the shows, this is his way I guess.

 

Just don't like this at all, it's like some horrible cringey US comedy show (i.e. The Big Bang) but set in space, I'm just waiting for them to add the canned laughter.

 

I've seen both episodes too, admittedly the second one was better but....what's with the harping on about their previous failed relationship, how long can that actually be funny?

Yes I'm serious...  what's the phrase.. lipstick on a pig? The look might be trek, and that's debatable, but there is no storyline commonality between this and trek. People upset over Discovery and trying to equate this as the next next generation are clueless and in denial that they have to pay to watch new trek.

 

Also if it's not Brooklyn 999 or on Sunday, it's doomed to only a year, maybe two before it's canned. 

1 minute ago, shockz said:

Yes I'm serious... there is no storyline commonality between this and trek. People upset over Discovery and trying to equate this as the next next generation are clueless and in denial that they have to pay to watch new trek.

ummm... did you watch the show ? the sets are trek, the uniforms are trek, the language is trek, the storylines and events/scenes are trek.

it's trek plastered with cheesy comedy about an old relationship...

 

This could be a great show, but they need to hire some of the Eureka writers if they want to pull this of as a credible seriouscomedyspacedrama. Those guys knew how to mix serious with good humor. 

11 minutes ago, HawkMan said:

ummm... did you watch the show ? the sets are trek, the uniforms are trek, the language is trek, the storylines and events/scenes are trek.

it's trek plastered with cheesy comedy about an old relationship...

 

This could be a great show, but they need to hire some of the Eureka writers if they want to pull this of as a credible seriouscomedyspacedrama. Those guys knew how to mix serious with good humor. 

ummmmm.... yes? The first episode was dreadful. When was the last time someone came blue goo on Trek? Or had a captain with a dysfunctional relationshp with an ex that ends up as a first officer???  The closest was Troi and Riker... and even then it was tactful. The alien of the week had possibly the worst acting and was nothing but shoot em up baddies. No substance.  And while pseudoscience has always been a thing on trek, I can't remember the last time a tree grew in space and somehow took out a ship. It's just comedy with quite frankly cheesy sequences. The language is not trek at all, unless it's being a satire.. And if you bothered reading my first post in the thread you'd see I said it had some similarities, but barely. This is seth's take on injecting comedy into Scifi (which always fails) and him playing out some of his trekkie fantasys, but it is hardly trek. It's a fun hour though, but this is nothing like trek outside a few set props and uniforms.

 

Edited by shockz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!