Recommended Posts

So, summarizing the Musk tweetstorm...

 

Raptor (sea level w/gimbal), RBoost (sea level w/o gimbal), and Raptor Vacuum (RVac) have been evolved/merged into,

 

Raptor 2: 230 tonnes of thrust, either gimbaled or fixed.

Raptor Vacuum (RVac): may or may not have a Raptor 2 core, TBD

 

Super Heavy: 32-33 x Raptor 2, up to 7,600 tonne-force of thrust
Starship: looking at 3 Raptor 2's, up to 6 RVacs

2 hours ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Oh wow... And people still take this guy seriously?  🤦‍♂️

Yes, because retrieving space junk/failed satellites not a new idea - the Shuttle did it in 1984. STS-51A (Discovery) retrieved 2 failed satellites (Palapa B2 and Westar 6). It did this after deploying Anik D2 and Syncom IV-1.

 

The Starship is best viewed as a super-Shuttle; cheaper to launch/operate because of reusability, capable of BEO missions, and with a honkin' huge payload bay & door. 

 

 

Edited by DocM
  • Like 1
39 minutes ago, DocM said:

Yes, because retrieving space junk/failed satellites not a new idea - the Shuttle did it in 1984. STS-51A (Discovery) retrieved 2 failed satellites (Palapa B2 and Westar 6). It did this after deploying Anik D2 and Syncom IV-1.

 

The Starship is best viewed as a super-Shuttle; cheaper to launch/operate because of reusability, capable of BEO missions, and with a honkin' huge payload bay & door. 

Retrieving space junk isn't my problem with his post... Chopping it up into little bits with the front of your ship? THAT is my problem.  Utterly ridiculous nonsense you'd expect from the imagination of a 5 year old, not a grown engineer.

  • Facepalm 1
10 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Retrieving space junk isn't my problem with his post... Chopping it up into little bits with the front of your ship? THAT is my problem.  Utterly ridiculous nonsense you'd expect from the imagination of a 5 year old, not a grown engineer.

 

The misconception is yours;  the vehicle's development name is Chomper, so "chomping up" debris simply means it opens its alligator jaw door and secures it inside. Easy enough to do with Kevlar or Vectran netting which tightens around it.

1 minute ago, DocM said:

 

The misconception is yours;  the vehicle's development name is Chomper, so "chomping up" debris simply means it opens its alligator jaw door and secures it inside. Easy enough to do with Kevlar or Vectran netting which tightens around it.

Elon's OWN WORDS, buttercup...

 

"Yes, we can fly Starship around space & chomp up debris with the moving fairing door"

 

Emphasis mine.  There's no misconception here, just the stupid words of a conman.

  • Facepalm 1
Just now, FloatingFatMan said:

Elon's OWN WORDS, buttercup...

 

"Yes, we can fly Starship around space & chomp up debris with the moving fairing door"

 

Emphasis mine.  There's no misconception here, just the stupid words of a conman.

 

"Chomp" can mean either bite or chew, in this context it's the former.

 

chomp

verb

\ ˈchämp  , ˈchȯmp \

chomped; chomping; chomps

Definition of chomp

intransitive verb

1: to chew or bite on something

 

Chomper bites, like an alligator.

6 minutes ago, DocM said:

 

"Chomp" can mean either bite or chew, in this context it's the former.

 

chomp

verb

\ ˈchämp  , ˈchȯmp \

chomped; chomping; chomps

Definition of chomp

intransitive verb

1: to chew or bite on something

 

Chomper bites, like an alligator.

However you try to define it to make Musk not appear an idiot, his meaning is clear.  Use the front of the ship to capture pieces of space junk in a biting motion and break them into smaller pieces in the process.  A monumentally stupid idea, but I'm not the slightest bit surprised that you think it's great...

Theres nothing wrong with his tweet. While playing hungry hungry hippos I have never once chomped the balls into smaller pieces. he mentioned nothing about breaking it up, everything floating in space is debris, and we have a tonne of small/medium sized crap up there besides satellites. He could have used swallow but as the door is essentially a mouth chomping is more fitting.

I know you hate elon, but hes closer to fixing the space debris problem right now than anyone else. actions are speaking louder than words.

  • Like 1
13 minutes ago, Louisifer said:

Theres nothing wrong with his tweet. While playing hungry hungry hippos I have never once chomped the balls into smaller pieces. he mentioned nothing about breaking it up, everything floating in space is debris, and we have a tonne of small/medium sized crap up there besides satellites. He could have used swallow but as the door is essentially a mouth chomping is more fitting.

He literally said "chomp up debris" is his tweet... :rolleyes: 

 

Quote

I know you hate elon, but hes closer to fixing the space debris problem right now than anyone else. actions are speaking louder than words.

I don't hate him, I just don't believe the sun shines out his backside and view everything he proposes with an actual PRACTICAL eye that's firmly grounded in reality that can see just how far many of his promises actually are from reality.

 

He's a dreamer, which isn't necessarily a bad thing.  But many of his dreams are just that, dreams.

 

Oh, and he's a bit of a plagiarist, too. ;)

 

 

EDIT: As for the space debris problem, I too used to think it was a big issue, until I decided to actually learn a bit more about it.  Just a little knowledge of orbital mechanics and reading a few scientific papers, and I learned it's much less of a problem than people think.  The vast majority of it will just de-orbit from a combination atmospheric drag and gravity after a few years and most of it will burn up.  What doesn't is far more likely to hit the ocean than any people, in fact, the odds of getting hit by space debris are somewhat lower then me landing a date with Scarlett Johansson! :p

 

Edited by FloatingFatMan
3 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

He literally said "chomp up debris" is his tweet

The hungry hippos still stand, you can chomp up balls all day with their chomping action, if he said grind up or crush then i would see your point.

 

We need dreamers, the billionaires are using up their own money or money of other rich folk, if they fail then all the advances along the way make it easier for the next person to take us to the stars.

  • Like 3
4 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

 

I don't hate him, I just don't believe the sun shines out his backside and view everything he proposes with an actual PRACTICAL eye that's firmly grounded in reality that can see just how far many of his promises actually are from reality.

 

He's a dreamer, which isn't necessarily a bad thing.  But many of his dreams are just that, dreams.

 

Oh, and he's a bit of a plagiarist, too. ;)

 

There's no need to lie...  There's 51 pages of this thread, and many of them have you running your mouth about how much you think Elon is an idiot.  It seems pretty clear that you spend a lot of time overthinking everything thing that he says.  Not sure why you're so threatened about discussing ideas and solutions to problems in space travel...

Just now, Astra.Xtreme said:

There's no need to lie...  There's 51 pages of this thread, and many of them have you running your mouth about how much you think Elon is an idiot.  It seems pretty clear that you spend a lot of time overthinking everything thing that he says.  Not sure why you're so threatened about discussing ideas and solutions to problems in space travel...

Because I have a firm grasp of what's possible, and what's stupid. 

 

Landing rocket boosters was a great idea and I congratulate him on making it both possible and reliable, but his economics don't add up.

Going from one side of the world to the other on a rocket in just an hour sounds great, but it's literally impossible.  You can't even load the fuel in that time, let alone the passengers...

Solar roofs was a great idea, but the reality is that hardly any installations have happened, they don't produce the promised results, and they're more than double the promised cost.

Affordable electric cars was a great idea and I congratulate him on making the industry invest, but his cars are built like garbage and his promises about self-driving have yet to be realised.  Roundabouts are easy, he said.. OK, so why can't your cars go around roundabouts, Elon?

Electric trucks was a great idea, but they carefully didn't mention the weight of the batteries needed to haul an average truck load.  The figures rapidly exceed the maximum allowed weight on roads, making them economically unviable as they just can't haul a big enough load.

Cybertruck looks neat, but it's a deathtrap for anyone not inside the thing.

 

16 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Because I have a firm grasp of what's possible, and what's stupid. 

 

Landing rocket boosters was a great idea and I congratulate him on making it both possible and reliable, but his economics don't add up.

Going from one side of the world to the other on a rocket in just an hour sounds great, but it's literally impossible.  You can't even load the fuel in that time, let alone the passengers...

Solar roofs was a great idea, but the reality is that hardly any installations have happened, they don't produce the promised results, and they're more than double the promised cost.

Affordable electric cars was a great idea and I congratulate him on making the industry invest, but his cars are built like garbage and his promises about self-driving have yet to be realised.  Roundabouts are easy, he said.. OK, so why can't your cars go around roundabouts, Elon?

Electric trucks was a great idea, but they carefully didn't mention the weight of the batteries needed to haul an average truck load.  The figures rapidly exceed the maximum allowed weight on roads, making them economically unviable as they just can't haul a big enough load.

Cybertruck looks neat, but it's a deathtrap for anyone not inside the thing.

 

This is exactly the problem...  You're so convinced about yourself that you don't even bother to look at the facts.  How long does it take to load fuel on a Falcon 9 rocket?  How long does it take to board people onto a passenger jet?  Do you really think those things take an hour?
Regardless, the hour timescale is about flight time, not total time from placing said rocket on launch pad to removing it from the landing pad.  Again, you look way too far into these things and get it completely wrong.

Not sure what you don't get about auto pilot being beta?  Ever heard of the levels of autonomy?  Educate yourself on it...  Nowhere has it been stated that Tesla's are at the level of full autonomy.
We're seeing the first electrics trucks soon and they will get better over time.   Just as electric cars have.  Now sure why you think the Cybertruck is any more dangerous than a semi or other large truck.  Again, reaching for such distant straws...

3 minutes ago, Astra.Xtreme said:

This is exactly the problem...  You're so convinced about yourself that you don't even bother to look at the facts.  How long does it take to load fuel on a Falcon 9 rocket?  How long does it take to board people onto a passenger jet?  Do you really think those things take an hour?
Regardless, the hour timescale is about flight time, not total time from placing said rocket on launch pad to removing it from the landing pad.  Again, you look way too far into these things and get it completely wrong.

Not sure what you don't get about auto pilot being beta?  Ever heard of the levels of autonomy?  Educate yourself on it...  Nowhere has it been stated that Tesla's are at the level of full autonomy.
We're seeing the first electrics trucks soon and they will get better over time.   Just as electric cars have.  Now sure why you think the Cybertruck is any more dangerous than a semi or other large truck.  Again, reaching for such distant straws...

It's precisely because I HAVE educated myself that I stopped drinking the Muskoil.  As for the Cybertruck... If you can't see that anyone getting hit by that monstrosity is going to turned into paté, then I can't help you. Vehicles are designed with crumple zones for a reason.  You can't build a crumple zone out of reinforced plate steel.  

14 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

It's precisely because I HAVE educated myself that I stopped drinking the Muskoil.  As for the Cybertruck... If you can't see that anyone getting hit by that monstrosity is going to turned into paté, then I can't help you. Vehicles are designed with crumple zones for a reason.  You can't build a crumple zone out of reinforced plate steel.  

Trucks generally do not have crumple zones https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crash_incompatibility#:~:text=For example%2C some SUVs and,requirements like the NCAP test. and crumple zones are mainly to protect  the occupant of the vehicle, not the bystander. Laws of physics dictate that crumple zone or not, being hit at speeds upward of 39mph start to become fatal.

1 hour ago, FloatingFatMan said:

However you try to define it to make Musk not appear an idiot, his meaning is clear.  Use the front of the ship to capture pieces of space junk in a biting motion and break them into smaller pieces in the process.  A monumentally stupid idea, but I'm not the slightest bit surprised that you think it's great...

 

It's not clear at all unless you choose to parse it that way and no other.  

52 minutes ago, FloatingFatMan said:

Because I have a firm grasp of what's possible, and what's stupid. 

 

Facts not in evidence 🤪

 

Quote

Landing rocket boosters was a great idea and I congratulate him on making it both possible and reliable, but his economics don't add up.

 

SpaceX has laid out the economics with specifics as to the percentage of costs attributable to the booster, upper stage, fairing, recovery ops and refurbishment. They can refly a booster & fairing at nearly half price and still make a profit.

 

Quote

Going from one side of the world to the other on a rocket in just an hour sounds great, but it's literally impossible.  You can't even load the fuel in that time, let alone the passengers...

 

The quoted times are flight times. How long does it take to gas up and load an A380? Similar size compared to the Starship vehicle.

 

Starship and Super Heavy will load in parallel, and since the version 1.0 ground support equipment is being built your judgement is premature. All that's known is those pipes are humongous.

 

Quote

Solar roofs was a great idea, but the reality is that hardly any installations have happened, they don't produce the promised results, and they're more than double the promised cost.

Like their cars, production will go through  a period of ramping. Tesla has produced about 3 million cars since 2008, but will produce over 1 million in just 2022.  

 

Price: yes, Solar Roof appears to cost 2x as much as traditional solar panels - but that's taking a narrow view. It's also a totally new premium roofing system, so add the two and it's a better deal. This also makes it ideal for new installations.

 

Quote

Affordable electric cars was a great idea and I congratulate him on making the industry invest, but his cars are built like garbage

 

Not according to auto industry analyst Sandy Munro and others. Panel gaps are gone, a victim of casting the rear underbody in one piece instead of doing a weldup. See Giga Press. They've also upgraded the paint system, etc.

 

Quote

and his promises about self-driving have yet to be realised.  Roundabouts are easy, he said.. OK, so why can't your cars go around roundabouts, Elon?

 

That's why FSD is still in beta. Call back after release.

 

Quote

Electric trucks was a great idea, but they carefully didn't mention the weight of the batteries needed to haul an average truck load.  The figures rapidly exceed the maximum allowed weight on roads, making them economically unviable as they just can't haul a big enough load.

 

With the new 4680 cells the batteries could easily be lighter than a Class 8  truck's driveline, fuel tanks, axels, drive shaft, etc. which get erased. They're road legal, in tests running loads in the US, and with a 500 mile range they can cover 80% of US large truck routes which are regional.  

 

Quote

Cybertruck looks neat, but it's a deathtrap for anyone not inside the thing.

 

Your perception ≠ reality, and the plain fact is most US pickups and SUVs are built like battering rams. Let's see what NHTSA says. 

 

3 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

Trucks generally do not have crumple zones https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crash_incompatibility#:~:text=For example%2C some SUVs and,requirements like the NCAP test. and crumple zones are mainly to protect  the occupant of the vehicle, not the bystander. Laws of physics dictate that crumple zone or not, being hit at speeds upward of 39mph start to become fatal.

Respectfully,  a pedestrians head bouncing off the hood of a regular pickup at 10mph is probably not going to smash like a coconut. A head bouncing off a Cybertruck's hood at 10mph is very likely going to shatter like a coconut hit with a sledgehammer.

 

I don't know about safety regs in the US, but many EU regulatory bodies have already commented the Cybertruck would be very unlikely to be allowed on their roads without some major redesign.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • Indeed - drives me mad - usually because Refresh is hidden in the full menu.
    • Firefox has had rounded corners for many years. I take it you're not a fan of modern browsers?
    • The problem is in the fundamentals of how businesses are allowed to operate and the change should happen in the basics and certain consumer friendly and moral practices should be enforced by law. This would fix so many things, not just this ages old default browser issue which is a tiny drop in the backut that includes a flood of privacy and other issues.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!