Recommended Posts

so maybe the mod deserved it! and the people too! and when will it go down?!

It doesn't go down. Its your permanent record. Whether or not anyone deserves it, flaming is against the neowin rules.

If you don't want it to continue going up, obey the rules :)

So what is your warn percentage based on? From personal experience I have been mistakenly been warned in the RWI forums but after mod review it has been dismissed yet it appears I am still 'guilty' regardless.

So is this like the unethical business practice where they only look at your arrest record and not convictions?

So what is your warn percentage based on?  From personal experience I have been mistakenly been warned in the RWI forums but after mod review it has been dismissed yet it appears I am still 'guilty' regardless.

So is this like the unethical business practice where they only look at your arrest record and not convictions?

each warning is worth 20%. mistakes, when they occur, are subtracted from the warn meter. It appears you're where you're at for other reasons.

all this is is simply a record for the moderators to go look at what things you've been warned for in the past.

I asked this question earlier, but focus was on another comment I made in my post...

But, do comments in the "front page" news articles have an efffect on the 'warning' level? I have seen plenty of violation of the rules there, and was curious if those people were exempt from warnings.

Ok, thanks Spyder.  I can accept I'm a argumentative ******.  I do think RWI should be a sliding scale IMO. ;)

hey no problem :) From what I've seen (this is all IMO.. I avoid modding there) RWI is a little more lenient given the nature of the discussions at hand and how heated they can get.

WHen you go into RWI it immediatly gets a bit toasty. Modding there must be like having to work as a cop in the rough part of the neighborhood.

you got it :) much props to silly and blaise :)

each warning is worth 20%. mistakes, when they occur, are subtracted from the warn meter. It appears you're where you're at for other reasons.

all this is is simply a record for the moderators to go look at what things you've been warned for in the past.

Oh! So 5 strikes and you're out.

I hope silly mistakes aren't worth 20%. :blush:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • add $200 and get DWARF 3 model add $2000 and visit scientists center in your town add $20000 and visit the biggest telescope in Chile
    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!