P4 1.8GHz or AMD Athlon XP And Why?


Recommended Posts

don't get me wrong, I'm not biased towards the Intel P4, it's just that it meets my needs for computing and I know I won't have any problems when it comes to overheating.

In a month or so I'm going to be building another PC and it'll be an AMD XP, they are both great processors :)

ya i understand

i've had and AMD K6-2 400 mhz processor before

i dont know how it compares to a P2 400 mhz or celeron because i have never had any at that speed but it was okay i guess

its just annoying when these fanboys insist on saying how great their AMD XP's are all because of a benchmark

im sure if the first benchmark was in Intels favor even if it was a doctored benchmark everybody would be on its balls instead

i go by what people have told me and what i experience cause benchmarks dont reflect on my everyday computing, but people and expereince do.

Where can I find documented proof that does not come in the form of benchmarks that will tell me intel processors are better than AMD processors? And why are benchmark tests considered meaningless by intel supporters? What superior method are intel supporters using that has given them different results that make benchmark tests meaningless?

The people who support AMD have posted some links that show proof of what they are talking about... but I haven't seen any websites posted here that show any proof that intel's processors are better than AMD's... You can't expect everyone to just accept your word for it and believe intel is better simply because you say so... If you don't have proof to backup your arguments, don't bother arguing at all... just some friendly advice...

hey freeza i must admit the first AMD's the K5 and K6 were crap get your self an AMD next time or go to a mtaes who has a 2000XP AMD u will be suprized how things have moved on...

my final thought....(sounding like jerry springer)....

is as long as there is Intel and an AMD prices will be low and speeds will be High.....

and we are the real winners

lol lol

s0ma,

You see the thing is, neither processor is better than the other in an overall aspect. One processor may be better than the other in a certain area, vice versa.

All you can do is look at all the pro's and con's between the two and make an opinion with the information you've gotten between the two.

They are both excellent processors!

When i was about to change mu system from a PIII 800 768 pc133 i had the same problem, atlon xp or p4 , personally i`v used intel,amd,cyrix, even Texas instrument since my 286 (i used to sell and change my computer almos every 2 weeks) and to be honest i like better intel, amd may be cheap but i had to set un different kinds of fans , cooler etc, just becouse AMD Works hotter and that is a fact , i fell more secure working on a intel p4 becouse i know that it wont fry even if it gets 90?c but an amd start working between the 80?c and so on... and if you read some from the net , cooler means faster becouse the electric resistence of the material change on teh material temperature , so if the Cpu is cooler it will have less resistance , in consecuence it will work baster , and it wonk hang up.

Also the p4 system acquitecture is more powerfull tan Amd, even Windows xp cant use the full potencial of the procesor , but i belive that the new generation of games and OS will do.

All this is using RIMM not DDR.

An finally if you get yourself a good scsi controller and 512+ RIMM you will se you p4 rech the sky.

So i ratter have my P4 than and atlon.

benchmarks dont make the processor

they are a one time test that tests the full potential (maybe, depending on how they are programmed) of the processor

thats why they do NOT matter

experience and user opinions matter.

if benchmarks were NEVER in the scenario at all i wonder how the AMD vs Intel war would turn out

and it really makes me wonder does AMD's processors hold that much gain over an intel one that one would be able to tell the difference between the two had benchmarking programs never been made or if you had two identical pcs sitting in front of you cept one was AMD and one was Intel and you were told to run a series of apps just to see which one you liked the feel of more..i doubt any of us would actually be able to tell the difference.

Originally posted by freeza  

benchmarks dont make the processor

they are a one time test that tests the full potential (maybe, depending on how they are programmed) of the processor

thats why they do NOT matter

experience and user opinions matter.

if benchmarks were NEVER in the scenario at all i wonder how the AMD vs Intel war would turn out

and it really makes me wonder does AMD's processors hold that much gain over an intel one that one would be able to tell the difference between the two had benchmarking programs never been made or if you had two identical pcs sitting in front of you cept one was AMD and one was Intel and you were told to run a series of apps just to see which one you liked the feel of more..i doubt any of us would actually be able to tell the difference.

Actually.. I can tell the difference.. Personally, i've never used a p4 system or an athlonxp system. but i'd get the athlon over the p4 anyday. I have a 900mhz @ 1ghz Athlon. My cousin has a 933PIII. I can tell the difference between the two computers after using it for 5 minutes. Before i upgraded to a 900 i had a 650 in my comp. I was running ME and so was my cousin. My computer ran much faster and did not crash nearly as much as his pIII.

Bain:

I agree, but from what I have seen, each group seems to believe one is better than the other... and no offense, but I'm seeing a better argument from the AMD supporters than the Intel supporters... And personally, I'm tired of hearing how useless benchmark tests are without any proof that it really is useless...

I am not against Intel... I respect them. I just have a problem with people who present opinions disquised as facts... facts do not exist without documented proof.

freeza:

Benchmarks do not make the processor, I agree... but neither do user opinions... Opinions are not facts. As for benchmarks being a one time test... I don't agree... We have seen benchmark tests over and over again on amd processors... there have been multiple tests conducted by various different people, correct?

If user opinions do matter to you, then why have you been arguing with the many users of AMD systems? Are their opinions not worth anything to you? And what about their experience?

Personally, I don't believe anything until I see documented proof from a reliable source... opinions are unstable, unreliable, and they are not necessarily what my opinions would be. I would however believe something if a large number of people have conducted tests with programs to measure speed, and compare speed... That's enough proof for me to accept that one processor may be good.

What you are saying really makes no sense to me... If a hundred people got together, and each had a different calculator, and each were given the same mathematical equation, and each got the same result, would you believe the numbers that were being displayed on the calculators were incorrect? Probably not... so if you don't argue with a calculator that calculates numbers, why argue with a calculator that calculates processor speed?

AMD supporters have no argument

anyone with decent programming knowledge can make a program to favor any processor

sorry to burst your bubble bit i can go in vb spend 15 minutes making some useless app to take around 20 minutes to conduct various tests that dont do **** but just tell you they are doin things

then at the very end it will display random numbers favoring AMD or intel or whatever processor i choose

benchmarks are a useless waste of time they are ONLY good in video cards..processors over a certain ghz speed the benchmarks are useless in and they only serve the purpose to feed the AMD crowd info so they can run back and have more ammo to shoot out about how their cpu can outperform some one elses just cause some old guy on a website said the benchmark he ran favored the AMD processor

opinions matter a lot more than what a program says because those opinoins are based up on the results a program like that give

now like i said earlier

had NO ONE thought of programming something that benchmarks your cpu AMD fans would have NO legitimate reason to say the processor is better

once again it is their ONLY defense and will always be

just give it up already

if everybody relied on what programs said rather than what users experience we'd be in a heap of trouble.

why do you think people conduct BETA tests where the USER does things?

if microsoft created a program to test every version of windows and we all just went happy go lucky sayin yeah windows is so reliable cause the ms benchmark said so but yet we have crashes every damn day (equivalent to overheating of AMD processors) everybody would be baffled.

its as plain as day to see that overheating is a problem no matter how much of you say yeahh i ran mine with what it came with with NO problems yeah im cool. the websites you trust so much have said that there ARE overheating issues

so dont try and use benchmarks to your advantage but shrug off the overheatnig issue like ugh thats so not true when it really is.

its pathetic how everybody is so quick to jump on the bandwagon of a program result rather than what they experience their damn selves

yeah im pretty sure if the performance were that big of a difference that you could actually notice a slow down ina p3 vs athlon system and im not talking about their lame XP then intel would have done something about it.

had you not known your cousin had a p3 im sure your statement would have been a lot different

If Microsoft created a program to test every version of windows, I would not trust it. But in this case, these are AMD customers doing these tests, don't forget. They are not AMD employees.

I would not believe one program, but I would believe multiple programs that were being used to test the speed by AMD CONSUMERS. And obviously, these people experienced both AMD and Intel processors during the tests they conducted.

Opinions mean nothing to me... It was once an opinion that the sun revolved around the earth, it was once an opinion that the earth was flat, and it was once an opinion that by allowing someone to nearly bleed to death, you could drain them of a certain disease or sickness they had... Your opinion is not better than anyone else's, but there is one thing that is better than an opinion... one thing that makes an opinion false... and that is a fact. Each of the opinions I mentioned here have been proved wrong with facts, therefore opinions are not always correct, right?

Speed is not measured by opinions, it is measured by tests... it has been for a while... we don't measure horsepower by opinions do we? You cannot accurately measure something with an opinion, but you can accurately measure something with a tool that has been created just for that purpose... Tests are more accurate than opinions... If that were not true, then the town I live in would not be famous for the testing of the a-bomb, we would have already cloned a human without ever testing it out on an animal first, and cars would be even more dangerous than they are now. Do you see my point? Without tests, there would be chaos.

hey all..very interesting subject..though not all have valid points

before i forget, the person who said that amd fans are stupid..think twice..i myself am in a dentistry course at my local university

anyways, back to the subject

in the begginning of december, i migrated from a p4 1.5 to an athlonxp 1900+. To say the truth, using normal software such as microsoft word etc..doesn't show the difference between the two processors (unless a centi-second timer is used)

the difference is seen in benchmarks. I totally agree that benchmarks are not everything in real-life software. And quake 3 and other 3d programs DO NOT show the full power of the cpu

as some ppl said earlier (i think freeza, very good points by the way), it is easier to favour a certain cpu brand by using specific coding.

amd may be faster than intel at the same cpus, BUT amd are coming near to the 0.18 micron architecture.. this is seen in overclocking, amd cpus need drastic heatsinks and fans 9and sometimes watercooling, and liquid nitrogen cooling). This means that if amd does not shift to the 0.13 micron, it will loose certain advantages that it owns right now..such as overall speed

0.13micron amd cpus remain to be seen

also, remember the fsb speeds..intel should soon release their 533mhz fsb cpus (133*4)..and in my opinion this can outpace amd cpus quite a bit..unless seious overclockign occurs.

[again... i am not favouding intel at all]

price and cost is also an issue..amd costs a whole lot less than intel cpus. a ddr athlon xp system is cheaper than a sdr p4 system..this is the reason my friends bought amd systems. If intel lowers their prices..coupled with ddr, they so a whole lot better in sales

someone earlier..mentined amd/via motherboard chipsets. Amd 761 chipsets motherboards such as the gigabyte 7dxr/7dxr+ that i have is in my opinion a perfect solution for amd cpus..no rpoblems at all. I tried a via kt266a motherboard, and i had a little touble with a sb live!, but it seems some via4in1 drivers solve the issues.

intel chipsets on the other hands are almost perfect..althoughi remember my p3 motherboard was once recalled ad exchanged for a 820 chipset with rambus ram :)

to conclude with-

amd cpus -

cheap

faster than intel cpus at same clock rates

need a good motherboard amd heatsink/fan

intel cpus -

very reliable

great overclocking property (northwood core)

intel heatsink more than enough

ANYONE who agrees or doesn't agree can post..and i will see where i went wrong in this post

regards

SYSTEM -

amd athlon xp 1900+

512 ddr ram pc266

gigabyte 7dxr mb

nvidia gef3 ti200 (soon to be replaced)

Here's my choice: Pentium

Here's my input.

Most AMD user wants power. Most AMD users are very young and new to computers. In reality, if you want power, you get power but you will loose quality. AMD users does not understand what quality is. To them, power is speed, speed is power. That's all they care. Don't talk quality to them. They'll make you think that power is their quality of their CPU. Yes. But quality and reliability has to be equal out or you else you don't have quality. They are young. It will take times for them to understand everything. The law of the universe is if you want the best of one thing, you have to sacrifice another. That's what AMD chip is all about. They neglect reliability over quality. I am not surprise if AMD user wouldn't understand my wide-spectrum of logical reasoning. Once you are fixed to something, it's hard for you to give it up. What I would be surprise is if there's Intel (Pentium) users that are very young. This is because they are smarter than average. :)

Originally posted by sOma  

Where can I find documented proof that does not come in the form of benchmarks that will tell me intel processors are better than AMD processors?  And why are benchmark tests considered meaningless by intel supporters?  What superior method are intel supporters using that has given them different results that make benchmark tests meaningless?

The people who support AMD have posted some links that show proof of what they are talking about... but I haven't seen any websites posted here that show any proof that intel's processors are better than AMD's... You can't expect everyone to just accept your word for it and believe intel is better simply because you say so... If you don't have proof to backup your arguments, don't bother arguing at all... just some friendly advice...

Heres some proof for you. I garantee you won't overclock an Athlon XP to 3ghz+.

http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/02q1/020117/

If you want to see some benchies here you go.

http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/02q1/0201...p4_3000-04.html , there are a few pages of benchies. :)

As you will see, Intel's best(The non-overclocked one), the 2200A comes out on top of most of the benchmarks against the best AMD has to offer..the XP 2000+. The XP actually beats it in a couple of the benchies, but not by much. In the real world nobody is going to be able to tell the difference between the best of AMD or Intel. The numbers are just for bragging rights(for the geeks..not many normal people really care). They are all fast as hell. I for one would rather have a processor that is a milosecond slower if I know it won't ever burn up and it doesn't need a cooling setup that sounds like a jet. Who said the Athlon was better for video stuff? It looks like to me that the P4 does video stuff like MPEG encoding better according to the benchies. The sad part is, Toms Hardware is Biased for AMD, but at least he shows the truth.

Another sad thing is, Intel could easily release thier the P4 Northwood@ 3ghz+(not overclocked) while AMD will still be stuck at under 2ghz for a long time because thier processors run way too hot.

wooo the testosterone is flying in here.

Have you guys ever seen a Athlon have the HSF removed while it was running? Ever seen a P4 with the HSF removed while it was running? Well, I luv my Athlon, but, the Athlon catches on fire while the P4 keeps going...

Mike

why would someone wanna take their fan off during mid opperation??????????????????????????

and you buy a good CPU heat sink so it doesnt conk out

as for the guy that says about the nortwood being faster.....

the 2000XP is 1.67ghz the nortwood is 2.2ghz

theoretticlly the AMD should be no where near the 2.2 but yet it beats it on several benchmarks

as for the guy about overclocking.....

if u cool a cpu with liquid nitorgen(purly for fun) and tewak the motherboard u can reach high speeds

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!