Was the moon landing faked ? I think so


Recommended Posts

This yet another example of how we are daily manipulated by our rulers.

I think this so caled 'moon landing' was actaully a Hollywood movie production.

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/3543/moonfake.htm

What is, isn't and what isn't, is

Tell us what you think.

Some other cover-ups are exposed here:

http://cpscrimes.tripod.com/infowars.htm

Guidelines and Pointers for this Forum

This forum is for topics that do not fit into other specific areas of Neowin, for all other topics we suggest you post in the right forum according to the Community Rules. Jokes and Funny Stuff is where you can show off your talent of making people laugh while the Poll Station is for all those statistics we love so much

Not only are you an idiot but there is a saying. "What one cannot understand they think is magic". Your just another one of those guys:

1. They did not land on the moon.

2. THey did not land rovers on mars.

3. There are no satellites orbiting mars from U.S. or Europe.

4. Blah blah

Stick to watching tv and learn to post in the right forum

Ugh. Conspiracy theorists annoy me to no end. Utter BS (N)

[moved here]

AMEN to that Keldyn: u people make me sick, u come up with complete crap stories and false information to throw others off because you people are too afraid to admit the truth of situations

Faked? Was it bollocks.

The only 'evidence' to suggest that they didn't land on the moon is 'problems' with lighting & shadows etc in the photos. One theory for 'why' there are some problems with the photography is that some of the photos were mocked up, due to lack of 'real' footage got on the moon. The theory is that they did land on the moon, and most of the footage is real, but the odd photo could have been 'faked' (in area 51 or wherever) in order to make it seem more spectacular, or whatever. This then supports evidence from both sides of the story: the NASA evidence that they did land on the moon and the 'conspirisy theorists' ideas that (some) of the footage is fake.

Comprende?

:alien:

Edited by farsightxc2

If we REALLY hadn't landed on the moon, I suspect that the Soviet Union would have been the first to jump on us about it. Given that it is only conspiricy theorists who have done as much, I am doubtful that we did not land on the moon. Also, why would we fake the landing? We obviously had the technology to do so. At the very least, we DID launch a rocket into space, and no scientists have come forward saying that moon-rock samples are fake. People who think up conspiricies like this have WAY too much time on their hands.

If you look at the main arguments people have against the moon landing you can dismiss them out of hand, e.g.

1. Theory. If you speed up the moon videos, you can tell there on the earth

Answer. If you speed up footage of anything falling in low gravity it will look like it was filmed on earth

2. Theory. Humans cant leave the earths magnetic feild

Amswer. Where's the proof to back that up?

AMEN to that Keldyn: u people make me sick, u come up with complete crap stories and false information to throw others off because you people are too afraid to admit the truth of situations

lol on man... head out of the sand... c'mon. you have no place to speak b/c youve never researched anything on conspiracies... you hear the word 'conspiracy' and your conditioned, brainwashed head triggers you to react this way. in fact, if you research ANYTHING on the moon landing you'll know that things dont make sense at all.

1. fact is Kennedy promised something we couldnt do in that time limit.

2. we had to beat the russians in something cause they beat us w/ everything else.

3. why hasnt the russians EVER tried to go to the moon?

4. why hasnt the US tried to go back since then?

5. why are all the pictures from the moon so perfect looking? they had a camera mounted on their chest w/ no view finder... they may as well be shooting blind... impossible to get these perfect "patriotic" shots

6. why are there shadows going in different directions if there's only one light source?

7. in a picture of an astronaut coming off the lander... he's clearly in a shadow of the lander but you can see his entire body.

8. of over 12000+ shots taken on all the moon missions, why do citizens only know of a few dozen?

9. some shots it's clear to see an astronauts antenaa appear and disappear... on the same mission.

10. in the "america is great" shot of neil armstrong posing on the moon... it's clear that the sun is behind him and yet you can see his body perfectly illuminated and even see the reflection in his visor! impossible.

11. if they were outside the van allen radiation belt how in the world did they survive the sun's radiation? it would take 4 feet of iron to protect them... their ship didnt have it... and their suits certainly didnt have any iron in them...

12. need i go on?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Saluton, Paŭlo. Dankon pro la ĉefartikolo. Ĝi estis interesa. Mi esploros pli pri la aplikaĵo kaj ĝia koncepto. Kompreneble, se vi konas min entute, vi scias, ke mi dirus, ke viaj artikoloj bezonas iom da redaktado! Mi ĉiam faras tion, ĉu ne? Ekzemple, la artikolo foje mencias koncepton antaŭ ol difini ĝin, ekzemple, relajsoj.
    • Screamer is 50% off on Steam, making it £24.99 here in the UK: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2814990/Screamer/ You might remember the series from the mid 90s / early 2000s, this new game is also by Milestone who created the older games.
    • U.S. partially reverses Anthropic AI ban for Mythos but keeps Fable 5 off the market by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic says that the U.S. government has finally allowed it to restore Claude Mythos 5. But of course, there's a catch. The rollout is again for a limited set of U.S. organizations that operate and defend critical infrastructure. The company announced this in a post on X (formerly Twitter). This does not mean that Anthropic's latest frontier models are back to normal availability. Fable 5, which was a tuned version of Mythos 5 for public release, remains unavailable. Anthropic said that it is still working with the government to expand Mythos 5 access and make Fable 5 available again, but there's no timeline. Reports from Bloomberg and Reuters say that this decision actually came through a letter from the U.S. Commerce Department. According to Reuters, this would allow more than 100 companies and institutions access to Mythos 5. Reuters also reported that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s letter removes the need for export licenses for approved companies’ non-US citizen employees, as well as Anthropic’s own non-US citizen employees, while restrictions remain for organizations outside the approved list. Anthropic isn't alone with this kind of controlled rollout. OpenAI's newest model family, GPT 5.6, was announced just yesterday, but isn't available for everyone yet. In its announcement, OpenAI also said that access to these models is initially limited to a select group of trusted partners and organizations, with broader access planned later this year. Both of these cases show that frontier AI launches are no longer just ordinary product releases and more like slow and vetted deployments shaped heavily by the U.S. government.
    • Sol, Terra, Luna - aren't those the names of failed crypto coins? 🤣🤣🤣
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!