[DEFINITIVE] Gmail queue !


Recommended Posts

Why should I?

Everyone always encourages everyone to post a lot, that's why half the people just post "LOL" or "I agree!" in every single thread.

Also, everyone always gets ****ed off and says "SEARCH FOR IT YOU DAMN NUB ALREADY POSTED."

Then you tell to purposely start another thread with the same topic?

Riiiiight.

300 post limit is stupid... I mean this isn't even an official thread by an admin or something. Just because I don't post a lot doesn't mean that I am any worse than any other member. I only post when I see a need or when I can be of help.

Anyways, still on the lookout for a gmail account! :happy:

can't please everyone buddy. In case you haven't noticed yet, I don't get any benefit from this. I do this so that neowinians can get a gmail account too.

Imagine if there wouldn't be any limits ? The whole board would be signing up and THAT would be a stupid idea.

If you think i'm wrong doing what i'm doing go ahead and report my thread to a mod.

300 post limit is stupid... I mean this isn't even an official thread by an admin or something. Just because I don't post a lot doesn't mean that I am any worse than any other member. I only post when I see a need or when I can be of help.

Anyways, still on the lookout for a gmail account! :happy:

You haven't contributed enough to Neowin yet. We don't want leechers.

Can mods please ban these topics? Its turning into a gimme gimme rampage

As far as I know this thread is MADE for people to beg... once. They are just adding their names to the list, they post once and its done... Or are you saying that its a good thing to have this thread AND to delete to other ones. :huh: :)

spIdeZ - so you're saying that everyone with alot of posts are spammers. and that you, the guy with ~100posts only post interesting long novels that always bring something to the thread. see how easy it is to generalize ? anyway... think what you want, like I said, the only thing I want is to gather people with gmail to help neowin have gmail accounts.

it's pretty useless even "signing up" in this thread because by the time there were enough invites gmail would already be open for anyone... ;)

but hey......everyone can get some free posts! :rolleyes: After all, an arbitrary number directly correlates to everything about a person!

Now remember kids, the more posts you have on an online forum with other geeks, the bigger your dick is and the richer you are!

dude, please stop posting here if you have nothing that's gonna contribute to this thread. All you do is troll and its annoying.

All you do by keeping posting here just proves that you're the only one that cares.

I may not be doing something against the rules, but you bitch and moan like I would be breaking them. You proved you point, it bothers you. And time proved something too, it ain't gonna change.

Now go, please.

Is there anyway we can know whos next in the queue? Like maybe post on the first post saying "The next person up is..." or somen.

That would be a great idea.

From now on I won't sort the names. Last name will be the last one to be invited. Then just look through the thread and tadam! :)

YES MA'AM! You're the boss! You have contributed sooooooo much more than I have, I just adore you! I only wish I could be that helpful! Already so many people have got their gmail accounts from this thread, I can already SEE the accomplishments!

Shut the hell up and be gone.

And I also like to change the title of this thread to - [DEFINITIVE] Posting Gmail invites bannage queue !

Radish?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!