• 0

How good is your antivirus?


Question

Since most would like to argue bout what is the best antivirus. I decided to open this thread solely for testing your preferred antivirus. This is a compilation of a group of hackers.

*************WARNING*************

THIS IS NOT FOR THE SCAREDY CATS. THERE ARE ALL VALID VIRUSES. DO NOT OPEN THEM OR EXTRACT THEM TO ANY LOCATION. SAFEST METHOD TO TEST YOUR ANTIVIRUS IS TO SCAN THE COMPRESSED FILE. I WILL NOT TAKE ANY RESPONSIBILITIES FOR YOUR ACTION.

Here's a link to download an archive file containing the viruses. READ THE WARNING BELOW BEFORE CLICKING HERE

TEST THIS AT YOUR OWN RISK

If you dare to take this challenge, do post the screenshots of the antivirus in action and please do not use any Photoshoping skills to manipulate the results.

Try to post at least the following information for others to evaluate

1) Program/scan engine version (Exm NAV 2004, AVG 6 Paid Version, SAV 9.0.0.338 and etc)

2) Any settings you changed

3) Screenshots (Optional as proof)

EDIT: Contrary to the filename which tells you 455 viruses, no it is not. Actual total is 593. If your antivirus detected them all, well done.

Edited by dreamthief
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/182983-how-good-is-your-antivirus/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
I don't understand why my results with Norton 2004 would have been so much lower than others with Norton. I have the lastest dat files, b/c I ran liveupdate right before I did the test. My results really bother me. Anyone have any ideas?

Maybe the difference would be some settings you changed, or having an older scan engine. Maybe you should look into it.

Second possibility would be some guys lied bout the results... :laugh:

  • 0
@Neotech

Read carefully my first post. Actual total is 594

@digitalslacker

Maybe you should update your SAV to version 9. DId significantly better. I am using it. detected 589.

@nuka_t

duh.. it's a windows virus. Hmm i didn't explicitly state that... :blush:

@alpoinacan

Read carefully, i stated... i checked with my friend with UPDATED virus definition. still same results. I dont mind you correcting me. Try it out.. post me the screenshots to prove me wrong.

Np, I just wanted to point out to you that your defs were a little old. I did d/l and try it out with the latest defs and I got the same results as you did. In other words, I wanted you to try with the latest, but did it myself. I'm now wondering what it missed, and why KAV found 604. I scanned with TDS and Pest as well. Same Results. Wanted to see if they were indeed all viruses and not a few trojans or such.

  • 0
Np, I just wanted to point out to you that your defs were a little old. I did d/l and try it out with the latest defs and I got the same results as you did. In other words, I wanted you to try with the latest, but did it myself. I'm now wondering what it missed, and why KAV found 604. I scanned with TDS and Pest as well. Same Results. Wanted to see if they were indeed all viruses and not a few trojans or such.

Point taken. But if those are trojans and etc. The AV should get all of them.

  • 0
Most/All AntiVirus are good at detecting Virus's... But actually getting rid is a different matter.

True.. that's why you should also see what action the AV takes after scanning all those viruses.

SAV as i posted earlier, automatically deleted the whole archive without any screen displayed (eliminate newbies choosing the wrong decisions). Someone posted bout AVG found 588 viruses but none cleaned. I'm not trying to troll but that doesn't sound right does it?

  • 0
How can yours pick up more.. I have the latest program and the latest defs

this is weird

yes.. i also wondering that obscure_.

sim1 just did that test. Same results with Staticfish.

Please do test by scanning the file instead of extracting it out. Although it shouldn't make any difference but it may affect the actions the AV takes. Therefore, i stated in the first post to directly scanned it to standardized the results.

  • 0
Same thing I got, isn't it the best virus protection ever?  :D

high fives!!!

Sadly to say, i tried Pccilin. It detected and removed every single one of them, all 594. Guess so far there isn't any Pccilin users that posted a result to confirm what i tested earlier.

Maybe Cnet's review and giving the highest ratings to Pccilin does have some sort of justifications.

EDIT: I purposely withheld certain information to try to make this thread as truthful as possible :whistle: . I tried it with some friends of mine, unfortunately the results are not accurate as i guess most are hardcore fans of AV and didn't want to lose.

  • 0

@kitteny_berk

I realize that not everyone has the knowledge to avoid viruses in the first place.

I even realize that *I'm not perfect*. I do have anti-virus software installed on my computer, but I've never needed to clean a virus from my computer in the 6 years I've been online.

I do recommend some sort of anti-virus software for anyone. I work at an ISP and people call with all sorts of questions. We have email server-side virus filtering at work, but I still convince people to have anti-virus software on their computer for everything else.

For most of our customers, I just recommend some sort of free antivirus software. I don't like the Avast interface. It's not all that intuitive. I usually recommend AVG and send them instructions on which settings to change for maximum coverage. (Update more often than every 14 days, use heueristics, use the Outlook Express 5 plugin, etc.)

So before you go nominating me for the Darwin Awards, try to see my post for what it is. People who have the knowledge should use it. People who don't, should try to attain it. In all cases, have a backup plan.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 1. Define "better". 2. It's still more expensive than equivalent PCs so...
    • Major Xbox layoffs may claim South of Midnight developer Compulsion entirely by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft has been making major changes in its gaming wing Xbox for a few months now, including the appointment of a new CEO, a large number of leadership changes, and strategy shifts. However, the company is seemingly also looking at initiating a major layoffs wave at Xbox and perhaps even a studio closure. The new report lands from Kotaku, Xbox first-party developer Compulsion Games is being shuttered soon by Microsoft. For those unfamiliar with the studio, it's the team behind Contrast (2013), We Happy Few (2018), and South of Midnight (2025). Its latest game was quite well received, even winning a Peabody Award for its writing. It even received a 9/10 in Neowin's own review, highlighting its engaging storyline, gorgeous world, and curious characters. The studio joined Xbox Game Studios in 2018, just as Microsoft announced it is acquiring Playground Games, Undead Labs, and Ninja Theory. Despite recent listings for new staff roles, according to the new report, Compulsion Games is being closed entirely, with over 90 staff being let go. Kotaku also added that the studio's leadership is in negotiations with Microsoft about this decision, but no official details have been revealed yet. The report lands just as two senior managers of Xbox leave their posts at Microsoft Gaming. Head of Xbox Game Studios Craig Duncan and chief of staff Louise O'Connor originally began their journey in Rare and have been a part of Xbox for over two decades. Dunkan has been responsible for games like Kinect Sports and Sea of Thieves, while O'Connor was primarily working on Rare's Everwild project before its cancelation. If this report about the studio shutdown is accurate, this may just be the start of a major new layoffs wave at Xbox Game Studios. There are also rumors of Arkane Studios being heavily affected. As always, take all these reports with a grain of salt until something official materializes from Microsoft or the studios.
    • The flaw with this analysis is that this laptop has a cellphone CPU in it. In the Intel world, that would be an N150 and those are everywhere, even in low end laptops. You can get an N150 based NUC with 16GB RAM and 256GB-512GB SSD... NOT soldered in... for < $500 Canadian (around US$360). The problem is two fold: tech bloggers/writers on most tech site (like this one, ironically) overvalue Apple and apparently aren't in the same earnings class as most regular people. As a result, we get breathless articles about how everyone needs a folding phone when most people just cannot afford one... or really need one. And we get Apple used as the baseline metric regardless of whether that comparison makes any sense. If Dell or HP released a retail laptop with a cellphone motherboard, you'd be all over them for doing that - but Apple does it and it's genius. I see articles suggesting what Samsung - a company that basically started the foldable phone market and has built them for eight years - needs to do to compete with Apple's unreleased, unspecced and unseen folding phone. Sorry, no - if the Neo (really creative name there BTW - still, better than the Go, the other "creative" product name everyone's using) encourages PC makers to make cellphone laptops using lower end ARM processors, we all lose. It's a step backwards and a capitulation to the fact that semiconductor makers and computer OEMs (and tech bloggers) have totally lost the plot.
    • Everyone should install this extension and ignore games that use AI. https://chromewebstore.google....nnigaaeelfkeomjcngmnh?pli=1 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ai-warning-for-steam/
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!