Recommended Posts

,Aug 8 2004, 05:20] I successfully slipstreamed a Dell SP1 XP disc, using the normal methods used for any other disc.  Didn't use Autostreamer though.

I'll bet you haven't tried that Dell disk on non-Dell machines...or have you? I tried and received a BIOS message immediately stating it did not detect Dell hardware. But then again, I tried this with the original XP disks that they used to ship.

I'll bet you haven't tried that Dell disk on non-Dell machines...or have you?  I tried and received a BIOS message immediately stating it did not detect Dell hardware.  But then again, I tried this with the original XP disks that they used to ship.

That's not what you stated as your problem. I said I was able to slipstream a Dell disc, not install a slipstreamed Dell disc on other than a Dell system. Dell discs have a winnt.sif file that contains the key that is locked to the system, which is why when you use a Dell disc on a Dell system, you aren't required to activate, and the key isnt required to be entered during install. However, if you use the key that comes on the little sticker on the actual case of the system, you'll be forced to activate. Both are legit keys, but the one on the disc doesnt require activation.

Two separate issues stated. The second one was dealt with slipping to Dell disk. The first one dealt with slipping any xp disk with sp2, IF being slipped using a Windows 2000 machine.

Also, I was referring to the Dell disk verifying that the disk has a hardware checker in the boot sector of the CD, not XP activation. Although the winnt.sif is used for unattended installs, and contains the product code, it will not contain a key that doesn't require activation - those kind are Corp keys and not handed out so "loosely".

Two separate issues stated.  The second one was dealt with slipping to Dell disk.  The first one dealt with slipping any xp disk with sp2, IF being slipped using a Windows 2000 machine.

Also, I was referring to the Dell disk verifying that the disk has a hardware checker in the boot sector of the CD, not XP activation.  Although the winnt.sif is used for unattended installs, and contains the product code, it will not contain a key that doesn't require activation - those kind are Corp keys and not handed out so "loosely".

Then kindly explain to me why, sitting here on my Dell system, and having slipstreamed both SP1 and SP2 onto both a Dell OEM Home Edition install disc and a Pro Corp VLK cd, I've -never- had to activate. Ever.

The Home disc I have slipstreams and installs fine. The key contained in the winnt.sif file (which I used in my own custom unnattended install disc w/ both SP1 and SP2) is DIFFERENT than the one contained on the system case. The key contained in the winnt.sif file on the disc DOES NOT require activation. The case key DOES require activation if used to replace the one in the winnt.sif file or that line is removed from the winnt.sif and that key is manually entered. As for your theory that the that the boot sector of the CD contains a hardware checker. Nope, sorry. I copied the install files from the Dell install disc, slipstreamed, then burnt those files to a cd that I made bootable with a different bootsector that I had downloaded from the net. So, not using Dell bootsector for disc, slipstreamed fine to SP2, Home Edition didn't require activation when using the original key from the original disc.

It does contain a key that doesn't require activation, but is tied to Dell systems. Sorry. :whistle:

Ohhhh Kaaaaayy. So you've got a Dell OEM disk with a product key that doesn't match the license on your case...and you got that disk shipped with that system? I could be wrong, since my company never uses the disks that come with the systems from Dell, we use images with VLK. And I've never checked each product key on the cd with the one on the case, especially not Home Edition. It just sounds funny that they don't match and the cd key doesn't require activation. That defeats the purpose of WPA, unless your are a corporate subscriber.

You say you also have Pro-VLK CD. So either you are in IT and received it legit, or...never mind, don't want to make accusations, but then again, apparently you've dabbled in the keygens as you've stated here so that's irrelevant now.

You still never answered my question...have you tried that Dell disk on a non-Dell machine? Like I stated oh so long ago, the last time I tried that it didn't work (using non-service packed XP plain vanilla Dell-provided disk) :hint: the 05:25 post

Edited by paratrupr

@paratrupr; Apparently, this is pretty common practice w/ Dell systems and their install disks. The key on the cd can only be used for a Dell system, I'm assuming the case key is just a standard key, perhaps to solve licensing issues in case someone requires a replacement cd, since it does require activation. I've asked around about it before, and others have said theirs is the same. No, you can't install the dell cd on a non-dell system using the key supplied in the winnt.sif file. I've not tried it with the case key, however.

But with the key for the unnattended file on the install cd...it functions exactly like a Corp cd. Activation is completely bypassed during setup, but I've yet to fully understand *how* it works, since I can make two identical slipstreamed discs, one with the original unnattended key and one with the case key, and the case key one will require activation at the normal point during install.

I see a few ppl complaint bout the errors... I only want to be in the list that did not encounter errors... I did not encounter one problem...dam AutoStreamer is simply too smooth... AutoStreamer makes this too easy that it took the fun away from doing manual slipstream. Damn. And I was gonna learn how to do manual slipstream.

this is how I made mine this guid is made by gholagha

Slipstreaming" - Integrating the Service Pack 2 into Windows XP

First copy the entire Windows Windows XP CD to your Hard Drive. I use the folder C:\WinXPCD

Now creat a folder by name of "SPExtract" example C:\SPExtract

Now find the Service Pack file (Where ever you downloaded it to, I used C:\Download\WindowsXP-KB835935-SP2-ENU

Now click Start > run and type C:\Download\WindowsXP-KB835935-SP2-ENU.exe -x

this will extract that to a folder

Now browse and find the folder you just made C:\SPExtract to Extract all WindowsXP-KB835935-SP2-ENU to that folder

Once you have extracted the files from WindowsXP-KB835935-SP2-ENU to C:\SPExtract

Strat run and type

c:\SPExtract\i386\update\update.exe /s:c:\WinXPCD

Now you made Integrating the Service Pack 2 into Windows XP

all you need is make bootabl CD from C:\WinXPCD Folder

that's all

Edited by zeebaf

I slipstreamed my XP Home Compaq OEM (SP1) CD with SP2 RTM. All went fine except I noticed when I installed it it got to the end and booted into Windows - it should come up with choose your username and connect to the Internet wizards but it went straight to the desktop with Owner as the user. Dunno if this is because I used AutoStreamer or something with SP2?

Anyone else confirm?

I slipstreamed my XP Home Compaq OEM (SP1) CD with SP2 RTM. All went fine except I noticed when I installed it it got to the end and booted into Windows - it should come up with choose your username and connect to the Internet wizards but it went straight to the desktop with Owner as the user. Dunno if this is because I used AutoStreamer or something with SP2?

Anyone else confirm?

OEM copies do that generally i believe :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • YouTube has finally brought back its DMs feature, but only in these countries by David Uzondu Late last year, YouTube started testing a "new" way to share videos directly with friends, without having to leave the app. Now, the video giant has announced that is now rolling out a revamped direct messaging inbox, which lets you share videos, Shorts, and live streams and have conversations about them, directly on YouTube. The platform limits this feature to 18+ users who are signed in to a verified channel and use the latest mobile app version. Direct messaging on YouTube first became a thing back in 2017 inside the mobile app (later renamed to "Messages"), where users could chat one-on-one and share clips directly, but all that came to an end on September 18, 2019, when Google decided to shut it down after giving users a month to download a .zip file archive of their past chats. No one really knows why YouTube killed the feature, but users were encouraged to migrate to the public Comments section, on Community tab posts, and via YouTube Stories. The previous incarnation suffered from moderation challenges, prompting Google to implement stricter safety guidelines and age verifications for this new iteration. Here's a list of the countries where the re-launched feature is currently available, though note that Brand Accounts do not have access to it, at least for now: Countries American Samoa Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Guam Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Northern Mariana Islands Norway Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Romania Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland U.S. Virgin Islands United Kingdom United States Before you can use the feature, you first have to send an invite link to your contact. Invite links expire exactly seven days after you create them. If the person on the other end accepts the invite, you can exchange videos directly and text back and forth inside the app. To delete a message, just long-press on the message and tap unsend to remove it for both users. You can also delete entire conversations by long-pressing the thread and selecting delete, but the other person will continue to see the chat history on their end. To make sure everything remains safe, YouTube monitors these messages to ensure they follow Community Guidelines.
    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • Is it still super slow or has it improved on that area?
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      214
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!